I have no legal proficiency however I do recognise from a brief reading
that the European concept of state and international law is entirely
derived from a bipartite worldview and I am wondering if it can be defined according to a tripartite paradigm from the grounding of an autonomy
applied to and inherited from persons who might hold dual nationality and thus the region has an attribute of a Venn diagram (ie.the concept of probability didn't exist until the 18th century but nevertheless
interpreted as reasonable expectation representing a state of knowledge or
as quantification of a personal belief).
Thus if one uses the meta prototypes applicable to a tripartite number definition can one thereby define an autonomous region in which two independent and sovereign states can interact:
- formula of universal law:
#54 - unity, #27 - duties
- formula of humanity
#18 - bifurcated principles / properties, #9 - autonomous delimiter
- formula of autonomy
#3 - mired (limitations), #6 - progression (opportunity)
- formula of progression.
#81 - sovereign juxtaposition (praxis protocols)
Just wondering since there will have to be an agreement at some stage
amongst persons who share some common language elements.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/?MD>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have no legal proficiency however I do recognise from a brief reading
that the European concept of state and international law is entirely
derived from a bipartite worldview and I am wondering if it can be defined >> according to a tripartite paradigm from the grounding of an autonomy
applied to and inherited from persons who might hold dual nationality and
thus the region has an attribute of a Venn diagram (ie.the concept of
probability didn't exist until the 18th century but nevertheless
interpreted as reasonable expectation representing a state of knowledge or >> as quantification of a personal belief).
Thus if one uses the meta prototypes applicable to a tripartite number
definition can one thereby define an autonomous region in which two
independent and sovereign states can interact:
- formula of universal law:
#54 - unity, #27 - duties
- formula of humanity
#18 - bifurcated principles / properties, #9 - autonomous delimiter
- formula of autonomy
#3 - mired (limitations), #6 - progression (opportunity)
I've had a look at the Chinese dictionary to get some sense of #3 - mired
...
#3 - 𝌈礥 - #454
xián
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:454>
#454 as [#400, #30, #20, #4] = lâkad (H3920): {UMBRA: #54 % #41 = #13} 1)
to capture, take, seize; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to capture, seize; 1a2) to capture (of men) (fig.); 1a3) to take (by lot); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be captured; 1b2) to be caught (of men in trap, snare) (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael) to grasp each other;
县 Trad. 縣
xiàn
county
宪 Trad. 憲
xiàn
statute
constitution
- formula of progression.
#81 - sovereign juxtaposition (praxis protocols)
Just wondering since there will have to be an agreement at some stage
amongst persons who share some common language elements.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/?MD>
An amplification of the principle posse comitatus (from the Latin for
"power of the county") would then constitutionally define the formula of autonomy
#3 - mired (limitations), #6 - progression (opportunity)
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have no legal proficiency however I do recognise from a brief reading
that the European concept of state and international law is entirely
derived from a bipartite worldview and I am wondering if it can be defined >>> according to a tripartite paradigm from the grounding of an autonomy
applied to and inherited from persons who might hold dual nationality and >>> thus the region has an attribute of a Venn diagram (ie.the concept of
probability didn't exist until the 18th century but nevertheless
interpreted as reasonable expectation representing a state of knowledge or >>> as quantification of a personal belief).
Thus if one uses the meta prototypes applicable to a tripartite number
definition can one thereby define an autonomous region in which two
independent and sovereign states can interact:
- formula of universal law:
#54 - unity, #27 - duties
- formula of humanity
#18 - bifurcated principles / properties, #9 - autonomous delimiter
- formula of autonomy
#3 - mired (limitations), #6 - progression (opportunity)
I've had a look at the Chinese dictionary to get some sense of #3 - mired
...
#3 - 𝌈礥 - #454
xián
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:454>
#454 as [#400, #30, #20, #4] = lâkad (H3920): {UMBRA: #54 % #41 = #13} 1) >> to capture, take, seize; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to capture, seize; 1a2) to capture >> (of men) (fig.); 1a3) to take (by lot); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be captured; >> 1b2) to be caught (of men in trap, snare) (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael) to grasp
each other;
县 Trad. 縣
xiàn
county
宪 Trad. 憲
xiàn
statute
constitution
- formula of progression.
#81 - sovereign juxtaposition (praxis protocols)
Just wondering since there will have to be an agreement at some stage
amongst persons who share some common language elements.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/?MD>
-- IS THERE A POSSIBLE PEACE BETWEEN UKRAINE AND RUSSIA?
The concept is rational and feasible by applying the tripartite number structure as definition...
I have no legal proficiency however I do recognise from a brief reading
that the European concept of state and international law is entirely
derived from a bipartite worldview and I am wondering if it can be defined according to a tripartite paradigm from the grounding of an autonomy
applied to and inherited from persons who might hold dual nationality and thus the region has an attribute of a Venn diagram (ie.the concept of probability didn't exist until the 18th century but nevertheless
interpreted as reasonable expectation representing a state of knowledge or
as quantification of a personal belief).
Thus if one uses the meta prototypes applicable to a tripartite number definition can one thereby define an autonomous region in which two independent and sovereign states can interact:
- formula of universal law:
#54 - unity, #27 - duties
- formula of humanity
#18 - bifurcated principles / properties, #9 - autonomous delimiter
- formula of autonomy
#3 - mired (limitations), #6 - progression (opportunity)
I've had a look at the Chinese dictionary to get some sense of #3 - mired
...
#3 - 𝌈礥 - #454
xián
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:454>
#454 as [#400, #30, #20, #4] = lâkad (H3920): {UMBRA: #54 % #41 = #13} 1)
to capture, take, seize; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to capture, seize; 1a2) to capture (of men) (fig.); 1a3) to take (by lot); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be captured; 1b2) to be caught (of men in trap, snare) (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael) to grasp each other;
县 Trad. 縣
xiàn
county
宪 Trad. 憲
xiàn
statute
constitution
An amplification of the principle posse comitatus from the Latin for "power of the county" would then constitutionally define the formula of autonomy.
#454 as [#200, #2, #200, #2, #50] = rabrᵉbân (H7261): {UMBRA: #454 % #41 = #3} 1) lord, noble;
Just scoping the structure dynamic as to whether it is logical and it
appears that such a notion could be framed by legislation / agreement
#454 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #9, #5, #200, #9, #1] = nomothesía (G3548): {UMBRA: #455 % #41 = #4} 1) law giving, legislation;
- formula of progression.
#81 - sovereign juxtaposition (praxis protocols)
Just wondering since there will have to be an agreement at some stage
amongst persons who share some common language elements.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/?MD>
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 107:12:15 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,348,345 |