Advocates for a particular expression of Christianity to be fused with American civic life, with the government vigorously promoting and preserving this version of Christianity as the principal and undisputed cultural framework has a peculiar but
traditional way of viewing the conflict between Israel and the Philistine.
We do understand how Israel has a strong defense against those who would deceive humanity with false beliefs and outright lies.
The sage understands both sides of the conflict but does see faults creating weaknesses
The world cannot tolerate too much of an increase in the price of oil as it would adversely affect the cost of food and the ability to supply bread as it is.
UN needs to find someone other than US and Israel to feed, supply and rebuild Gaza while Gaza at the same time is willing to coexist with Israel and US as is.
Hence any strike against Iran so as to not adversely affecting oil shipping is for US to act as someone like Lindsay Graham or Nicky Haley, or Donald Trump, would suggest: takeout Iranian oil production.
I am inclined to believe that Iran has until February of 2025 to think about it. Doesn't rule out any such action before then
Of course that may invite some fire from Iran on shipping, but immediate response by US would be somewhat devastating to Iran's Navy, coastline and residents.
Iranian oil fields may be saved by release of hostages in Gaza and that is what I see at the moment..
Not all Muslims see the destruction of Israel as necessary. All governments are in need of major reforms, so am not going to say Israel is without fault. Hamas though is perceived as a Nazi-like ideology and the intention is to exterminate Israel , rule
Jerusalem, and to approve of the death of "infidels" .

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)