Hello...
'
Read again my final corrected post about more of my philosophy about my
way of playing the game smartly and more..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am really smart, and as you have just noticed that i have
just said that i am having many "plans" so that to become rich and
successful, and read about them below, so by logical analogy it looks
like the being diversified economy so that to be resilience, i mean i am
like not putting all the eggs in the same basket, and it will also be
soon my way of investing in the financial economy, since you can for
example diversify your financial investments by investing in this and
that company in the stock market etc., but there is also another smart
way and it is to like invest in a company in the stock market... that
is much more diversified by for example having many products or services
so that to bring "resilience", but of course you have to be more
knowledgeable about the company products and services in
a smart way, so hope you are getting the idea, so it is my kind of way
of attacking the problem of how to become rich and successful.
More of my philosophy about my kind of personality and about my plans
and more..
I think i am really smart, and i invite you to look at the following
video from USA that talks about income and opportunity:
Milton Friedman - Equality and Freedom - Social Justice Debunked!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCnxOICRtLE
I have just quickly taken a look at the above video, and i am
understanding rapidly his talk, but i think i don't look like other
people, since i think i am like a super soldier and i will explain to
you my way of becoming successful and rich:
1- First important thing for me is to have many "plans" that make
me successful and rich, so if the first plan fails , i will use the
second plan and so forth.
2- So my first plan is that i have invented many software products,
so they were more sophisticated software products than average, but
those software products were written with software compilers coming
from the following known USA company:
https://www.embarcadero.com/
but since this software company was less organized successfully
in there way of doing, so this has made my first plan to become
successful and rich not succeed. So i have used my following second
plan that is much more sophisticated plan that shows that i am like
a super soldier.
3- My second plan to become successful and rich is that i have invented
many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, and many of them
are breakthroughs scalable algorithms, so they are really powerful,
and i have also invented some powerful software products.
4- My third plan will also go parallel with my second plan, since
i will write many sophisticated digital books about my software
inventions and about my philosophy that is making me successful and
and that is making me powerful like a super soldier.
5- My fourth plan is that i will also invest my money in "financial"
economy so that to become much more successful and rich.
And as you have just noticed that in my third plan i will write digital
books and here is how i am implementing it:
More of my philosophy about the scalability of my form of digital or
electronic book and more..
I think i am smart, and i think that my form of digital or electronic
book is scalable since you can go from the a main sophisticated "Tree
menu" to other childs of sophisticated "Tree menus" inside the left HTML
frame of the digital book, so i think it is also a powerful and
sophisticated kind of digital book, so i have thought fast this project
of mine and i have designed it fast, but also you have to know that the sophisticated "Tree menu" that shows in the left HTML frame of the
digital book has not to use the same CSS configuration as the right HTML
frame with: "font-size: 1.3vw", since i think that the fonts of the sophisticated "Tree menu" must be fixed fonts size so that to permit to
scroll the left HTML frame correctly etc., so i invite you to read my
previous thoughts so that to understand my way of doing:
More of my philosophy about digital or electronic books and more..
I think i am smart, and i have just finished my programming of a project
that easy for you to make electronic or digital books with HTML and
Javascript and CSS, now it consists of a sophisticated "Tree menu" that
will show the indexes of the digital or electronic book that will appear
on the left of the screen in a left HTML frame, also i have just thought
about my design and i think that here is how i will show the HTML with
CSS pages of the the digital or electronic book: First i have to include
in the HTML pages of the digital book the following in HTML:
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="mystyle.css">
</head>
And the mystyle.css "CSS" file will contain the following so that
the HTML pages of the digital book appears correctly in different screen resolutions:
mystyle.css file is:
body
{
font-size: 1.3vw;
}
So as you are noticing i am using "font-size: 1.3vw" , since the
right HTML frame that contains the HTML pages of the book is 3/4 the
size,and here is how i am constructing the HTML frames of the digital
book so that to notice it:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>A frameset document</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<FRAMESET>
<FRAMESET cols="25%,*" frameborder="yes" framespacing=1>
<FRAME name="frame1" src="example01.html" scrolling="auto">
<FRAME name="frame2" src="poems1.html" scrolling="auto">
<Frame scrolling="auto">
</FRAMESET>
</FRAMESET>
</HTML>
So notice that it is: "FRAMESET cols="25%,*", so it means that
the left HTML frame of the digital book is 1/4 of the size and
the right HTML frame is 3/4 of the size.
And i will show you more the sophisticated "Tree menu" that will show
the indexes of the digital book, so stay tuned since i will start to
organize my thoughts of my philosophy and my other thoughts
of software computing etc. into my above form of a digital book.
And here is my philosophy of why i am organizing my thoughts in
a digital book:
More of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about
deforestation and more..
I invite you to read the following article about the environmental
footprint of paper vs. electronic books:
https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/
And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about
how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs.
electronic books, but i think that deforestation does not only
cause green house emissions, but i think we have to take into account
the the other following disadvantages:
The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon
dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest
habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals.
Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around
200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but
it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves
17 trees. If it’s recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think
that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the
following article so that to notice it:
https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/),
so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic books on
computers is better than using paper books.
And i invite you to read the following articles:
How Useful Is Recycling, Really?
Read more here:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/
How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else?
Read more here:
https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625
Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It
Read more here:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401
More of my philosophy about communism and communism of China and more..
I think i am really smart, and i think that the main problem with
communism and marxism, it is that in its first form, that was
a radical form of doing, it has wanted to equalize much more and too
much humans and it has used a form of Class Struggle
that was an extremist and violent form, but i think i have just talked
about it by saying that it is not the right thing to do, read my below
thoughts about Class Struggle so that to understand my views on this
subject, but communism of China in the its modern form is not using the extremist form of Class Struggle and is not wanting to equalize much
more and too much like in the first radical form of communism, but the
today modern form of communism of China is still a one party form of
governing that is using a democratic "centralism" form of governing, but
this democratic centralism is much more centralized form that can be
much more easily corrupted than democracy, also the one party type of
governing of communism of China can much more easily be corrupted than democracy, this is why you can notice that the communist party of china
is too much corrupted, other than that there is lack of mechanisms of
democracy like having a kind of free press, so it is not good at all, so
i don't think that we can speak about the kind of meritocratic type of governing of China, since the basis of the type of governing of
communist China is too much lacking on the mechanisms of democracy that efficiently fight corruption, this is why I think that USA and Canada
have to show and talk about the big weakness of the today communist
system of China, and it is that it is too much corrupt and it can much
more easily be corrupted than democracy, and it is the big weakness
of China, since you can not be this too much corruption of China
and be a China that want at the same time to construct big economic
projects in Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia, since China can
too much corrupt Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia too. So i
don't think China is on the right path, this is why i think that China
has to become Democracy.
And here is my views on what is Class Struggle and what it has to be:
Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:
And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:
Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.
And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U
More of my philosophy about USA and China and more..
And i invite you to look at the following video:
The New World of Xi Jinping I ARTE.tv Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeGZz6NGJXg
More of my philosophy of how to efficiently fight corruption and more..
We can fight corruption using the mechanisms of democracy and using
democracy, and we can fight corruption by being a rich country,
since western countries are rich countries that have very low
corruption, also we suggest, among other things, that officials in
vulnerable and important posts receive higher instead of lower salaries
than comparable workers get in the private sector.
Read more here so that to understand:
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-causes-and-cures-of-corruption?utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=1220154768&hsa_cam=12374283753&hsa_grp=117511853986&hsa_ad=499567080219&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=aud-1249316000837:
dsa-19959388920&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=Cj0KCQiAi9mPBhCJARIsAHchl1xO6oTAZCJmdoiYHEjz18J30qdAxxTrEV5sKPh22EMpDMxjVXo4Y80aAt79EALw_wcB
Also i have invented my new monotheistic religion so that to also
fight more efficiently corruption, also here is another mechanism that
fights corruption and it is the following:
I think i am smart, so my new architectural idea of my philosophy is the following:
An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
, so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree
More of my philosophy of my two modes of speaking and more..
You have to notice that i am speaking in two modes, and it is
that i am speaking as a wise type of man and as a philosopher,
and i am also speaking as a prophet from God, and i have just posted
about my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts as a wise type of person and as a philosopher:
More of my philosophy of how to unite people of the world or of a
country and more..
I think i am really smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:
How can we unite the people of a country or people of the world ?
So i think i am really smart, and i will say that the being the
correctly united in a country, can be a kind of being united , but it is
not the fully being united in a country, and it can also come from
powerful intellectual mechanisms that plays the role of engines, i mean
take for example "self-confidence", so it also permits you to have like
the what we call the "will to live" like was talking about it the
philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, so i think that even self-confidence is
a powerful mechanism and an engine that permits to unite people, since
it is a powerful engine that must be "guided" by the "goal" of
philosophy, and the goal of philosophy is happiness , but happiness is
not just the today happiness , but it is also the tomorrow and the
future happiness, so if you want to be happiness tomorrow or in the
future, you have to be responsability, so the goal of philosophy that is
to become happiness becomes the goal that has to be responsability that
comes from the wanting to be happiness, so then the knowing about this
fact is also a mechanism that unite people in a kind of way, but not
fully, also the other mechanism that is so important, is the fact that
you have to be "hope" about the tomorrow or the future, since it is like
a positive energy that pushes you forward, since a negative energy is
not so efficient, so here again you notice that i am a philosopher that
is not in accordance with the following saying of the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche:
"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the
torments of man"
So i am not in accordance with the above saying about Hope of the
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since as i have just said that Hope ,
like hope about our exponential progress that is so fast, can be a
positive energy that pushes you forward. And so that to understand more
my thoughts, i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
of how you become self-confidence and how you become this positive
energy and positive energy of hope:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM
And read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about unity and about democracy and more..
I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the following
video of the Arab Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZA3gMBsrQ
And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
being this kind of unity in a country is a defect, and it is the basis
of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing,
since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united
or being united, it is about plurality or diversity of thoughts or
political views and about a kind of diversity that bring efficiency,
and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where
comes the defect of the arab countries or such countries that are
lacking Democracy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s
So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:
"A house divided can not stand"
But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or perfection. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about
Democracy so that you understand my thoughts:
More of my philosophy about IQ and about the laws and about humanity and
more..
I will answer the following problem from a white supremacist website and
it is like a problem in a form of a smart IQ test that i have to answer,
so here is how i am answering it smartly:
I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:
Why Capitalism Fails
https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/
And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:
"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private
property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner.
And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner,
yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with
how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or
how well or how significantly they have worked."
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I
think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by
taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become
rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become
"rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command
transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of
the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of
the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to
become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice
that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".
More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..
I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:
"Western Values" Explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA
I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:
I think that Western values are:
1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government
But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change,
since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid
the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by
the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of
expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive
rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational
reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments,
so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they
can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:
More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..
I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:
Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg
I will ask a philosophical question of:
Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?
So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom
of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be
accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist
is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult
since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where
there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of
speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for
example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of
Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so
this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it
and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i
think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not
Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that
the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of
speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a
realistic and objective way of doing.
Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:
And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:
Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.
And about Democracy here is what i have just said:
More of my philosophy about the ideological fight between communist
China and the West..
I think i am really smart, and i say that in the ideological fight
between communist China and the West, it is that the West has to
make this not so mature Democracy in the West, as in USA, into a much
more mature Democracy by for example making the governance much more meritocratic, since i think that Donald Trump governance was a bad move
that hurt a lot Democracy, since Donald Trump was not enough educated
and was not enough experienced , so he has made big mistakes that have
brought big problems to Democracy, and of course the West has to offer a
good education to people, and i think that we have not to be too
pessimistic about capitalism as not being enough meritocratic, since as
i just said, that in capitalism, intelligence, skill, and hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, read it below so that to understand my views.
And here is my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy:
And we can say the following:
The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.
But i ask a smart question of:
Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?
Here is my answer:
But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU
More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..
Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?
When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
we can logically prove it by saying the following:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)