Hello...


More of my philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart and i think that the problem of today Western
countries is that they are not being the right Elitism, since i think
that populism is not the right Elitism that we require, so i will give
you an example so that you understand, so look at the following new
article of a journalist of a white supremacist website in USA called
national vanguard:

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/09/how-to-tell-true-philosophy-from-false-philosophy-in-30-seconds/

So i think that this article is not smart since look carefully
at how he is ranking Survival,Truth and Justice, Freedom, etc.
and notice carefully that he is saying that Survival comes before Truth,
and i think that it is not smart to say so, since i think i am smart and
i say that Survival is like my smart redefinition of Utilitarianism,
since you have to survive in the present and you have to survive in the
near future or in the future, so since you have to survive this way so
you have to survive as a group to be better survival and then
responsability is inherent to it since you have also to be more
organized as a group so that to survive in the near future or future, so
then since this responsability is inherent so we can logically say that
you have to be more organized by using more sophisticated knowledge or smartness, so then this more sophisticated knowledge comes with truth
that permits you to be better organized so that to survive, so then this
proves that we can not simply Rank Survival before the truth, so then my logical proof is finished and it shows that the above article is not
right by Ranking as he is ranking.

More of my philosophy of what is exactly smartness..

So what is exactly smartness ?

So i will think "rapidly" the answer of this question as follows:

If you look below at how i am discovering rapidly the pattern with my
fluid intelligence in my logical proof, i think this shows more what is smartness of the fluid intelligence, i think that being smart is also
the fluid intelligence that discovers patterns, and i think that a
pattern that you discover with your fluid intelligence is like a static
or dynamic "system" that you discover, and this pattern recognition in
human fluid intelligence is to recognize a particular way in which
something is done, is organized, or happens and this pattern that you
discover can be low level or high level, for example look at my below
logical proof and how i am discovering the pattern with my fluid
intelligence and since the pattern that i have just discovered gives a
high level knowledge that is the pattern in itself, so i think it is a
high level pattern, so there is also low level patterns that are a low
level knowledge, and the high level knowledge is like Macroeconomics and
the low level knowledge is like Microeconomics and when you discover the sophisticated patterns with your fluid intelligence , those
sophisticated patterns are the tools that make you more smart or much
more smart.

And read carefully my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs


More of my philosophy about being logically consistent..

I invite you to look at the following known black american that
says the following:

"FAILURE Means You've LEARNED Another VALUABLE LESSON!"

Here he is in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHpDeonEwO4

And we had, before the above saying, the same saying in Morocco as
following:

"Koul 3atra fiha khir"

But i think that the above black american is not smart and that those
above sayings are not smart and are not logically consistent, and i
think i am smart and i am rapidly seeing a pattern with my fluid
intelligence and here it is:

I will say that since you have two types of learning, and here they are:

1- Learning by being the right prevention

2- Learning by not being the right prevention

So i think the above sayings are not logically consistent,
since if in the second type of learning above you have made a mistake
that you have not to make if you are the right prevention, you can not
"simply" say as a conclusion by being "positive" that it is a "valuable" lesson, since logically this positive way of saying is not logically
allowed since the conclusion must be that making the mistake is a
stupidity that you had not to make and that it is not a "valuable"
lesson , so then i say that the above sayings are logically inconsistent.

And if you want logically consistent proverbs, here is my new proverbs
that are logically consistent and that are interesting:

So you can read all my proverbs that i have just invented quickly here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)