On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 9:18:47 AM UTC-5, Lazarus Cain wrote:
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 8:53:42 AM UTC-5, Lazarus Cain wrote:
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 6:18:21 AM UTC-5, David Dalton wrote:
https://lizband.bandcamp.com/track/motherfucker
--
David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
"This could be the final breath/This is life and death/
This is hard rock and water/Out here between wind and flame/
Between tears and elation/Lies a secret nation" (Ron Hynes)
Holy shit David!
You and I are both neck deep in wave theory. We must be somewhat like-minded.
Gravity wave theory from the book: Gravitation
New subject matter to be explored: ( was trying to look up a topic that I recently noted; concerns multidimensional subnuclear physical theory, which of course involves waveforms and manifolds
Awww shit!
Recent missing files . . . no matter, my human memory can resurrect the concepts again and I know where to find detailed explanations.
Am trying to discover any new files I have created this year.
EMF and gravitational theory? They must be afraid of my research.
Is usually my fuck up that I lose something, but am being frustrated by inability to recover recent files.
As I said, human memory not so easily hacked and interference only piques more curiosity and investigations of scientific discovery.
Chinese real good at modern physics.
I hate losing or misplacing my notes
Always have some form of backup to allow recreation of even better theory I suspect US interference because of my viewpoint on Ukraine war and because easier for US to hack my system and "instigate file loss"
I know and remember I did the work, but the physical memory is what is important. The words are just symbols expressing the idea in mind..
https://www.lazarus-cain.com/
Makes little difference:
The newer theory or song just replaces or overrides the old song or theory. The ideas evolve and life itself evolves as well.
New life evolves or replaces the old life.
I'll just keep singing on this tune I am working on.
I sing badly at that.
Forgive me Lod, as I make lots and lots of mistakes as I learn about the life You placed me in.
My writing can be very sloppy and prone to stupid mistakes when I work too rapidly.
Chew on this:
Much like other candidates for a grand unifying theory – aka the Theory of Everything (TOE) – the belief that the universe is made up of ten dimensions (or more, depending on which model of string theory you use) is an attempt to reconcile the
standard model of particle physics with the existence of gravity. In short, it is an attempt to explain how all known forces within our universe interact, and how other possible universes themselves might work
My theory is a simplified summation involving the description of all basic dimensional units such as kg, coulomb, etc. to a simple mi/secj format , where i and j denote the dimensional value.
For example volume is three dimensional which we may describe as mi, with an i of 3 as an exponent. (Have problem typing in superscripts here)
Additionally, we intuitively understand velocity as 2 dimensional, m/sec
Here we see time as an inverted dimension which mathematics easily includes. Describing mass as 5 dimensional with a three dimensional volume effect we may allow m3/sec2, and this will work.
I had debated with a singularity mass description, point mass, as m/sec4 , which also had worked.
I discovered voltage or potential as m2/sec2, pevious thought had asocciated voltage with m/sec3
The first model has charge and mass with the same metric dimensioning of m3/sec2, and second model has charge as m2/sec3
I am suspecting that the perception of the model allows for either case, which gives rise to some uncertainty.
The second model has the eccentricity as m0/sec0, i.e. dimensioned as 0
Whereas the first model set G, the gravitational constant as m0/sec0
Equation Gmm/r gives potential energy m5./sec4 which is why I consider Energy as 9 dimensional and power as 10 dimensional.
Physical manifestations involve a cause factor with respect to time, and in physics we associate cause with respect to change in the observable, its 3-form, with respect to cause factors with respect to time or a second order or even 3rd order
differentiation
That which is caused is of a lesser dimension than the cause itself.
by the way, voltage time charge give m5/sec/4 also. See an equivalence and G or permittivity of free space are very similar, and there is equivalence of form as if electricity is a phase of mass energy, which it is.
Waveform of the mass energy describes the apparent physical shape integrated over its cycle period., but the harmonic description of the basic mass nit is very difficult to desribe using an science or math.
Intuitive model gives a general grasp with the ability ti disprove or find equation in error if dimensions on both sides do not match dimensions of unit wise
If am too vague, it is because I am limited with symbolic expression here, among other things.
Someone can take over from my theory. I do not care. I am old and can't do the math as easily anymore.
Just bear in mind that it has worked 100% of the time for me as a I check any equation in physics. I just need to know which model of charge and mass I will use and go from there.
Some have equivocated the second with a meter, but bear in mind it is actually jct, which we use to actually physically define the 4th dimension of time as an equivalent to "physical distance" experienced as time is transited
The theory goes on and on and on from there mocking the intelligence of us all as we struggle to understand the cosmos.
Of course, silly human wars complicate the expression of certain truths as hatred between ethnic groups is publicly encouraged so as to foster the desire for war and conflict. Scientific cooperation between China Russia and US is then stifled while war
industry attempts to take us all to the Dark Ages.
If it works 100% of the time for me, outside lack of faith matters little.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)