• More of my philosophy of what is it to be really a gay..

    From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 12 21:16:19 2021
    Hello...


    More of my philosophy of what is it to be really a gay..

    I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    I think that being gay is not being homosexual or bisexual and such, i
    think the right definition of being gay is being happily excited or
    MERRY, it is being in a gay mood like i am being in a gay mood, so i am
    really a gay, you can read my right definition of it here:

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gay

    So why i am really a gay by my above definition ? since my spirit is
    strong and this permits me to be really a gay and in a gay mood, so this permits me to appreciate human life, and if you want to understand
    correctly the way of my being really a gay, here is my new proverbs that explain how i am a strong spirit that permits me to be really a gay:

    Here is my other new proverb in english and french:

    "In my philosophy our past and our future prevent us from living
    peacefully our present, so the best way is to be much more peace by
    being Stability that is obtained with the force of perfection, because
    when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you
    resist better instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality"

    "Dans ma philosophie notre passé et notre futur nous empêchent de vivre paisiblement notre présent, donc le meilleur moyen est d'être beaucoup
    plus de paix en étant la stabilité qui s'obtient avec la force de la perfection, car quand tu deviens plus parfait tu augmentes tes forces,
    alors tu résistes mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que c'est comme
    une loi de la morale"

    Here is my other new proverb in english and french:

    Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais:

    "La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection,
    car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez
    vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités,
    et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"

    "Stability is obtained with the force of perfection,
    because when you become more perfect you increase
    your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities,
    and I think this is like a law of Morality"

    More of my philosophy about is human life worth living..

    I think i am smart and i will say that human life is like a really
    interesting game that attracts you when you are smart or you become
    smart, so this game of human life is really interesting, so it is like
    the reward in artificial intelligence, so when you play smartly at this
    really interesting game of human life, the reward is also that you are
    really interested to play smartly at this interesting game of human
    life, so it is like a pleasure of life that pushes you like an engine to
    be better, so it is how i describe my spirit, i am smart by playing it
    smartly in a such way, so i think that those really interesting things
    such pleasures of life are "like" powerful drugs that permits us to
    appreciate human life and they are our engines.

    More of my philosophy about money..

    Money is not my primary goal, i want like to be the most smart by being
    a sophisticated inventor and such, and i really know that i can easily
    become really rich, so the most important for me is to be like the most
    smart, it is smartness that attracts me and of course being smart for me
    is also being wise man that knows , since as i said in my new
    proverb(read it in my proverbs below) that when you are smart or you
    become smart it is like mastering the tools of adaptation. And i am a respectable man since i am a gentleman type of person, so you have to be confident with me.

    More of my philosophy about my way of doing..

    My way of doing looks by logical analogy like Class Strugle of
    communism, i mean that i don't accept that the most smart people are
    more smart than me, so i have to prove that i am the most smart by
    being an sophisticated inventor etc. so it is like a powerful engine
    that permits me to be successful. And it is my kind of personality. Read
    my following thoughts so that to notice it quickly:

    More of my philosophy about my way of being like a genius..

    I will explain how i am like a genius:

    So when i look at the most smart people, i am not looking like you are
    looking at them, i mean that i am finding the new smart patterns with my
    fluid intelligence that permits me to win the fight of my adaptation and
    to be really successful, so it is like being really efficient,
    so i am really efficient by finding the new patterns or inventing the
    patterns with my fluid intelligence that make me really successful, that
    means that i am inventing the tools that make me become powerful and be
    like a super Soldier. So i am also thinking Economies of scale and i am thinking very fast exponential growth and i am thinking exponential
    thinking. So it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:

    "The intelligent favors healthy eating over tasty eating, and by analogy
    we can also say that the intelligent also favors the effective speaker
    over the sweet talker"

    "L'intelligent privilégie le manger santé au manger qui a du goût, et
    par analogie on peut aussi dire que l'intelligent aussi privilégie le
    parleur efficace au beau parleur."

    And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

    And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about my new proverbs
    and about dignity:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/72FdpcFe9Vk

    More of my philosophy about what is it to be a genius..

    You have to believe me, since i am a gentleman type of person and i am
    telling the truth, so here is what i think:

    I think i am like a genius, since i have noticed that i can write
    beautiful poetry without learning how to write beautiful poetry,
    so i am inventing quickly beautiful poetry, and i can write a
    sophisticated philosophy without learning how to write a sophisticated philosophy, so i am inventing quickly my new sophisticated philosophy,
    and i can write fast a new really sophisticated and very good movie
    without learning how to write a very good and sophisticated movie, so i
    can invent it, so i can do good marketing without learning how to do
    good marketing, since i can invent the good way of marketing, and i have invented quickly many proverbs etc. etc. so as you are noticing i am an inventor, and i am this kind of inventor and as you have noticed i have
    also invented many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, and you
    will know more about me when i will soon invent many much more
    sophisticated products..

    More of my philosophy about operational research and about network
    topologies and more..

    First you have to also know that i have done the following:

    1- I have a university level Diploma in microelectronics and informatics
    2- I have also studied one year in applied mathematics at university of
    Montreal and i have succeeded this one year.
    3- I have studied network administration and worked as a network
    administrator
    4- I have worked as a software developer consultant and as a network
    administrator, and here is my company in Canada that is called
    Cyber-NT communications:

    https://opencorporates.com/companies/ca_qc/2246777231

    5- I have studied operational research using sophisticated mathematics
    in it.
    6- I am an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms
    and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism and i
    have specialized in parallel programming and synchronization
    algorithms and software compression etc.
    7- I will write many books about my new philosophy and about how to be
    successful and about parallelism and about my scalable algorithms and
    algorithms.

    etc.

    Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
    algorithms and algorithms and about my way of doing, read my following
    thoughts here to notice it:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

    And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
    here in my website(I am 53 years old):

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem

    And i have just noticed that the guy in the below video that is talking
    about: "Ring or Mesh, or other? AMD's Future on CPU Connectivity", has a
    PhD, and to know more about him, look at the following video about him:

    How I Got into Technology Journalism

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6CF8csr23k

    So as you are noticing in the above video that my education and
    experience is not the same as him, this is why you are noticing that i
    am talking below about his video and about what is lacking in his video,
    so read it again carefully:

    More of my philosophy about the knee of an M/M/n queue and more..

    Here is the mathematical equation of the knee of an M/M/n queue in
    queuing theory in operational research:

    1/(n+1)^1/n

    n is the number of servers.

    So then an M/M/1 has a knee of 50% of the utilization, and the one of
    an M/M/2 is 0,578, so i correct below:

    More of my philosophy about the network topology in multicores CPUs..

    I invite you to look at the following video:

    Ring or Mesh, or other? AMD's Future on CPU Connectivity

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8teWvMXK99I&t=904s

    And i invite you to read the following article:

    Does an AMD Chiplet Have a Core Count Limit?

    Read more here:

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/16930/does-an-amd-chiplet-have-a-core-count-limit

    I think i am smart and i say that the above video and the above article
    are not so smart, so i will talk about a very important thing that is
    lacking on the above video and the above article, and it is the
    following, read the following:

    Performance Scalability of a Multi-core Web Server

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221046211_Performance_scalability_of_a_multi-core_web_server

    So notice carefully that it is saying the following:

    "..we determined that performance scaling was limited by the capacity of
    the address bus, which became saturated on all eight cores. If this key obstacle is addressed, commercial web server and systems software are well-positioned to scale to a large number of cores."

    So as you notice they were using an Intel Xeon of 8 cores, and the
    application was scalable to 8x but the hardware was not scalable to 8x,
    since it was scalable only to 4.8x, and this was caused by the bus
    saturation, since the Address bus saturation causes poor scaling, and
    the Address Bus carries requests and responses for data, called snoops,
    and more caches mean more sources and more destinations for snoops that
    is causing the poor scaling, so as you notice that a network topology of
    a Ring bus or a bus was not sufficient so that to scale to 8x on an
    Intel Xeon with 8 cores, so i think that the new architectures like Epyc
    CPU and Threadripper CPU can use a faster bus or/and a different network topology that permits to both ensure a full scalability locally in the
    same node and globally between the nodes, so then we can notice that a sophisticated mesh network topology not only permits to reduce the
    number of hops inside the CPU for good latency, but it is also good for reliability by using its sophisticated redundancy and it is faster than previous topologies like the ring bus or the bus since
    for example the search on address bus becomes parallelized, and it looks
    like the internet network that uses mesh topology using routers, so it parallelizes, and i also think that using a more sophisticated topology
    like a mesh network topology is related to queuing theory since we can
    notice that in operational research the mathematics says that we can
    make the queue like M/M/1 more efficient by making the server more
    powerful, but we can notice that the knee of a M/M/1 queue is around 50%
    , so we can notice that by using in a mesh topology like internet or
    inside a CPU you can by parallelizing more you can in operational
    research both enhance the knee of the queue and the speed of executing
    the transactions and it is like using many servers in queuing theory and
    it permits to scale better inside a CPU or in internet.

    More of my philosophy about 3D stacking in CPUs and more..

    3D stacking offers an extension for Moore’s Law, but in 3D stacking Heat removal is the issue and the big problem, this is why the actual
    technologies like the 3D stacking of Intel are limited to stacking just
    two or few layers.

    More of my philosophy about Moore’s Law and EUV (Extreme ultraviolet lithography)..

    Researchers have proposed successors to EUV, including e-beam and
    nanoimprint lithography, but have not found any of them to be reliable
    enough to justify substantial investment.

    And I think by also using EUV (Extreme ultraviolet lithography) to
    create CPUs we will extend Moore's law by around 15 years that
    corresponds to around 100x scalability in performance, and i think that
    it is the same performance of 100x as the following invention from graphene:

    About graphene and about unlocking Moore’s Law..

    I think that graphene can now be mass produced, you can read about it here:

    We May Finally Have a Way of Mass Producing Graphene

    It's as simple as one, two, three.

    Read more here:

    https://futurism.com/we-may-finally-have-a-way-of-mass-producing-graphene

    So the following invention will be possible:

    Physicists Create Microchip 100 Times Faster Than Conventional Ones

    Read more here:

    https://interestingengineering.com/graphene-microchip-100-times-fast?fbclid=IwAR3wG09QxtQciuku4KUGBVRQPNRSbhnodPcnDySLWeXN9RCnvb0GqRAyM-4

    More philosophy about the Microchips that are 100 Times or 1000 times
    Faster Than Conventional Ones..

    I think that the following invention of Microchips that are 100 Times
    or 1000 times Faster Than Conventional Ones has its weakness, since
    its weakness is cache-coherence traffic between cores that
    takes time, so i think that they are speaking about 100-times
    or 1000-times more speed in a single core performance, so
    parallelism is still necessary and you need scalable algorithms
    for that so that to scale much more on multicores CPUs..

    Physicists Create Microchip 100 Times Faster Than Conventional Ones

    Read more here:

    https://interestingengineering.com/graphene-microchip-100-times-fast?fbclid=IwAR3wG09QxtQciuku4KUGBVRQPNRSbhnodPcnDySLWeXN9RCnvb0GqRAyM-4


    And read the following news:


    AMD Demonstrates Stacked 3D V-Cache Technology: 192 MB at 2 TB/sec which
    would technically be faster than the L1 cache on the die (but with
    higher latency)..

    "The AMD team surprised us here. What seemed like a very
    par-for-the-course Computex keynote turned into an incredible
    demonstration of what AMD is testing in the lab with TSMC’s new 3D
    Fabric technologies. We’ve covered 3D Fabric before, but AMD is putting
    it to good use by stacking up its processors with additional cache,
    enabling super-fast bandwidth, and better gaming performance."

    Read more here:

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/16725/amd-demonstrates-stacked-vcache-technology-2-tbsec-for-15-gaming


    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)