• More philosophy about emergence and more..

    From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 31 14:14:26 2021
    Hello..


    More philosophy about emergence and more..

    I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    Emergence is the formation of global patterns from solely local
    interactions.

    I invite you to read more about the strong and weak emergence here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence

    I invite you to look at the following video about emergence:

    Emergence – How Stupid Things Become Smart Together

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16W7c0mb-rE

    And read carefully my following thoughts on how i am redefining
    Utilitarianism and more..

    More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
    an IQ test..

    Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
    with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
    of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
    maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
    i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
    smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
    only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
    is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
    to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
    correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

    I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
    here it is:

    So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
    intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

    So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
    called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

    It is like my IQ test..

    So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
    fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
    the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
    too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
    into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
    you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

    Read my previous thoughts:

    More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

    I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

    So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
    that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
    but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
    happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
    only the present but also the future.

    More of my philosophy about the Exploration/Exploitation trade off in AI(artificial intelligence)..

    You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

    Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
    algorithms and algorithms:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

    And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
    here in my website(I am 53 years old):

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem

    In Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), for each
    action (i.e. lever) on the machine, there is an expected reward. If this expected reward is known to the Agent, then the problem degenerates into
    a trivial one, which merely involves picking the action with the highest expected reward. But since the expected rewards for the levers are not
    known, we have to collate estimates to get an idea of the desirability
    of each action. For this, the Agent will have to explore to get the
    average of the rewards for each action. After, it can then exploit its knowledge and choose an action with the highest expected rewards (this
    is also called selecting a greedy action). As we can see, the Agent has
    to balance exploring and exploiting actions to maximize the overall
    long-term reward. So as you are noticing i am posting below my
    just new proverb that talks about the Exploration/Exploitation trade off
    in AI(artificial intelligence), and you also have to know how to build correctly "trust" between you and the others so that to optimize
    correctly, and this is why you are seeing me posting my thoughts like i
    am posting.

    You have to know about the Exploration/Exploitation trade off in
    Reinforcement Learning and PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) in AI by
    knowing the following and by reading my below thoughts about artificial intelligence:

    Exploration is finding more information about the environment.

    Exploitation is exploiting known information to maximize the reward.

    This is why i have just invented fast the following proverb that also
    talks about this Exploration/Exploitation trade off in AI (artificial intelligence):

    And here is my just new proverb:

    "Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
    openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
    the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

    And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

    I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
    generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
    that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
    across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
    us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
    notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
    with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
    than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
    the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
    get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
    optimum of efficiency, and it is related to my following thoughts about
    the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i invite you to read them:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

    More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented
    many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will
    easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding
    artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but
    you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to
    guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning
    you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is
    good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
    optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data,
    also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level
    abstraction in artificial intelligence..

    Read about it here:

    https://mattturck.com/frontierai/


    And read about PathNet here:

    https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46


    More about artificial intelligence..

    I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is
    reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on
    right now, see the following video to understand more about it:

    Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s

    I think that since i have just understood much more artificial
    intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project
    that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a
    powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial
    intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain
    much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness..

    And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial
    intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it:

    Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization

    But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee
    the optimal convergence.

    So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO:

    Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient
    parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal
    convergence, here is how to do it with PSO:

    v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))]

    x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1)

    constriction coefficient parameter is:

    k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi)))

    k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729

    phi = c1 + c2

    To guarantee the optimal convergence use:

    c1 = c2 = 2.05

    phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729

    w=0.7298

    Population size = 60;


    Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
    optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are
    much less powerful since they perform only exploitation.

    In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching
    capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms
    ( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both
    Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as
    SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only.

    In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the
    chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not
    have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration).

    Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the
    lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different
    places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in
    many valleys simultaneously.

    And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO.

    More of my philosophy about Japanese Ikigai..

    Read more about the Japanese Ikigai in the following article:

    The More People With Purpose, the Better the World Will Be

    https://singularityhub.com/2018/06/15/the-more-people-with-purpose-the-better-the-world-will-be/

    I think that Japanese Ikigai gets the "passion" from the "mission",
    since the mission is the set of interests and of course you have to get
    the interest that is interesting for you from the mission,
    so then this interest becomes your passion that plays the role
    of an engine, and the interest can become the interest of making much
    more money so that to become rich, but this interest has to be aligned
    with the right global mission, since you can have local missions or a
    global mission, now how can it be aligned with the right global mission?
    so i will give an example by inviting you to read my following three
    proverbs that rules more correctly the interest of making money, here
    they are:

    "You have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having
    a good education with a good education system, since getting
    rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the
    tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow
    you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich."

    "In my philosophy our past and our future prevent us from living
    peacefully our present, so the best way is to be much more peace by
    being Stability that is obtained with the force of perfection, because
    when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you
    resist better instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality"

    "Stability is obtained with the force of perfection,
    because when you become more perfect you increase
    your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities,
    and I think this is like a law of Morality"

    So you can read all my proverbs that i have just invented quickly here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/72FdpcFe9Vk

    Read my previous thoughts:

    More precision about more of my philosophy about China and how to align
    the interest with right global mission..

    China bans people under 18 from playing video games for more than three
    hours per week

    Read more here:

    https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fjeux.developpez.com%2Factu%2F317975%2FLa-Chine-interdit-aux-moins-de-18-ans-de-jouer-a-des-jeux-video-pendant-plus-de-trois-heures-par-semaine-pour-mettre-fin-a-une-dependance-
    croissante%2F

    So I just said the following:

    The great weight of importance of smartness of humans gives motivation
    to humans and if we think about the important values of human life, i
    can notice that they also give motivation to humans, but this kind of motivation is a kind of pleasure of life, since it comes from the
    interests that are interesting for us that have to be aligned with the
    right global mission and that gives also a kind of reward, so it is in accordance with my thoughts below that say that the meaning of life
    comes from pleasures of life, and pleasures of life gives happiness.

    So i think my above thoughts are logically consistent since you can
    carefully read my following post about the exponential progress of our
    humanity so that to notice it:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/AKcN-UFoXCw

    So as you notice i am saying above that motivation comes from the
    interests that are interesting for us that have to be aligned with the
    right global mission and that gives also a kind of reward, so as
    you notice i am saying that it has to be aligned with the right global
    mission, and i think it is what is doing China that bans people under 18
    from playing video games for more than three hours per week(read above),
    and i will say that it is in accordance with Japanese Ikigai that is
    like a Japanese philosophy that is like the right combination or
    "balance" of passion, vocation, and mission, and Ikigai and MTP, as
    concepts, urge us to align our passions with a mission to better the
    world, so i also think that Japanese Ikigai gets the "passion" from the "mission".


    More of my philosophy about smartness of humans and motivation..

    I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    I just said the following:

    The great weight of importance of smartness of humans gives motivation
    to humans and if we think about the important values of human life, i
    can notice that they also give motivation to humans, but this kind of motivation is a kind of pleasure of life, since it comes from the
    interests that are interesting for us that have to be aligned with the
    right global mission and that gives also a kind of reward, so it is in accordance with my thoughts below that say that the meaning of life
    comes from pleasures of life, and pleasures of life gives happiness.

    So i think my above thoughts are logically consistent since you can
    carefully read my following post about the exponential progress of our
    humanity so that to notice it:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/AKcN-UFoXCw


    Read my previous thoughts:

    More philosophy about motivation and interests and the meaning of life..

    I think i am a smart philosopher, and i think that the great weight of importance of smartness of humans gives motivation to humans, so i think
    that if we think about the important values of human life, i can notice
    that they also give motivation to humans, but this kind of motivation is
    a kind of pleasure of life, since it comes from the interests that are interesting for us that have to be aligned with the right global mission
    and that gives also a kind of reward, so it is in accordance with my
    thoughts below that say that the meaning of life comes from pleasures of
    life, and pleasures of life gives happiness.

    Read my previous thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus..

    I think that absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus is not logically consistent, since Albert Camus said that human life is absurd , but i
    think that human life is not absurd since the meaning of human life
    comes also from the value of human life, so when we look at human life
    we can notice that smartness of humans has a great and important value,
    so it is like a great weight of importance, and this great value and
    importance of smartness brings also motivation and it gives pleasure of
    life, so i think that human life has an important value this is why it
    is not absurd, so i think that the meaning of human life comes from the important values of human life and it comes also from pleasures of life.


    Read my previous thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about the meaning of life..

    I invite you to look at the following video that says, like absurdism
    of the philosopher Albert Camus, that life has no meaning or is absurd:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHyVg2sXy5w

    But i think i am smart, and i can notice the logical inconsistency of
    the above video, and it is that you have to distinguish two things,
    first, when we view our universe and measure it absolutely we can say
    like was saying it the philosopher Albert Camus that Absurdism arises
    out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning, and, on the
    other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that,
    and second, when we think human life, and we look at the experience of
    human life, we can say that our experience of our human life is not
    absurd, since when we are living we are not constantly thinking about
    this absurdity of our universe, and i will say that happiness comes from pleasures of life that we enjoy and it comes from the right level of
    motivation that comes from the interests that are interesting for us
    that have to be aligned with the right global mission, so you have to
    know how to be motivated, so i think that we can be motivated by using different interests that are interesting for us, so that means that we
    can be happy, so in my new philosophy this interests that are
    interesting for us are also a pleasure of life that gives the motivation
    and that makes you happy, this is why we can say in a positive way that
    the meaning of life comes from pleasures of life. And the other thing
    that brings motivation is also to know how to learn to appreciate life
    by the way of being in difficult human conditions, so this way of
    learning how to appreciate human life makes you motivated and makes you
    happy, and this appreciating human life is a pleasure of life, so we can
    also say in this case that the meaning of life comes from pleasures of
    life. and you have to understand my new philosophy, since you have not
    to measure it absolutely like was measuring it the philosopher Albert
    Camus, but in my new philosophy you are motivation that comes from
    interests that are interesting for you and you are enjoying pleasures of
    life that can be interests that are interesting for you that have to be
    aligned with the right global mission, and this enjoying pleasures of
    life with our human senses is "like" a powerful "drug" that permits to
    be happy and to not to be preoccupied with the absolute meaning of human
    life that is talking about the philosopher Albert Camus, so i think that
    human life is not absurd.

    You can read my following thoughts about my new philosophy so that
    to understand more:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

    And you can read more about my philosophy in my following thoughts:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

    And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
    here in my website(I am 53 years old):

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem


    And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about artificial
    intelligence:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/63xQiI2GbsU

    And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about my new proverbs
    and about dignity:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/72FdpcFe9Vk

    And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs


    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)