[continued from previous message]

if you care, because we're allowed to have guns anyway. So I hope you
enjoy pictures of bikini girls shooting machine guns, because none of
these words matter!

mariou Sey Cins.. Sery Guus! Angela- -11-14 Hetlly-- A-47 lasio-zi Dotlie- Fourteen af the seriest sourthern Califoria beaties scantily clad in
string
This VHS tape is by far the least likable thing I own.

Continue Reading Below
Advertisement

The Second Amendment guarantees arms for a well-regulated militia, but who
is that? Well, according to the Injury Control Research Center at Harvard University, half of our guns are in the hands of 3 percent of the
population. And according to Scientific American, most of those people are racist cowards, which I mean in the most clinical way possible. Studies
show gun hoarders are predominantly white men worried they can't protect
their families who suffer from economic insecurity and racial fears. It
might be what you already suspected, and maybe you're smug enough for
those findings to be satisfying, but we should be a little worried that
there's a massive industry lobbying to make twitchy intolerant people as
lethal as possible.

You run into a lot of constitutional scholars on Facebook or Fox News
these days who specialize entirely in aggressively insane interpretations
of the Second Amendment. It's like when someone can easily recall any
given state's age of consent. They're not so much a civics expert as they
are interested in doing awful (but technically legal) things. Let me put
it another way: If you're on the internet defending guns while you live in
the country where the most mentally ill person can buy any gun they want,
the statesmanlike convicted fraudster you voted for would describe you by holding up a gimpy hand and going "DUHHR UHHHHRR."

Continue Reading Below
Advertisement

"You gotta see this guy. Uaaahhh!" -- Donald J. Trump, 45th president of
the United States

There are no shortage of uneducated, mentally ill men self-publishing
books on the Second Amendment. Amazon has thousands of them (though many
are miscategorized ladies underpants), and that number is increasing
faster than any single madman can read.

T Release on Amszon FEnSALD 1] S Slaves hate the 2nd Amendment RIGHO BEAR
ARLS THE MENDM HAS ARMS! EVERYONE BEAR RIGHT TO By JD Lovil Now GOD Tust
99s
That wasn't me being silly. You really do get a lot of gun rights panties
when you search for "2nd Amendment" under "books."

Continue Reading Below
Advertisement

The most insecure genre of nonfiction is Second Amendment books. I have a theory that after you buy your tenth gun, they start to whisper to each
other at night, only to fall silent when you scream, "Who said something
about my small penis!?" I looked for a whimsically insane one to review,
but the theme of every single one of these books is how after night falls,
guns laugh at the author's penis. These books are all disorganized
collections of echo-chambered arguments for how 27 words written two
centuries ago ensure the author's ability to melt his congressman with a flamethrower.

It doesn't really matter how you feel about the Second Amendment. I mean,
you can have an opinion and debate and threaten your congressman with
melting, but the Supreme Court might one day disagree with you. So what
then? For decades, gun owners have been threatening "civil war" if anyone
ever comes for their guns, and honestly, that seems like an overreaction.
Who cares if the government makes your guns illegal? Just hide a few. You maniacs are on Facebook threatening to murder police if they come to take
them, but you're scared to lie to the hypothetical gun collector? That's
like refusing to download Westworld, but being okay with torturing James Marsden until he tells you what happens in it. Look at it this way:
Throwing stars are illegal right now, and ask me how many throwing stars I have. Or try with all those throwing stars in your neck, mouth, and dick.

These books are filled with titty-thumping threats about rising up against tyranny. They assert that all these handguns are there to insure no
government ever tries to take things too far. But what would that look
like? Some of the more coherent books try to pull obscure events from
history to demonstrate the dangers of gun control, but there's a more contemporary example. Philando Castile was pulled over by police 46 times
for things like speeding, not wearing a seat belt, or having muffler
trouble. Actual "jack-booted government thugs" took his liberty, stole thousands of dollars of his money, and eventually shot him to death
because he had a legal gun in his car. And not a single one of you grabbed
a rifle and overthrew the government. So don't tell me there will be a
second civil war. You've already seen tyranny, and your reaction was to
blame the victim for not meekly complying hard enough. Unless ... oh shit, unless you're ... no. Unless you're ... r-racist?

If you're scared because everything wants to kill you, a gun won't make
that go away, you coward. And if you're stockpiling weapons to defeat
America, do you have enough men to operate your LPs and OPs and still
maintain your defensive positions? Why am I asking? They have tanks,
buddy. If the American military decides they want American civilians dead,
your choices are joining the Army or dying with a lot of valid questions.
So if it makes you feel good to carry your gun around, or play with it, or
yank it out in a panic when you hear a strange noise, that sounds fun, but
stop trying to convince us it's because you're super smart and tough.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

[continued from previous message]

if you care, because we're allowed to have guns anyway. So I hope you
enjoy pictures of bikini girls shooting machine guns, because none of
these words matter!

mariou Sey Cins.. Sery Guus! Angela- -11-14 Hetlly-- A-47 lasio-zi Dotlie- Fourteen af the seriest sourthern Califoria beaties scantily clad in
string
This VHS tape is by far the least likable thing I own.

Continue Reading Below
Advertisement

The Second Amendment guarantees arms for a well-regulated militia, but who
is that? Well, according to the Injury Control Research Center at Harvard University, half of our guns are in the hands of 3 percent of the
population. And according to Scientific American, most of those people are racist cowards, which I mean in the most clinical way possible. Studies
show gun hoarders are predominantly white men worried they can't protect
their families who suffer from economic insecurity and racial fears. It
might be what you already suspected, and maybe you're smug enough for
those findings to be satisfying, but we should be a little worried that
there's a massive industry lobbying to make twitchy intolerant people as
lethal as possible.

You run into a lot of constitutional scholars on Facebook or Fox News
these days who specialize entirely in aggressively insane interpretations
of the Second Amendment. It's like when someone can easily recall any
given state's age of consent. They're not so much a civics expert as they
are interested in doing awful (but technically legal) things. Let me put
it another way: If you're on the internet defending guns while you live in
the country where the most mentally ill person can buy any gun they want,
the statesmanlike convicted fraudster you voted for would describe you by holding up a gimpy hand and going "DUHHR UHHHHRR."

Continue Reading Below
Advertisement

"You gotta see this guy. Uaaahhh!" -- Donald J. Trump, 45th president of
the United States

There are no shortage of uneducated, mentally ill men self-publishing
books on the Second Amendment. Amazon has thousands of them (though many
are miscategorized ladies underpants), and that number is increasing
faster than any single madman can read.

T Release on Amszon FEnSALD 1] S Slaves hate the 2nd Amendment RIGHO BEAR
ARLS THE MENDM HAS ARMS! EVERYONE BEAR RIGHT TO By JD Lovil Now GOD Tust
99s
That wasn't me being silly. You really do get a lot of gun rights panties
when you search for "2nd Amendment" under "books."

Continue Reading Below
Advertisement

The most insecure genre of nonfiction is Second Amendment books. I have a theory that after you buy your tenth gun, they start to whisper to each
other at night, only to fall silent when you scream, "Who said something
about my small penis!?" I looked for a whimsically insane one to review,
but the theme of every single one of these books is how after night falls,
guns laugh at the author's penis. These books are all disorganized
collections of echo-chambered arguments for how 27 words written two
centuries ago ensure the author's ability to melt his congressman with a flamethrower.

It doesn't really matter how you feel about the Second Amendment. I mean,
you can have an opinion and debate and threaten your congressman with
melting, but the Supreme Court might one day disagree with you. So what
then? For decades, gun owners have been threatening "civil war" if anyone
ever comes for their guns, and honestly, that seems like an overreaction.
Who cares if the government makes your guns illegal? Just hide a few. You maniacs are on Facebook threatening to murder police if they come to take
them, but you're scared to lie to the hypothetical gun collector? That's
like refusing to download Westworld, but being okay with torturing James Marsden until he tells you what happens in it. Look at it this way:
Throwing stars are illegal right now, and ask me how many throwing stars I have. Or try with all those throwing stars in your neck, mouth, and dick.

These books are filled with titty-thumping threats about rising up against tyranny. They assert that all these handguns are there to insure no
government ever tries to take things too far. But what would that look
like? Some of the more coherent books try to pull obscure events from
history to demonstrate the dangers of gun control, but there's a more contemporary example. Philando Castile was pulled over by police 46 times
for things like speeding, not wearing a seat belt, or having muffler
trouble. Actual "jack-booted government thugs" took his liberty, stole thousands of dollars of his money, and eventually shot him to death
because he had a legal gun in his car. And not a single one of you grabbed
a rifle and overthrew the government. So don't tell me there will be a
second civil war. You've already seen tyranny, and your reaction was to
blame the victim for not meekly complying hard enough. Unless ... oh shit, unless you're ... no. Unless you're ... r-racist?

If you're scared because everything wants to kill you, a gun won't make
that go away, you coward. And if you're stockpiling weapons to defeat
America, do you have enough men to operate your LPs and OPs and still
maintain your defensive positions? Why am I asking? They have tanks,
buddy. If the American military decides they want American civilians dead,
your choices are joining the Army or dying with a lot of valid questions.
So if it makes you feel good to carry your gun around, or play with it, or
yank it out in a panic when you hear a strange noise, that sounds fun, but
stop trying to convince us it's because you're super smart and tough.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)