Hello...
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
Here is my just new smart proverb:
"When you want to fly like a bird, you can fly like a bird and look from
high above from the sky at our world as a "beautiful" world without
looking at its imperfections and then you can be more happy, or you can
look at our world from the inside and think about it from inside by
looking at its imperfections and be much less happy or sad, so how do
you solve this problem ? so when you are smart you will notice that we
can solve the problem by also powerfully energizing the spirit using the positive spirit so that to transcend much better the imperfections of
our world, and in my new philosophy i will speak about how to
efficiently and powerfully energize the spirit using the positive spirit"
And here is my other new proverb:
"Human smartness is finding a small number of tools that permit to
solve a great number of problems, so when you look carefully at what is
human smartness you will notice that it is not about great quantity, it
is about a small quantity of good quality that permits us to be so
powerful. Being smart is not about quantity, it is much more about quality."
So i think i am smart and i will explain my new proverb above:
With pattern recognition of fluid intelligence we are finding
patterns that are the tools, and we are understanding and applying those patterns that we are finding with fluid intelligence to
other many other new problems, so then we are not finding the patterns
again and again, so then we are not finding the tools that are those
patterns again and again, so pattern recognition of fluid intelligence
is a minimization process that permits to find a small number of tools
that permit to solve great number of problems. I think i am smart, and I
have to be more precise, so you have to understand that the minimization process above is on the "finding", so when i say in my proverb above:
"Human smartness is finding a small number of tools that permit to solve
a great number of problems", the "finding a small number" is my good
abstract thinking and it means that it is a minimization process on the "finding", since we are not "finding" the tools that are the patterns
again and again.
More of my philosophy about my other just new proverb..
I think i am smart and i will explain my following just new proverb:
"You don't learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, but you learn a valuable lesson from being the right prevention and making the mistakes"
So if you say that you learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, it
is the general way of saying, so it includes the mistakes that have not
be prevented by the right prevention, so then this way of learning must logically not be allowed, so then it becomes not a valuable lesson as in
my new proverb, so i think that the general way of saying it is the way
of my new proverb.
So as i am saying below:
I will say that since you have two types of learning, and here they are:
1- Learning by being the right prevention
2- Learning by not being the right prevention
So the second way of learning by using the right prevention is the right
way.
Here is my just new proverb:
"You don't learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, but you learn a valuable lesson from being the right prevention and making the mistakes"
So I invite you to look at the following known black american that
says the following:
"FAILURE Means You've LEARNED Another VALUABLE LESSON!"
Here he is in the following video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHpDeonEwO4
So i think i am smart, and from my just new above proverb you are
understanding that the above general saying of the known black american
is not smart, since the "failure" comes also from the mistakes. And
now by reading my just new above proverb you are understanding my
logical proof below, so read all my previous thoughts below:
More of my philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism..
I think i am smart and i think that the problem of today Western
countries is that they are not being the right Elitism, since i think
that populism is not the right Elitism that we require, so i will give
you an example so that you understand, so look at the following new
article of a journalist of a white supremacist website in USA called
national vanguard:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/09/how-to-tell-true-philosophy-from-false-philosophy-in-30-seconds/
So i think that this article is not smart since look carefully
at how he is ranking Survival,Truth and Justice, Freedom, etc.
and notice carefully that he is saying that Survival comes before Truth,
and i think that it is not smart to say so, since i think i am smart and
i say that Survival is like my smart redefinition of Utilitarianism,
since you have to survive in the present and you have to survive in the
near future or in the future, so since you have to survive this way so
you have to survive as a group to be better survival and then
responsability is inherent to it since you have also to be more
organized as a group so that to survive in the near future or future, so
then since this responsability is inherent so we can logically say that
you have to be more organized by using more sophisticated knowledge or smartness, so then this more sophisticated knowledge comes with truth
that permits you to be better organized so that to survive, so then this
proves that we can not simply Rank Survival before the truth, so then my logical proof is finished and it shows that the above article is not
right by Ranking as he is ranking.
More of my philosophy of what is exactly smartness..
So what is exactly smartness ?
So i will think "rapidly" the answer of this question as follows:
If you look below at how i am discovering rapidly the pattern with my
fluid intelligence in my logical proof, i think this shows more what is smartness of the fluid intelligence, i think that being smart is also
the fluid intelligence that discovers patterns, and i think that a
pattern that you discover with your fluid intelligence is like a static
or dynamic "system" that you discover, and this pattern recognition in
human fluid intelligence is to recognize a particular way in which
something is done, is organized, or happens and this pattern that you
discover can be low level or high level, for example look at my below
logical proof and how i am discovering the pattern with my fluid
intelligence and since the pattern that i have just discovered gives a
high level knowledge that is the pattern in itself, so i think it is a
high level pattern, so there is also low level patterns that are a low
level knowledge, and the high level knowledge is like Macroeconomics and
the low level knowledge is like Microeconomics and when you discover the sophisticated patterns with your fluid intelligence , those
sophisticated patterns are the tools that make you more smart or much
more smart.
And read carefully my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs
More of my philosophy about being logically consistent..
I invite you to look at the following known black american that
says the following:
"FAILURE Means You've LEARNED Another VALUABLE LESSON!"
Here he is in the following video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHpDeonEwO4
And we had, before the above saying, the same saying in Morocco as
following:
"Koul 3atra fiha khir"
But i think that the above black american is not smart and that those
above sayings are not smart and are not logically consistent, and i
think i am smart and i am rapidly seeing a pattern with my fluid
intelligence and here it is:
I will say that since you have two types of learning, and here they are:
1- Learning by being the right prevention
2- Learning by not being the right prevention
So i think the above sayings are not logically consistent,
since if in the second type of learning above you have made a mistake
that you have not to make if you are the right prevention, you can not
"simply" say as a conclusion by being "positive" that it is a "valuable" lesson, since logically this positive way of saying is not logically
allowed since the conclusion must be that making the mistake is a
stupidity that you had not to make and that it is not a "valuable"
lesson , so then i say that the above sayings are logically inconsistent.
And if you want logically consistent proverbs, here is my new proverbs
that are logically consistent and that are interesting:
So you can read all my proverbs that i have just invented quickly here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)