• More of my philosophy about future of humanity and Climate Warming and

    From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 12 14:06:01 2021
    Hello...



    More of my philosophy about future of humanity and Climate Warming and
    more..

    I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    Without Further Intervention 3 Degrees is Worst Case 2100 Climate Warming

    Assessment of current policies by two researchers published in the
    journal Nature suggests that the world is on course for around 3 °C of warming above pre-industrial levels. The world is already at 1 °C of
    warming above pre-industrial levels.

    The 2.5 degree celsius scenario by 2100 is the likely scenario where all
    cars and trucks go electric by 2060 and where solar and wind and battery
    power get to 50% more more of power generation.

    Read more here:

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2021/10/without-further-intervention-3-degrees-is-worst-case-warming.html

    More of my philosophy of do we have to be optimistic or pessimistic..

    I invite you to look at the following pessimistic video:

    Is The US Becoming A Dystopia?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmXQ3nQBE4U


    I think that the the above video is too pessimistic, but i am
    optimistic since i think that we have to be much more optimistic,
    read my following thoughts to understand why:

    More of my philosophy of why i am more positive about our world..

    I am more positive about our world since and i am explaining why
    by posting my following writing and thoughts, you can read them
    in the following web links:

    More of my philosophy about capitalism and innovation:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc

    And read my thoughts here:

    More of my philosophy about the future of humanity:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/0X024jfzNvM

    And read my thoughts here:

    More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and neuroevolution
    and common sense and more:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/awfCypJ9iRE

    Also read my following thoughts and writing about our Era of
    democratization of technology and democratization of information and democratization of finance so that to be more positive:

    More about "democratization" of finance..

    This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development
    (R&D))..

    And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to
    understand:

    The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it’s ever been

    Read more here:

    https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/


    About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research
    and Development (R&D) investment

    This is also why i said the following:

    Look at the following interesting video:

    Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI

    But i think that this minister of education, science and technology
    of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly
    into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology
    that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than
    using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think
    that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization
    has been characterized by the democratization of technology,
    democratization of finance, and democratization of information.

    Here is more proof of what i am saying:


    2. Question: What do you mean by “Democratizing Innovation”?

    Eric von Hippel:

    The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap
    and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a
    steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These
    sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively
    little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they
    can use them to design new products and services.

    Read more here:

    Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users

    https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html

    And read my following thoughts to understand more:

    More of my philosophy about the well balanced brain between divergent
    and convergent thinking..

    I think that i have not an extremely masculine brain, but i have
    a masculine brain that is well balanced between convergent and divergent thinking, read below so that to understand:

    Here is more about my genetical type:

    I have come to Canada when i was 20 years old, and i am living
    in Canada Quebec for 33 years and now i am 53 years old , but i am
    genetically like an athletic guy and i feel that i am still young
    because i am more athletic and i am 6 Feet tall, and i am beautiful
    from the inside since i am a gentleman type of person and it is also
    genetical in me, and you can take a look at my photo that i have just
    put here in my website(I am 53 years old):

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem

    But i have to explain a very important thing:

    You have to distinguish between, in one side, the intellectual gifted
    brain with the high prenatal testosterone that is an agressive and
    violent brain that doesn't know how to think correctly and that doesn't
    behave correctly, and, in the other side, my kind of brain, since my
    genetical type is also that I have a masculine brain that is well
    balanced between convergent and divergent thinking, so it is good for
    good thinking, and my brain is not an extremely masculine brain that is
    violent or agressive, and i have passed a certified IQ test and i have
    scored high and well above 115 in it, so i invite you to look carefully
    at the following interesting video that explains the two types of
    intellectual gifted brains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmbEaBfzKFk

    You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

    And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

    More of my philosophy about the smart IQ tests and the scalable
    algorithms and algorithms..

    Bonita Montero a software engineer has just written to me the following
    about my new invention below:

    Multiple reader, exlusive writer locks are *never*
    starvation-free. Readers can hold the lock infinitely
    and writers as well,

    And i have just answered the following:

    But i think she is not right, since this holding
    the lock infinitely is not counted, since you have
    just to use it correctly and avoid this case, so I
    think she is making a mistake and she is not
    understanding what is that a Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer
    Lock is starvation-free, so what i mean by starvation-free
    is that in my invention of my algorithm the readers don't
    starve the writers and the writers don't starve the readers,
    and the writers don't starve and readers don't starve, it
    is what we call starvation-free, and i think my invention is
    scalable and starvation-free and fair.

    And Branimir Maksimovic answered me the following:

    If used correctly you don't need any lock :P
    Locks are for synchronization, which is not
    good thing :P

    Please read here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/NOJrZoQ3-qk


    But I think my answer is correct and i think i am really smart, and here
    is my explanation:

    Since my answer is like a smart IQ test, and it is that my answer is
    first that you to know how the: "you have just to use it correctly" is logically in "relation" with the "avoid this case" in my sentence,
    so if what i mean in my answer is that the: "you have just to use it
    correctly" of my sentence is not the cause of the: "avoid this case"
    of my sentence, so you are failing the smart IQ test of my answer,
    since you are just thinking the case where: "you have just to use it
    correctly" is the cause of the "avoid this case", and the second case
    is if we say: "you have to use it correctly", it also mean that you have
    to use it in the right environment, so if it is not, so it doesn't just
    mean don't use it, but it also mean change the environment that is
    causing the Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock to wait indefinitely.
    So you are again failing the smart IQ test.

    More of my philosophy about the effects of a commercial society based on
    the pursuit of self-interest..

    I think that we have to understand the work of the philosopher and
    economist Adam Smith about economic Liberalism, i think the defect of
    his theory or work is that he is for example saying the following:

    "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

    But i think i am a philosopher that is not in accordance with
    the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, since you have to understand
    that Adam Smith says about his economic Liberalism that self-interest is
    most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption,
    fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is
    the engine of the properity and happiness of nations described the
    opposing, but complementary forces of self-interest and competition as
    the invisible hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not
    acting with the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they
    do, since when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process
    you provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society,
    so it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism
    is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but i think
    that the most important defect of economic Liberalism of Adam Smith is
    the following: How to bring the positive or the much more positive
    spirit since the way of egoism and competition of economic Liberalism of
    Adam Smith brings a negative spirit that causes disorder and violence ?
    Also i think that a much more positive or positive spirit is better for economy, this is why my new model that i call coopetition that is a well balance between cooperation and competition is better, this is why i am
    sharing a number of my inventions of scalable algorithms and algorithms
    and softwares with the public or people so that to bring the positive or
    the much more positive spirit(and you can find all of them here in my
    website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/), and i think that
    this positive spirit or much more positive spirit is good for economy,
    but you have to play it "smartly", and i give you a proverb of mine that
    shows how it is important:

    "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
    a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
    that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
    is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
    like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
    noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
    you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
    way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
    you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
    and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
    you."

    I think i am smart, and notice how i am talking about
    how we have not to have a narrow view of what is smartness, and notice
    how i am talking about the distributed smartness as rules etc. so i
    think i can logically infer from my below thoughts the other way of
    solving the greatly complex systems that is not by like "planning" the
    whole system from a centralized government, but by emergence of a higher
    level intelligence from distributing like the rules or.. into the small
    parts of the system that will solve the greatly complex system, it looks
    like the evolutionary design and planning, and it looks like the way of
    the higher level smartness from an Ant colony, since in an Ant colony
    there is no central government, but there is a distributed intelligence
    that needs a kind of diversity of genetics of the members of the colony
    and it needs like a distributed rules that the members have to follow
    that will make emerge a higher level of intelligence. And of course it
    looks like evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, since the advantage of evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence is that
    they don't plan in advance but they search by like following some
    distributed rules, and of course they need some "randomness" so that to
    not get stuck in a local optimum, this is why i am talking below about
    how to make our civilization that is a complex system much more
    resilient by learning how to learn to humans with like a set
    of rules like in an Ant colony by saying the following and notice
    that the learning how to learn can be an efficient abstraction that
    helps a lot:

    More of my philosophy about how i am more happy and more..

    I think that i am much more happy since i am understanding that being
    happy is like a lifestyle that is based on some efficient rules that
    permit the emergence of happiness, and i will talk about it more in my
    new philosophy, so i think that we even need some important rules so
    that to be a much more resilient civilization, since i think that there
    is the way of learning people how to become an engineer, but this way of
    doing is lacking very much, and there is also the way of learning people
    how to learn that also permits to efficiently take advantage of this sophisticated tool that we call internet, so i think that this way of
    learning how to learn to people does make our civilization much more
    resilient, since the way of "specialization" of our today civilization
    is also a "weakness" that has to be solved much more efficiently by the
    way of learning people how to learn on internet etc. and here is my
    new proverb that talks about it:

    "I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
    it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized
    in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and
    productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a
    weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart
    working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

    And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

    More of my philosophy of why i have just invented a better Reader-Writer
    Lock that is scalable and starvation-free and fair and reentrant
    (recursive)..

    Here is why i have just invented a better Reader-Writer Lock that
    is scalable, starvation-free and fair and reentrant (recursive),
    and look at my invention below:

    Notice that the following PhD researcher says the following:

    "Until today, there is no known efficient reader-writer lock with starvation-freedom guarantees"

    Read more here:

    http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com/2019/04/onefile-and-tail-latency.html

    And read the following paper:

    Scalable Read-mostly Synchronization Using Passive Reader-Writer Locks

    https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc14/atc14-paper-liu.pdf

    You will notice that it has a first weakness that it is for TSO hardware
    memory model and the second weakness is that the writers latency is very expensive when there is few readers, and it can livelock because of the
    writer preference, and it can have starvation.

    And here is the other best scalable reader-writer lock invention of
    Facebook:

    SharedMutex is a reader-writer lock. It is small, very fast, scalable
    on multi-core

    Read here:

    https://github.com/facebook/folly/blob/master/folly/SharedMutex.h

    But you will notice that the weakness of this scalable reader-writer
    lock is that the priority can only be configured as the following:

    SharedMutexReadPriority gives priority to readers,
    SharedMutexWritePriority gives priority to writers.

    So the weakness of this scalable reader-writer lock is that
    you can have starvation with it and you can have a livelock.

    Bonita Montero a software engineer has just written to me the following
    about my new invention below:

    Multiple reader, exlusive writer locks are *never* starvation-free.
    Readers can hold the lock infinitely and writers as well,

    But i think she is not right, since this holding the lock infinitely is
    not counted, since you have just to use it correctly and avoid this
    case, so I think she is making a mistake and she is not understanding
    what is that a Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock is
    starvation-free, so what i mean by starvation-free is that in my
    invention of my algorithm the readers don't starve the writers and the
    writers don't starve the readers, and the writers don't starve and
    readers don't starve, it is what we call starvation-free, and i think my invention is scalable and starvation-free and fair.

    And as you have just noticed i am also making public a number of my
    scalable algorithms and algorithms and softwares as also open source
    softwares and since i have just said in my new philosophy the following
    about my new model that is called coopetition that is a well balancing
    between cooperation and competition, since i think that economic
    Liberalism or capitalism needs both competition and cooperation, since
    we even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and
    industries(and this needs globalization) that make us much more
    creative, and i invite you to read the following important article so
    that to notice it:

    EU study on the impact of open source published

    https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/open-source-observatory-osor/news/report-open-source-driver-eus-digital-innovation

    And read my following thoughts about Adam Smith and more so that to
    notice it:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

    And read also here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc

    Here is my new invention of a fast, and scalable and starvation-free and
    fair and lightweight Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock called
    LW_RWLockX, and now i have included two units that are called MREWEx and LighweightMREWEx that include TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer and TLightweightMREW classes that are scalable and starvation-free and fair
    since they are using my Scalable LW_RWLockX that is starvation-free and
    fair, also BeginRead() and BeginWrite() of LightweightMREWEx and MREWEx
    are reentrant (recursive), so in other words, if a thread already called BeginWrite(), it can call BeginWrite() again and it will succeed and it
    will not deadlock, and the same applies to BeginRead(), please take a
    look at them inside the source code of my units.

    You can download it from my website here:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/new-variants-of-scalable-rwlocks

    Here is also my way of how i am becoming rich:

    First i want to say that i have passed four IQ tests and some of them
    are certified and i have scored high, so i am highly smart, second,
    my methodology is also that i am reading many PhD papers of researchers
    and i am seeking the weaknesses of them, and i have found many
    weaknesses on those PhD papers and from those weaknesses i have invented
    many software scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented
    some powerful software tools for parallelism etc., so i give you an
    example of one of my invention that is: A Scalable reference counting
    with efficient support for weak references, so that you understand that
    i am truthful, here it is:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

    But the truth is that i have invented many scalable algorithms such
    as this one, and i have made public some of them. And here is another
    example of how i am inventive and creative in operational research too,
    i have just read the following book (and of other books like it) of a
    PhD researcher about operational research and capacity planning, here
    they are:

    Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning by Example

    https://www.amazon.ca/Performance-Design-Computer-Capacity-Planning/dp/0130906735

    So i have just found that there methodologies of those PhD researchers
    for the E-Business service don't work, because they are doing
    calculations for a given arrival rate that is statistically and
    empirically measured from the behavior of customers, but i think that it
    is not correct, so i am being inventive and i have come with my new
    methodology that fixes the arrival rate from the data by using an hyperexponential service distribution(and it is mathematical) since it
    is also good for Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks and i will write a
    powerful book about it that will teach my new methodology and i will
    also explain the mathematics behind it and i will sell it, and my new methodology will work for cloud computing and for computer servers.

    You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

    And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

    I have just talked about the way to success, and read the following
    about the best big brains from around the world in USA so that to
    understand more about the way of success:

    Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai
    that is a Ph.D., it says:

    "Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the “smart
    fraction” of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance
    of that country, for example, its GDP."

    And it also says the following:

    "“According to recent population estimates, there are about eight
    Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains.”
    But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every
    other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.

    What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead
    in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing
    on average and below average people. Maybe it’s time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country."

    Read more here:

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world

    So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese
    and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are
    making USA a rich country.

    And read also the following to understand more:

    Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants

    There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech.
    Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies.
    Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from
    American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry’s friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that
    technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B
    system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones.

    But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it
    misses the picture among Silicon Valley’s top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in
    that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in
    the world to fill a particular role.

    But today’s most ambitious tech companies are not like factories.
    They’re more like athletic teams. They’re looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do
    in the first place.

    “It’s not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants,” said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief
    executive of the cloud-storage company Box. “It’s about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that are going to change everything.”

    Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with
    those inventions? It’s partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture
    capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5
    percent of the world’s population; it stands to reason that most of the world’s best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren’t born here.

    If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google’s entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority
    of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands
    of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran,
    and Eric Veach, from Canada.

    But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well
    in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to
    new ideas.

    Read more here:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html


    More of my philosophy about the financial market and more..

    I think that the stock market crashes can be due to economic or natural disasters, speculation, or investor panic, but i also think that
    it is the "control" over the factors of speculation and investment panic
    that is the most important that permits to prevent a stock market crash,
    so first we have to know that an investor is concerned with the
    fundamental value of his investment, whereas a speculator is only
    concerned with market price movement, and here is my thoughts about how
    to avoid stock market crash:

    More philosophy about the future of financial stability and cyber risk..

    I have just read rapidly the following very interesting article,
    i invite you to read it carefully:

    The future of financial stability and cyber risk

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-future-of-financial-stability-and-cyber-risk/

    I think that we have to be positive about the future of financial
    stability and cyber risk, since notice that the financial stability
    depends on three things:

    1- Leverage
    2- Maturity and Risk Transformation
    3- Procyclicality of the price of risk

    Read the above article to notice it, but i think that for the first two,
    i mean Leverage and Maturity and Risk Transformation, the financial institutions have not to put all the eggs in the same basket, so
    they need to diversify the risk correctly by diversifying portfolios
    etc., and for the third that is the Procyclicality of the price of risk,
    i think that it is less risky since it depends on the "asset" prices
    that are diversified to a certain level, and for the cyber risk i am
    positive since i think we are getting much more sophisticated in cyber security. So i remain positive.

    And my above thoughts are related to how i will invest more for my
    retirement etc. as follows, read my following thoughts so that to
    understand my way of doing about it:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h4FblBWnNHk

    More of my philosophy about my new proverb and more..

    I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person,
    and as you have just noticed i have just invented quickly
    a new proverb and here it is and read my explanation below:

    ---

    Here is my new proverb:

    "When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
    path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
    flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
    have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
    life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
    through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
    learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
    think this conception of life makes you more positive."

    And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

    "Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
    dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
    chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
    plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
    d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
    ressemble à cela,