• More of my philosophy of what is beauty and more.. (1/2)

    From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 2 13:15:21 2021
    Hello..


    More of my philosophy of what is beauty and more..

    I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    I think i am smart, and i think i can define beauty with my fluid
    intelligence as the following:

    Beauty comes from both order and harmony, and i think that beauty is
    "order" that is pleasant for the human senses, so when you have disorder
    that is unpleasant for the human senses, so it is not beautiful, so when
    you look at a circle it is an order that is pleasant to look at, this is
    why a circle is beautiful.

    More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..

    I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,

    Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:

    Does Love is subjective ?

    Does Beauty is subjective ?

    Here is my answer:

    I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure
    it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance,
    i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of
    doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at
    beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a
    not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific
    and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say
    that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure
    beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if
    we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way
    with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't
    become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that
    Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that
    merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb:

    Here is my new proverb:

    "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
    a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
    that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
    is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
    like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
    noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
    you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
    way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
    you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
    and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
    you."

    So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and
    its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a
    process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a
    process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a
    "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that
    action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of
    particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the
    local optimization of PSO is like the process of individual Love, and
    the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in
    a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial
    intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the
    actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the
    optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the
    values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum.

    And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

    And speaking about beauty, here is my beautiful poems of Love, read them
    all carefully:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s

    More of my philosophy about scalability and Gödel's incompleteness
    theorem and more..

    Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics only applies to
    sufficiently strong systems. It is not applicable to systems like
    Presburger arithmetic and first-order logic.

    But FOL(First-order logic) in mathematics is not all-powerful by any
    means, and it has
    the following disadvantages:

    1- It has no concept of time
    2- hard to do arithmetic
    3- Can't do beliefs --"If he believes this then surely he must believe
    that" is often wrong in everyday life; also surprising mathematical
    results.
    4- Can't have variables with set values: "All functions are boring"
    turns out to be a 2nd-order, not 1st-order statement.

    So first-order logic is not scalable, so i think we can not avoid the
    problem of Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics, but notice
    that the Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics says the following:

    "For any such consistent formal system, there will always be statements
    about natural numbers that are true, but that are unprovable within the
    system. The second incompleteness theorem, an extension of the first,
    shows that the system cannot demonstrate its own consistency."

    So notice carefully that it says that there will always exist in those
    systems statements that are "true" that we can not prove, so then
    we can not demonstrate the consistency of those systems, but
    i think that those systems remain "really" "useful" for us.

    More of my philosophy about civilization and specialization of our today world..

    Here is my new proverb:

    "I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
    it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized
    in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and
    productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a
    weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart
    working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

    I think i am smart and here is my new proverb:

    "The most important disadvantage of education today, it is that we are
    learning the students, but we are neglecting to efficiently learn to
    students how to learn."

    This is one of the basis of my philosophy below, and read about it
    in my following thoughts:

    I think i am smart, and i think you can be more confident with me, since
    i think i am not too specialized(Since you have to read my below proverb
    about it), since here is what i have done:

    1- I have gotten my university level Diploma in Microelectronics and
    informatics.
    2- I have studied 1 year of applied mathematics at university of
    Montreal Canada and i have succeeded it.
    3- I have also studied operational research
    4- I have also studied network administration and i have worked
    as a network administrator
    5- I am also an inventor of many scalable algorithms and algorithms
    and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism.
    6- I have studied more web software development with Perl, Javascript
    and CGI and FCGI and ODBC using SQL etc. and i have worked in the
    past as a web software developer.
    7- I have worked as a software developer consultant
    etc. etc.

    You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

    And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

    I invite you to look at the following beautiful photo Gunnersbury
    Writing Desk in a beautiful wood:

    https://www.wayfair.ca/furniture/pdp/astoria-grand-gunnersbury-writing-desk-astg6385.html

    So i think i am smart, and when i look at the above photo of this
    beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, it is
    like an efficient philosophy for me, since i am seeing the pattern with
    my fluid intelligence, since having this Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a beautiful wood, it is like living near the beautiful of the mother
    nature, and it is like an abstraction or it is like an efficient simple language, since it is like we are bringing the beautiful of mother
    nature like a beautiful tree made of beautiful wood into our house, so
    it makes our house really beautiful and it makes us more happy, here is
    some photos of them:

    https://www.thecoolist.com/most-beautiful-trees/

    So this kind of philosophy is like using smartly a "lever" to move a
    heavy or firmly fixed load, since as you notice that when you have this beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, you are not
    bringing all a beautiful forest of beautiful trees made of wood or all a beautiful tree made of wood of mother into your house, so it permits you
    to like easily lift your problems and solve them and be much more happy,
    and i think it is the right philosophy, since so that to be much more
    happy you have to know how to efficiently find those kind of simple
    levers that permits you to be much more happy and use them smartly, and
    here is another lever that can be made simple that you can use smartly,
    read about it in my following proverb:

    "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
    and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
    and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
    that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
    and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
    engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
    positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
    to easy the jobs for you."

    So i think when you understand this smart philosophy you will understand
    that using an efficient simple language is also very efficient.

    More of my philosophy about technology and mother nature..

    I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that i am also an
    smart artist, and i invite you to look and listen at the following video
    of a music of Jean-Michel Jarre:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSIMVnPA994

    So i think i am a smart artist, and i am noticing a smart pattern with
    my fluid intelligence in the above music and video of Jean-Michel Jarre,
    so the pattern is that the above music of Jean-Michel Jarre is not
    complete detachment from the beauty of mother nature, since he is using
    a mixture of the beautiful of mother nature(like the wind or the water
    as electronic sounds) and the beautiful of electronic music that is
    detached from the mother nature, and i think that humans needs and
    require the two, the beautifulness of mother nature and the
    beautifulness of electronic music or digital photos and such that are
    detached from the beautiful of mother nature, so the beautiful of mother
    nature is essential for humans, i will give you a quick example so that
    to notice it:

    I invite you to listen at the following beautiful arab song from Algeria:

    Ch'hal aâyit mesbar

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS6KG2ybOB0&list=RDzS6KG2ybOB0&start_radio=1

    And notice how in this beautiful arab music they are using old
    music instruments that give beautiful sounds and music that comes from
    the beautiful of mother nature or that are much nearer from the mother
    nature than electronic music sounds, so then i think that this arab
    music and song is like the beautiful of mother nature. And as
    i have just said that the beautiful of mother nature is essential for
    humans, so i think that there is a difference between my following poems
    of Love and mathematics, since mathematics is like far away from the
    beautiful of mother nature, it is like robots, but my poems of Love are
    like the beautiful of mother nature, here they are, read them all carefully:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s

    And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to
    read my following thoughts about them:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

    More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..

    I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
    first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
    projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
    not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
    why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
    such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
    Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
    carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
    that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
    normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
    grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
    optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
    the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
    maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
    out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
    notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
    allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
    have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between "performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
    of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
    people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more
    my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them
    here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

    And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to
    read my following thoughts about them:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

    More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal..

    I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal,
    but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say
    that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the
    requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a
    level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see
    much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it:

    So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections,
    i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so
    that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much
    more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there
    everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become
    perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that
    we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder.

    More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..

    I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why
    morality is universal:

    So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look
    at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but
    you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative,
    and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will
    think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example
    there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse
    it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or
    much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection
    since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it
    is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality
    become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we
    become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of
    morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that
    are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since
    also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.

    More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche..

    I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical
    proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the
    philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully
    how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new
    type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over
    his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so
    as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an
    inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong
    to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can
    notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that
    there is different types of morals, and here is his saying:

    "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
    slaves or the weak."

    That means in french:

    "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
    pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.",

    So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof
    that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the
    morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the
    strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of
    morality is universal:

    More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more..

    I have just looked at the following video about:

    NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE

    I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the
    philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since
    he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
    pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It
    is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
    slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man
    that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is
    smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it
    seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in
    the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery
    over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply
    existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy,
    because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you
    are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my
    below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent
    philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch
    is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism:

    More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism..

    I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy:

    Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020

    https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020

    And notice that it says the following:

    “The Stoics suggest that what’s most important in order to lead a good
    life is internal rather than external. It’s about developing the right character, the right state of mind,”

    I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the
    logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that
    developing the right character and the right state of the mind in
    Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external
    reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we
    can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions
    and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough
    hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and
    fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a
    failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul
    Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in
    french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that
    this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the
    question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural
    side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is
    "not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a
    purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and
    like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life
    is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not
    absurd, and read it below.

    My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more..

    I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy:

    SARTRE - Le regard des autres

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI

    I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking,
    since first you have to understand the following:

    Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.

    But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul
    Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence
    that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher
    Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope"
    by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture
    is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i
    think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And
    Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert
    Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here
    again i am not in accordance with it, since i say that human existence
    is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy:

    How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?

    I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
    relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
    measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
    i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like
    absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will
    start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd",
    and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very
    basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive
    or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a
    human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of
    smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like
    absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at
    all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world
    or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy,
    since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
    that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
    i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
    can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
    above philosophical question since you have to measure how
    to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by
    looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today
    humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
    basis of my philosophy by reading it below:

    I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
    i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and
    human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
    beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit
    us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate
    much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it
    also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't
    look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically
    understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

    And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs


    More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich
    Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more..

    I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher
    Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer:

    The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche

    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba

    I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the
    philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior philosophers, and i will explain as following:

    Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a
    problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza,
    that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for
    example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich,
    and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency
    to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich
    Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i
    think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the
    essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below
    about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be
    pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur
    Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization
    that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am
    explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts
    so that to understand:

    More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..

    I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,

    Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:

    Does Love is subjective ?

    Does Beauty is subjective ?

    Here is my answer:

    I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure
    it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance,
    i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of
    doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at
    beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a
    not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific
    and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say
    that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure
    beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if
    we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way
    with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't
    become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that
    Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that
    merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb:

    Here is my new proverb:

    "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
    a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
    that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
    is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
    like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
    noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
    you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
    way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
    you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
    and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
    you."

    So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and
    its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a
    process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a
    process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a
    "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that
    action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of
    particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the
    local optimization of PSO is like the process of individual Love, and
    the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in
    a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial
    intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the
    actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the
    optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the
    values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum.

    And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

    More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West..

    I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that
    is talking about self-esteem:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk

    So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the
    above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing
    your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a
    society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain
    level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that
    constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job,
    and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a
    value in a society, so then the individual has a value and importance in
    a society that gives him a self-esteem.

    More of my philosophy about beauty..

    I will ask a philosophical question:

    Is a beautiful women beautiful ?

    So it depends on if you are a wise man type of person or not..

    Since i think that you have not to rush in like a fool and think that
    that the women that is beautiful is beautiful, since the wise man
    says that it first needs "wisdom" so that to also appreciate beauty or
    so that to appreciate pleasures of human life, so i think that the wise
    man type of person is like the way, so read my following thoughts
    so that to understand much more clearly:

    Here is my other just new proverb:

    "I think i am a wise type of person and i say that happiness comes from
    an efficient way of thinking or from imagination, and not from reality
    and not from pleasures of reality or pleasures of life, since reality
    when you look at it from the more and more details, it comes with too
    much imperfections, so the efficient way of thinking or of imagination
    has to not be "complete" detachment like in Taoism or Buddhism , since i
    think by being complete detachment like in Taoism or buddhism you will
    make the engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection
    much more weak, so then you have to be like the right dose of detachment
    that makes you like well balanced so that it makes you appreciate our

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)