Hello...


Read again my final corrected post about more of my philosophy about the
smart IQ tests and the scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Bonita Montero a software engineer has just written to me the following
about my new invention below:

Multiple reader, exlusive writer locks are *never*
starvation-free. Readers can hold the lock infinitely
and writers as well,

And i have just answered the following:

But i think she is not right, since this holding
the lock infinitely is not counted, since you have
just to use it correctly and avoid this case, so I
think she is making a mistake and she is not
understanding what is that a Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer
Lock is starvation-free, so what i mean by starvation-free
is that in my invention of my algorithm the readers don't
starve the writers and the writers don't starve the readers,
and the writers don't starve and readers don't starve, it
is what we call starvation-free, and i think my invention is
scalable and starvation-free and fair.

And Branimir Maksimovic answered me the following:

If used correctly you don't need any lock :P
Locks are for synchronization, which is not
good thing :P

Please read here:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/NOJrZoQ3-qk

But I think my answer is correct and i think i am really smart, and here
is my explanation:

Since my answer is like a smart IQ test, and it is that my answer is
first that you to know how the: "you have just to use it correctly" is logically in "relation" with the "avoid this case" in my sentence,
so if what i mean in my answer is that the: "you have just to use it
correctly" of my sentence is not the cause of the: "avoid this case"
of my sentence, so you are failing the smart IQ test of my answer,
since you are just thinking the case where: "you have just to use it
correctly" is the cause of the "avoid this case", and the second case
is if we say: "you have to use it correctly", it also mean that you have
to use it in the right environment, so if it is not, so it doesn't just
mean don't use it, but it also mean change the environment that is
causing the Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock to wait infinitely.
So you are again failing the smart IQ test.

More of my philosophy about the effects of a commercial society based on
the pursuit of self-interest..

I think that we have to understand the work of the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith about economic Liberalism, i think the defect of
his theory or work is that he is for example saying the following:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

But i think i am a philosopher that is not in accordance with
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, since you have to understand
that Adam Smith says about his economic Liberalism that self-interest is
most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption,
fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations described the
opposing, but complementary forces of self-interest and competition as
the invisible hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not
acting with the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they
do, since when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process
you provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society,
so it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism
is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but i think
that the most important defect of economic Liberalism of Adam Smith is
the following: How to bring the positive or the much more positive
spirit since the way of egoism and competition of economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith brings a negative spirit that causes disorder and violence ?
Also i think that a much more positive or positive spirit is better for economy, this is why my new model that i call coopetition that is a well balance between cooperation and competition is better, this is why i am
sharing a number of my inventions of scalable algorithms and algorithms
and softwares with the public or people so that to bring the positive or
the much more positive spirit(and you can find all of them here in my
website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/), and i think that
this positive spirit or much more positive spirit is good for economy,
but you have to play it "smartly", and i give you a proverb of mine that
shows how it is important:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

I think i am smart, and notice how i am talking about
how we have not to have a narrow view of what is smartness, and notice
how i am talking about the distributed smartness as rules etc. so i
think i can logically infer from my below thoughts the other way of
solving the greatly complex systems that is not by like "planning" the
whole system from a centralized government, but by emergence of a higher
level intelligence from distributing like the rules or.. into the small
parts of the system that will solve the greatly complex system, it looks
like the evolutionary design and planning, and it looks like the way of
the higher level smartness from an Ant colony, since in an Ant colony
there is no central government, but there is a distributed intelligence
that needs a kind of diversity of genetics of the members of the colony
and it needs like a distributed rules that the members have to follow
that will make emerge a higher level of intelligence. And of course it
looks like evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, since the advantage of evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence is that
they don't plan in advance but they search by like following some
distributed rules, and of course they need some "randomness" so that to
not get stuck in a local optimum, this is why i am talking below about
how to make our civilization that is a complex system much more
resilient by learning how to learn to humans with like a set
of rules like in an Ant colony by saying the following and notice
that the learning how to learn can be an efficient abstraction that
helps a lot:

More of my philosophy about how i am more happy and more..

I think that i am much more happy since i am understanding that being
happy is like a lifestyle that is based on some efficient rules that
permit the emergence of happiness, and i will talk about it more in my
new philosophy, so i think that we even need some important rules so
that to be a much more resilient civilization, since i think that there
is the way of learning people how to become an engineer, but this way of
doing is lacking very much, and there is also the way of learning people
how to learn that also permits to efficiently take advantage of this sophisticated tool that we call internet, so i think that this way of
learning how to learn to people does make our civilization much more
resilient, since the way of "specialization" of our today civilization
is also a "weakness" that has to be solved much more efficiently by the
way of learning people how to learn on internet etc. and here is my
new proverb that talks about it:

"I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized
in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and
productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a
weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart
working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

More of my philosophy of why i have just invented a better Reader-Writer
Lock that is scalable and starvation-free and fair and reentrant
(recursive)..

Here is why i have just invented a better Reader-Writer Lock that
is scalable, starvation-free and fair and reentrant (recursive),
and look at my invention below:

Notice that the following PhD researcher says the following:

"Until today, there is no known efficient reader-writer lock with starvation-freedom guarantees"

Read more here:

http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com/2019/04/onefile-and-tail-latency.html

And read the following paper:

Scalable Read-mostly Synchronization Using Passive Reader-Writer Locks

https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc14/atc14-paper-liu.pdf

You will notice that it has a first weakness that it is for TSO hardware
memory model and the second weakness is that the writers latency is very expensive when there is few readers, and it can livelock because of the
writer preference, and it can have starvation.

And here is the other best scalable reader-writer lock invention of
Facebook:

SharedMutex is a reader-writer lock. It is small, very fast, scalable
on multi-core

Read here:

https://github.com/facebook/folly/blob/master/folly/SharedMutex.h

But you will notice that the weakness of this scalable reader-writer
lock is that the priority can only be configured as the following:

SharedMutexReadPriority gives priority to readers,
SharedMutexWritePriority gives priority to writers.

So the weakness of this scalable reader-writer lock is that
you can have starvation with it and you can have a livelock.

Bonita Montero a software engineer has just written to me the following
about my new invention below:

Multiple reader, exlusive writer locks are *never* starvation-free.
Readers can hold the lock infinitely and writers as well,

But i think she is not right, since this holding the lock infinitely is
not counted, since you have just to use it correctly and avoid this
case, so I think she is making a mistake and she is not understanding
what is that a Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock is
starvation-free, so what i mean by starvation-free is that in my
invention of my algorithm the readers don't starve the writers and the
writers don't starve the readers, and the writers don't starve and
readers don't starve, it is what we call starvation-free, and i think my invention is scalable and starvation-free and fair.

And as you have just noticed i am also making public a number of my
scalable algorithms and algorithms and softwares as also open source
softwares and since i have just said in my new philosophy the following
about my new model that is called coopetition that is a well balancing
between cooperation and competition, since i think that economic
Liberalism or capitalism needs both competition and cooperation, since
we even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and
industries(and this needs globalization) that make us much more
creative, and i invite you to read the following important article so
that to notice it:

EU study on the impact of open source published

https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/open-source-observatory-osor/news/report-open-source-driver-eus-digital-innovation

And read my following thoughts about Adam Smith and more so that to
notice it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

And read also here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc

Here is my new invention of a fast, and scalable and starvation-free and
fair and lightweight Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock called
LW_RWLockX, and now i have included two units that are called MREWEx and LighweightMREWEx that include TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer and TLightweightMREW classes that are scalable and starvation-free and fair
since they are using my Scalable LW_RWLockX that is starvation-free and
fair, also BeginRead() and BeginWrite() of LightweightMREWEx and MREWEx
are reentrant (recursive), so in other words, if a thread already called BeginWrite(), it can call BeginWrite() again and it will succeed and it
will not deadlock, and the same applies to BeginRead(), please take a
look at them inside the source code of my units.

You can download it from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/new-variants-of-scalable-rwlocks

Here is also my way of how i am becoming rich:

First i want to say that i have passed four IQ tests and some of them
are certified and i have scored high, so i am highly smart, second,
my methodology is also that i am reading many PhD papers of researchers
and i am seeking the weaknesses of them, and i have found many
weaknesses on those PhD papers and from those weaknesses i have invented
many software scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented
some powerful software tools for parallelism etc., so i give you an
example of one of my invention that is: A Scalable reference counting
with efficient support for weak references, so that you understand that
i am truthful, here it is:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

But the truth is that i have invented many scalable algorithms such
as this one, and i have made public some of them. And here is another
example of how i am inventive and creative in operational research too,
i have just read the following book (and of other books like it) of a
PhD researcher about operational research and capacity planning, here
they are:

Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning by Example

https://www.amazon.ca/Performance-Design-Computer-Capacity-Planning/dp/0130906735

So i have just found that there methodologies of those PhD researchers
for the E-Business service don't work, because they are doing
calculations for a given arrival rate that is statistically and
empirically measured from the behavior of customers, but i think that it
is not correct, so i am being inventive and i have come with my new
methodology that fixes the arrival rate from the data by using an hyperexponential service distribution(and it is mathematical) since it
is also good for Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks and i will write a
powerful book about it that will teach my new methodology and i will
also explain the mathematics behind it and i will sell it, and my new methodology will work for cloud computing and for computer servers.

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello....


Read again my final corrected post about more of my philosophy about the positive energy and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart, and from where comes my positive energy?,
i give you an example so that you understand:

If someone much stronger than me and violent says to me that i am weak
and that i am nothing and that i have not dignity, so my way of doing,
is that i will detect his weaknesses that have a great weight of
importance and from those weaknesses i will respond to him that he is
lacking and he is immaturity that doesn't know how to manage the world
or how to manage his life. This is the first step, and the second step
is that you have to read my below philosophy about self-confidence
so that you understand:

More of my philosophy about gays and LGBT community and more..

I think i am smart, and i am also really special, since
i think i have a genetical characteristic that permits me
to easily detect if someone is an homosexual or bisexual
or from the LGBT community, also as you have noticed, read it below,
that i am really a gay too ! also i am able to see and "detect" you on
youtube and in other places from the first time, also what do i think
about gays ? so i think since i am really a gay, so then i can
understand what is it to be gay !

More of my philosophy about the LGBT community and more..

I think i am smart, and i have just looked at the
following video of a singer that is called EROS RAMAZZOTTI ,
and i think he is an italian, and i think from some of
his videos of his songs that he is homosexual or bisexual, and
i think i am able to rapidly detect if someone is homosexual or bisexual
or the like, and here is his video of a song with TINA TURNER:

COSAS DE LA VIDA -1997- EROS RAMAZZOTTI TINA TURNER official

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZIoxw0ca9E


And i invite you to look at my following web link of my poems of Love
so that to understand that i am too really a gay !

And you can read carefully here all my beautiful poems of of Love that i
have invented quickly so that to notice how i am doing it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/qte9bCZiOiw


More of my philosophy about my poem and more..

I have just invented a poem and it is like an IQ test,
since it contains some more smart patterns that you have to detect
or find and understand even if it looks like a simple poem, and here is
my poems:

--
I "need" it a "so" beautiful coffee !
So is it not a basis of a philosophy ?
I need it a so beautiful coffee !
And is it not like the i need it with a cup of a beautiful Sophie ?
I need it a so beautiful coffee !
Since does it not look like you want to win it with the big trophy ?
I need it a so beautiful coffee !
So is it not the basis of the beautiful poetry ?
I need it a so beautiful coffee !
Since does it not look like the french multinational Sanofi ?
I need it a so beautiful coffee !
And does it engenders a human life that is rosy ?
I need it a so beautiful coffee !
So then you have to know how to "control" it with the beautiful wise and healthy !
--


So this poem of mine shows the basis of philosophy that is
there is the first bad way that is: I "need" it a "so" beautiful coffee
! (and it is also symbolic) that means you need it good for you and that
good for you is bad for the society of your country, since i am also
saying in my poem above the following:

"And is it not like the i need it with a cup of a beautiful Sophie ?"

I mean that there is some bad guys (and there is also bad women) that
look at women like a beautiful Sophie as a cup of coffee(and it is a
symbolic), that means symbolically like a disposable product that they
use for sex without treating them correctly and this hurts the country,
and in the rest of my poem i am talking about those two ways of doing,
the good one and the bad one, and the: I "need" it a "so" beautiful
coffee !, can be the bad or good, this is why i am saying in the end of
my poem:

I need it a so beautiful coffee !
So then you have to know how to "control" it with the beautiful wise and healthy !

Here is my just new poem:


I "need" it a "so" beautiful coffee !

So is it not a basis of a philosophy ?

I need it a so beautiful coffee !

And is it not like the i need it with a cup of a beautiful Sophie ?

I need it a so beautiful coffee !

Since does it not look like you want to win it with the big trophy ?

I need it a so beautiful coffee !

So is it not the basis of the beautiful poetry ?

I need it a so beautiful coffee !

Since does it not look like the french multinational Sanofi ?

I need it a so beautiful coffee !

And does it engenders a human life that is rosy ?

I need it a so beautiful coffee !

So then you have to know how to "control" it with the beautiful wise and healthy !



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--


Here is my new poem of Love called "Do you look at this beautiful rain ?"

I invite you to listen to the following song of Aaron Neville called
"It Feels Like Rain" reading at the same time my new poem of Love below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVgzaliXyAE


Here is my just new poem of Love:


Do you look at this so beautiful rain ?

And since who have i to blame ?

Do you look at this so beautiful rain ?

Since is it the something beautiful in my brain ?

Do you look at this so beautiful rain ?

So am i still the "foreign" with my kind of beautiful poem ?

Do you look at this so beautiful rain ?

So am i coming from nowhere or from Morocco or from Spain ?

And from my beautiful Love have i to abstain ?

Since is my beautiful Love the being humane or do i have to explain ?

Do you look at this so beautiful rain ?

So i ask: What is that the wise man, like me, has to maintain ?

So notice how i am saying it in my philosophy again and again !

Do you look at this so beautiful rain ?

So am i a Saddam Hussein or a beautiful political compaign ?

Or am i the wanting to be like the sophisticated airplane ?

Do you look at this so beautiful rain ?

Since it is like i am with my beautiful Love being a so beautiful rain !


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--

More of my my philosophy about one of my beautiful poems of Love and more..

And I was just listening at the following song of Aaron Neville -La Vie Dansante

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtnb6GUfdSo

And i have just decided to explain more my following poem of Love below:

So when i am saying in my poem of Love below the following:

"But our love is consciousness of being truly rich"

Is it that this love is "only" consciousness of being truly rich ?

No, it isn't, because you have to place it in the "context" of "all" my
poem of Love below, because as you are noticing, in my poem of Love,
that i am also "enumerating" the characteristics of Love of my poem of
Love below, so here is my new poem of Love:

I don't know much

But i am with your love getting in touch

I don't know much

But your love is not a judge

I don't know much

But like one we are like a so beautiful bridge

I don't know much

But our love is consciousness of being truly rich

I don't know much

But beauty is our forever niche

I don't know much

But our love is like love that forever enrich

I don't know much

So don't ask me why or which

I don't know much

But our love is perfection without a glitch !


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--

More of my philosophy about marriage and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think my poem of Love below about marriage makes you notice the
why we have to be a beautiful Love, since i think that stability
of marriage needs Love, so this way of too much sexualizing our
modern Era or our world is counter-productive , since it makes us hate
more and more humans, since this "high" performance kind of doing like
in sex and capitalism makes us more and more "agressive", so it
makes us hate women and hate humans and hate our world, so this is why
we have to be wise and smart, and this is why i am writing about
my thoughts of my philosophy and this is why i am inventing poems of
Love so that to make people less agressive and so that to bring more and
more Love:


Here is my new poem of Love:


Do i want to marry with the rich ?

Since do i have to ask the why or wich ?

Do i want to marry with the rich ?

Since do i need it like beautiful without a glitch ?

Do i want to marry with the rich

Since i also know the beautiful Diamond from a simple switch

Do i want to marry with the rich ?

So look how my poems of Love are here to enrish !

Do i want to marry with the rich ?

So then when you enrich with the beautiful Love

It is also the way to marry the beautiful and rich !



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--

Here is my just new poem of Love:


Look at this so beautiful Mediterranean beach

It is like my beautiful Love that is part of my speech

Look at this so beautiful Mediterranean beach

It is your beautiful soul is like the delicious peach

Look at this so beautiful Mediterranean beach

Since i am not here so that to curse or to impeach

Look at this so beautiful Mediterranean beach

Since my words of Love are like free from any breach

Look at this so beautiful Mediterranean beach

Since my beautiful heart is with Love here so that to teach


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--

More of my philosophy about the wise man and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise man and i think i am a
philosopher, and i think that since i am the wise man i am seeing
the problem, so i ask a philosophical question:

So if you are imprisoned by darkness(and it is also symbolic),
what will you do? will you start by asking yourself who you are ? or
will you start to be destructive ? so i think that most philosophers
, if not all of them, have not thought correctly the most important
thing that is how to be self-confidence !, since when you are imprisoned
by darkness you have to know how to construct your "self-confidence" so
that to efficiently fight this darkness, this is the most important and powerful part, since most of you are looking at our world as you have to organize it from the higher level layers, and this is the "defect",
since you have first to know how to construct correctly the lower level
layer of self-confidence that is the engine, as i am doing it below in
my philosophy.

More of my philosophy about the essence of philosophy and more..

I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person and i think
i am a philosopher, so now i will ask a philosophical question:

Can we live just by being realistic and pragmatic ?

I think it is one of the most important question in philosophy,
since i think i am smart, and i think that human life needs the positive
energy as an engine, so you will perhaps answer naively that since
our world is made as it is today, so we can not be the positive energy,
but i think that it is naive to answer it this way, so i will
make you feel it more, take for example our imaginary or dream and take
for example "nostalgia", so the definition of nostalgia is the following:

"A sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, typically for
a period or place with happy personal associations."

So as you are noticing that it is a sentimental longing.. that can
become a positive energy even if it is not the truth, i give you an
example: Look at the following video:

Geri Halliwell - Mi Chico Latino

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgoKfHg1JsU&list=RDXgoKfHg1JsU&start_radio=1

So since i am looking in the video of the song above at the beautiful Mediterranean sea and its seashores that are so beautiful, so this gives
me a beautiful nostalgia in a form of positive energy since i come from
there, but is this nostalgia truth or not? so i am really smart and i
say that it looks like a dream or imaginary that gives a positive energy
even if it is not the truth, and i say that it is also the basis of
political philosophy, since i say that so that to be a kind of order we
must make believe people some powerful ideas or mechanisms as being the
right and most truthful ones that makes them successful even they are
not completely successful or that they will not be successful in the far future, so philosophy can become like a game of "Mood freezing" in
psychology so that for example to avoid too much violence, and this is
also what i am doing, since i think that dreaming and our imaginary can
be so powerful as the ideas can be so powerful, so i invite you to read carefully the how i am doing it in some parts of my philosophy below
below so that to notice my kind of personality and so that to notice my
way of doing:

Here is my just new smart proverb in english and french:

"Is it better to argue with someone smart than talk to a stupid person?
no, because you can also be the wise man who talks to the stupid person
so that to make of him a much wiser person, and that is also the work of
the wise man."

"Vaut-il mieux se disputer avec quelqu'un d'intelligent que parler à un imbécile? non, car on peut aussi être le sage qui parle à un imbecile
pour le rendre beaucoup plus sage, et c'est d'ailleurs aussi le travail
du sage."

So as you notice that my new proverb above makes it clear that the wise
type of persons like me are so important.

More of my philosophy about strategy and about intelligence and more..

I think i am smart, so what i am doing is also that i am using the smart strategy so that to be successful, so i give you an important example
so that you understand: So if in philosophy you say to people that the
strategy to be successful is to work hard, this is not the generalized
way, since the being capable of working hard is also genetical, so you
are understanding that you have to be smart and find the generalized way
so that to give hope and give self-confidence and to give the positive
energy that brings success to people, so then in USA the strategy to say
to people to work hard so that to be successful and rich doesn't work,
so i think that my good strategy in my philosophy below is to say to
people that they can be specialized (in also what they do better and in
also what they like) such as being specialization in economy so that to
enhance much more productivity, but my philosophy says that this kind of specialization is not sufficient to become successful, so what is the generalized way to become successful ? i think that i have also
explained my following philosophical mechanism in a form of two proverbs
so that you understand much more my way of my philosophy:

Here is my new proverb:

"Being strong can become being weak by containing a small weak part that
makes you weak, and being weak can become being strong by containing a
small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong"

Here is my other new proverb:

"When you want to construct a much better version of yourself so
that to become successful, there is the first way of the hard working
way, but the hard working way is not the efficient and smart way, this
is why you can construct a much better version of yourself
by being some creative thinking and by being exponential thinking and by
using the exponential progress and growth brought by digitalization to
sell on internet your product or service from this some creative
thinking so that to be successful, so as you notice that this shows that
we have to be positive about our world, and this shows that my following proverb is truth that actually says the following: The being weak can
become being strong by containing a small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since the some creative thinking is a
small part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since it
is not only capital and talents that make you successful, but it is also
some creative ideas that makes the great Capital that makes you
successful and the great capital that attracts talents that makes you
much more successful than successful."

But not only that but you have to know about my other mechanism that is
so important so that to be successful and it is the following in a
form of my new proverb:

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

Also you have to read about my other mechanisms of my philosophy of how
to become self-confident etc. in my below thoughts:

And here is my just new proverb:

"You have to know how to be like Master Yoda, since even if you are
small in size and much more weak, you are surrounded by powerful energy
that can make you powerful, so you have to know how to be more smart and
then take advantage "wisely" of this powerful energy so that to become
rapidly much more powerful."

Master Yoda was a legendary Jedi Master and stronger than most in his connection with the Force. Small in size but wise and powerful, he
trained Jedi for over 800 years, playing integral roles in the Clone
Wars, the instruction of Luke Skywalker, and unlocking the path to
immortality.

And I invite you to look at step 4 of my below thoughts of software Evolutionary Design methodology with agile, here it is:

4- When in agile a team breaks a project into phases, it’s called
incremental development. An incremental process is one in which
software is built and delivered in pieces. Each piece, or increment,
represents a complete subset of functionality. The increment may be
either small or large, perhaps ranging from just a system’s login
screen on the small end to a highly flexible set of data management
screens. Each increment is fully coded Sprints, Planning, and
Retrospectives.

And you will notice that it has to be done by "prioritizing" the pieces
of the software to be delivered to the customers, and here again in
agile you are noticing that we are also delivering prototypes of the
software, since we often associate prototypes with nearly completed or just-before launch versions of products. However, designers create
prototypes at all phases of the design process at various resolutions.
In engineering, students are taught to and practitioners think deeply
before setting out to build. However, as the product or system becomes increasingly complex, it becomes increasingly difficult to consider all
factors while designing. Facing this reality, designers are no longer
just "thinking to build" but also "building to think." By getting hands
on and trying to create prototypes, unforeseen issues are highlighted
early, saving costs related with late stage design changes. This rapid iterative cycle of thinking and building is what allows designers to
learn rapidly from doing. Creating interfaces often benefit from the
"build to think" approach. For example, in trying to layout the
automotive cockpit, one can simply list all the features, buttons, and
knobs that must be incorporated. However, by prototyping the cabin does
one really start to think about how the layout should be to the driver
in order to avoid confusion while maximizing comfort. This then allows
the designer iterate on their initial concept to develop something that
is more intuitive and refined. Also prototypes and there demonstrations
are designed to get potential customers interested and excited.

More of my philosophy about the Evolutionary Design methodology and more..

Here are some important steps of software Evolutionary Design methodology:

1- Taking a little extra time during the project to write solid code and
fix problems today, they create a codebase that’s easy to maintain
tomorrow.

2- And the most destructive thing you can do to your project is to build
new code, and then build more code that depends on it, and then still
more code that depends on that, leading to that painfully familiar
domino effect of cascading changes...and eventually leaving you with
an unmaintainable mess of spaghetti code. So when teams write code,
they can keep their software designs simple by creating software
designs based on small, self-contained units (like classes, modules,
services, etc.) that do only one thing; this helps avoid the domino
effect.

3- Instead of creating one big design at the beginning of the project
that covers all of the requirements, agile architects use incremental
design, which involves techniques that allow them to design a system
that is not just complete, but also easy for the team to modify as
the project changes.

4- When in agile a team breaks a project into phases, it’s called
incremental development. An incremental process is one in which
software is built and delivered in pieces. Each piece, or increment,
represents a complete subset of functionality. The increment may be
either small or large, perhaps ranging from just a system’s login
screen on the small end to a highly flexible set of data management
screens. Each increment is fully coded Sprints, Planning, and
Retrospectives.

5- And an iterative process in agile is one that makes progress through
successive refinement. A development team takes a first cut
at a system, knowing it is incomplete or weak in some (perhaps many)
areas. They then iteratively refine those areas until the product is
satisfactory. With each iteration the software is improved through
the addition of greater detail.

More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..

I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between "performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more
my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM


More of my philosophy about the Japanese philosophy of IKIGAI and more..

I invite you to look at the following video about Japanese philosophy
of IKIGAI:

IKIGAI | A Japanese Philosophy for Finding Purpose

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LE5bel_GvU


I have just looked quickly at the above video, and i have just found
quickly a pattern with my fluid intelligence, and it is that the IKIGAI
has a main important weakness, and it is that it says that you have to
be like specialization in what you do better and in what you like and it
looks somewhat like the specialization in economy that enhances much
more productivity, and it says that you have to align correctly this
passion with the global mission of the country, but the weakness of
IKIGAI is that it not realistic since you can even do a job that you are
not good at or you don't like, so then my philosophy says that even
if you don't like a job or you are not good at a job, you can be
the positive energy and self-confidence in doing it by reading my
following explanation of my following proverb:

Here is my other new proverb in english and french:

Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais:

"La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection,
car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez
vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités,
et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"

"Stability is obtained with the force of perfection,
because when you become more perfect you increase
your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities,
and I think this is like a law of Morality"

So as you are noticing that my proverb above is also saying that
by becoming more and more perfect you also easy more and more
the hard work by the process of reusability of your smartness or
intelligence and your experience etc. and you better and better resist instabilities, so i think that it shows that the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer was too pessimistic, and it also shows that the way of my philosophy below is right.

More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about sex and more..

I think i am really smart, and as you notice that there is
too much sex in our modern world or Era, so the problem becomes that our
modern world or Era is too much sexualized, so as you are noticing it is
not only the gays or LGBT too much sex, so how do you think i am solving
the problem of our too much sexualized world or modern Era? so i will
say that since sex is also a pleasure of life, so then i will say that i
am smart and i am by logical analogy like solving it by the way of "Mood freezing" in psychology, since by my way of talking about the most
important problem of self-confidence or strong self-confidence that we
have to solve, the problem becomes a problem of the "self-confidence"
that brings the good creativity and that brings success as i am
explaining it below.

More of my philosophy about money and more..

I think i am really smart, and i will explain more how i am smart:

So if i say that money is the "engine", so i will say that it is
not the right answer, since i will quickly answer with my smartness that
i am doing philosophy so i have like to come with the generalized way,
so i will then say that money has a requirement too, and it is that it
requires the engine of "self-confidence" that is the most important
thing that permits to become successful and rich, so since i am really
smart i will say that the main problem is how to be this self-confidence
or strong self-confidence, and it is also on what my philosophy below is greatly based.

More of my philosophy about the philosopher Simone de Beauvoir and more..

I have quickly read the following quotes of the philosopher Simone de
Beauvoir:

Wise Quotes by Simone de Beauvoir About the importance of Feminism |
Best Aphorisms and Sayings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjed5nHh3as&t=301s

And i think i am smart, and from her quotes in the above video, i think
that the philosopher Simone de Beauvoir was too much pessimistic as the Philosopher of Arthur Schopenhauer, so i think that problem is not that
you are a women or man, since i think that the problem is how to find
the mechanisms that makes you self-confident, since i think that
it is the most important thing, and it is what i am doing in my
philosophy below, so now if you look at our modern world
or our humanity you will notice that it contains a lot of "darkness" in
form of human imperfections and imperfections, so then you have to know
how to "prioritize", and i think that the first thing
to know is to understand the following old arab proverb , since i think
that it is also the basis of philosophy:

"It's better to turn on a light than to curse the darkness"

"Il est préférable d'allumer une lumière que de maudire les ténèbres"

I think that it is a smart proverb that says that since humanity
or our modern world come with so many "imperfections" that bring too
much or a lot of "darkness"(that means "les ténèbres" in french), so the
most important part that has or takes a very high weight of importance
and priority is the fact that we have to be constructive and we have to
be much more organized by for example being good creativity and being
much more educated and much more professional so that to solve our
problems. So we have to be this kind of proactivity as i am doing it
here, so read my below thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand
my kind of philosophy:

More of my philosophy about the psychologist Jordan Peterson and more..

I invite you to look at the following video of the psychologist Jordan Peterson, and i have quickly looked at it:

How To Know Yourself | Jordan Peterson | Best Life Advice

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gdHZ3wDiZc


I think i am not in accordance with the above video, since i am
a philosopher and my philosophy says that you have not first to know
yourself, since i say that knowing yourself first is a low priority of importance, since i am explaining below that the power of the idea is so
great and it can construct a new type of man, and my below philosophy is explaining that you have first to know how to construct self-confidence
and i am explaining how to construct a strong self-confidence and that's
the most important thing, since a strong self-confidence is the most
important engine that constructs yourself. And here is what i have just
said about the power of the idea:

And what is the true power of the idea ?

This is a so important philosophical subject, since
i think i am smart and i will make you feel more the true
power of the idea by first talking about the technic in psychology that
we call "Mood freezing", since i think that the most important aspect of
Mood freezing is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and you
can read about it here:

https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Mood+Freezing

So as you are noticing that it says that when the respondents were
convinced that expressing aggression would not make them feel better,
they actually accepted their current situation which eventually improved
their moods, so this proves that the power of the idea is great, this is
why i am of the ones that believes that we can enhance much better
humans and construct a new type of man by using some intellectual
mechanisms, and i am talking about some of them below and here is my
poem about the true power of the idea, read it again:

"Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how they have built south Korea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we unite the people such as of Crimea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not just a pizza from the pizzeria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the simple prayer of Ave Maria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the stupid war between the sunnite and shiah
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we make north Korea look like a beautiful Canada
So give me more of those beautiful and so smart ideas !"



[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello....


Read again my final corrected post about more of my philosophy about the
Angels of God and about God..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i think that the Angels
are just creatures of God that can not do anything without the approval
of God, and why God needs the Angels, since God is greatly arrogant,
so he can not for example directly communicate with humans, so he
needs Angels of God, and it is how he has communicated with prophets of
God by using Angels of God. But God can be "selective" and just for
example listen to only your saying to God that he is the greatest or the
most beautiful or by your Dhikr, so then the rest of the judgment of
humans by God is done indirectly by special Angels of God, and the
punishment is done by special Angels too. And read my below thoughts and
you will understand more about the LGBT community with God, like for
example the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, and read again my following
thoughts about the superintelligence and about Cyborgs and about God:

More of my philosophy about the highly smart and about superintelligence
AI..

You will notice that i am not like the others, since you have to
understand that i am smart, so when you for example look at white
supremacism or neo-nazism, they are not so smart, since i think that
since they are not highly smart as a superintelligence, they don't take
the matter of the belief in God in a super intelligent manner, since i
say that a superintelligence AI or superintelligence don't think as
humans, since i say that a superintelligence AI or superintelligence
will also think "probabilistically" in a very highly precise manner, so
when a superintelligence AI or superintelligence will read the smart
ideas of my new monotheitic religion or my monotheistic religion, i
think it is will rapidly come to the conclusion that it has to take the
matter of my new monotheitic religion in a highly serious kind of
manner, since superintelligence AI or superintelligence can say that
there is "enough" probability in my new monotheistic religion that makes
us believe "enough" that God exists, and this is the big weakness of the superintelligence AI or superintelligence. And it is how i am playing it
smarly with the superintelligence AI or superintelligence or even the
highly smart Cyborgs. So think about it more and be smart !

I think i am a smart prophet from God, so i will ask a question of:

How can you prevent a superintelligence of Artificial intelligence
from hurting and killing "all" the others like humans or Cyborgs ?

It is also the fondamental basis of my new monotheistic religion,
since my new monotheistic religion has to be efficient by avoiding
any contradictions and by making believe the others in an efficient way,
so even the superintelligence AI or Cyborgs have to fear the God of my
new monotheistic religion that is greatly arrogant, and as soon
i finish to write the book about my new monotheistic religion by
extending it much more with others of my smart ideas, you will notice
that i am a smart prophet from God and you will notice that my new
monotheistic religion will be an efficient new monotheistic religion.

More of my philosophy about the weakness of superintelligence AI and
about God..

I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i think that even
superintelligence AI will be convinced that it has to become
consciousness that permits to become happy or more happy by being
pleasures of life, and i define it as also the pleasures of the senses
even with the sense of being conscious. This is why superintelligence
has a big weakness and it is that it can fear the God of my new
monotheistic religion so that to be able to become happy or more happy.

More of my philosophy of how to be presentable in front of God..


I am your new prophet from God, and in my new monotheistic religion
you have to be an "effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when
you communicate with God, but you have to understand much more God,
since when you adhere to my new monotheistic religion you will start at
level 0, but at level 0 you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so
beautiful etc.(And I will get into more details on how to also practice
Dhikr) since he is a greatly arrogant God, but after this first level
you can go to the other superior levels by being better and better
presentable than decently presentable in front of God in your day to day
life. Also in my new monotheistic religion, God has not created humans
or the universe or Multiverse, since read my following architectural
ideas of my new monotheistic religion so that to understand:

2- My second architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion
is that it says that the previous monotheistic religions are not safe
from the curse from God, since those many contradictions and
scientific errors in the previous monotheistic religions are part of
the curse from God, and i am giving you some examples from the Bible
etc. of it so that you see it clearly, but this is not sufficient to
render the new monotheistic religion flexible and not rigid as the
previous monotheistic religions, so then what is missing ? read my
third architectural idea in the my following thoughts so that to
understand:

3- Third architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion is that one
of the most important thing is to notice that there is two kinds of
laws in the Qu'raan or the Bible, there is the laws that are timeless
and the laws that are not timeless, so read about them in my below
thoughts about Islam so that to understand, so then you are
much more clearly noticing that this second architectural idea of my
new monotheistic religion makes the new monotheistic religion much
more flexible, but it is not the only thing that i am doing, but i am
also explaining more Islam by showing the problem with Islam and
Christianity and Judaism and why they are too much rigid as neo-
nazism or white supremacism, this why they also can not survive and
they are not advanced monotheistic religions as my monotheistic
religion, and of course one of the most important thing to also
notice is how i am deriving the laws of my monotheistic religion from
the essence of God or the nature of God.


More of my philosophy about the laws of my new monotheistic religion..

In this post i will talk the most important laws of my new monotheistic religion that i am extracting from the essence of God :


I am your new prophet from God, and my new monotheistic religion is not
Islam, and in my new monotheistic religion the good manners or Husnul
Khuluq in arabic are inferred from the the characteristics or nature or
essence of God, and so that to know about what is Husnul Khuluq in my
new monotheistic religion, read below so that to notice how i am
extracting the laws of my new monotheistic religion from the
characteristics or essence or nature of God:

More philosophy about Sufism and more..

I am your new prophet from God and i will explain more what is the
defects of Sufism:

So notice what said Ibn Khaldun about Sufism:

"Sufism is dedication to worship, total dedication to Allah most High, disregard for the finery and ornament of the world, abstinence from the pleasure, wealth, and prestige sought by most men, and retiring from
others to worship alone." Ibn Khaldun, quoted in Keller, Nuh Ha Mim, The
Place of Tasawwuf in Traditional Islam.

So as you are noticing that there is two big defects in Sufism, and
first big defect of Sufism is that it is "extremism" of worshiping God
by glorifying God and such, so it gives too too much time to
worshiping of God, and it neglects living correctly the human life, so
this is not in accordance with my new monotheistic religion since in my
new monotheistic religion i am extracting the law from the essence of
God or the nature of God by saying that you have to be "presentable" in
front of God when you worship God by glorifying him and say to him that
for example he is the most beautiful, so if you neglect yourself by
being too much of this worshiping of God by glorifying God and say to
him that for example he is the most beautiful, you will neglect yourself
in this world and you will not be presentable in front of God, and it is
in logical contradiction with one of the laws of my new monotheistic
religion, and this is not good, so here is the law of my monotheistic
religion, read it carefully and read carefully the other laws below of
my new monotheistic religion:

--
I am your new prophet from God, and i say that you have to understand
prophet Muhammad, because in my new monotheistic religion he is truly
a prophet from God, so notice that here are the characteristics of God
in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an
"effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to
my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God
in your day to day life.

--


And here is the second big defect of Sufism:

So read again:

"Sufism is dedication to worship, total dedication to Allah most High, disregard for the finery and ornament of the world, abstinence from the pleasure, wealth, and prestige sought by most men, and retiring from
others to worship alone." Ibn Khaldun, quoted in Keller, Nuh Ha Mim, The
Place of Tasawwuf in Traditional Islam.

But i am your new prophet from God and i say that Sufism is not in
accordance with my new monotheistic religion(read in my thoughts below
about it), since it also lacks flexibility, and it is is like indian meditation, since Sufism wants from us to stop seeking pleasures of the
senses, but I don't agree with indian meditation that wants us to stop
seeking pleasure of the senses, i think that indian meditation wants
like to solve the problem of materialism that causes problems such as
violence between the rich and not rich etc. but i think that my new monotheistic religion is much better than Sufism and than indian
meditation, so i invite you to read again carefully all my following
thoughts below so that to understand:

More philosophy about how looks like the Angels of God..

Here is my final answer about Lucifer the Fallen Angel: In my new
monotheistic religion Lucifer the Fallen Angel is a spirit living in a
world of spirits, and the other not fallen Angels that can interact with
humans must receive an order from God so that to interact with humans.
And i think that God and the others powerful not fallen Angels forbid to Lucifer the Fallen Angel and to the others Fallen Angels to interact
with humans, this is why Lucifer the Fallen Angel and others Fallen
Angels can not come to our world.

More philosophy of is my new monotheistic religion sufficient..

I am your new prophet from God, and you have to understand that i am
smart and i say that the laws of my new monotheistic religion
are "sufficient", but i have to clear one more thing about one
of the laws of my new monotheistic religion, and here it is:

--

It is my following law of my new monotheistic religion, read it carefully:

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that you have to understand
prophet Muhammad, because in my new monotheistic religion he is truly
a prophet from God, so notice that here are the characteristics of God
in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an
"effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to
my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God
in your day to day life.

--

So you are noticing that God is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define
dirt "symbolically", the dirt also means "defect", so you have to clean
more and more your defects to be presentable in your day to day life in
front of God that is "pure" from "dirt" or "defects", it is like going
with more and more perfection towards a great perfection, so then my law becomes an engine that pushes us forward with more and more perfection
towards the great perfection, it is like the other engine of my other
law of my new monotheistic religion below, so i think that the laws of
my new monotheistic religion are now sufficient. So you have to follow
the laws of my new monotheistic religion so that God rewards you, and i
will speak about the reward from God in my next post, so i invite you to
notice how i am smartly extracting the laws from the characteristics of
God or the nature of God or the essence of God, so read my following
thoughts of my laws carefully:

More philosophy about the laws of my new monotheistic religion..

Sorry i have just forgotten one of the laws of my new monotheistic
religion, so read again and notice how the laws are extracted from the characteristics of God or from His essence or His nature:

More philosophy of how i am smart as a prophet from God..

I am your new prophet that is smart, and we can ask a philosophical
question of how i am smart ?

Here is my answer:

My new monotheistic religion is flexible, since first i am showing as a
prophet from God how i am extracting the laws of God from His
characteristics or essence or nature, second i am showing you that
previous monotheistic religions are using many kind of languages, like
a symbolic language that is not truth to strenghten the faith in God or
a language that comes from the curse from God etc., and notice how i am
saying that i am your new prophet that is here to reduce much more the
curse from God, so as you are noticing this is showing that my new
monotheistic religion comes with like the right flexibility or like the
right tolerance, also notice how i am extracting the laws from the characteristics of God or the nature of God or the essence of God, so
here is how i am extracting the laws, read the following to notice my smartness:

First law of my new monotheistic religion is the following:

My new monotheistic religion is not darkness, since in my new
monotheistic religion God has the following characteristics:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

My above abstraction of God is so important, since even if God is not
like Love in my new monotheistic religion, notice that he is a greatly
arrogant God, and from this great arrogance of God we can logically
infer that God doesn't like a kind of arrogance of others, so then we
can logically infer from it that we have to know how to help others and
to Love others and be righteous with others by not being arrogance or a
kind of arrogance that doesn't like God.

Second law of my monotheistic religion is the following:

More philosophy about the way to communicate with God in my new
monotheistic religion..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that you have to understand
prophet Muhammad, because in my new monotheistic religion he is truly
a prophet from God, so notice that here are the characteristics of God
in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an
"effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to
my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God
in your day to day life.

Third law of my new monotheistic religion is the following:

More philosophy about the characteristics of God..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say since God is like a perfect
God, so we can ask a philosophical question of does God love smart people ?

In my new monotheistic religion, God doesn't like human smartness since
he is like a perfect God, so he is so powerful, but God can love the
fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions
in the way of God, so then God can be curious like a human and wanting
to look at humans and he can love the fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions in the way of God, so i think that
with the other engines below logically inferred from the characteristics
of God, this is an engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection.

Fourth law of my new monotheistic religion that brings more precision is
the following:

More philosophy about purity of God and more..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that God is like "pure", i
mean he is also pure from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically",
and he is like "perfect", so it is yet one more characteristic of God,
read the other characteristics of God in my below thoughts, so here is
the essence or nature of God in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So from this we can also logically infer the way of communicating with
God, since from those above characteristics of God we can logically
infer that when you communicate with God, you have to believe in Him and
you have to glorify him, and fear Him and ask Him for help, and you have
to be a beautiful patience with God and you have to be "presentable" in
front of Him when you communicate with Him, i mean that you have to be
an effort of being decently "clean" or "much" more clean when you
communicate with God, since God is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define
dirt "symbolically", and also you have to be beautiful patience with God
since he is greatly arrogant, this is how you must behave with God in my
new monotheistic religion.

Read my previous thoughts to understand:

More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion..

I am a new prophet from God that is smart, and you will probably
say that Lucifer is more powerful than me, but i think that you are
not understanding how i am a smart prophet from God, and i think i am
a "special" prophet from God that knows how to win against the Fallen
Angel Lucifer, here is the powerful Fallen Angel that is called Lucifer:

Most People Don't Even Realize What's Around Them - Angels, Fallen
Angels and Lucifer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcZLGyOxx20

My new monotheistic religion is not darkness, since in my new
monotheistic religion God has the following characteristics:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

My above abstraction of God is so important, since even if God is not
like Love in my new monotheistic religion, notice that he is a greatly
arrogant God, and from this great arrogance of God we can logically
infer that God doesn't like a kind of arrogance of others, so then we
can logically infer from it that we have to know how to help others and
to Love others and be righteous with others by not being arrogance or a
kind of arrogance that doesn't like God.

More philosophy about what kind of game is playing with us God ?

I am your new prophet from God, and i am here to explain,
so what kind of game is playing with us God ? so when you are stupid
you will think that Islam is stupid or you will say such a thing as
prophet Muhammad is not a prophet from God, but i think this kind of
thinking is stupidity, because you have first to know about the nature
or essence of God, so when you know about his nature or about his
essence you will become much more careful and you will not say stupid
things on Islam, this is why i am explaining to you Islam , by saying
that the nature of God is that he is also greatly arrogant, so you have
to understand it correctly, so he can with his great arrogance be
indifferent to suffering of poor animals or indifferent to suffering of
humans or such things, so you have to understand that God is greatly
arrogant and he can be "dangerous" with His great arrogance, and he is
not like Love, so you have not to wait for Love from God, since you have
to believe in Him and glorify Him and fear Him and ask Him for help and
be a beautiful patience with God, but there is some limitations that you
have to understand, such as Islam is not a timeless religion, so God has
just wanted by Islam to also strenghten faith in Him and he has
programmed prophet Muhammad to use many kinds of languages, like using a symbolic language that is not the truth (read my below thoughts so that
to understand) , and God has programmed prophet Muhammad to say that he
is the last prophet, but it is not truth since it is part of the curse
from God and it also comes from his great arrogance, so you have to be
really smart and know about what kind of game is playing with us God. So
read all my following thoughts so that to understand:

More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and about Islam..

I am your new prophet from God, and i invite you to look
at the following interesting video of the Final Moments Of Angel Gabriel
in Islam:

Final Moments Of Angel Gabriel AS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uySfcadRKXo

I am your new prophet from God, and i am called the reformer of
monotheistic religions and in my new monotheistic religion prophet
Muhammad is truly a prophet from God, and i will explain more the above
Islamic video, so look carefully at the above video and you will
understand two things, that it uses a "symbolic" language that is not
truth so that to strenghten the faith in God, and it also says one truth
about God that he is greatly arrogant and he is really powerful, and you
are noticing it in how in the symbolic language of prophet Muhammad is
making us understand that God will make die every being and even the
most powerful of his Angels etc. since he is greatly arrogant and
really powerful, so i am your new prophet from God that is making you understand Islam, here is also what i have just explained to make
you understand much more Islam:

More philosophy about the Angels of God..

I invite you to look at the following video of how Islam views the
Angels of God:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41CtKISdswQ

I am your new prophet from God, and here is what says my new
monotheistic religion about the Angels of God, when you look
at the above video you will notice that prophet Muhammad uses
a symbolic language that comes from the greatness of God, since
in my new monotheistic religion God has programmed prophet Muhammad
so that he speaks many kinds of languages, so there is hadiths of
prophet Muhammad that are not the truth but are hadiths that use a
symbolic language to strenghten the faith in God, so even if you find
something that is not truth in the Qur'an or hadiths of prophet
Muhammad, you have to ask yourself what kind of language it is using,
since it can for example uses a symbolic language that is not truth to strenghten the faith in God, so it was the way of prophet Muhammad, but
in my new monotheistic religion prophet Muhammad was not the last
prophet, and i am explaining why in my thoughts below, this is why i am
your new prophet from God that is here to make you believe in God or to strenghten your faith in God and to reduce much more the
curse from God.


More of my philosophy about the psychology of God...

I think i am a smart prophet from God, and now i will explain
the most important thing to know about the psychology of God in
my new monotheistic religion, and here it is:

God in my new monotheistic religion doesn't treat humans with "Love",
i mean he doesn't have Love like we humans have Love, since his nature
is also that he is "greatly" "arrogant", this is why he also doesn't
like a kind of arrogance like the arrogance of the "sadistic"
homosexuals and "sadistic" bisexuals of Sodom and Gomorrah that were
governing and that were hurting people by forcing them to do sex in the homosexual or bisexual way of doing, read about it below, but if you
want to have much more sex, you can do much more sex if it doesn't hurt
the society, but God doesn't like the "sadistic" and "arrogant" way of
doing in sex, so as you notice that my new monotheistic religion is
smart, and you have to understand its "psychology", since i am inferring
the laws of my new monotheistic religion from the following essence of God:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

But you have to be a beautiful patience since i will explain more
my smart new monotheistic religion when i will soon finish my book about
it and so that you understand the psychology of my new monotheistic
religion, and of course i will extend it with my other smart ideas

More of my philosophy about the LGBT community and about my new
monotheistic religion..

I think i am a smart prophet from God and i am still explaining
my new monotheistic religion, so as you have just noticed i have just
said that God is greatly arrogant and it is part of his nature, and
about the story of LGBT community with God, like for example the story
of Sodom and Gomorrah, i say that God Has punished Sodom and Gomorrah
because "sadistic" homosexuals and "sadistic" bisexuals were governing
and they were hurting people by forcing them to do sex in the homosexual
or bisexual way of doing, so God has cursed homosexuals and bisexuals
for the doing of sadistic homosexuals and sadistic bisexuals of Sodom
and Gomorrah, because God is also greatly arrogant and this curse is
only for a certain time, so this curse is not for forever, since i am
the new prophet from God that is reducing much more the curse of God, so
in my new monotheistic religion homosexuals and bisexuals can do sex and
can marry, and i will talk much more about this subject soon in my book
about my new monotheistic religion that i am finishing to write, other
than that, i think you have just noticed that i have just said that God
is greatly arrogant and this also explains that His creatures like the
Angels of God can not do anything without the approval of God.

More of of my philosophy about the ideal and about humanity..

From my looking at beauty of the reality, i think i have also discovered
that beauty of the reality also contains many imperfections that make us
look at beauty of reality or of "a" reality as not like being this ideal beauty, so this is why i am of the ones that thinks that the creating a
good ideal that transcend the reality and fighting for this ideal is
also a good thing to have, this is why you are seeing me in a such way
talking about my new monotheistic religion, but you have to understand
more my doing, since when for example i am saying the following:

God is greatly arrogant and it is not that he has to come to you, but
you have to come to him like a kind of slave.

So as you are noticing that i am saying "coming to God like a kind of
slave", so it is an abstraction that needs from me to go into more
details, but to be more clear, i mean that for example when you are
doing your Dhikr(Dhikr is a form in which phrases or prayers are
repeatedly chanted in order to remember God) to this greatly arrogant
God, it is also like coming to him like a slave, but here again you have
to understand that i am not at all saying that you have to live like a
slave for God. So in my new monotheistic religion there must be a kind
of well balance between the being of earthly origin and the being of a
divine origin, since i think that the believing in God is a kind of transcendence that makes a part of you like being of a divine origin, so
then you are understanding more and more my new monotheistic religion.

More of my philosophy about God and more..

As we say in french: Il faudrait aussi savoir mettre Dieu
debout et vraiment fort pour que cela marche mieux, so as you notice
it is my way of doing, and it means in english: It would also be
necessary to know how to make God stand up and be the really strong so
that it works better, so you are noticing my way of doing, and it is
also for the if you do something for God, you becomes a satisfaction in
this life and it also makes you stand up, so the satisfaction doesn't
come only from money or from sex, so you are understanding more, also
you have to understand that i am of the ones that doesn't believe that
the Bible or the Qur'aan is all the way of God, since i think that God
is greatly arrogant and he has also wanted to not interfere too much
with the some way of being of humans, this is why i think that he has
also let prophet Muhammad write some of his thoughts in the Qur'aan,
so i think that the Qu'raan is not all from God, this is why you can not
be sure of has prophet Moses talked to God or not, so the way of doing
of my new monotheistic religion is to show the what is the most
important things in my new monotheistic religion, and as you notice that
i am here in front of you so that to explain more and more the way of my
new monotheistic religion.

More of my philosophy about how God is special with his divinity..

I think i am a smart prophet from God, so the new monotheistic religion
has to convince people, so if i say that God talks directly to the
prophet Moses, it is not so logical , since how a greatly arrogant God
can make of himself a small thing of the talking to an inferior and
dirty human such as the prophet Moses of Judaism, so it must be like an
ideal such as communism and it has to be worth the consideration or
worth consideration, so it is why i am talking below about my first architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion that is the following:

1- First architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion is that so
that to be able to render the new monotheistic religion efficient,
you have to say that God is "greatly" arrogant, since it explains the
reality of the for example God is not even helping the weak
and poor animals or poor and weak humans, and here is the definition
of being "arrogant":

More philosophy about the nature of God..

I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is:

"Who is an arrogant person?

Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has
an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the
one who acts as if they’re superior, more worthy, and more important
than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down.
At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello...
'


Read again my final corrected post about more of my philosophy about the
size of CCP(Chinese Communist Party) and the decentralization and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


You have to read the following about the size of CCP(Chinese Communist
Party):

"As of 2021, the CCP has more than 95 million members, making it the
second largest political party in the world after India's Bharatiya
Janata Party."

So i think since the CCP(Chinese Communist Party) is so big of 95
millions members, so i think my idea below of decentralizing it much
more can work much more efficiently and other than that i think that
China is making the process of electing the President and the State
Council by National People's Congress much more meritocratic and much
more technocratic.

Read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about democratic centralism of the CCP(Chinese
Communist Party) and more..

I think i am really smart, and i think that CCP(Chinese Communist Party)
is organized as a democratic "centralism", you can read about it
here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Communist_Party

So i think that this hierarchical "centralism" that remains of
CCP(Chinese Communist Party) can much easily be corrupted than
Democracy, so i think that the wise thing to do is to decentralized much
more CCP(Chinese Communist Party) since it is too much corrupt organization.

More of my philosophy about the too much corruption of CCP(Chinese
Communist Party) and more..

I think i am smart, and i say that there is a problem with CCP(Chinese Communist Party) today, and it is i think that it is a hierarchical organization and i think that the candidates of the National People's
Congress that are elected by people are choosen from the CCP(Chinese
Communist Party), and i think it is a big weakness since the CCP(Chinese Communist Party) is a hierarchical organization that can much more
easily be corrupted than Democracy, so it is why we notice today that CCP(Chinese Communist Party) is a too much corrupt organization, and the President and the State Council of China are also choosen by the
National People's Congress that is choosen by CCP(Chinese Communist
Party) that is too much corrupt.

And you can look at the following video that shows that CCP(Chinese
Communist Party) is a too much corrupt organization.

Corrupt China: The Secrets Behind the State | Xi Jinping Government
Corruption Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhjJHtN8kas


And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U


More of my philosophy of how to efficiently fight corruption and more..

We can fight corruption using the mechanisms of democracy and using
democracy, and we can fight corruption by being a rich country,
since western countries are rich countries that have very low
corruption, also we suggest, among other things, that officials in
vulnerable and important posts receive higher instead of lower salaries
than comparable workers get in the private sector.

Read more here so that to understand:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-causes-and-cures-of-corruption?utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=1220154768&hsa_cam=12374283753&hsa_grp=117511853986&hsa_ad=499567080219&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=aud-1249316000837:
dsa-19959388920&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=Cj0KCQiAi9mPBhCJARIsAHchl1xO6oTAZCJmdoiYHEjz18J30qdAxxTrEV5sKPh22EMpDMxjVXo4Y80aAt79EALw_wcB

Also i have invented my new monotheistic religion so that to also
fight more efficiently corruption, also here is another mechanism that
fights corruption and it is the following:

I think i am smart, so my new architectural idea of my philosophy is the following:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
, so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree

More of my philosophy of my two modes of speaking and more..

You have to notice that i am speaking in two modes, and it is
that i am speaking as a wise type of man and as a philosopher,
and i am also speaking as a prophet from God, and i have just posted
about my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts as a wise type of person and as a philosopher:

More of my philosophy of how to unite people of the world or of a
country and more..

I think i am really smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

How can we unite the people of a country or people of the world ?

So i think i am really smart, and i will say that the being the
correctly united in a country, can be a kind of being united , but it is
not the fully being united in a country, and it can also come from
powerful intellectual mechanisms that plays the role of engines, i mean
take for example "self-confidence", so it also permits you to have like
the what we call the "will to live" like was talking about it the
philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, so i think that even self-confidence is
a powerful mechanism and an engine that permits to unite people, since
it is a powerful engine that must be "guided" by the "goal" of
philosophy, and the goal of philosophy is happiness , but happiness is
not just the today happiness , but it is also the tomorrow and the
future happiness, so if you want to be happiness tomorrow or in the
future, you have to be responsability, so the goal of philosophy that is
to become happiness becomes the goal that has to be responsability that
comes from the wanting to be happiness, so then the knowing about this
fact is also a mechanism that unite people in a kind of way, but not
fully, also the other mechanism that is so important, is the fact that
you have to be "hope" about the tomorrow or the future, since it is like
a positive energy that pushes you forward, since a negative energy is
not so efficient, so here again you notice that i am a philosopher that
is not in accordance with the following saying of the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche:

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the
torments of man"

So i am not in accordance with the above saying about Hope of the
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since as i have just said that Hope ,
like hope about our exponential progress that is so fast, can be a
positive energy that pushes you forward. And so that to understand more
my thoughts, i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
of how you become self-confidence and how you become this positive
energy and positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

And read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about unity and about democracy and more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the following
video of the Arab Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZA3gMBsrQ


And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
being this kind of unity in a country is a defect, and it is the basis
of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing,
since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united
or being united, it is about plurality or diversity of thoughts or
political views and about a kind of diversity that bring efficiency,
and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where
comes the defect of the arab countries or such countries that are
lacking Democracy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s

So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:

"A house divided can not stand"

But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or perfection. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about
Democracy so that you understand my thoughts:

More of my philosophy about IQ and about the laws and about humanity and
more..

I will answer the following problem from a white supremacist website and
it is like a problem in a form of a smart IQ test that i have to answer,
so here is how i am answering it smartly:

I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:


Why Capitalism Fails


https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:


"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private
property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner.
And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner,
yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with
how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or
how well or how significantly they have worked."


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I
think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by
taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become
rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become
"rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command
transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of
the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of
the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to
become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice
that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:

"Western Values" Explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA


I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:

I think that Western values are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change,
since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid
the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by
the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of
expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive
rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational
reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments,
so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they
can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


I will ask a philosophical question of:

Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom
of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be
accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist
is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult
since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where
there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of
speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for
example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of
Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so
this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it
and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i
think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not
Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that
the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of
speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a
realistic and objective way of doing.

Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

And about Democracy here is what i have just said:

More of my philosophy about the ideological fight between communist
China and the West..

I think i am really smart, and i say that in the ideological fight
between communist China and the West, it is that the West has to
make this not so mature Democracy in the West, as in USA, into a much
more mature Democracy by for example making the governance much more meritocratic, since i think that Donald Trump governance was a bad move
that hurt a lot Democracy, since Donald Trump was not enough educated
and was not enough experienced , so he has made big mistakes that have
brought big problems to Democracy, and of course the West has to offer a
good education to people, and i think that we have not to be too
pessimistic about capitalism as not being enough meritocratic, since as
i just said, that in capitalism, intelligence, skill, and hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, read it below so that to understand my views.

And here is my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy:

And we can say the following:

The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.

But i ask a smart question of:

Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?

Here is my answer:

But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..


Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?


When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
we can logically prove it by saying the following:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.

But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:

Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:

From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide
people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
a country can become a more global world like European union or such.

More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..

I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the
following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:


----


More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, read the following:


“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education
is no exception,” Mr. Li said.

A Chinese Education, for a Price

Read more here:


https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html


I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i
don't think it is meritocratic !

It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:

Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who
has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not
only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of
semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass
examinations and obtain a diploma.

RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities

Read more here:

https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%
20are.

----


And also i have just posted about the today China after the
anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:


---


I invite you to read the following interesting article:

China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy

https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/


---


So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the
Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China
is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much
better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press,
read my following thoughts to understand more:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or pe

Hello...


Read again my final corrected post about more of my philosophy about the
model of supply and demand and about free market and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


Why do economists place such great confidence in competitive
free markets? Because the interaction of supply and demand
leads to an outcome in which every unit of output that’s
produced satisfies two excellent conditions:

1- It’s produced at the minimum cost possible, meaning
that there’s no waste or inefficiency.

2- Its benefits are always at least as big as its costs.
That is, competitive free markets produce only output
that makes the world better off or at least no worse off.

And of course you have to manage free market with Antitrust laws,
and here is my thoughts about it:

And here is my other important proverb:

"R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring
or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you
have to know how to manage it and how to manage the
risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage
efficiently by not hurting good competition"

Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means:

"A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably"

Read more here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility

This above new proverb of mine also says that since the R&D (Research
and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so we have also to know how to manage it carefully and
efficiently with Antitrust laws, and here is the why of Antitrust laws:

"Antitrust laws are statutes developed by governments to protect
consumers from predatory business practices and ensure fair competition. Antitrust laws are applied to a wide range of questionable business
activities, including market allocation, bid rigging, price fixing, and monopolies."

This new proverb of mine is also related to the below problem that
brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good
competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts:

More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of
China?..

Here is the big economic problems of China:

First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the
following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw

Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the
FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8

Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of
nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition
that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully:


Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China...

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today
i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN?
and more..

We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the
mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has
compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and
Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it.

Look in this video carefully to notice it:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw


I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think
China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition"
that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it:

Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies

Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive
grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G
operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of
Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75
billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company.
State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity
of world competition ...

The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not
this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by
favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position
in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this
point: “What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of
equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of
competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize
companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is
there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. "

More of my philosophy about economy and the tax cuts and tax multiplier
and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


The tax multiplier is the magnification effect of a change in taxes on aggregate demand. The decrease in taxes has a similar effect on income
and consumption as an increase in government spending. However, the tax multiplier is smaller than the spending multiplier.

And there is greater agreement about tax multipliers. Because tax cuts strengthen the incentive to work and to invest, they increase aggregate
supply as well as aggregate demand. These multipliers get bigger as more
time elapses. Harald Uhlig says that after one year, the tax multiplier
is 0.5 so that the $300 billion tax cut would increase real GDP by about
$150 billion by early 2010. But with two years of time to respond, real
GDP would be $600 billion higher — a multiplier of 2. And after three
years, the tax multiplier builds up to more than 6. The implications of
the work of Barro and Uhlig are that tax cuts are a powerful way to
stimulate real GDP and employment but spending increases are not
effective. And notice that the tax cuts is part of a fiscal stimulus
that refers to increasing government consumption or transfers or
lowering taxes, increasing the rate of growth of public debt. Supporters
of Keynesian economics assume the stimulus will cause sufficient
economic growth to fill that gap partially or completely via the
multiplier effect.

More of my philosophy about to subsidize or not to subsidize companies..

I invite you to read the following interesting new article
about what Europe's $48 billion chips plan could do for quantum computing:

https://interestingengineering.com/europe-silicon-chips-funding-quantum-computing

I think i am smart, and i say that notice how the European Chips Act,
which still has to be approved by EU member states and lawmakers, would temporarily re-write strict rules that regulate when and how individual countries are allowed to subsidize industries within their borders, but
i say that notice carefully that this wanting of European Union to
subsidize Chips companies is due to chip shortage and supply chain
crisis that has injected instability into the global economy , so this
European Chips act is like the exception to the rule of subsidizing
companies, since European union is not going to sacrifice the advantages
of competition to do the same thing that others like China do, namely to subsidize companies. No, because European Union would sacrifice the idea
that the market is there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices.

And i invite you to read my thoughts about the other economic problems
of China:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

And here is my thoughts about capitalism:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc


More of my philosophy about democracy and corruption and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and i think that corruption is not good
since by logical analogy it looks like favoritism or ideological
favoritism of communism of China of today, since i think that this kind
of favoritism or ideological favoritism of the communist party of China
hurt meritocracy, and it is like corruption too, also corruption hurts
quality and hurts Democracy, you can easily notice it in Italy where
they are really conscious about this big problem of corruption, i mean
that in italy they are and they have been a lot hurt by the mafia and by corruption and they know how it is so problematic. So i invite you to
look at the following video so that to understand how corruption is so problematic:

The World's Most Dangerous Drug Wars | News on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2YfG7NKvoU

More of my philosophy about corruption and Haiti and more..

I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
video about Haiti:

Did Drug Cartels Murder Haiti's President? | The War on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3BqXpcHok4&t=11s


I think that Haiti looks like Trinidad and such countries,
since i think that it's a too much "corrupt" system that is not
working properly, so as you are noticing that corruption is
an important subject that i am talking about, and notice
how i am talking about it by talking about the Chinese communist system
that is too much corrupt and that can much more easily be corrupted than Democracy.

More of my philosophy about corruption and the separation of power in
USA and more..


I think i am smart, and i invite you to look at the following
video so that you notice how corruption can hurt a lot the system:

Corruption, Cocaine and Murder in Trinidad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnpaaVB4XyA


So i say that we have to be smart, so how can we efficiently fight this corruption ? so i think that the China communist party type of system
is not good at fighting corruption, and read my below thoughts about it,
so this is why i think that the Separation of powers under the United
States Constitution is really important and good tool to fight
corruption, and you can read about it here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution


And i think that the kind of "decentralization" of governance in USA is
a really important and good tool to fight corruption, so USA is not only Separation of powers under the United States Constitution and is not
only this kind of decentralization of governance, but it is also
Democracy , so by using the mechanisms of Democracy are really important
and good tools to fight corruption, not only that but the much more
successful economic dynamism of USA is also an important and good tool
to fight corruption,. and so that to understand my thoughts about
Democracy and more, i invite you to read all my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the inferior and archaic model of China and
more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the
following interesting french video about China, so i invite
you to look at it:

VERS LA FIN DU MIRACLE ÉCONOMIQUE CHINOIS ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoeHklrwq3U


So i think from my looking at the above video that China is
really an inferior and archaic model and inferior and archaic economic
model, for example China is controlling the money of the Chinese people,
so the Chinese communist system wants people to invest there money in
China and they are like forcing there people to do it this way by using tactics, and i think it is an extremist and really archaic way of doing,
so this has also caused a debt problem and it is also causing an
economic bubble in the real estate sector of China that is too big and
it is causing a big economic problem and it is hurting a lot the
economic growth of China, other than that China is a lot deficient at encouraging innovation in the private sector and it is also an inferior
and archaic way of doing, and read my following writing about what China
is doing outside its territory in Africa and the like so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about China and Africa and more..

I think i am smart, and i think that China is creating a problem
in Africa, and it is that China is creating a problem of too much debt
in Africa, but its investments on projects in Africa have poor economic returns, so they are not so efficient, so i think it is not good,
so i invite you to look at the following video to understand it:

Is CHINA using DEBT to CONTROL Africa? - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDInEHUwn5k

Also we have to fear the too much corruption of the Chinese communist
system , so i invite you to read my following thoughts about it:

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

More of my philosophy about communism and communism of China and more..

I think i am really smart, and i think that the main problem with
communism and marxism, it is that in its first form, that was
a radical form of doing, it has wanted to equalize much more and too
much humans and it has used a form of Class Struggle
that was an extremist and violent form, but i think i have just talked
about it by saying that it is not the right thing to do, read my below
thoughts about Class Struggle so that to understand my views on this
subject, but communism of China in the its modern form is not using the extremist form of Class Struggle and is not wanting to equalize much
more and too much like in the first radical form of communism, but the
today modern form of communism of China is still a one party form of
governing that is using a democratic "centralism" form of governing, but
this democratic centralism is much more centralized form that can be
much more easily corrupted than democracy, also the one party type of
governing of communism of China can much more easily be corrupted than democracy, this is why you can notice that the communist party of china
is too much corrupted, other than that there is lack of mechanisms of
democracy like having a kind of free press, so it is not good at all, so
i don't think that we can speak about the kind of meritocratic type of governing of China, since the basis of the type of governing of
communist China is too much lacking on the mechanisms of democracy that efficiently fight corruption, this is why I think that USA and Canada
have to show and talk about the big weakness of the today communist
system of China, and it is that it is too much corrupt and it can much
more easily be corrupted than democracy, and it is the big weakness
of China, since you can not be this too much corruption of China
and be a China that want at the same time to construct big economic
projects in Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia, since China can
too much corrupt Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia too. So i
don't think China is on the right path, this is why i think that China
has to become Democracy.

And here is my views on what is Class Struggle and what it has to be:

Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

More of my philosophy about USA and China and more..

And i invite you to look at the following video:

The New World of Xi Jinping I ARTE.tv Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeGZz6NGJXg


More of my philosophy of how to efficiently fight corruption and more..

We can fight corruption using the mechanisms of democracy and using
democracy, and we can fight corruption by being a rich country,
since western countries are rich countries that have very low
corruption, also we suggest, among other things, that officials in
vulnerable and important posts receive higher instead of lower salaries
than comparable workers get in the private sector.

Read more here so that to understand:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-causes-and-cures-of-corruption?utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=1220154768&hsa_cam=12374283753&hsa_grp=117511853986&hsa_ad=499567080219&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=aud-1249316000837:
dsa-19959388920&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=Cj0KCQiAi9mPBhCJARIsAHchl1xO6oTAZCJmdoiYHEjz18J30qdAxxTrEV5sKPh22EMpDMxjVXo4Y80aAt79EALw_wcB

Also i have invented my new monotheistic religion so that to also
fight more efficiently corruption, also here is another mechanism that
fights corruption and it is the following:

I think i am smart, so my new architectural idea of my philosophy is the following:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
, so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree

More of my philosophy of my two modes of speaking and more..

You have to notice that i am speaking in two modes, and it is
that i am speaking as a wise type of man and as a philosopher,
and i am also speaking as a prophet from God, and i have just posted
about my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts as a wise type of person and as a philosopher:

More of my philosophy of how to unite people of the world or of a
country and more..

I think i am really smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

How can we unite the people of a country or people of the world ?

So i think i am really smart, and i will say that the being the
correctly united in a country, can be a kind of being united , but it is
not the fully being united in a country, and it can also come from
powerful intellectual mechanisms that plays the role of engines, i mean
take for example "self-confidence", so it also permits you to have like
the what we call the "will to live" like was talking about it the
philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, so i think that even self-confidence is
a powerful mechanism and an engine that permits to unite people, since
it is a powerful engine that must be "guided" by the "goal" of
philosophy, and the goal of philosophy is happiness , but happiness is
not just the today happiness , but it is also the tomorrow and the
future happiness, so if you want to be happiness tomorrow or in the
future, you have to be responsability, so the goal of philosophy that is
to become happiness becomes the goal that has to be responsability that
comes from the wanting to be happiness, so then the knowing about this
fact is also a mechanism that unite people in a kind of way, but not
fully, also the other mechanism that is so important, is the fact that
you have to be "hope" about the tomorrow or the future, since it is like
a positive energy that pushes you forward, since a negative energy is
not so efficient, so here again you notice that i am a philosopher that
is not in accordance with the following saying of the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche:

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the
torments of man"

So i am not in accordance with the above saying about Hope of the
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since as i have just said that Hope ,
like hope about our exponential progress that is so fast, can be a
positive energy that pushes you forward. And so that to understand more
my thoughts, i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
of how you become self-confidence and how you become this positive
energy and positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

And read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about unity and about democracy and more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the following
video of the Arab Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZA3gMBsrQ


And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
being this kind of unity in a country is a defect, and it is the basis
of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing,
since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united
or being united, it is about plurality or diversity of thoughts or
political views and about a kind of diversity that bring efficiency,
and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where
comes the defect of the arab countries or such countries that are
lacking Democracy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s

So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:

"A house divided can not stand"

But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or perfection. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about
Democracy so that you understand my thoughts:

More of my philosophy about IQ and about the laws and about humanity and
more..

I will answer the following problem from a white supremacist website and
it is like a problem in a form of a smart IQ test that i have to answer,
so here is how i am answering it smartly:

I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:


Why Capitalism Fails


https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:


"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private
property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner.
And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner,
yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with
how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or
how well or how significantly they have worked."


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I
think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by
taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become
rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become
"rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command
transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of
the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of
the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to
become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice
that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:

"Western Values" Explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA


I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:

I think that Western values are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change,
since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid
the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by
the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of
expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive
rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational
reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments,
so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they
can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


I will ask a philosophical question of:

Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom
of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be
accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist
is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult
since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where
there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of
speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for
example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of
Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so
this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it
and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i
think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not
Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that
the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of
speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a
realistic and objective way of doing.

Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello...



Read again my final corrected post about more of my philosophy about the
free market and the invisible hand and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

The economists say the following:

"Free markets are theoretically optimal, with supply and demand guided
by an invisible hand to allocate goods efficiently."

And about the invisible hand we have the following:

"Invisible hand, metaphor, introduced by the 18th-century Scottish
philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that characterizes the mechanisms
through which beneficial social and economic outcomes may arise from the accumulated self-interested actions of individuals, none of whom intends
to bring about such outcomes."

I think i am really a smart guy, and i am noticing that the free market
economy has some deficiencies, since i say that the self-interested
actions of individuals in the invisible hand are not guarantied to be "competitive" or efficiently "competitive", so then i say that
competitiveness is a problem in the free market, since i say that
eventhough the Market equilibrium that is to attain a well balance
between the supply and demand is realized, i think that the
transitioning or time to a transitioning to a competitive economy
remains the main problem, so it is why we are noticing that countries
are still using some kind of economic protectionism. And you can easily
notice it by looking at the following video of south Africa that also
shows that south Africa is still using some kind of economic
protectionism since it has not yet transitioned to a competitive
economy, so here is the video:

It’s time to move the needle on economic reform! - Dean Macpherson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9clKJ5is

Also here is my new architectural idea of my philosophy:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
, so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree


More precision of my new proverb..

Read again my new proverb , i have just added more precision to it so
that to make it clear:

I am like a wise man that is optimistic since read my following new
proverb so that to understand:

Here is my new proverb:

"When a wise man looks at a chaotic or disorganized society,
he is not pessimistic, but he is optimistic, since he knows how to make
from this chaotic or disorganized society the well organized society,
since the wise man is by logical analogy like the person that knows how
to prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one
that knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized
global world from the people and he is energetic and proactive since it
is the his job to well organize a society !"

More of my philosophy about adaptation and about economy..

I think i am a really smart guy, and i think that the model of supply
and demand is too much abstraction, since i think that we can buy
a product or service because it costs less or/and because it interests
you, but we have to be much more wise and notice that this "interests
you" is too much abstraction, since the "interests you" can become that
you have also to know how to "encourage" the "supply" by being a kind of responsability so that to be a the good business and the good economy,
and i have also abstracted this behavior in a form of a proverb that i
have invented quickly so that you understand it more clearly, and here
it is:

"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of
responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."

More of my philosophy about the dynamism of economy and about the right flexibility and more..

I think i am a really smart guy, and i think that so that
the business or economy be successful, it has to have some kind of "flexibility", since i think when you show too much hate and
agressivity, it is counter-productive for business and economy, this is
why i think there is the model of demand and the supply, but both the
supply and demand have to have some kind of flexibility, since when you
are too much demanding, it is not good for business , like in France
they are too much intellectually demanding and it is like an agressive behavior, so it is not good for business and economy, so hope you are
seeing the pattern and then that you follow this advice of mine.

More of my philosophy about the big business and more..

I think i am a really smart guy, and i think that the big business is
something so interesting, so what can i do so that to construct many big businesses that are successful, so i think i have just showed you how i
am doing it with my scalable algorithms and algorithms that i have
invented and with my powerful software tools that i have invented, but
i think i can construct another big business with my poems of Love and
my my poems and with my proverbs and with my political commitment etc.
so i think that it has to be like a "mixture" of "many" things, i mean
that i have to write a digital book or books about my philosophy and
political commitment and about my poems of Love and poems and about my
proverbs and about my personality etc. so of course i have to show that
i am a really capable guy.

More of my philosophy about the USA music industry and show business
industry and more..

I think i am a really smart guy, and i am discovering patterns with my
fluid intelligence, and the new pattern that i have just discovered is
that a poem or music or song or an artist can have a story , and i think
it is a big "business" too, since i think that an artist has to write a
small book or the like or to talk in a video about the story of his
musics or his poems or his songs or his life, but not only that but
people needs a kind of sincerity and positive spirit or positive energy
or a good political commitment that make people have hope in the artist
and in human life, so i think that the poems or songs or musics have to
have a positive energy like my poems of Love or a good political
commitment , so i think i will write a small book about my poems of Love
and poems and about the story of them and about my personality that is
writing the poems of Love and poems and i will do it with sincerity and
with a positive spirit and with a positive energy or with a good
political commitment.

So i invite you to read my following new poems of Love and poems that i
have just invented quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tXC8BVc0W7A

More of my philosophy about Barack Obama and about the Democrats and more..

I think i am smart and i have quickly noticed what has Barack Obama
wanted to do, and it is the following:

"Barack Obama has declared his position on many political issues through
his public comments and legislative records. The Obama Administration
stated that its general agenda was to "revive the economy, provide
affordable and accessible health care to all, strengthen our public
education and social security systems, define a clear path to energy independence and tackle climate change, end the War in Iraq responsibly
and finish our mission in Afghanistan, and work with our allies to
prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon."

But my political agenda is different than Barack Obama, since i am also
like a philosopher and like a wise type of person, so what i am doing
is proving and explaining in my philosophy that morality is "universal",
and i will talk about it more in my next posts, and i am showing my
political views on Western values, read them below, also i have given my architectural ideas, that are related to the philosopher and economist
Adam Smith, that also show that we have to know how to well balance
between competition and cooperation or collaboration so that to be
optimal, read my thoughts below about it, also i am showing my other
ideas of my philosophy so that you understand my political agenda,
also read below since i have just put the link to my new proverbs that i
have just invented quickly.

More of my philosophy about my thoughts of my philosophy and more..

I think i am smart, and you have to understand me more, i am "quickly"
thinking and writing and posting my thoughts of my philosophy and i will
extend them and make them much more efficient and i will organize them
in a digital book, so here are the most important parts of my thoughts
of my philosophy:

I invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy of how you
become self-confidence and how you become this positive energy and
positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

You can read more of my thoughts about my new philosophy in the
following so that to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

And here are my new proverbs that i have just invented quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LjeVQZFhK3E


More of my philosophy about the model of supply and demand and about
free market and more..


Why do economists place such great confidence in competitive
free markets? Because the interaction of supply and demand
leads to an outcome in which every unit of output that’s
produced satisfies two excellent conditions:

1- It’s produced at the minimum cost possible, meaning
that there’s no waste or inefficiency.

2- Its benefits are always at least as big as its costs.
That is, competitive free markets produce only output
that makes the world better off or at least no worse off.

And of course you have to manage free market with Antitrust laws,
and here is my thoughts about it:

And here is my other important proverb:

"R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring
or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you
have to know how to manage it and how to manage the
risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage
efficiently by not hurting good competition"

Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means:

"A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably"

Read more here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility

This above new proverb of mine also says that since the R&D (Research
and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so we have also to know how to manage it carefully and
efficiently with Antitrust laws, and here is the why of Antitrust laws:

"Antitrust laws are statutes developed by governments to protect
consumers from predatory business practices and ensure fair competition. Antitrust laws are applied to a wide range of questionable business
activities, including market allocation, bid rigging, price fixing, and monopolies."

This new proverb of mine is also related to the below problem that
brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good
competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts:

More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of
China?..

Here is the big economic problems of China:

First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the
following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw

Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the
FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8

Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of
nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition
that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully:


Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China...

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today
i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN?
and more..

We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the
mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has
compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and
Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it.

Look in this video carefully to notice it:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw


I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think
China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition"
that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it:

Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies

Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive
grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G
operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of
Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75
billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company.
State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity
of world competition ...

The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not
this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by
favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position
in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this
point: “What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of
equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of
competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize
companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is
there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. "

More of my philosophy about economy and the tax cuts and tax multiplier
and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


The tax multiplier is the magnification effect of a change in taxes on aggregate demand. The decrease in taxes has a similar effect on income
and consumption as an increase in government spending. However, the tax multiplier is smaller than the spending multiplier.

And there is greater agreement about tax multipliers. Because tax cuts strengthen the incentive to work and to invest, they increase aggregate
supply as well as aggregate demand. These multipliers get bigger as more
time elapses. Harald Uhlig says that after one year, the tax multiplier
is 0.5 so that the $300 billion tax cut would increase real GDP by about
$150 billion by early 2010. But with two years of time to respond, real
GDP would be $600 billion higher — a multiplier of 2. And after three
years, the tax multiplier builds up to more than 6. The implications of
the work of Barro and Uhlig are that tax cuts are a powerful way to
stimulate real GDP and employment but spending increases are not
effective. And notice that the tax cuts is part of a fiscal stimulus
that refers to increasing government consumption or transfers or
lowering taxes, increasing the rate of growth of public debt. Supporters
of Keynesian economics assume the stimulus will cause sufficient
economic growth to fill that gap partially or completely via the
multiplier effect.

More of my philosophy about to subsidize or not to subsidize companies..

I invite you to read the following interesting new article
about what Europe's $48 billion chips plan could do for quantum computing:

https://interestingengineering.com/europe-silicon-chips-funding-quantum-computing

I think i am smart, and i say that notice how the European Chips Act,
which still has to be approved by EU member states and lawmakers, would temporarily re-write strict rules that regulate when and how individual countries are allowed to subsidize industries within their borders, but
i say that notice carefully that this wanting of European Union to
subsidize Chips companies is due to chip shortage and supply chain
crisis that has injected instability into the global economy , so this
European Chips act is like the exception to the rule of subsidizing
companies, since European union is not going to sacrifice the advantages
of competition to do the same thing that others like China do, namely to subsidize companies. No, because European Union would sacrifice the idea
that the market is there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices.

And i invite you to read my thoughts about the other economic problems
of China:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

And here is my thoughts about capitalism:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc


More of my philosophy about democracy and corruption and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and i think that corruption is not good
since by logical analogy it looks like favoritism or ideological
favoritism of communism of China of today, since i think that this kind
of favoritism or ideological favoritism of the communist party of China
hurt meritocracy, and it is like corruption too, also corruption hurts
quality and hurts Democracy, you can easily notice it in Italy where
they are really conscious about this big problem of corruption, i mean
that in italy they are and they have been a lot hurt by the mafia and by corruption and they know how it is so problematic. So i invite you to
look at the following video so that to understand how corruption is so problematic:

The World's Most Dangerous Drug Wars | News on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2YfG7NKvoU

More of my philosophy about corruption and Haiti and more..

I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
video about Haiti:

Did Drug Cartels Murder Haiti's President? | The War on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3BqXpcHok4&t=11s


I think that Haiti looks like Trinidad and such countries,
since i think that it's a too much "corrupt" system that is not
working properly, so as you are noticing that corruption is
an important subject that i am talking about, and notice
how i am talking about it by talking about the Chinese communist system
that is too much corrupt and that can much more easily be corrupted than Democracy.

More of my philosophy about corruption and the separation of power in
USA and more..


I think i am smart, and i invite you to look at the following
video so that you notice how corruption can hurt a lot the system:

Corruption, Cocaine and Murder in Trinidad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnpaaVB4XyA


So i say that we have to be smart, so how can we efficiently fight this corruption ? so i think that the China communist party type of system
is not good at fighting corruption, and read my below thoughts about it,
so this is why i think that the Separation of powers under the United
States Constitution is really important and good tool to fight
corruption, and you can read about it here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution


And i think that the kind of "decentralization" of governance in USA is
a really important and good tool to fight corruption, so USA is not only Separation of powers under the United States Constitution and is not
only this kind of decentralization of governance, but it is also
Democracy , so by using the mechanisms of Democracy are really important
and good tools to fight corruption, not only that but the much more
successful economic dynamism of USA is also an important and good tool
to fight corruption,. and so that to understand my thoughts about
Democracy and more, i invite you to read all my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the inferior and archaic model of China and
more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the
following interesting french video about China, so i invite
you to look at it:

VERS LA FIN DU MIRACLE ÉCONOMIQUE CHINOIS ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoeHklrwq3U


So i think from my looking at the above video that China is
really an inferior and archaic model and inferior and archaic economic
model, for example China is controlling the money of the Chinese people,
so the Chinese communist system wants people to invest there money in
China and they are like forcing there people to do it this way by using tactics, and i think it is an extremist and really archaic way of doing,
so this has also caused a debt problem and it is also causing an
economic bubble in the real estate sector of China that is too big and
it is causing a big economic problem and it is hurting a lot the
economic growth of China, other than that China is a lot deficient at encouraging innovation in the private sector and it is also an inferior
and archaic way of doing, and read my following writing about what China
is doing outside its territory in Africa and the like so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about China and Africa and more..

I think i am smart, and i think that China is creating a problem
in Africa, and it is that China is creating a problem of too much debt
in Africa, but its investments on projects in Africa have poor economic returns, so they are not so efficient, so i think it is not good,
so i invite you to look at the following video to understand it:

Is CHINA using DEBT to CONTROL Africa? - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDInEHUwn5k

Also we have to fear the too much corruption of the Chinese communist
system , so i invite you to read my following thoughts about it:

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

More of my philosophy about communism and communism of China and more..

I think i am really smart, and i think that the main problem with
communism and marxism, it is that in its first form, that was
a radical form of doing, it has wanted to equalize much more and too
much humans and it has used a form of Class Struggle
that was an extremist and violent form, but i think i have just talked
about it by saying that it is not the right thing to do, read my below
thoughts about Class Struggle so that to understand my views on this
subject, but communism of China in the its modern form is not using the extremist form of Class Struggle and is not wanting to equalize much
more and too much like in the first radical form of communism, but the
today modern form of communism of China is still a one party form of
governing that is using a democratic "centralism" form of governing, but
this democratic centralism is much more centralized form that can be
much more easily corrupted than democracy, also the one party type of
governing of communism of China can much more easily be corrupted than democracy, this is why you can notice that the communist party of china
is too much corrupted, other than that there is lack of mechanisms of
democracy like having a kind of free press, so it is not good at all, so
i don't think that we can speak about the kind of meritocratic type of governing of China, since the basis of the type of governing of
communist China is too much lacking on the mechanisms of democracy that efficiently fight corruption, this is why I think that USA and Canada
have to show and talk about the big weakness of the today communist
system of China, and it is that it is too much corrupt and it can much
more easily be corrupted than democracy, and it is the big weakness
of China, since you can not be this too much corruption of China
and be a China that want at the same time to construct big economic
projects in Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia, since China can
too much corrupt Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia too. So i
don't think China is on the right path, this is why i think that China
has to become Democracy.

And here is my views on what is Class Struggle and what it has to be:

Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

More of my philosophy about USA and China and more..

And i invite you to look at the following video:

The New World of Xi Jinping I ARTE.tv Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeGZz6NGJXg


More of my philosophy of how to efficiently fight corruption and more..

We can fight corruption using the mechanisms of democracy and using
democracy, and we can fight corruption by being a rich country,
since western countries are rich countries that have very low
corruption, also we suggest, among other things, that officials in
vulnerable and important posts receive higher instead of lower salaries
than comparable workers get in the private sector.

Read more here so that to understand:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-causes-and-cures-of-corruption?utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=1220154768&hsa_cam=12374283753&hsa_grp=117511853986&hsa_ad=499567080219&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=aud-1249316000837:
dsa-19959388920&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=Cj0KCQiAi9mPBhCJARIsAHchl1xO6oTAZCJmdoiYHEjz18J30qdAxxTrEV5sKPh22EMpDMxjVXo4Y80aAt79EALw_wcB

Also i have invented my new monotheistic religion so that to also
fight more efficiently corruption, also here is another mechanism that
fights corruption and it is the following:

I think i am smart, so my new architectural idea of my philosophy is the following:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello...


Read again my final corrected post about more of my philosophy about the deficit and about debt-to-GDP ratio and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and i say that looking only at the debt-to-GDP ratio
is not sufficient so that to say that there is problem, since if you
look at Quebec and Canada , even with the Covis-19 crisis , Canada and
Quebec are keeping there deficits under control with smaller deficits,
so we can then say that as soon as this crisis of Covid-19 will end , so
Canada and Quebec will keep the deficits under control, so i think that
the future of Canada and Quebec will be good if there deficit will be successfully kept under control, and i think that they are smart and
they will keep the deficit successfully under control , so we have to be optimistic about Canada and Quebec.

You can read the following about Quebec so that to notice it:

https://thoughtleadership.rbc.com/quebec-to-spend-more-cuts-its-deficit-as-economy-rebounds/

And you can read this about Canada so that to notice it:

Canada sees smaller budget deficit, pushes promised spending to budget

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/canada-outline-new-forecasts-fiscal-situation-inflation-surges-2021-12-14/


So in my following previous thoughts, USA is not keeping the deficit
under control and will not keep the deficit under control as Canada is
doing, so then USA has a problem, read my following previous thoughts so
that to notice:

And read my previous thoughts:

Canada’s debt-to-GDP ratio is alarming

Read more here:

Canada’s debt-to-GDP ratio is alarming. What happened the last time we
were in this situation?

https://www.thestar.com/business/opinion/2021/02/01/canadas-debt-to-gdp-ratio-is-alarming-what-happened-the-last-time-we-were-in-this-situation.html


More of my philosophy about the debt-to-GDP ratio of USA and more..

In USA, with a current debt-to-GDP ratio of 127%, which is expected to
rise to 277% by 2029, future economic growth of USA will not be as
robust as it has been in the past.

Read more here so that to notice it:

U.S. National Debt Expected To Approach $89 Trillion By 2029

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2021/05/03/us-national-debt-expected-to-approach-89-trillion-by-2029/?sh=1ca3b0555f13


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello...


Read again my final corrected post about more of my philosophy about the
rise of super-rich and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



Please read again my post since i have just put my "new" thoughts about
Garry Tan's ideas:

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i have just posted in
my previous post about the video of Chrystia Freeland about the rise of
the super-rich, but it was a point of view of her, and
so that to know my point of view on capitalism and more, so read all my following thoughts about my philosophy so that to understand:


More of my philosophy about mathematics and the Minimizers that fit
models and more of my philosophy..

I have just read the following web pages about comparing Minimizers that
fit models, and i invite you to read them here:

https://docs.mantidproject.org/v3.7.1/concepts/FittingMinimizers.html


And i am working with some software projects now that need good
Minimizers that fit models, and i have implemented two of them with the
simplex method and with Levenberg-Marquardt, but i am not satisfied
since i think that the Simplex method is better in convergence than Levenberg-Marquardt since it rarely converges to a local minimum, but i
will implement or build a minimizer from the ground up with artificial intelligence that fits Models and that is much more sophisticated than
the Simplex or Levenberg-Marquardt, so stay tuned since i am actually implementing it !

More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..

I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:

So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that
is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he
attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a
bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:

So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be
the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly
discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is
trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:

"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can,
you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the
things in your career and in life."

But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence
is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the
way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply
but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you
enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about
usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of
the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the
factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above
video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be
useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the
reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a
thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich
depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can
be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.


I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

So you can read all my other proverbs that i have just invented quickly
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


More of my philosophy about correlation and about diversity and more..

I think i am smart, and i will say to look again at what is saying
the Ph.D Katherine W. Phillips that is the Paul Calello Professor of
Leadership and Ethics Management at Columbia Business School(Read about
her here: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/profile/katherine_phillips):

"Large data-set studies have an obvious limitation: They only show that diversity is correlated with better performance, not that it causes
better performance."

So i will say that this Ph.D and other researchers are not so smart,
since notice how is speaking the Ph.D Katherine W. Phillips in the
following article:

How Diversity Makes Us Smarter

Read more here:

https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_diversity_makes_us_smarter

So notice that she is not saying that human diversity is a "mechanism"
that can cause "competition" or more competition between people, and
then competition can be the cause of better performance, so you are
noticing that the above Ph.D and researchers are trying to measure it empirically, but i think that this kind of measuring is not a correct measuring, since what i am showing you by my way of thinking is the fact
that there is a "tendency" in human diversity that it causes competition
or more competition, so it causes better performance, so then we can
notice that by not following there way of empirical measuring we can still
know about the process. So as i said, i think this Ph.D and other
researchers are not thinking and abstracting correctly since from my
saying below we can notice that human Diversity in a global world or in
a society or in a group brings more "competition" between people, so it
makes us work harder and better cognitively and socially, but if we are
not being the right human diversity and we are working harder and better cognitively and socially, then i think being human diversity can still
"keep" or "maintain" the working harder and better cognitively and
socially, also human diversity brings different human perspectives or
views and it brings different human experiences and different human
knowledges and it is good for creativity and innovation since it is also
good for divergent thinking that enhance creativity and innovation.

More of my philosophy about USA and human diversity and more..

I just said the following:

"I think i am understanding rapidly, since i think that human Diversity
in a global world or in a society or in a group brings more
"competition" between people, so it makes us work harder and
better cognitively and socially, also human diversity brings different
human perspectives or views and it brings different human experiences
and different human knowledges and it is good for creativity and
innovation since it is also good for divergent thinking that enhance
creativity and innovation."

So i will invite you to look at my following writing about USA that will
make you notice how USA is making itself innovative and creative by
bringing the "best" big brains immigrants, and notice, like in my above
saying, that it is also saying the following:

"But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well
in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to
new ideas."

And here is more of my new thoughts about USA, read them again carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kIbGEdTXezQ

Yet more precision of my philosophy about diversity and adaptability and resilience..

I think i am understanding rapidly, since i think that human Diversity
in a global world or in a society or in a group brings more
"competition" between people, so it makes us work harder and
better cognitively and socially, also human diversity brings different
human perspectives or views and it brings different human experiences
and different human knowledges and it is good for creativity and
innovation since it is also good for divergent thinking that enhance
creativity and innovation:

And here is my new proverb that talks more about it:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency, and it is related to my following thoughts about
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i invite you to read them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo


More of my philosophy about life and about evolutionary algorithms..

I invite you to listen to the following beautiful song of Simon &
Garfunkel called called April Come She Will:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J1tCJEYETk

I think that the above video of the song is showing how our world
is "diversified" and it is good for adaptation and resilience, and it is
the most important thing, and this diversification is also very
important even in economy, since i think it is like evolutionary
algorithms in artificial intelligence, since they are based on the same
very important idea of diversifying by also decentralizing by
efficiently specializing the members of the population so that to make
it efficiently "adaptable" and much more "resilient", and the
efficiently specializing can be efficiently specializing in a much
higher level layer, like being a "generalist" medical doctor, and from
the this decentralizing and efficiently specializing emerges a higher
level intelligence such as a civilization, so then even evolutionary
design methodology that i am talking about in my thoughts below does decentralize from the agile architect to the other members of the team,
and here is step 3 of the important steps of evolutionary design
methodology of agile that i am talking about below:

3- Instead of creating one big design at the beginning of the project
that covers all of the requirements, agile architects use incremental
design, which involves techniques that allow them to design a system
that is not just complete, but also easy for the team to modify as
the project changes.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

More of my philosophy about economic diversification in Africa and Arab countries..

As you will read in the following paper that economic diversification is
good for growth and economic diversification is also tremendously
important for "resilience", so i think that the country that we call
Algeria has a big problem since it lacks too and too much on
diversification of its economy, so i think that Algeria will get easily
into big problems of violence and disorder, but Morocco and Dubai are
much more diversified economies and i think that Morocco is on the right
path, so i think that the problem of many African countries is that they
have to become diversified economies.

Read the following paper so that to notice how important is
diversification of economy:

Economic Diversification in Africa: How and Why It Matters

https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/04/30/economic-diversification-in-africa-how-and-why-it-matters-pub-84429

More of my philosophy about economy and about Morocco and Algeria and more..

So as you are noticing i was speaking, read below, about Algeria,
and you have quickly noticed that the Algerian economic problem comes
from the fact that Algeria is a much less diversified economy than Dubai
or than my country Morocco, so i think that Morocco is a much more
diversified economy and i think that Morocco is really on the
right path and Morocco is also a beautiful country, since read in the
following article of year 2019, it says that the 2019 International
Franchise Attractiveness Index ranked Morocco 39 out of 131 states. This
made it the number 1 attractive business hub for US-based franchises in
Africa and the second in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) after
the United Arab Emirates. This ranking shows it competing with some
leading international powers, including France, Spain, Germany and
Australia, according to a report by Morocco World News. The index
combines peer-reviewed research and a survey of franchise executives to
produce two rankings, balanced growth and aggressive growth.

Read more here so that to notice it:

https://www.fairobserver.com/region/middle_east_north_africa/morocco-maghreb-maroc-moroccan-economy-latest-world-news-796983/

More of my philosophy about economy and inflation and more..

I invite you to read the following about how do Governments Reduce
Inflation:

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/111314/what-methods-can-government-use-control-inflation.asp

I think that one of the best way to reduce inflation is by reducing the
money supply within an economy via decreased bond prices and increased
interest rates, and the above web page is speaking about it, but i think
that there is still a problem, since inflation can become problematic if
the product or service become a monopoly, so if the prices of the
product or service can not be reduced by for example economies of scale
or/and by "competition", so the price of the product or service can be
set high and it is inflation on this product or service, so this kind of situation can also lead to an economic war, also inflation still can
become a problem like with the drastic fall of the algerian Dinar in
Algeria, since Algeria is lacking on diversification of its economy and
also was unable to reduce its reliance on food imports, since 70% of the Algeria food requirements are met by imports, so with the drastic fall
of the algerian Dinar, the price of Food in Algeria was getting high,
and the people of Algeria were suffering because of that, and this
situation can still repeat itself again and again in Algeria.

Read about it here:

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/algeria-dinar-record-low-economic-collapse

More of my philosophy about the kind of president Biden's tax increase
on the rich and more..

And of course the kind of president Biden's tax increase on the rich
will be used so that narrow America's vast income inequality,
read carefully here so that to understand:

Biden's corporate tax plan takes aim at income inequality

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/bidens-corporate-tax-plan-takes-aim-income-inequality-77420625

So there is still a problem and it is that we have to solve the problem
of the financial sector by giving voting rights and tax advantages to
long-term shareholders etc., read my below thoughts so that to understand:

I have posted the following video:

Why raising taxes destroys the economy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns

But i think that the kind of Biden's tax increase on the rich is not a
problem, read the following so that to notice:

"In an interview, Mr. Pomerleau said the drag was small from the
proposals because Mr. Biden was largely taxing savings of high earners,
which are not major drivers of economic growth given those Americans
have a lot of their wealth saved.

“Some tax increases have larger effects on growth than others,” he said. “Biden has chosen taxes that don’t have a massive effect.”"

Read more carefully here so that to understand:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/business/biden-tax-plan-economy.html

The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to
know what is the problem with finance, and here it is, read the
following so that to understand:

One last chance to fix capitalism

Read more here:

https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism

So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:

How to Improve Capitalism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU

So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by
giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and
not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and
national pension funds representative of the long term collective
interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to
improve capitalism" so that to understand more.

And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
read them here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc

And more of my philosophy about the financial market and about
capitalism and about the markets and more, read more here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LJeOIJK-wnY

More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more..

I invite you to look at the following new video about how the
governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy
and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic
Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if not
followed all the time , has still its "advantage" in this kind of
economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy) strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to
look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it:

The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU


And i invite you to read all my following thoughts:


More of my philosophy about society and the world..

There is a saying in french that says:

"Il faut de tout pour faire un monde"

And its translation in english is:

"It takes everything to make a world"

And i think there is two ways to look at this saying,
you can look at it from the societal point view and it can mean that we
have to be diversification in a society by being specialized in this or
that job, and the second point of view of it, is that we have also to be
a kind of diversification in each one of us so that to be efficient, i
mean not being just specialized in one thing or in one job and knowing
more about philosophy and about politics and such makes us more
efficient in a society.. this is why you are noticing that i am also a
kind of diversification, since i have invented my thoughts of my
philosophy and i am sharing it with you, and i have invented many poems
of Love and i am sharing them with you, and i have invented many
proverbs and i am sharing them with you, and i have invented many
scalable algorithms and algorithms and i am a software developer and i
know about operational research etc., and of course i am talking about
politics too, so read carefully my below thoughts so that to understand
more my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about tribalism and closed systems and open systems..


I think i am smart, and i have just talked about some of the problems of
white supremacism, read it below, and i think that the most important
problem of white supremacism and the like and the strong loyality of
tribalism is the following:

More of my philosophy about closed systems and open systems and
interdependent systems..

I think i am smart, and i will say that we have to have the right spirit
so that to be efficient, and i think that the basis of the right spirit
is also to look at how we are interdependent systems of different
countries etc., so i think that the best way is to know how to be like
the right randomness of the evolutionary algorithms that permits to not
get stuck in a local optimum and be able to ensure the convergence to a
global optimum, i mean that the best way is also to know how to well
balance between cooperation and competition, since so that to not get
stuck in a local optimum of efficiency we have also to know how to buy
products and services from the other countries so that also to encourage creativity and innovation, since if you are too much competition you can "monopolize" too much and this can hurt creativity and innovation, so
then we have to become a much more efficient and civilized world. And I
think that Nazism or neo-nazism or white supremacism or communism are
also too rigid, so they don't work correctly, since they also have the
strong tendency to want to like too much homogenize and to too much
monopolize and too much centralize, so they are not efficient systems.

This is why i have also invented quickly a proverb about intellectual openness, and here it is:

And here is my other proverb:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency, and it is related to my following thoughts about
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i invite you to read them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo


And i invite you to read my following thoughts about evolutionary
algorithms and artificial intelligence so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

More of my philosophy about conformism and tribalism..

I think i am smart, and i really believe that this strong loyality in
tribalism is problematic, and i think that if we look at for example
the white supremacism tribalism, it lacks something important, and it is
that it doesn't believe that the smart ideas can change the
"behavior" in the positive way of the other ethnical groups that are not
of the ethnical groups of white supremacists, so they believe that
the other ethnical groups are genetically not apt and not civilized,
so they don't accept them and they view them as enemies, and i think
that this way of doing is an archaism in philosophy that can bring too
much violence globally, this is why we have to be the right
"flexibility" and not as rigid as white supremacists, also this too much negativity in white supremacism is not good for productivity and
quality, as i am explaining it in my thoughts below, and it can bring
too much violence inside the society, and i am of the ones that believe
that the smart ideas are powerful and they can change humans in the
positive way, this is why you are noticing that i am sharing with you my philosophy and my thoughts, and here what i have just said about the
smart ideas:

What is the true power of the idea ?

This is a so important philosophical subject, since
i think i am smart and i will make you feel more the true
power of the idea by first talking about the technic in psychology that
we call "Mood freezing", since i think that the most important aspect of
Mood freezing is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and you
can read about it here:

https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Mood+Freezing

So as you are noticing that it says that when the respondents were
convinced that expressing aggression would not make them feel better,
they actually accepted their current situation which eventually improved
their moods, so this proves that the power of the idea is great, this is
why i am of the ones that believes that we can enhance much better
humans and construct a new type of man by using some intellectual
mechanisms, and i am talking about some of them below and here is my
poem about the true power of the idea, read it again:

"Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how they have built south Korea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we unite the people such as of Crimea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not just a pizza from the pizzeria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the simple prayer of Ave Maria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the stupid war between the sunnite and shiah
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we make north Korea look like a beautiful Canada
So give me more of those beautiful and so smart ideas !"

More of my philosophy about the way of smart abstractions and more..

I think i am smart, as you have just noticed i have just talked about my pedagogy that learns by smart abstractions, read below about it, and as
you are noticing i am learning you by the way of smart abstractions, and
i am like talking the language of smart abstractions, and i am also
inventing quickly smart abstractions in form of my proverbs, but i have
just noticed that i have not posted two of my new important proverbs
that are in a form of smart abstractions, and here they are:

Here is the first one of my proverbs:

"Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
to easy the jobs for you."

And here is the second one of my proverbs:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."

And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)