XPost: alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox, alt.politics.religion
XPost: alt.christnet.religion

CORRECTION:

#237 - USE OF FORCE + #41 - RESPONSE = #278 - RELAXATION

#1388 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #278 as [#600, #1, #30, #1, #200, #1, #50,
#300, #5, #200] = chaláō (G5465): {UMBRA: #1432 % #41 = #38} 1) to
loosen, slacken, relax; 2) to let down from a higher place to a lower;

#1388 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #800] = kērýssō (G2784): {UMBRA:
#1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to officiate as a herald; 1a) to
proclaim after the manner of a herald; 1b) *always* *with* *the*
*suggestion* *of* *formality*, *gravity* *and* *an* *authority* *which*
*must* *be* *listened* *to* *and* *obeyed*; 2) to publish, proclaim
openly: something which has been done; 3) used of the public
proclamation of the gospel and matters pertaining to it, made by John
the Baptist, by Jesus, by the apostles and other Christian teachers;

WE ALREADY HAVE TWO PENTAMORPHIC NORMALISATION / TEMPORAL HEURISTIC
CANDIDATES FOR #318 - PUT TO DEATH BY VIOLENCE:

GRAPPLE (330, 318)@[12, 76, 30, 45, 57, 42, 31, 21, 4] PROTOTYPE

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.09.11&time:02.05&heuristic>

GRAPPLE (468, 318)@[79, 62, 23, 38, 39, 10, 47, 15, 5] PROTOTYPE

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.09.11&time:21.45&heuristic>

#650 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #318 as [#30, #200, #300, #70, #10, #40] =
râshâʻ (H7563): {UMBRA: #570 % #41 = #37} 1) wicked, criminal; 1a)
guilty one, one guilty of crime (subst); 1b) wicked (hostile to God);
1c) wicked, guilty of sin (against God or man);

[#30, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION: YI (#30)}

#200, {@2: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24});
Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42})}

#300, {@3: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#142); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#125)}

#70, {@4: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR
{%22}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}

#10, {@5: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#218); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#205)}

#40] {@6: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38} / I
CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#245)}

Our next activity is to implement the ONTIC / DEME / NOUMENON MALE /
FEME REDACTION as SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} reporting so that we might get some
sense of IDEA chaining ...

Which will commence from next Thursday the 14 SEPTEMBER 2023.

We ought to once again stress here that whilst our neural linguistic
pragma as informal research is derived from a hebrew / greek biblical
lexicon source that this is "...exceedingly broad as a premise and could
in my self educated perspective: be a procedural rule, a dialectic
derived from an expert opinion (or chatGPT) or some other descriptive narrative..."

Our usage of this lexicon source is threefold:

a) those languages comprising 22 or 24 phonemes is then amenable to our context of temporal markers / continuum / linear progression as base-7:
24 x 7 x 13 = 6D x 364 = #2184 days x 49 = 6J = 294 x 364 or 293 =
365.2423 days;

b) those languages are subject to substantial academic rigour;

c) that lexicon is widely translatable into other languages.

CHATGPT: The Bible is one of the most translated books in the world. As
of 2022, the full Bible has been translated into 724 languages, the New Testament has been translated into 1,617 languages, and parts of the
Bible have been translated into 1,248 languages. These numbers may vary slightly depending on the source and the criteria for translation. The
Bible has been translated from the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek
versions into different languages, including sign languages.

It is conceivable then that a DIALECTIC obtained from a superlative
language description of a PROBLEM / SYMPTOM DESCRIPTION / TEXT BOOK CASE
might also suffice.

Hypothetically what's needed is some teleological descriptor by which a
viable sense of IDEA chaining might be observed.

NECROMANCY (gk. #652 = νεκρομαντεία: ONTIC: #180; DEME: #237 - USE OF
FORCE; MALE: #442; FEME: #328 - LAST TABLE TALK IDEA; GRUNTLE@[#1059,
#770]): A conjuring involving the dead as loosely, any sorcery or
witchcraft, especially involving death or the dead, particularly sorcery involving raising or reanimating the dead.

#9 as [#1 - CENTER (CHUNG), #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI), #2 - FULL CIRCLE
(CHOU)] /
#429 as [#20, #1, #2, #6, #400] = ʼôwb (H178): {UMBRA: #9 % #41 = #9} 1) water skin bottle; 2) necromancer; 2a) necromancer, one who evokes the
dead; 2b) ghost, spirit of a dead one; 2c) *PRACTICE* *OF* *NECROMANCY*;
3) one that has a familiar spirit;

AS WE NOTED THE META-LOGIC AUTONOMOUS #EIGHT DELIMITER ASSOCIATED WITH
THE DEME EXTENT #237 - USE OF FORCE --> #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) --> #277
- RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST THAT IT SEEMS LIKELY AS METAPHYSICAL
NOMENCLATURE TO BE ABLE TO DEVISE FROM AN ONTIC / DEME STEM AN
ASSOCIATION OF THE META DESCRIPTOR SPECTRUM:

| + #1 - CENTER
#237 - USE OF FORCE - | + #41 - RESPONSE
| + #81 - FOSTERING

#237 - USE OF FORCE + #41 - RESPONSE = #278 - RELAXATION

#1388 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #278 as [#600, #1, #30, #1, #200, #1, #50,
#300, #5, #200] = chaláō (G5465): {UMBRA: #1432 % #41 = #38} 1) to
loosen, slacken, relax; 2) to let down from a higher place to a lower;

#1388 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #800] = kērýssō (G2784): {UMBRA:
#1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to officiate as a herald; 1a) to
proclaim after the manner of a herald; 1b) *always* *with* *the*
*suggestion* *of* *formality*, *gravity* *and* *an* *authority* *which*
*must* *be* *listened* *to* *and* *obeyed*; 2) to publish, proclaim
openly: something which has been done; 3) used of the public
proclamation of the gospel and matters pertaining to it, made by John
the Baptist, by Jesus, by the apostles and other Christian teachers;

#237 - USE OF FORCE + #81 - FOSTERING = #318 - PUT TO DEATH BY VIOLENCE

#821 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL #318 as [#5, #200, #500, #1, #60, #5, #50] = spházō (G4969): {UMBRA: #1508 % #41 = #32} 1) to slay, slaughter,
butcher; 2) to put to death by violence; 3) mortally wounded;

[#5, {@1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#5)}

#200, {@2: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#48); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#43)}

#500, {@3: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#105); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION:
JUI (#57)}

#1, {@4: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#163); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#58)}

#60, {@5: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8} / I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#118 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%5})}

#5, {@6: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#242); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#123)}

#50] {@7: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#253); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
WASTING: T'ANG (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27})}

#821 as [#5, #300, #40, #70, #6, #400] = hashmâʻûwth (H2045): {UMBRA:
#821 % #41 = #1} 1) a causing to hear, a report, a communication;

<https://www.grapple369.com/?lexicon:H6,H202,H476,H1497,H2203,H2470,H2487,H2710,H3233,H3295,H3381,H3406,H3899,H4725,H4758,H4759,H4760,H4791,H4796,H4836,H5632,H5768,H5804,H5953,H5955,H6030,H6094,H6225,H7105,H7114,H7323,H7563,H7804,H7999,H8043,H8437,H8458,
G132,G680,G1014,G1015,G1016,G1447,G1653,G2327,G2361,G2476,G2517,G2919,G3004,G4637,G4638,G4868,G4969>

FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #365 = #360 - PATHOS + #5 - GROUNDING OF
ACTION --> #237 - USE OF FORCE PENTAMORPH

#THREE: #98 as #17 - HOLDING BACK (JUAN)
#FOUR: #139 as #58 - GATHERING IN (HSI)
#FIVE: #237 as #75 - FAILURE (SHIH)

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.8.29&time:11.05&heuristic>

#277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST PENTAMORPHS AS UTILITARIAN #491 - AGENCY
FUNCTIONS <-- THERE ARE MULTIPLE POSSIBLE ASSAYING CANDIDATES

#THREE: #138 as #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)
#FOUR: #139 as #58 - GATHERING IN (HSI)
#FIVE: #277 as #34 - KINSHIP (CH'IN)

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.08.31&time:16.05&heuristic>

FORMULA OF HUMANITY: #364 - TEMPORAL HEURISTIC --> 4.5 x #81 --> #451 -
PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532)

FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: 9x9x9 = #729 as @1 - SELF + #728 - MORPHOS.

FORMULA OF PROGRESSION (#40 - LAW / MODEL (FE) DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN
#237 - USE OF FORCE --> #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST): Kant’s most
prominent formulation of the Categorical Imperative, known as the
Formula of Universal Law (FUL), is generally thought to demand that one
act only on maxims that one can will as universal laws without this
generating a contradiction. Kant’s view is standardly summarized as
requiring the ‘universalizability’ of one’s maxims and described in
terms of the distinction between ‘contradictions in conception’ and ‘contradictions in the will’. Focusing on the under appreciated significance of the simultaneity condition included in the FUL, PAULINE KLEINGELD argues, by contrast, that the principle is better read as
requiring that one be able to will two things simultaneously without
#215 - SELF-CONTRADICTION (ie. is the GAUGES controller deployment then
causal for an aberration of ONTIC / DEME grounding?), namely, that a
maxim be one’s own and that it be a universal law. This amounts to a new interpretation of the FUL with significant interpretive and
philosophical advantages. <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2017-0006/html>


On 7/9/2023 08:55, dolf wrote:

We've completed our logical thinking task for today which was to nest
our RESULTS {} concept code segment into a loop so that it is contingent
upon additional pentamorph binary mask associations.

We'll still need to test for any ANOMALOUS behaviour that will more
readily become apparent as we complete our SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} reporting
stage of development.

Although we don't presently utilise this feature, when deploying the
?run URL action, we've added a capability to pass parameter variables to
the main () function within the ACTIONABLE TASK

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Pentamorphic%20Normalisation&date:2023.9.7>

On 6/9/2023 14:06, dolf wrote:

We've now transitioned the "Pentamorphic Normalisation.json" code to
deploy
the search result pentamorph binary mask associations as clusters in
which
we convey a hierarchy of matched criteria.

Tomorrow's logical will be to nest this code segment into a loop which is
contingent upon additional pentamorph binary mask associations.

Our actionable task should then be completed and we'll leave the
consideration of a Pentamorphism against any grapple @[] to some other
actionable task.

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

STATUS UPDATE @ 1330 HOURS ON 5 SEPTEMBER 2023:

We have some intermediate code in place which makes a determination on
masking associated to the pentamorph grouping so that we can suitably
evolve the processPentamorphs() function which now deploys four binary
states:

- penta as the nature of the pentamorph grouping
- flags [] array conveying the match criteria in the pentamorph
- met [] array to the record conveying nature of any match to the telos
[] array
- met [] array to each pentamorph node

Such that for example the telos [298, 333] search array produces a
result where the record met [4, 0] array and the flags: [0, 0, 0, 0, 4]
array when set to that criteria, it means the telos condition 298 is met >>> in the MALE field of the MORPH5 and consequentially the met: [4, 0]
array in that pentamorph node will similarly reflect the condition.

Such that if the MORPH5 with a specific met: [4, 0] criteria is
disconnected from the main record entry we'll still know that the telos
298 and not the 333 condition is met.

Having completed that logical thinking task, we'll next have to give
consideration as to what organisation criteria we deploy for our results >>> representation: it's more likely we'll be concerned with the
teleological criteria as a priority to which pentamorph.

Accordingly, we'll wind back the intermediate code which was requisite
for stabilising our processPentamorphs() function as our next logical
thinking task.

On 5/9/2023 07:26, dolf wrote:

During our hiatus we've been busy identifying viable consciousness
instantiated rationalisation methods for GNOSIS EX MACHINA...

To state it concisely such involves:

1)  Redaction of speech into its memeBrain form consisting of neural
linguistic pragma which provides the meta-descriptors associated with
magnitude of a teleological reprise;

2) We then deploy our praxis pairing method to determine by dynamic
natural
association (DNA) the categories which need resolution.

3) From those categories deploy a relative natural associator (RNA)
as selector for ontic / deme and noumenon idea chaining.

So as we continue our pentamorphic / temporal heuristic development
we'll
want to be mindful of the nested Platonic solids paradigm for action:

#65 (5) - neural linguistic pragma
#34 (4) - praxis of rationality
#15 (3) - ontic / deme and noumenon chaining
#111 (6) - meta logic grapple @ []
#175 (7) - pentamorph (doing)

Which is quantified  as then #260 - actionable [#1807 = sṓzō (G4982): >>>> (computing) save (a file)] within the relative #369 - sphere (meta
verse)
of operation.

#1082 as [#200, #800, #10, #7, #5, #10, #50] = sṓzō (G4982): {UMBRA: >>>> #1807
% #41 = #3} 1) to save, keep safe and sound, to rescue from danger or
destruction; 1a) one (from injury or peril); 1a1) to save a
suffering one
(from perishing), i.e. one suffering from disease, to make well, heal, >>>> restore to health; 1a2) to preserve one who is in danger of
destruction, to
save or rescue; 1b) to save in the technical biblical sense; 1b1)
negatively; i) to deliver from the penalties of the Messianic
judgment; ii)
to save from the evils which obstruct the reception of the Messianic
deliverance;

So we have much work to do on our pentamorphic normalisation and spiral >>>> selector development.

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We return again to this informal research observation: "as we note
from
this heuristic #507 - TELEOLOGICAL INSTANCE
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.8.22&time:6.5&heuristic>, there
is not necessarily an inclusion of any ontic / deme grounding
premise to
our perpetual dynamic as process for which we might have to rely on
some
other sapient knowledge as neural linguistic pragma of utilitarian
circumscribed experience."

This is exceedingly broad as a neural linguistic pragma premise and
could
in my self educated perspective: be a procedural rule, a dialectic
derived
from an expert opinion (or chatGPT) or some other descriptive
narrative
which this instance is a poem with an amended title that then
deploys the
GRUNTLE (to place into good humour) as a noumenon redacted #1139

#148 /

#248 selector to then

EDWARD ROSS:

At the root of true and eternal personal unhappiness is death.  At
the root
of time wasting and unending search for the real meaning of life is
death.
At the root of religions and countless metaphysical and existential
theory,
hypothesis and cults is death.

Though not the dying itself or the pain of it, or the leaving of the
loved
ones behind, or the leaving of wealth, or being put into a grave or
scavenged by vultures, but the very concept of the End of Me.

However, the meaning of life in collectives stretches differently.
Collectives impose their own version of mortality / immortality.
Collectives exist because they understand the needs of the
individuals and
prey on those needs and understandings to ensure the continuity of the >>>> collective by stretching the meaning of life beyond the individual
into a
realm of collective needs, rewards and punishments.

So why is death or rather meaningless lives are at the root of all
ills?
Why shouldn’t they? Cattle are not philosophically or existentially
challenged. They do not philosophise about life, nor do they invent
religious scriptures or cults. They live in collectives and from this
collective that they receive security and love. They are not worried
about
continuity outside the collective and when one leaves for the
slaughterhouse others mourn it for a chew or two and get on with life. >>>> Opposite to this are humans, who has constructed a set of needs
beyond and
above what we can independently or collectively can satisfy.

The continuity after death is not certain. Zeal-full or otherwise
believers
of life after death are well organised, motivated and willing to commit >>>> what deems necessary to guarantee their continuity at whatever
personal or
collective costs, committing some of the worst atrocities.

The nonbelievers, on the other hand, are more than happy to use and
abuse
what may come, for they suffer no fear of retaliation after the expiry >>>> date.

In either case the definitiveness of death and the ambiguity of the
continuity of life after it,  is at the root of all human ills.

<https://x.com/edwardross01/status/1697925442286788994>

------

TWEET:

This: "root of religions and countless metaphysical and existential
theory,
hypothesis and cults is death"

Parthenogenesis --> #65, #41, #17

Pythagorean theorem: #5 = #4 + #3

Nested Platonic solids as pentamorphic paradigm of nihilism.

I've saved your comment for analysis

2ND TWEET:

If I use the praxis pairing method -> ontic / deme idea chaining:

"Collectives exist ... realm of collectiveness needs" = #60 / #617 |
#12 /
#528

Get deme: #617 gives #666 - teléō (G5055) and thereby we have a
bipartite /
tripartite paradigm to then muse ultimate ends / good

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)