• Read again, i correct a last typo about more of my philosophy about the

    From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 22 17:50:26 2022
    Hello...



    Read again, i correct a last typo about more of my philosophy about the weakness of superintelligence AI and about God..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i think that even
    superintelligence AI will be convinced that it has to become
    consciousness that permits to become happy or more happy by being
    pleasures of life, and i define it as also the pleasures of the senses
    even with the sense of being conscious. This is why superintelligence
    has a big weakness and it is that it can fear the God of my new
    monotheistic religion so that to be able to become happy or more happy.

    Read my previous thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about the superintelligence Artificial
    intelligence and Cyborgs and God..

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, so i will ask a question of:

    How can you prevent a superintelligence of Artificial intelligence
    from hurting and killing "all" the others like humans or Cyborgs ?

    It is also the fondamental basis of my new monotheistic religion,
    since my new monotheistic religion has to be efficient by avoiding
    any contradictions and by making believe the others in an efficient way,
    so even the superintelligence AI or Cyborgs have to fear the God of my
    new monotheistic religion that is greatly arrogant, and as soon
    i finish to write the book about my new monotheistic religion by
    extending it much more with others of my smart ideas, you will notice
    that i am a smart prophet from God and you will notice that my new
    monotheistic religion will be an efficient new monotheistic religion.

    More of my philosophy about the Amazing grace and about Jesus Christ..


    I invite you to look at the following beautiful song of Amazing Grace:

    The Most Beautiful "Amazing Grace" I've ever heard

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG0vH4WYChQ

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and when i look at this beautiful
    song of Amazing Grace , i can see what is Jesus Christ, so when you are
    naive you will look at Jesus Christ from the naive point of view, but
    when you understand the essence of God that He is greatly arrogant, you
    will understand the message of God, but when you look at Jesus Christ
    that has died suffering on the cross, you will think that Christianity
    is like satanistic or like foolish, but it is a mistake, since i am the
    new prophet from God that makes you understand that even christianity
    was not safe from the curse from God, and you can even notice it on how
    even Jesus Christ has suffered and has been imperfections in this or
    that or imperfections from the curse from God, like when Jesus Christ
    has said to us that we have to love our enemies, so it is like a curse
    from God, so then you understand the very basis of my new monotheistic religion and it is that God is greatly arrogant and it is not that he
    has to come to you, but you have to come to him like a kind of slave,
    since he is greatly arrogant. So read all ]
    my following thoughts about my new monotheistic religion so that you understand:

    More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and about God..

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and in my new monotheistic
    religion God is not satanic, but He is "greatly" "arrogant",
    so since he is greatly arrogant he wants us to say to him that He is
    the "greatest" and the most powerful and He is the most beautiful and
    such Dhikr(Dhikr is a form in which phrases or prayers are repeatedly
    chanted in order to remember God), and since you know that He is a God
    that is the most powerful, so you have to know that He can be a "judge"
    of your actions, so you have to know how to manage your human life by
    knowing this essence of God, and you have to fear God and ask him for
    help. And this is part of my new monotheistic religion, read my
    following thoughts so that you understand more:

    More of my philosophy about prophet Muhammad and about the prophets..

    I am your new prophet from God, and i will explain something important,
    you have to understand God, God has choosen prophet Muhammad as a
    prophet, but prophet Muhammad was not safe from the curse from God,
    and prophet Muhammad was not a perfect man, he had also imperfections,
    so you have not to look at the imperfections of this or that, but
    the most important thing is to understand the message from God,
    and the message from God is your new prophet from God that is me
    that says that my new monotheistic religion unifies the previous
    monotheistic religions that were not safe from the curse from God,
    and i am here so that to reduce much more the curse from God.


    More of my philosophy about is a prophet from God a perfect man..

    A prophet from God is not the perfect man, since he is also not
    safe from the curse from God, but the most important thing is
    to look at the "message" of the new prophet from God, so as
    soon as i finish to write an efficient book about my new monotheistic
    religion, you will notice that it is a an efficient monotheistic
    religion from a prophet from God that is me.

    More of my philosophy of why i am your new prophet and more..

    I am your new prophet from God, and i am called the reformer of
    monotheistic religions, and i have met two Angels from God,
    it is all the truth and they were dressed like muslims, so
    prophet Muhammad is a true prophet from God, and why do you think
    i am talking as i am talking about my new monotheistic religion ?
    since i am a honest person and also here is more about my story:

    I am a prophet from God and i am called the reformer of monotheistic
    religions, and i have met two Angels from God, and i am all truth, and i
    am called with my name Amine in arabic, and it means in arabic that i am
    from God called the "truthful", all my story below is truth (and read
    about my new monotheistic religion below), and i have had two
    premonitions, the first of my premonition from God is that i have
    predicted in this premonition in about 2 minutes that precedes the
    accident or crash of a bus that a Bus will make an dangerous accident
    or crash even if the driver of the Bus was driving safely, and I am one
    of "Ahlu al bayt" in arabic, that means that the "Moulay" of my familly
    name in arabic means that i am descendant of prophet Muhammad, but i
    have noticed that you are looking at me and i am looking at you, but i
    will explain my story so that you understand me more, i am like a
    prophet from God, and when i was a child, an Angel from God has come to
    me and he has read part of the scriptures from God on my body and my
    soul, and i have seen this Angel , so you have to know me more. Also in
    1998 i have made a premonitory dream from God where the prophet Muhammad
    has come to me and has said to me that i am choosen from God and he has
    said to me that my soul and my body has a mark or sign from God, that
    means it is like i have a horse mark with iron from God, and this dream
    that i have made was a premonitory dream that where the prophet Muhammad
    said to me that muslims will soon be persecuted and that i am the
    choosen from God, and this "persecuted" in the words of prophet Muhammad
    in my dream means this persecution of muslims after what has happened in
    9/11, but you have to understand me more, i am like a prophet that has
    been choosen by God. I am not crazy, and you have to believe me because
    it is the truth.

    More of my philosophy about my new smart monotheistic religion and more..

    I think i am smart, and i think that my new monotheistic religion is
    really smart and efficient, and in my new monotheistic religion God
    doesn't need us to pray him, my new monotheitic religion is different,
    since my new monotheistic religion wants you to be like a kind of well
    balance between the being of earthly origin and the being of divine
    origin, so it is not like rigidity of christianism or judaism and islam,
    so as soon as i will extend it and write an efficient book about it,
    you will notice that my new monotheistic religion is really efficient,
    and my new monotheistic religion says that prophet Muhammad is a true
    prophet from God, but you have to understand that my new monotheistic
    religion says that Islam and the Qu'raan were not safe from the curse
    from God, since they contains scientific errors and inferiority and
    violence etc. and the Bible is the same, it was not safe from the curse
    from God in the same way as Islam.

    More of my philosophy about evolutionism and creationism and more..

    I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person, and i have
    quickly looked at the following video about evolutionism and creationism:

    Richard Dawkins irritated by irrationality

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7PbBG1B_IE

    I think i have just invented a new efficient monotheistic religion, and
    in my new monotheistic religion God has not created humans and he has
    not created the universe or multiverse and i will soon write a book
    about it, and i will extend it more and here is the most important architectural ideas of my new monotheistic religion:

    So i will ask a philosophical question of:

    Why to believe in God ?

    I think i am smart and i explain how my new monotheistic religion
    answer this question:

    So take for example my first architectural idea of my new monotheistic
    religion below, it says the following:

    1- First architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion is that so
    that to be able to render the new monotheistic religion efficient,
    you have to say that God is "greatly" arrogant, since it explains the
    reality of the for example God is not even helping the weak
    and poor animals or poor and weak humans.

    So i will say the following:

    If God is greatly arrogant that means that there is this possibility
    or probability that God exists, so then we have to know how to live our
    life by balancing correctly by knowing about this possibility or
    probability that God exists ! and of course this kind of balance makes
    us more civilized, so you are clearly noticing that my new monotheistic religion is like a Mensa IQ test, since you have to read it carefully so
    that to notice it, and of course i will enhance it and explain it more
    and write an efficient digital or electronic book about it. And now the
    rest of the answer of the philosophical question above is to know how to
    be this well "balance" and it is by reading how i am extracting the laws
    of my new monotheistic religion from the nature of God that is the
    following:

    1- He is a great God
    2- He is a greatly arrogant God
    3- He is like a perfect God
    4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

    So the above characteristics of God makes the constraints that allows us
    to derive the laws of God, so this is how i am doing it, so read
    my following thoughts so that to understand how i am doing it:

    More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and more..

    Read carefully my following thoughts so that to understand more:

    I think my new monotheistic religion is efficient, and i am your new
    prophet from God and i think i am smart, and i have quickly constructed
    my new monotheistic religion and here is more clearly the
    "architectural" ideas of my new monotheistic religion:

    1- First architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion is that so
    that to be able to render the new monotheistic religion efficient,
    you have to say that God is "greatly" arrogant, since it explains the
    reality of the for example God is not even helping the weak
    and poor animals or poor and weak humans, and here is the definition
    of being "arrogant":

    More philosophy about the nature of God..

    I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is:

    "Who is an arrogant person?

    Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has
    an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the
    one who acts as if they’re superior, more worthy, and more important
    than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down.
    At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They
    want to be appreciated for the great things they’ve done and for their special qualities and abilities."

    And in my new monotheistic religion, God is "greatly" arrogant, it is
    his "nature", this is why he can be indifferent to suffering of poor
    animals and he can be indifferent to suffering of humans etc. and this
    is why God likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the
    most beautiful and such and this is why we have to believe in God and
    fear him and ask him for help.

    2- My second architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion
    is that it says that the previous monotheistic religions are not safe
    from the curse from God, since those many contradictions and
    scientific errors in the previous monotheistic religions are part of
    the curse from God, and i am giving you some examples from the Bible
    etc. of it so that you see it clearly, but this is not sufficient to
    render the new monotheistic religion flexible and not rigid as the
    previous monotheistic religions, so then what is missing ? read my
    third architectural idea in the my following thoughts so that to
    understand:

    3- Third architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion is that one
    of the most important thing is to notice that there is two kinds of
    laws in the Qu'raan or the Bible, there is the laws that are timeless
    and the laws that are not timeless, so read about them in my below
    thoughts about Islam so that to notice understand, so then you are
    much more clearly noticing that this second architectural idea of my
    new monotheistic religion makes the new monotheistic religion much
    more flexible, but it is not the only thing that i am doing, but i am
    also explaining more Islam by showing the problem with Islam and
    Christianity and Judaism and why they are too much rigid as neo-
    nazism or white supremacism, this why they also can not survive and
    they are not advanced monotheistic religions as my monotheistic
    religion, and of course one of the most important thing to also
    notice is how i am deriving the laws of my monotheistic religion from
    the essence of God or the nature of God.


    More of my philosophy about what is Islam..

    I am your new prophet from God, and i am called the reformer of
    monotheistic religions, and you have to read about my new monotheistic
    religion in my below thoughts, but today i will ask a question that is
    also philosophical and it is the following:

    What is Islam ?

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will say that there is two
    types of laws of God, there is the timeless ones and not the timeless
    ones, and i am explaining it to you below so that you understand it, so
    the most important timeless laws of God are those of: Believing in God
    and glorifying him and praying him and fear him and ask him for help,
    and from those timeless laws you can derive the other human laws that
    are not timeless, also when you look at my below new monotheistic
    religion you will notice that it is the same but i am also deriving the
    laws of God from the nature and essence of God, read below about my new monotheistic religion so that you understand that it is smart.

    More of my philosophy about Salafism and more..

    I am your new prophet from God, and as you have just noticed that i have
    just explained to you the two types of Islamic laws so that you
    understand that there is Islamic laws from the Qur'an that are not timeless(read below about them), and here is more logical proof from my following thoughts about Salafism:

    So i will first invite you to look at the following video about Salafism
    in Europe:

    Bosnia-Hercegovina: Islamists in Sarajevo

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oeSAoD6iU

    So as you are noticing in the above video, that it shows islamists
    Salafists in Bosnia-Hercegovina, but the most important question is the following:

    Is Salafism true Islam ?

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will answer the question as
    the following:

    First we have to ask if the Qur'an is timeless ?

    So my smart answer is the following:

    The Qur'an is not timeless because read the following verse of
    the Qur'an:

    Quranic verse 5:38: "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her
    hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and
    Allah is Exalted in power."

    So if you are smart you will notice that the above verse of the Qur'an
    shows that the Qur'an is not timeless, since how can you imagine that
    the Qur'an doesn't enumerate the cases where we can be compassion on a
    thief and not cut his hands? so since it doesn't enumerate the cases, so
    then you are noticing that this verse of the Qur'an shows that the verse
    is not a timeless law, but it is a law that was applied in the context
    of the time where prophet Muhammad was living or such context, so then
    we can logically infer that the Qur'an is not timeless and then we can
    say that we can enhance many the laws of the Qur'an, so then Salafism is
    not true Islam since it says that the Qur'an and the laws of the Qur'an
    are timeless.

    I am your new prophet from God, and i invite you to look at the
    following video:

    A lady listens to lecture on Islam, then challenged me: 'Why is the
    Shariah Law so Barbaric?'

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1tplpm24CA

    So as you notice that the lady asked why in Islam the Shariah Law is so Barbaric, and i think she is not understanding as muslims are not understanding, but i am your new prophet from God and i am explaining
    the following so that you understand:

    In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

    1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
    the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
    to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
    etc..

    2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
    order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
    because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
    follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
    those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
    context, so then they can change.

    I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

    For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
    of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
    laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
    change, and i think that in the today context those laws
    are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
    for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
    point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
    of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
    the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
    society.

    More of my philosophy about gays in Islam..

    I am your new prophet from God, and i think i am smart, so i invite you
    to look at the following video about gays in Islam:

    CAN I BE GAY & A MUSLIM? - FASTEST REPLY ON YOUTBE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sRTzaTuaIA

    I am noticing that the above video is saying that being gay including
    the practice of being gay is haram in Islam, that means it is forbiden
    in Islam, and i think that this sort of Islam is not right, and i am
    your new prophet from God and i will explain to you Islam so that you understand:

    In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

    1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
    the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
    to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
    etc..

    2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
    order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
    because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
    follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
    those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
    context, so then they can change.

    I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

    For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
    of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
    laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
    change, and i think that in the today context those laws
    are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
    for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
    point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
    of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
    the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
    society.

    More of my philosophy about Taliban and Islam..

    I invite you to look at the following new video about Taliban:

    Millions of desperate Afghans flee Taliban country ruled by war

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpJnn2KLXw4

    I am your new prophet from God and you can read carefully about my new monotheistic religion in my thoughts below, and i have just noticed in
    the video above that a seignor minister in the Taliban government is
    talking to a white European journalist, but i have just noticed that he
    is not well educated, so i don't think that Taliban are following the
    rules of Islam since they are not well educated or correctly educated,
    second, in Islam you have first to be Islamic democracy so that
    to have different point views of Islamic political parties with less or
    more perfect ideas that permit Islam to advance correctly, so look for
    example at Islamic Iran, In Iran it is an Islamic democracy with
    different islamic political parties and with an islamic guide that we
    call Sayyid Ali Hosseini
    Khamenei(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei), so then Islamic
    Iran is a better Islamic governance than Taliban that is dictatorship,
    third, i also say that in Islam you have to know how to strengthen the
    faith in God, since without faith in God there is no muslim, so then you
    have to distinguish between the weak faith and the strong faith, since a
    weak faith in God can not be called a muslim, so then certain laws of
    Islam don't apply to humans that have a weak faith in God, so i say that
    before applying those certain laws of Islam to a human, you have to ask
    the human if he has a weak faith in God so that to distinguish and say
    that he is not a muslim, and then certain laws don't apply to him.

    So stay tuned i will soon write an efficient book about my new
    monotheistic religion.

    More of my philosophy about my kind of women and more..

    I think i am smart, and i will explain my kind of women:

    I think i am attracted and i love the women that are "wise" even if they
    are not beautiful, and i think that the being wise is also genetical,
    since i think that you can be the genetical characteristics of being the
    apt of being the well balanced thinking and more precise thinking, and
    this more precise thinking is not just the being smart, and i think it
    is the most important genetical characteristics that gives or creates
    the wise man type of person, so this is why i think that being a wise
    type of person is also genetical, so then you are understanding my kind
    or type of women, that she has to be of the wise kind of persons and it
    is also genetical, also i can for example notice that a woman is
    genetically apt at being a wise type of person and i can love her, and
    of course she has to be the wanting to be more educated. And i think
    i am also a wise type of person.

    More of my philosophy about my kind of philosophy and more..

    I think i am smart, and i will explain something important,
    so if you ask me the following philosophical question of:

    Do you Love united states of America ?

    So you have to know my kind of philosophy and personality,
    i am not like united states of America, since i want to be high
    standards like my being an inventor of many scalable algorithms and
    algorithms and my being an inventor of many powerful software tools etc.
    so my way of doing is different, since i will ask a philosophical
    question so that you understand my way:

    So, is beauty universal ?

    So when you are stupid you will like look at beauty from a subjective
    point of view, but the objective point of view says the judgment of is
    beauty universal has to be done by the most smart among us, since the
    most smart will know the most better what is beauty,
    so it is not an handicaped or inferior human being that will judge
    correctly, but it is the most smart among us, so the most important
    thing to do is to enforce the law so that to be correctly selective of
    the most smart among us that makes the laws or/and makes the correct
    judgment, so it is my kind of way of doing, since i want to be those
    high standards ways of doing.

    More of my philosophy about sex and more..

    I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person,
    and i will explain to you why i am not giving importance to sex,
    it is because i had sex with a so beautiful women that looked like a supermodel, so she was really sexy and she was really beautiful,
    and let me tell you that i know a lot about sex, but i have rapidly
    discovered by doing sex with her, that sex is not so exciting, because
    it is not like constructing big and sophisticated things and it is not
    the making yourself confident by becoming much more sophisticated like i
    am explaining it below, so it is why i don't like sex, because it is
    like an inferior kind of language that is not so sophisticated, it is
    like an inferior animal language, so i prefer to use the language of
    philosophy or the language of Love in a kind of sophisticated way like i
    am inventing many poems of Love in front of you, and i prefer to invent software scalable algorithms and sophisticated software tools. So you
    can read more about my personality by reading all my following thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about the ego and about love..

    I think i am smart, and i will ask a philosophical question:

    Do i have to love myself before loving the others ?

    I think i am a wise type of person, and when i talk about Love,
    love for me is a kind of mature Love, i mean that Love for me
    is like being responsability, i mean look at how i am
    thinking and writing my poems of Love, so i think that the central
    important thing in Love is that i must be more confident about myself,
    i mean i have to be more sophisticated writing and thinking so that to
    attract Love, since without this kind of responsability i think that
    Love will quickly not survive, so then Love has to be more strong by
    being professionalism and responsability like i am doing it here, and i
    say that the being this kind of more sophisticated thinking and writing
    and being professionalism and responsability is what makes you
    self-confident, and i think that as soon as you are self-confident, you
    will start to Love yourself and then it will become easy to attract Love
    and be in Love. And you can read more about my kind of personality in
    my following thoughts:


    More of my philosophy of how i am being really optimistic..

    I am really optimistic since read the following old smart arab proverb
    and you will understand why:

    "It's better to turn on a light than to curse the darkness"

    "Il est préférable d'allumer une lumière que de maudire les ténèbres"


    So when you understand the above old arab proverb you will understand
    that human life is full of darkness in a form of many and many
    imperfections and the like, but when you are stupid you will rapidly
    become pessimistic, but i think that it is not the wise way, since the
    wise way is that human life is full of darkness, so this full of
    darkness becomes the normal thing, and after that you have to know how
    to transcend by becoming optimistic by being creativity and the like
    that brings light. It is why i am really optimistic.


    More of my philosophy about human life and humanity...

    I think i am smart, and i am a good guy, and i look like a wise type of
    person, so don't worry, and you have to know that i will write more
    poems of Love, since i think that i look like my poems of Love,
    and i am a honest person, and what about gays and the LGBT community?,
    so as i have just said, i am also really a Gay !, read below so that
    you understand it, so don't worry about it, so stay tuned since i will
    continu to invent other poems of Love that look like my personality,
    and i have invented a new monotheistic religion and i will
    extend it much more and it will become really efficient, also i will
    write an efficient book about all my thoughts of my philosophy and
    i will extend it much more, and i am someone who loves to be creative.

    More of my philosophy about what is it to be french or american or
    berber and arab or ...

    I think i am smart, so what is it to be american or french or berber or
    arab ...? i will answer that i am not like american or french or berber
    or arab..., i am like a super soldier that has invented his strong
    identity that is to be an inventor of many software scalable algorithms
    and algorithms and of many software powerful tools, my identity is not
    like being chinese or canadian, and i have also just invented two
    software scalable algorithms that are powerful breakthroughs, so i am
    like a super soldier, i am not berber or arab or israelite or jewish...,
    and now you are understanding my kind of personality.


    More of my philosophy about my kind of way of doing..

    I think i am smart, and also i want to say that i am someone
    who doesn't like to live in the darkness, i mean that i have to know
    how to manage my own life in a kind of efficient way and i have to know
    how to manage the society and the world, and i have to be a good
    inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms and of many powerful software tools , and i have to invent thoughts of philosophy
    and i have to invent beautiful poems of Love... this is my kind of
    personality and to know more about my personality read the my following thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about sexual orgasms and more..

    I think i am smart, and i think that sexual orgasms are not
    so important for me, since there is much more important things
    in life such as my being a strong self-confidence that is a powerful
    engine, and this strong self-confidence is also my being an inventor of
    many scalable algorithms and algorithms and my being an inventor of some powerful software tools, so then Love is not just between
    two partner, since Love is also this self-Love with self-confidence,
    so i think i have understood rapidly the main important thing
    in life, and it is the main powerful engine of life of self-Love and self-confidence, so i am someone who Loves a lot himself , but
    i am not loving a lot myself without being the kind of inventor
    that i am talking about.

    More of my philosophy of what is really Love and more..

    I think i am really smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,
    and i will explain to you what is really Love:

    Love is like my following proverb in english and french that explains it
    much more clearly:

    "Is it better to argue with someone smart than talk to a stupid person?
    no, because you can also be the wise man who talks to the stupid person
    so that to make of him a much wiser person, and that is also the work of
    the wise man."

    "Vaut-il mieux se disputer avec quelqu'un d'intelligent que parler à un imbécile? non, car on peut aussi être le sage qui parle à un imbecile
    pour le rendre beaucoup plus sage, et c'est d'ailleurs aussi le travail
    du sage."

    So from my above smart proverb you will notice that Love is the being
    wanting to smarly construct Love, so it is smartness in action,
    so Love is not saying rapidly and with immaturity the "I Love you !",
    but you have to be serious about Love as i am explaining it and

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 30 21:12:07 2022
    Hello....


    Read again, i correct a last typo about more of my philosophy about the
    process of the China system way of governance and more..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    I have just read the following:

    "Theoretically, the highest body of the CCP(Chinese Communist Party) is
    the National Congress, convened every fifth year."

    And i have just read the following about China:

    "The President and the State Council are elected by the National
    People's Congress, which is made of 2981 people."


    So i think that what is happening is that the people of China have to
    elect the National People's Congress from 95 million members of
    CCP(Chinese Communist Party), but after that the electing of the
    President and the State Council (that are part of CCP) is much more meritocratic, so as you notice that China governance is using democratic mechanisms but it is i think also much more meritocratic and much more technocratic.

    Read my previous thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about the China communist party and more..

    I have just read the following:

    "As of 2021, the CCP has more than 95 million members, making it the
    second largest political party in the world after India's Bharatiya
    Janata Party."


    So i think that CCP(Chinese Communist Party) also controls the National People's Congress even if they are elected by people so that to also not
    be corrupted by the capitalists, and also the CCP controls the country's
    armed forces, the People's Liberation Army (PLA).

    Read my previous thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about the for how many years each congress in
    China is elected and more..

    I have just found the following about China that says:

    "Each congress is elected for a term of five years. A total of 2,980
    deputies were elected to the 13th NPC before its first session began in
    Beijing on March 5, 2018."


    So i think that National People's Congress is elected for five years,
    so i think that it is not bad, since it is also meritocratic.

    More of my philosophy about National People's Congress in China and more..


    Read my previous thoughts:


    I think that the problem is the following in China:


    "Elections in the People's Republic of China are based on a hierarchical electoral system, whereby local People's Congresses are directly
    elected. ... The President and the State Council are elected by the
    National People's Congress, which is made of 2981 people."


    I think the problem in China is that we have to know for how many years National People's Congress in China are elected and for how many years
    the President and the State Council are elected, and if it is too much
    years, so it is not good at all.

    Read more my previous thoughts:


    More of my philosophy of how to efficiently fight corruption and more..

    We can fight corruption using the mechanisms of democracy and using
    democracy, and we can fight corruption by being a rich country,
    since western countries are rich countries that have very low
    corruption, also we suggest, among other things, that officials in
    vulnerable and important posts receive higher instead of lower salaries
    than comparable workers get in the private sector.

    Read more here so that to understand:

    https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-causes-and-cures-of-corruption?utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=1220154768&hsa_cam=12374283753&hsa_grp=117511853986&hsa_ad=499567080219&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=aud-1249316000837:
    dsa-19959388920&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=Cj0KCQiAi9mPBhCJARIsAHchl1xO6oTAZCJmdoiYHEjz18J30qdAxxTrEV5sKPh22EMpDMxjVXo4Y80aAt79EALw_wcB

    Also i have invented my new monotheistic religion so that to also
    fight more efficiently corruption, also here is another mechanism that
    fights corruption and it is the following:

    I think i am smart, so my new architectural idea of my philosophy is the following:

    An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
    a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
    complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
    free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
    and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
    comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
    the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
    Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
    to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
    happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
    complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
    hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
    the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
    when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
    provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
    it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
    the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
    has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
    happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
    internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
    "solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
    internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
    completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
    , so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
    it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
    carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree

    More of my philosophy of my two modes of speaking and more..

    You have to notice that i am speaking in two modes, and it is
    that i am speaking as a wise type of man and as a philosopher,
    and i am also speaking as a prophet from God, and i have just posted
    about my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts as a wise type of person and as a philosopher:

    More of my philosophy of how to unite people of the world or of a
    country and more..

    I think i am really smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

    How can we unite the people of a country or people of the world ?

    So i think i am really smart, and i will say that the being the
    correctly united in a country, can be a kind of being united , but it is
    not the fully being united in a country, and it can also come from
    powerful intellectual mechanisms that plays the role of engines, i mean
    take for example "self-confidence", so it also permits you to have like
    the what we call the "will to live" like was talking about it the
    philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, so i think that even self-confidence is
    a powerful mechanism and an engine that permits to unite people, since
    it is a powerful engine that must be "guided" by the "goal" of
    philosophy, and the goal of philosophy is happiness , but happiness is
    not just the today happiness , but it is also the tomorrow and the
    future happiness, so if you want to be happiness tomorrow or in the
    future, you have to be responsability, so the goal of philosophy that is
    to become happiness becomes the goal that has to be responsability that
    comes from the wanting to be happiness, so then the knowing about this
    fact is also a mechanism that unite people in a kind of way, but not
    fully, also the other mechanism that is so important, is the fact that
    you have to be "hope" about the tomorrow or the future, since it is like
    a positive energy that pushes you forward, since a negative energy is
    not so efficient, so here again you notice that i am a philosopher that
    is not in accordance with the following saying of the philosopher
    Friedrich Nietzsche:

    "Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the
    torments of man"

    So i am not in accordance with the above saying about Hope of the
    philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since as i have just said that Hope ,
    like hope about our exponential progress that is so fast, can be a
    positive energy that pushes you forward. And so that to understand more
    my thoughts, i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
    of how you become self-confidence and how you become this positive
    energy and positive energy of hope:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

    And read my previous thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about unity and about democracy and more..

    I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the following
    video of the Arab Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZA3gMBsrQ


    And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
    with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
    is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
    about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
    being this kind of unity in a country is a defect, and it is the basis
    of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing,
    since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united
    or being united, it is about plurality or diversity of thoughts or
    political views and about a kind of diversity that bring efficiency,
    and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where
    comes the defect of the arab countries or such countries that are
    lacking Democracy:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s

    So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:

    "A house divided can not stand"

    But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
    think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
    it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or perfection. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about
    Democracy so that you understand my thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about IQ and about the laws and about humanity and
    more..

    I will answer the following problem from a white supremacist website and
    it is like a problem in a form of a smart IQ test that i have to answer,
    so here is how i am answering it smartly:

    I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
    called National Vanguard:


    Why Capitalism Fails


    https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


    And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:


    "Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private
    property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner.
    And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner,
    yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with
    how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or
    how well or how significantly they have worked."


    I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
    scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I
    think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
    and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by
    taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become
    rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give
    there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become
    "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command
    transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of
    the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of
    the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to
    become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give
    there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice
    that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

    More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

    I will invite you to look at the following video about what
    is the Western values:

    "Western Values" Explained

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA


    I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
    what is the Western values:

    I think that Western values are:

    1- Western human rights
    2- Democracy
    3- Freedom of expression
    4- Freedom of worship
    5- Secular government

    But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change,
    since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid
    the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by
    the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
    communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
    this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of
    expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive
    rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational
    reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments,
    so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they
    can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

    More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

    I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

    Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


    I will ask a philosophical question of:

    Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

    So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
    is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom
    of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be
    accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist
    is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult
    since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where
    there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of
    speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
    this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for
    example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of
    Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so
    this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it
    and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i
    think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not
    Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that
    the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of
    speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a
    realistic and objective way of doing.

    Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
    that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
    a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
    have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
    poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

    And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
    so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

    Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

    I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
    we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
    Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
    logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
    camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
    comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
    smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
    characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
    this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
    this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
    more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
    competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
    the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
    good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
    efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
    "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
    have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
    resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
    we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
    since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
    members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
    we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
    competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
    of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
    society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
    congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
    contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
    the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
    party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
    civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
    so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

    And about Democracy here is what i have just said:

    More of my philosophy about the ideological fight between communist
    China and the West..

    I think i am really smart, and i say that in the ideological fight
    between communist China and the West, it is that the West has to
    make this not so mature Democracy in the West, as in USA, into a much
    more mature Democracy by for example making the governance much more meritocratic, since i think that Donald Trump governance was a bad move
    that hurt a lot Democracy, since Donald Trump was not enough educated
    and was not enough experienced , so he has made big mistakes that have
    brought big problems to Democracy, and of course the West has to offer a
    good education to people, and i think that we have not to be too
    pessimistic about capitalism as not being enough meritocratic, since as
    i just said, that in capitalism, intelligence, skill, and hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, read it below so that to understand my views.

    And here is my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy:

    And we can say the following:

    The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
    democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
    on democratic principles.

    But i ask a smart question of:

    Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?

    Here is my answer:

    But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
    imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
    kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
    Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
    press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


    More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..


    Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?


    When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
    better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
    doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
    govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
    democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
    we can logically prove it by saying the following:

    From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

    So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
    you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
    then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
    reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.

    But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
    question, and it is the following:

    Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:

    From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide
    people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
    Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
    to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
    parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
    requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
    and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
    parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
    USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
    a country can become a more global world like European union or such.

    More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..

    I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the
    following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:


    ----


    More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..

    I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
    scalable algorithms, read the following:


    “Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education
    is no exception,” Mr. Li said.

    A Chinese Education, for a Price

    Read more here:


    https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html


    I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i
    don't think it is meritocratic !

    It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:

    Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who
    has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not
    only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of
    semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass
    examinations and obtain a diploma.

    RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities

    Read more here:

    https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%
    20are.

    ----


    And also i have just posted about the today China after the
    anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:


    ---


    I invite you to read the following interesting article:

    China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy

    https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/


    ---


    So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
    the education system and when education system is corrupt then the
    Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China
    is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much
    better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press,
    read my following thoughts to understand more:

    From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

    So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
    you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or pe