Hello...


Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about entropy and
about how morality is universal..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal,
but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say
that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the
requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a
level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see
much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it:

So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections,
i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes an entropy(gradual decline into disorder), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much more
perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there everyday
life so that to also maintain order or so that to become perfection or
much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that we are
perfectioning so that to not to become disorder.

More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..

I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why
morality is universal:

So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look
at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but
you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative,
and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will
think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example
there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse
it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or
much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection
since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it
is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality
become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we
become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of
morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that
are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since
also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.

More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche..

I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical
proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the
philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully
how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new
type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over
his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so
as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an
inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong
to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can
notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that
there is different types of morals, and here is his saying:

"It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
slaves or the weak."

That means in french:

"C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.",

So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof
that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the
morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the
strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of
morality is universal:

More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more..

I have just looked at the following video about:

NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the
philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since
he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It
is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man
that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is
smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it
seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in
the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery
over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply
existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy,
because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you
are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my
below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent
philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch
is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism:

More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism..

I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy:

Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020

And notice that it says the following:

“The Stoics suggest that what’s most important in order to lead a good
life is internal rather than external. It’s about developing the right character, the right state of mind,”

I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the
logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that
developing the right character and the right state of the mind in
Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external
reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we
can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions
and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough
hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and
fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a
failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in
french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that
this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the
question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural
side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is
"not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a
purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and
like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life
is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not
absurd, and read it below.

My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more..

I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy:

SARTRE - Le regard des autres

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI

I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking,
since first you have to understand the following:

Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.

But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence
that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher
Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope"
by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture
is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i
think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And
Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert
Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here
again i am not in accordand with it, since i say that human existence is
not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy:

How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?

I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like
absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will
start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd",
and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very
basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive
or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a
human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of
smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like
absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at
all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world
or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy,
since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by
looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today
humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:

I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and
human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit
us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate
much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it
also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't
look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically
understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs


More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more..

I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer:

The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba

I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the
philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior philosophers, and i will explain as following:

Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a
problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza,
that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for
example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich,
and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency
to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i
think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the
essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below
about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be
pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur
Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization
that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am
explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts
so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..

I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,

Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:

Does Love is subjective ?

Does Beauty is subjective ?

Here is my answer:

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure
it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance,
i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of
doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at
beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a
not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific
and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say
that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure
beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if
we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way
with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't
become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that
Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that
merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb:

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and
its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a
process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a
process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a
"margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that
action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of
particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the
local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and
the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in
a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial
intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the
actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the
optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the
values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West..

I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that
is talking about self-esteem:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk

So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the
above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing
your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a
society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain
level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that
constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job,
and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a
value in a society, so then the individual has a value and importance in
a society that gives him a self-esteem.

More of my philosophy about beauty..

I will ask a philosophical question:

Is a beautiful women beautiful ?

So it depends on if you are a wise man type of person or not..

Since i think that you have not to rush in like a fool and think that
that the women that is beautiful is beautiful, since the wise man
says that it first needs "wisdom" so that to also appreciate beauty or
so that to appreciate pleasures of human life, so i think that the wise
man type of person is like the way, so read my following thoughts
so that to understand much more clearly:

Here is my other just new proverb:

"I think i am a wise type of person and i say that happiness comes from
an efficient way of thinking or from imagination, and not from reality
and not from pleasures of reality or pleasures of life, since reality
when you look at it from the more and more details, it comes with too
much imperfections, so the efficient way of thinking or of imagination
has to not be "complete" detachment like in Taoism or Buddhism , since i
think by being complete detachment like in Taoism or buddhism you will
make the engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection
much more weak, so then you have to be like the right dose of detachment
that makes you like well balanced so that it makes you appreciate our
world much more, and so that it makes you appreciate much more pleasures
of life or so that it makes you appreciate much more life, so then it
makes you much more happy. And of course it is inherent to my proverb
that when you realize that reality, when you look at it from the more
and more details, comes with too much imperfections and that you can not
change for the better quickly, you become much more wise with much more patience etc. And i will explain more my new philosophy in my next book
that will also extend with much more new creative ideas."

More of my philosophy of what is Love..

I think Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an
action that merits a reward, but i think that you have also to know how
to play it smartly and "wisely", but we have not to be pessimistic since
i think that the best way to attain Love is by being more and more
wisdom so that to become much more wise or wise, since i am really
convinced that by being much more wise or wise you will start to
appreciate much more human life in a smart way and be much more happy as
i am doing it, and you will start to know how to be a wise type of Love
as i am doing it, since i think i am a wise type of person. And so that
to know more how i am wise, you can also look at my following poems of
Love that looks like my personality since i am also a gentleman type of
person:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ITE99pf3KHA

And since i am saying above that Love looks like the action and its
reward in artificial intelligence, you can read more my following
thoughts about artificial intelligence so that to understand more:

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

You can read all my other proverbs below:

More of my philosophy about money and about the meaning and the purpose
of human life..

I think i am smart and i say that Money is not a good and powerful
engine, since you can be stupid and think that it is a powerful engine,
but when you are a smart philosopher like me you will realize that
thinking that Money is a powerful engine is like the big mistake that
is making the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu by thinking that the action
itself is sufficient as an engine, and read my thoughts below about it,
since the question is how to make humans more "strong" and "energetic"
and "positive" so that they be pushed forward towards more and more
perfection. So this is why i am talking in my new philosophy about those
kind of powerful "engines".

More of my philosophy about the meaning and the purpose of human life..

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i am not speaking
in my new philosophy about the belonging to a society or to group with a
good purpose, since you can think that the pillars of the meaning of
human life are the belonging to a society or group with a good purpose
and with a kind of transcendence and such, but i think i am a
philosopher and i say it is not the right way, since i think what is the
best and right way is to talk about what are the good and powerful
"engines" that make you have this good meaning and purpose of human
life, this is why you have to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so
that to notice my kind of new philosophy and i am extending much more my
new philosophy with other much more creative ideas:

More of my philosophy about the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu..

I invite you to look at the following video about the Taoist Philosophy
of Lieh Tzu:

Let It Go, Ride the Wind | The Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA7Q8zb1hVU

I think i am smart, and i am noticing in the above video
that the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu has a problem,
since notice that it says the following:

"Lieh Tsu shows us that only when we transcend the duality of life -
things like gain and loss, attraction and repulsion, wonderful and
awful, we can become truly indifferent, and start acting for no other
reason than the action itself."

So the problem with this, it is one of the engine, since
we have to have a powerful engine that pushes us forward towards
more and more perfection, and since the Philosopher Lieh Tzu says
that we have to transcend the duality and become truly indifferent, and
start acting for no other reason than the action itself, but how
can you be pushed forward towards more and more perfection by
just the action in itself, so then the engine becomes much more weak,
so the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu is problematic. But
my new philosophy below is different, since as you notice in my
below proverb that it is not a "complete" detachment and it comes
like with the right dose of detachment, since you have to understand
more my proverb below, and it is that pleasures of consumerism are not sufficient so that to become happy or much more happy, since it needs
from you to change your state of the mind or your kind of thinking so
that to attain happiness, and it is why is explaining my new proverb
below, so read all my thoughts below so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about how to be harmony and how to be happy and more..

I think i am smart, and i say that the philosopher Baruch Spinoza
said that the being strong makes you happy and the being weak makes you
sad, but so that to be smart, we have to be pragmatic and
learn the others the how to be strong, and we have to learn them
the how to be harmony in a society and how to be harmony with
themselves, so as you are noticing that i am in accordance with
the philosopher Baruch Spinoza on the fact that the being strong makes
you happy and the being weak makes you sad, and here is my
new proverb that talks about it more clearly:

Here is my other new proverb in english and french:

Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais:

"La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection,
car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez
vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités,
et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"

"Stability is obtained with the force of perfection,
because when you become more perfect you increase
your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities,
and I think this is like a law of Morality"

Now as you are noticing i am speaking in my below thoughts
about how to make humans more strong and how to make them
be in harmony by talking about resourcefulness and by
showing them how to be in harmony and how to be happy,
so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that
to understand, other than that i have just looked at the
following video that talks about the philosopher Baruch Spinoza:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8DECD8kK94

So I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i am not in accordance
with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza that was a Dutch philosopher of
Portuguese Sephardi origin that said that morality is not universal,
since i think that i am a smart philosopher that has logically proved
that morality is both universal and progressive, so i invite you to read
here in my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

More of my philosophy about Resourcefulness and more..

Here is my new proverb about Resourcefulness that permits
you to understand it:

"Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
to easy the jobs for you."

More of my philosophy about self-affirmations and Mood freezing and more..

As you are noticing i am saying that i am smart or i am a wise type of
person, and i think it is part of the value of self-affirmations, and it
is not that this self-affirmations boost my inner strength and make me
likely to succeed, but it is just that i am much more "confident" about
me and i also think that i am smart, and read my below thoughts so that
to understand more about my personality, also as you are noticing
in my below first proverb that i am using a technic that looks like Mood freezing in psychology, since the most important aspect of Mood freezing
in psychology it is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and
it is this true power of the mind that interests me, this is why i am
using my below technic in my first proverb, since i want to make the
others convinced that expressing anger or/and frustration and such in
the given context would not make them feel better, so as you have just
noticed i am wanting to make the others much better persons by improving
their moods etc., so i invite you to read carefully all my thoughts
below so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about my new philosophy about detachment and more..

In Buddhism the detached mindset is one that realizes the importance of
living with the natural flow of things and respecting the impermanence
of all life, but in my new philosophy you can realize a kind of
detachment by understanding my following new proverb:

"I am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that
when you look from a higher level layer to humans, like when you look at
a beautiful movie or a beautiful song, you can like think that it is a beautiful movie or a beautiful song, but when you get into the more and
more details of being humans you start to see more and more
imperfections of humans, so we have not to think that the beautiful
movie or the beautiful song and such is what will make us more happy,
since the wise type of person like me will say that humans are
problematic or are the main problem, and the wise man will say that it
is so important to learn to humans how to be much more wise, by for
example using wisely the tools such as beauty or money etc. so we have
to become much more wise or wise, and you can also become much more
happy by understanding that life and human life come with too many imperfections that you can not change for the better "quickly" and you
have then to become "patience" since life and humans come with too many imperfections so you have to know how to let go and not to become angry
or/and frustrated and such, so by this way of thinking differently and
becoming this kind of patience you will become much more happy, and i
think that being this kind of patience brings harmony, since also when
you become much more wise or wise you will know that this kind of
patience makes us care much more since we become lovable we humans by
being this kind of patience and it also makes us reduce much more our imperfections and this makes us much more happy."

I think i am smart and i am a wise type of person, and as i have told
you that i am writing a book about my new philosophy, and this book
of mine will also efficiently learn you how to be happy or much more
happy and of course you have seen me posting about my new philosophy,
but i have posted just a part of my new philosophy, but i have extended
my new philosophy with much more of new of my creative ideas, and of
course i will sell my new book about my new philosophy, other than that
i will write a book about how to be successful, and i will write a book
about parallel programming and synchronization algorithms that will talk
much more about my inventions of scalable algorithms and synchronization algorithms, and of course i will sell all my books, and i am really
confident that i will be successful, other than that i have also told
you that i have invented many powerful software tools and softwares
that i will sell. So stay tuned !

And of course i will invest more for my retirement etc. as follows, read
my following thoughts so that to understand my way of doing about it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h4FblBWnNHk

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

More of my philosophy about my new proverbs..

I have just forgotten to say that here is my other new proverbs that i
have just invented quickly, you can read them carefully here:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/U3Tlh2yhaLk

And you can read all my other proverbs that i have just invented quickly
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

More of my philosophy about those immature south africans..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video of south
africans about apartheid:
'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zam4HGAssqY


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello...



Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about entropy and
about mathematics and about artificial intelligence and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and notice carefully what i have just said:

"I think i am smart, and i say that the way of evolutionary algorithms
in artificial intelligence is not the right way since it starts from
like the low level layers and it is by logical analogy like circular
reasoning, since when you start from like the low level layers like in evolutionary algorithms you need a way to construct a more and more
difficult objective function that permit the reward , so it needs more
and more smartness so it is like circular reasoning, so i think that the
much better way is the way of COMET (short for “commonsense
transformers”) that is capable of common sense reasoning, since it is
like an emulation that incorporates smartness of humans, so it doesn't
start from like the low level layers, so read about it below so that to understand my thoughts and views"

So i think that it is by logical analogy like the philophical question of:

Is mathematics discovered or invented ?


So i am really smart, and i will say that there is what we call entropy,
so it can be disorder, but mathematics that we discover is not disorder,
but it is also not like a sophisticated human language that we talk, so
then we can say that mathematics is discovered as not like higher
smartness of a sophisticated language that we talk, but it is also
invented like a higher smartness sophisticated language that we talk, so
then you are understanding my logical analogy with artificial
intelligence, that evolutionary algorithms need an
objective function that permits the reward, but this objective function
needs to be sophisticated like higher smartness of a sophisticated
language that we talk to permit general artificial intelligence, so it
is like a circular reasoning, since it needs to be organized like a sophisticated smartness and this is not in accordance with the system of natural evolution , since the system of natural evolution that creates
human brain was mostly not a sophisticated smartness of the objective
function that permit general artificial intelligence.

More of my philosophy about common sense reasoning and about artificial intelligence and more..

I think i am smart, and i say that the way of evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence is not the right way since it starts from like
the low level layers and it is by logical analogy like circular
reasoning, since when you start from like the low level layers like in evolutionary algorithms you need a way to construct a more and more
difficult objective function that permit the reward , so it needs more
and more smartness so it is like circular reasoning, so i think that the
much better way is the way of COMET (short for “commonsense
transformers”) that is capable of common sense reasoning, since it is
like an emulation that incorporates smartness of humans, so it doesn't
start from like the low level layers, so read about it below so that to understand my thoughts and
views:

I think i am smart, and i say that in the biologic there is what we call
the "useful" for the biological, so the environment is dependent on
the genetical diversity, so this being useful in the environment is also
the engine that pushes towards better and better quality, so how can
you emulate it in artificial intelligence? so how can you emulate water
or food that is useful for the biological that permit the apparition of
the bigger and bigger brain ? so you are noticing that i am abstracting
below by saying in the following that the wanting the useful depends on
the environment of the biological that contains the useful:


More of my philosophy about general artificial intelligence and
about evolutionary algorithms and more..

I think i am smart, and i say that there the two ways
that permit to construct general artificial intelligence,
there is the evolutionary way with evolutionary algorithms and
there is like the way that i am talking about it below that
is COMET (short for “commonsense transformers”) or the like,
i think the evolutionary way like with PSO or neuroevolution
algorithms or genetic algorithms is the way that has to maintain
"diversity" of the population and it has, and it is the most important
thing in artificial intelligence, to create a kind of function that
plays the role of the objective function that permits to optimise with a "reward", and by logical analogy, it looks like the requirement
to wanting the useful and the wanting of being of higher quality in the
natural evolution process that makes the highly better and complex
objects such as humans and the human brain, so i think that in
artificial intelligence the most difficult part is how to "emulate" this characteristics of the biologic that is genetically equipped with
the wanting the useful and wanting to be of or wanting the higher
quality, so then you will say that it is part of the diversification
process of the evolutionary algorithm, but what i want to explain that
the most difficult problem is how to create those kind of
characteristics that are biological in artificial intelligence, since
the problem is not creating diversity, but it is how to create a kind of diversity that is part of the biologic that permit to be the wanting the
useful and wanting to be of or wanting the higher quality, since i say
that the requirement of such a difficult objective function that permits
the reward is the most difficult part, so i think that abstracting by
saying that the evolutionary algorithms need diversification and the
the kind of natural selection or objective function is not correct
abstraction.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

And you can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem


More of my philosophy about Machine programming and about oneAPI from
Intel company and about artificial intelligence..

I think that COMET (short for “commonsense transformers”) is the future
of artificial intelligence since they are capable of common sense and
common sense reasoning, you can read more about it here:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05317

And read about it in the following article:

"Now, Choi and her collaborators have united these approaches. COMET
(short for “commonsense transformers”) extends GOFAI-style symbolic reasoning with the latest advances in neural language modeling — a kind
of deep learning that aims to imbue computers with a statistical “understanding” of written language. COMET works by reimagining common-sense reasoning as a process of generating plausible (if
imperfect) responses to novel input, rather than making airtight
deductions by consulting a vast encyclopedia-like database."

Read more here:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/common-sense-comes-to-computers-20200430/

And you can look at the benchmark on the following paper of how COMET is
much better than GPT-3:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.05953.pdf

And now i will talk about another interesting subject and it is
about the next revolution in the software industry that is Machine
programming, so i invite you to read carefully the following new article
about it:

https://venturebeat.com/2021/06/18/ai-weekly-the-promise-and-limitations-of-machine-programming-tools/

So then i think that COMET (short for “commonsense transformers”) will
also render Machine programming much more successful since it will
permit much better AI-powered assistants that will be much more
efficient, also i think it will enhance much more productivity and it
will higher much more economic growth.

Also I will say that when you know C and C++ moderately, it will not be
so difficult to program OpenCL(Read about OpenCL here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL) or CUDA, but the important
question is what is the difference between FPGA and GPU ? so i invite
you to read the following interesting paper about GPU vs FPGA
Performance Comparison:

https://www.bertendsp.com/pdf/whitepaper/BWP001_GPU_vs_FPGA_Performance_Comparison_v1.0.pdf

So i think from this paper above that GPU is the good way when you
want performance and you want too cost efficiency.

So i think that the following oneAPI from Intel company that wants with
it to do all the heavy lifting for you, so you can focus on the
algorithm, rather than on writing OpenCL calls, is not a so smart way of
doing, since as i said above that OpenCL and CUDA programming is not so difficult, and as you will notice below that oneAPI from Intel permits
you to program FPGA in a higher level manner, but here again from the
paper above we can notice that GPU is the good way when you want
performance and cost efficiency, then so that to approximate well the efficiency and usefulness of oneAPI from Intel you can still use
efficient and useful libraries.

Here is the new oneAPI from Intel company, read about it:

https://codematters.online/intel-oneapi-faq-part-1-what-is-oneapi/

More of my philosophy about automation and artificial intelligence and productivity and more..

I think that Donald Trump was not thinking correctly, since around 85%
of jobs losses in the manufacturing sector in USA was caused by
automation and not by China or such as were thinking it the people who
elected Donald Trump, and you can look at the following interesting
video that makes you understand that automation also has advantages and
to make you understand how Donald Trump was not right:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-rd3kW7Bc8


And following are some of the advantages of automation:

1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.

2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.

3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).

4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
needed to use and operate the computers.

5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
increase productivity.

And this video above is related to my following thoughts:

And read carefully my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

And here is my thoughts about 3D stacking in CPUs and about Moore’s law:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/0VJbDNqXgHY

More of my philosophy about how to boost productivity with artificial intelligence and more..

You can boost productivity with artificial intelligence by:

1- More accurate demand forecasting using AI and machine learning
2- Predictive maintenance
3- Hyper-personalized manufacturing
4- Optimizing manufacturing processes
5- Automated material procurement

Read more here about those 5 ways artificial intelligence can boost productivity:

https://www.industryweek.com/technology-and-iiot/article/22025683/5-ways-artificial-intelligence-can-boost-productivity

More of my philosophy about the Canada Government Budget Balance and more..

So i think that Canada has not balanced the budget in the past and is
not balancing the budget and it has been hit badly by
Covis-19, so you can look at the following details of Economic and
Fiscal Projections of Canada that i have just read so that to understand:

https://www.budget.gc.ca/2021/report-rapport/anx1-en.html

So i think that the best way for Canada to solve the deficit's problem
and the debt-to-GDP ratio problem is to efficiently invest in artificial intelligence that could double annual economic growth rates , but
Canada has to invest efficiently in Digital and AI(artificial
intelligence) literacy, so read the following so that to notice it:

"Compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about growth today. There
has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of
production capital investment and labor to propel economic growth."

And it it says the following:

"Accenture research on the impact of AI in 12 developed economies
reveals that AI could double annual economic growth rates in 2035 by
changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man
and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business is projected to
increase labor productivity by up to 40 percent and enable people to
make more efficient use of their time."

Read more here so that to notice it:

https://www.accenture.com/ca-en/insight-artificial-intelligence-future-growth-canada

And McKinsey estimates that AI(Artificial intelligence) may deliver an additional economic output of around US$13 trillion by 2030, increasing
global GDP by about 1.2 % annually. This will mainly come from
substitution of labour by automation and increased innovation in
products and services.

Read more here:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637967/EPRS_BRI(2019)637967_EN.pdf

And more of my philosophy about Digital and AI literacy and more..

I think Canada still has a problem, since it has to invest much
more in Digital and AI literacy, so read the following article so that
to understand the great importance of Digital and AI literacy:

"Digital and AI literacy is of utmost importance to help Canadian
businesses scale and compete internationally. Investing in widespread
digital and AI literacy for the entire population will increase domestic
demand for technology and technology jobs. A technologically literate population will create more data, which fuels AI and thus the
data-driven economy as a whole. It is also necessary for workers to be
able to upskill and re-skill in order to remain productive and
competitive in an automated workforce. Canadian businesses that adopt AI technology will save from lower production costs, have increased output,
and be able to invest more. Increased revenue from this domestic demand,
as well as Canada’s global reputation for responsible AI, will help
Canadian businesses scale globally and compete on the international
level. Canada has a promising future in the data-driven economy, and
strategic choices by policymakers are necessary to ensure that Canadians
can benefit from an ethical and thriving AI ecosystem."

Read more here:

Canada's Economic Future with Artificial Intelligence

https://www.kroegerpolicyreview.com/post/canada-s-economic-future-with-artificial-intelligence

And here is my following thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

More of my philosophy about the Debt-to-GDP ratio and about Germany and
more...

Germany is well managing its debt-to-GDP ratio, even in the crisis of
Covid-19, since the Debt-to-GDP ratio of Germany is the best among the
G-7 countries, so i invite you to read the following article so that to
notice it:

Germany to Ramp Up Borrowing With 2021 Debt of $286 Billion

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-22/germany-to-ramp-up-borrowing-with-2021-new-debt-of-286-billion


And I invite you to read the following interesting article:

China’s debt-reduction campaign is making progress, but at a cost

Read more here:

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/chinas-debt-reduction-campaign-is-making-progress-but-at-a-cost/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)