Hello...



I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Here is my just new poem, and notice that the lightness in
my new poem means: The state of having a sufficient or considerable
amount of natural light.


So here is my new poem:


Darkness for me is not madness

Since darkness is also a "mechanism" that brings better lightness

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is not coming just from U.S. state of Kansas

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is also coming from the USA congress

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the USA congress is also a place where to better discuss

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss is not loneless and is not being novice

Darkness for me is not madness

Since to better discuss is also like our beautiful princess

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss brings better Sageness and better soundness


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--

More about simulation and about prediction and more..

So as you have just noticed that i just said that i have just
invented two software scalable algorithms that i think are
breakthroughs, but you have to know that one of them has needed from
me to simulate it, so i have abstracted the real world behavior
of one of this new scalable algorithms as a model that i have simulated
by software and this has permitted me to "ensure" that this new scalable algorithm of mine, that i think is a breakthrough, is "reliable" and is
working perfectly, also simulation in general also permits
to not only ensure the "reliability" but also to "predict" the behavior
of the real world systems.

More of my philosophy about the inventors and about algorithms and more..

If you ask me the following question:

What are you, Amine Moulay Ramdane, doing right now ?


I will say that the most important thing that i am doing
is that i have just today invented two software scalable
algorithms that i think are breakthroughs, but i am not
thinking too much about money since what i have done
is that i have invented many software scalable algorithms
and algorithms to better our humanity and our world, so as you notice
that my personality is also that i am an "inventor" that have invented
really interesting things. Also i am right now implementing some
interesting software projects from the ground up with artificial
intelligence, So i invite you to read all my following thoughts so that
to know more about my personality:

More of my philosophy about mathematics and the Minimizers that fit models..

I have just read the following web pages about comparing Minimizers that
fit models, and i invite you to read them here:

https://docs.mantidproject.org/v3.7.1/concepts/FittingMinimizers.html


And i am working with some software projects now that need good
Minimizers that fit models, and i have implemented two of them with the
simplex method and with Levenberg-Marquardt, but i am not satisfied
since i think that the Simplex method is better in convergence than Levenberg-Marquardt since it rarely converges to a local minimum, but i
will implement or build a minimizer from the ground up with artificial intelligence that fits Models and that is much more sophisticated and
much more efficient than the Simplex or Levenberg-Marquardt, so stay
tuned since i am actually implementing it !

More of my philosophy of how to become rich and more..

I invite you to look at the following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So he is saying the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

So look at the following how he is giving the "general" way:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare."

I think that the "defect" in the above saying and "general" way of the
above video is that it is not taking into account the factor of the
usefulness to consumers or to customers since you can acquire skills
that nobody else has, especially in combination that are rare, but those
skills can still be useless to the consumers or customers, so i think
that the above saying is not so smart. So the person on the above video
has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be useful
for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart
"redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

So you can read all my other proverbs that i have just invented quickly
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


More of my philosophy about correlation and about diversity and more..

I think i am smart, and i will say to look again at what is saying
the Ph.D Katherine W. Phillips that is the Paul Calello Professor of
Leadership and Ethics Management at Columbia Business School(Read about
her here: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/profile/katherine_phillips):

"Large data-set studies have an obvious limitation: They only show that diversity is correlated with better performance, not that it causes
better performance."

So i will say that this Ph.D and other researchers are not so smart,
since notice how is speaking the Ph.D Katherine W. Phillips in the
following article:

How Diversity Makes Us Smarter

Read more here:

https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_diversity_makes_us_smarter

So notice that she is not saying that human diversity is a "mechanism"
that can cause "competition" or more competition between people, and
then competition can be the cause of better performance, so you are
noticing that the above Ph.D and researchers are trying to measure it empirically, but i think that this kind of measuring is not a correct measuring, since what i am showing you by my way of thinking is the fact
that there is a "tendency" in human diversity that it causes competition
or more competition, so it causes better performance, so then we can
notice that by not following there way of empirical measuring we can still
know about the process. So as i said, i think this Ph.D and other
researchers are not thinking and abstracting correctly since from my
saying below we can notice that human Diversity in a global world or in
a society or in a group brings more "competition" between people, so it
makes us work harder and better cognitively and socially, but if we are
not being the right human diversity and we are working harder and better cognitively and socially, then i think being human diversity can still
"keep" or "maintain" the working harder and better cognitively and
socially, also human diversity brings different human perspectives or
views and it brings different human experiences and different human
knowledges and it is good for creativity and innovation since it is also
good for divergent thinking that enhance creativity and innovation.

More of my philosophy about USA and human diversity and more..

I just said the following:

"I think i am understanding rapidly, since i think that human Diversity
in a global world or in a society or in a group brings more
"competition" between people, so it makes us work harder and
better cognitively and socially, also human diversity brings different
human perspectives or views and it brings different human experiences
and different human knowledges and it is good for creativity and
innovation since it is also good for divergent thinking that enhance
creativity and innovation."

So i will invite you to look at my following writing about USA that will
make you notice how USA is making itself innovative and creative by
bringing the "best" big brains immigrants, and notice, like in my above
saying, that it is also saying the following:

"But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well
in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to
new ideas."

And here is more of my new thoughts about USA, read them again carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kIbGEdTXezQ

Yet more precision of my philosophy about diversity and adaptability and resilience..

I think i am understanding rapidly, since i think that human Diversity
in a global world or in a society or in a group brings more
"competition" between people, so it makes us work harder and
better cognitively and socially, also human diversity brings different
human perspectives or views and it brings different human experiences
and different human knowledges and it is good for creativity and
innovation since it is also good for divergent thinking that enhance
creativity and innovation:

And here is my new proverb that talks more about it:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency, and it is related to my following thoughts about
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i invite you to read them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo


More of my philosophy about life and about evolutionary algorithms..

I invite you to listen to the following beautiful song of Simon &
Garfunkel called called April Come She Will:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J1tCJEYETk

I think that the above video of the song is showing how our world
is "diversified" and it is good for adaptation and resilience, and it is
the most important thing, and this diversification is also very
important even in economy, since i think it is like evolutionary
algorithms in artificial intelligence, since they are based on the same
very important idea of diversifying by also decentralizing by
efficiently specializing the members of the population so that to make
it efficiently "adaptable" and much more "resilient", and the
efficiently specializing can be efficiently specializing in a much
higher level layer, like being a "generalist" medical doctor, and from
the this decentralizing and efficiently specializing emerges a higher
level intelligence such as a civilization, so then even evolutionary
design methodology that i am talking about in my thoughts below does decentralize from the agile architect to the other members of the team,
and here is step 3 of the important steps of evolutionary design
methodology of agile that i am talking about below:

3- Instead of creating one big design at the beginning of the project
that covers all of the requirements, agile architects use incremental
design, which involves techniques that allow them to design a system
that is not just complete, but also easy for the team to modify as
the project changes.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

More of my philosophy about economic diversification in Africa and Arab countries..

As you will read in the following paper that economic diversification is
good for growth and economic diversification is also tremendously
important for "resilience", so i think that the country that we call
Algeria has a big problem since it lacks too and too much on
diversification of its economy, so i think that Algeria will get easily
into big problems of violence and disorder, but Morocco and Dubai are
much more diversified economies and i think that Morocco is on the right
path, so i think that the problem of many African countries is that they
have to become diversified economies.

Read the following paper so that to notice how important is
diversification of economy:

Economic Diversification in Africa: How and Why It Matters

https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/04/30/economic-diversification-in-africa-how-and-why-it-matters-pub-84429

More of my philosophy about economy and about Morocco and Algeria and more..

So as you are noticing i was speaking, read below, about Algeria,
and you have quickly noticed that the Algerian economic problem comes
from the fact that Algeria is a much less diversified economy than Dubai
or than my country Morocco, so i think that Morocco is a much more
diversified economy and i think that Morocco is really on the
right path and Morocco is also a beautiful country, since read in the
following article of year 2019, it says that the 2019 International
Franchise Attractiveness Index ranked Morocco 39 out of 131 states. This
made it the number 1 attractive business hub for US-based franchises in
Africa and the second in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) after
the United Arab Emirates. This ranking shows it competing with some
leading international powers, including France, Spain, Germany and
Australia, according to a report by Morocco World News. The index
combines peer-reviewed research and a survey of franchise executives to
produce two rankings, balanced growth and aggressive growth.

Read more here so that to notice it:

https://www.fairobserver.com/region/middle_east_north_africa/morocco-maghreb-maroc-moroccan-economy-latest-world-news-796983/

More of my philosophy about economy and inflation and more..

I invite you to read the following about how do Governments Reduce
Inflation:

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/111314/what-methods-can-government-use-control-inflation.asp

I think that one of the best way to reduce inflation is by reducing the
money supply within an economy via decreased bond prices and increased
interest rates, and the above web page is speaking about it, but i think
that there is still a problem, since inflation can become problematic if
the product or service become a monopoly, so if the prices of the
product or service can not be reduced by for example economies of scale
or/and by "competition", so the price of the product or service can be
set high and it is inflation on this product or service, so this kind of situation can also lead to an economic war, also inflation still can
become a problem like with the drastic fall of the algerian Dinar in
Algeria, since Algeria is lacking on diversification of its economy and
also was unable to reduce its reliance on food imports, since 70% of the Algeria food requirements are met by imports, so with the drastic fall
of the algerian Dinar, the price of Food in Algeria was getting high,
and the people of Algeria were suffering because of that, and this
situation can still repeat itself again and again in Algeria.

Read about it here:

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/algeria-dinar-record-low-economic-collapse

I invite you to look at step 4 of my below thoughts of software
Evolutionary Design methodology with agile, here it is:

4- When in agile a team breaks a project into phases, it’s called
incremental development. An incremental process is one in which
software is built and delivered in pieces. Each piece, or increment,
represents a complete subset of functionality. The increment may be
either small or large, perhaps ranging from just a system’s login
screen on the small end to a highly flexible set of data management
screens. Each increment is fully coded Sprints, Planning, and
Retrospectives.

And you will notice that it has to be done by "prioritizing" the pieces
of the software to be delivered to the customers, and here again in
agile you are noticing that we are also delivering prototypes of the
software, since we often associate prototypes with nearly completed or just-before launch versions of products. However, designers create
prototypes at all phases of the design process at various resolutions.
In engineering, students are taught to and practitioners think deeply
before setting out to build. However, as the product or system becomes increasingly complex, it becomes increasingly difficult to consider all
factors while designing. Facing this reality, designers are no longer
just "thinking to build" but also "building to think." By getting hands
on and trying to create prototypes, unforeseen issues are highlighted
early, saving costs related with late stage design changes. This rapid iterative cycle of thinking and building is what allows designers to
learn rapidly from doing. Creating interfaces often benefit from the
"build to think" approach. For example, in trying to layout the
automotive cockpit, one can simply list all the features, buttons, and
knobs that must be incorporated. However, by prototyping the cabin does
one really start to think about how the layout should be to the driver
in order to avoid confusion while maximizing comfort. This then allows
the designer iterate on their initial concept to develop something that
is more intuitive and refined. Also prototypes and there demonstrations
are designed to get potential customers interested and excited.

More of my philosophy about the Evolutionary Design methodology and more..

Here are some important steps of software Evolutionary Design methodology:

1- Taking a little extra time during the project to write solid code and
fix problems today, they create a codebase that’s easy to maintain
tomorrow.

2- And the most destructive thing you can do to your project is to build
new code, and then build more code that depends on it, and then still
more code that depends on that, leading to that painfully familiar
domino effect of cascading changes...and eventually leaving you with
an unmaintainable mess of spaghetti code. So when teams write code,
they can keep their software designs simple by creating software
designs based on small, self-contained units (like classes, modules,
services, etc.) that do only one thing; this helps avoid the domino
effect.

3- Instead of creating one big design at the beginning of the project
that covers all of the requirements, agile architects use incremental
design, which involves techniques that allow them to design a system
that is not just complete, but also easy for the team to modify as
the project changes.

4- When in agile a team breaks a project into phases, it’s called
incremental development. An incremental process is one in which
software is built and delivered in pieces. Each piece, or increment,
represents a complete subset of functionality. The increment may be
either small or large, perhaps ranging from just a system’s login
screen on the small end to a highly flexible set of data management
screens. Each increment is fully coded Sprints, Planning, and
Retrospectives.

5- And an iterative process in agile is one that makes progress through successive refinement. A development team takes a first cut
at a system, knowing it is incomplete or weak in some (perhaps many)
areas. They then iteratively refine those areas until the product is satisfactory. With each iteration the software is improved through
the addition of greater detail.

More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..

I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between "performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more
my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

More of my philosophy about the kind of president Biden's tax increase
on the rich and more..

And of course the kind of president Biden's tax increase on the rich
will be used so that narrow America's vast income inequality,
read carefully here so that to understand:

Biden's corporate tax plan takes aim at income inequality

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/bidens-corporate-tax-plan-takes-aim-income-inequality-77420625

So there is still a problem and it is that we have to solve the problem
of the financial sector by giving voting rights and tax advantages to
long-term shareholders etc., read my below thoughts so that to understand:

I have posted the following video:

Why raising taxes destroys the economy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns

But i think that the kind of Biden's tax increase on the rich is not a
problem, read the following so that to notice:

"In an interview, Mr. Pomerleau said the drag was small from the
proposals because Mr. Biden was largely taxing savings of high earners,
which are not major drivers of economic growth given those Americans
have a lot of their wealth saved.

“Some tax increases have larger effects on growth than others,” he said. “Biden has chosen taxes that don’t have a massive effect.”"

Read more carefully here so that to understand:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/business/biden-tax-plan-economy.html

The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to
know what is the problem with finance, and here it is, read the
following so that to understand:

One last chance to fix capitalism

Read more here:

https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism

So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:

How to Improve Capitalism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU

So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by
giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and
not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and
national pension funds representative of the long term collective
interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to
improve capitalism" so that to understand more.

And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
read them here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc

And more of my philosophy about the financial market and about
capitalism and about the markets and more, read more here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LJeOIJK-wnY

More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more..

I invite you to look at the following new video about how the
governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy
and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic
Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if not
followed all the time , has still its "advantage" in this kind of
economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy) strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to
look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it:

The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU


And i invite you to read all my following thoughts:


More of my philosophy about society and the world..

There is a saying in french that says:

"Il faut de tout pour faire un monde"

And its translation in english is:

"It takes everything to make a world"

And i think there is two ways to look at this saying,
you can look at it from the societal point view and it can mean that we
have to be diversification in a society by being specialized in this or
that job, and the second point of view of it, is that we have also to be
a kind of diversification in each one of us so that to be efficient, i
mean not being just specialized in one thing or in one job and knowing
more about philosophy and about politics and such makes us more
efficient in a society.. this is why you are noticing that i am also a
kind of diversification, since i have invented my thoughts of my
philosophy and i am sharing it with you, and i have invented many poems
of Love and i am sharing them with you, and i have invented many
proverbs and i am sharing them with you, and i have invented many
scalable algorithms and algorithms and i am a software developer and i
know about operational research etc., and of course i am talking about
politics too, so read carefully my below thoughts so that to understand
more my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about tribalism and closed systems and open systems..


I think i am smart, and i have just talked about some of the problems of
white supremacism, read it below, and i think that the most important
problem of white supremacism and the like and the strong loyality of
tribalism is the following:

More of my philosophy about closed systems and open systems and
interdependent systems..

I think i am smart, and i will say that we have to have the right spirit
so that to be efficient, and i think that the basis of the right spirit
is also to look at how we are interdependent systems of different
countries etc., so i think that the best way is to know how to be like
the right randomness of the evolutionary algorithms that permits to not
get stuck in a local optimum and be able to ensure the convergence to a
global optimum, i mean that the best way is also to know how to well
balance between cooperation and competition, since so that to not get
stuck in a local optimum of efficiency we have also to know how to buy
products and services from the other countries so that also to encourage creativity and innovation, since if you are too much competition you can "monopolize" too much and this can hurt creativity and innovation, so
then we have to become a much more efficient and civilized world. And I
think that Nazism or neo-nazism or white supremacism or communism are
also too rigid, so they don't work correctly, since they also have the
strong tendency to want to like too much homogenize and to too much
monopolize and too much centralize, so they are not efficient systems.

This is why i have also invented quickly a proverb about intellectual openness, and here it is:

And here is my other proverb:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello...


Here is my new poem:


What is the wild West ?

It is like i am coming to you with the best

Since the wild West learns you how to be well dressed !

And is not the well dressed "meritocratic" as being the best ?

What is the wild West ?

It is also that i don't want to be depressed !

Since it is also i don't want to be just a blind self-interest

What is the wild West ?

It is also an intelligence test !

Since is it not also like a criminal that we have to arrest ?

What is the wild West ?

It is also that you have even to know how to welcome the guest !

So then even the Wild West has to be well organized and be blessed !

And it is how i am talking about corruption that also needs the good
moral quest !


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--


More of my philosophy about democracy and corruption and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and i think that corruption is not good
since by logical analogy it looks like favoritism or ideological
favoritism of communism of China of today, since i think that this kind
of favoritism or ideological favoritism of the communist party of China
hurt meritocracy, and it is like corruption too, also corruption hurts
quality and hurts Democracy, you can easily notice it in Italy where
they are really conscious about this big problem of corruption, i mean
that in italy they are and they have been a lot hurt by the mafia and by corruption and they know how it is so problematic. So i invite you to
look at the following video so that to understand how corruption is so problematic:

The World's Most Dangerous Drug Wars | News on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2YfG7NKvoU

More of my philosophy about corruption and Haiti and more..

I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
video about Haiti:

Did Drug Cartels Murder Haiti's President? | The War on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3BqXpcHok4&t=11s


I think that Haiti looks like Trinidad and such countries,
since i think that it's a too much "corrupt" system that is not
working properly, so as you are noticing that corruption is
an important subject that i am talking about, and notice
how i am talking about it by talking about the Chinese communist system
that is too much corrupt and that can much more easily be corrupted than Democracy.

More of my philosophy about corruption and the separation of power in
USA and more..


I think i am smart, and i invite you to look at the following
video so that you notice how corruption can hurt a lot the system:

Corruption, Cocaine and Murder in Trinidad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnpaaVB4XyA


So i say that we have to be smart, so how can we efficiently fight this corruption ? so i think that the China communist party type of system
is not good at fighting corruption, and read my below thoughts about it,
so this is why i think that the Separation of powers under the United
States Constitution is really important and good tool to fight
corruption, and you can read about it here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution


And i think that the kind of "decentralization" of governance in USA is
a really important and good tool to fight corruption, so USA is not only Separation of powers under the United States Constitution and is not
only this kind of decentralization of governance, but it is also
Democracy , so by using the mechanisms of Democracy are really important
and good tools to fight corruption, not only that but the much more
successful economic dynamism of USA is also an important and good tool
to fight corruption,. and so that to understand my thoughts about
Democracy and more, i invite you to read all my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the inferior and archaic model of China and
more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the
following interesting french video about China, so i invite
you to look at it:

VERS LA FIN DU MIRACLE ÉCONOMIQUE CHINOIS ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoeHklrwq3U


So i think from my looking at the above video that China is
really an inferior and archaic model and inferior and archaic economic
model, for example China is controlling the money of the Chinese people,
so the Chinese communist system wants people to invest there money in
China and they are like forcing there people to do it this way by using tactics, and i think it is an extremist and really archaic way of doing,
so this has also caused a debt problem and it is also causing an
economic bubble in the real estate sector of China that is too big and
it is causing a big economic problem and it is hurting a lot the
economic growth of China, other than that China is a lot deficient at encouraging innovation in the private sector and it is also an inferior
and archaic way of doing, and read my following writing about what China
is doing outside its territory in Africa and the like so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about China and Africa and more..

I think i am smart, and i think that China is creating a problem
in Africa, and it is that China is creating a problem of too much debt
in Africa, but its investments on projects in Africa have poor economic returns, so they are not so efficient, so i think it is not good,
so i invite you to look at the following video to understand it:

Is CHINA using DEBT to CONTROL Africa? - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDInEHUwn5k

Also we have to fear the too much corruption of the Chinese communist
system , so i invite you to read my following thoughts about it:

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

More of my philosophy about communism and communism of China and more..

I think i am really smart, and i think that the main problem with
communism and marxism, it is that in its first form, that was
a radical form of doing, it has wanted to equalize much more and too
much humans and it has used a form of Class Struggle
that was an extremist and violent form, but i think i have just talked
about it by saying that it is not the right thing to do, read my below
thoughts about Class Struggle so that to understand my views on this
subject, but communism of China in the its modern form is not using the extremist form of Class Struggle and is not wanting to equalize much
more and too much like in the first radical form of communism, but the
today modern form of communism of China is still a one party form of
governing that is using a democratic "centralism" form of governing, but
this democratic centralism is much more centralized form that can be
much more easily corrupted than democracy, also the one party type of
governing of communism of China can much more easily be corrupted than democracy, this is why you can notice that the communist party of china
is too much corrupted, other than that there is lack of mechanisms of
democracy like having a kind of free press, so it is not good at all, so
i don't think that we can speak about the kind of meritocratic type of governing of China, since the basis of the type of governing of
communist China is too much lacking on the mechanisms of democracy that efficiently fight corruption, this is why I think that USA and Canada
have to show and talk about the big weakness of the today communist
system of China, and it is that it is too much corrupt and it can much
more easily be corrupted than democracy, and it is the big weakness
of China, since you can not be this too much corruption of China
and be a China that want at the same time to construct big economic
projects in Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia, since China can
too much corrupt Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia too. So i
don't think China is on the right path, this is why i think that China
has to become Democracy.

And here is my views on what is Class Struggle and what it has to be:

Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

More of my philosophy about USA and China and more..

And i invite you to look at the following video:

The New World of Xi Jinping I ARTE.tv Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeGZz6NGJXg


More of my philosophy of how to efficiently fight corruption and more..

We can fight corruption using the mechanisms of democracy and using
democracy, and we can fight corruption by being a rich country,
since western countries are rich countries that have very low
corruption, also we suggest, among other things, that officials in
vulnerable and important posts receive higher instead of lower salaries
than comparable workers get in the private sector.

Read more here so that to understand:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-causes-and-cures-of-corruption?utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=1220154768&hsa_cam=12374283753&hsa_grp=117511853986&hsa_ad=499567080219&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=aud-1249316000837:
dsa-19959388920&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=Cj0KCQiAi9mPBhCJARIsAHchl1xO6oTAZCJmdoiYHEjz18J30qdAxxTrEV5sKPh22EMpDMxjVXo4Y80aAt79EALw_wcB

Also i have invented my new monotheistic religion so that to also
fight more efficiently corruption, also here is another mechanism that
fights corruption and it is the following:

I think i am smart, so my new architectural idea of my philosophy is the following:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
, so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree

More of my philosophy of my two modes of speaking and more..

You have to notice that i am speaking in two modes, and it is
that i am speaking as a wise type of man and as a philosopher,
and i am also speaking as a prophet from God, and i have just posted
about my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts as a wise type of person and as a philosopher:

More of my philosophy of how to unite people of the world or of a
country and more..

I think i am really smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

How can we unite the people of a country or people of the world ?

So i think i am really smart, and i will say that the being the
correctly united in a country, can be a kind of being united , but it is
not the fully being united in a country, and it can also come from
powerful intellectual mechanisms that plays the role of engines, i mean
take for example "self-confidence", so it also permits you to have like
the what we call the "will to live" like was talking about it the
philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, so i think that even self-confidence is
a powerful mechanism and an engine that permits to unite people, since
it is a powerful engine that must be "guided" by the "goal" of
philosophy, and the goal of philosophy is happiness , but happiness is
not just the today happiness , but it is also the tomorrow and the
future happiness, so if you want to be happiness tomorrow or in the
future, you have to be responsability, so the goal of philosophy that is
to become happiness becomes the goal that has to be responsability that
comes from the wanting to be happiness, so then the knowing about this
fact is also a mechanism that unite people in a kind of way, but not
fully, also the other mechanism that is so important, is the fact that
you have to be "hope" about the tomorrow or the future, since it is like
a positive energy that pushes you forward, since a negative energy is
not so efficient, so here again you notice that i am a philosopher that
is not in accordance with the following saying of the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche:

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the
torments of man"

So i am not in accordance with the above saying about Hope of the
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since as i have just said that Hope ,
like hope about our exponential progress that is so fast, can be a
positive energy that pushes you forward. And so that to understand more
my thoughts, i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
of how you become self-confidence and how you become this positive
energy and positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

And read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about unity and about democracy and more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the following
video of the Arab Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZA3gMBsrQ


And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
being this kind of unity in a country is a defect, and it is the basis
of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing,
since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united
or being united, it is about plurality or diversity of thoughts or
political views and about a kind of diversity that bring efficiency,
and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where
comes the defect of the arab countries or such countries that are
lacking Democracy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s

So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:

"A house divided can not stand"

But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or perfection. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about
Democracy so that you understand my thoughts:

More of my philosophy about IQ and about the laws and about humanity and
more..

I will answer the following problem from a white supremacist website and
it is like a problem in a form of a smart IQ test that i have to answer,
so here is how i am answering it smartly:

I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:


Why Capitalism Fails


https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:


"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private
property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner.
And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner,
yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with
how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or
how well or how significantly they have worked."


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I
think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by
taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become
rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become
"rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command
transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of
the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of
the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to
become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice
that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:

"Western Values" Explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA


I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:

I think that Western values are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change,
since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid
the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by
the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of
expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive
rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational
reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments,
so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they
can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


I will ask a philosophical question of:

Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom
of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be
accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist
is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult
since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where
there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of
speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for
example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of
Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so
this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it
and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i
think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not
Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that
the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of
speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a
realistic and objective way of doing.

Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

And about Democracy here is what i have just said:

More of my philosophy about the ideological fight between communist
China and the West..

I think i am really smart, and i say that in the ideological fight
between communist China and the West, it is that the West has to
make this not so mature Democracy in the West, as in USA, into a much
more mature Democracy by for example making the governance much more meritocratic, since i think that Donald Trump governance was a bad move
that hurt a lot Democracy, since Donald Trump was not enough educated
and was not enough experienced , so he has made big mistakes that have
brought big problems to Democracy, and of course the West has to offer a
good education to people, and i think that we have not to be too
pessimistic about capitalism as not being enough meritocratic, since as
i just said, that in capitalism, intelligence, skill, and hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, read it below so that to understand my views.

And here is my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy:

And we can say the following:

The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.

But i ask a smart question of:

Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?

Here is my answer:

But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..


Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?


When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
we can logically prove it by saying the following:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.

But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:

Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:

From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide
people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
a country can become a more global world like European union or such.

More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..

I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the
following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:


----


More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, read the following:


“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education
is no exception,” Mr. Li said.

A Chinese Education, for a Price

Read more here:


https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html


I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i
don't think it is meritocratic !

It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:

Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who
has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not
only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of
semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass
examinations and obtain a diploma.

RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities

Read more here:


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)