really active...MEASURES OF
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
THUSLY THE PROVISIONAL CONCEPT
turn {@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 73 (#73)}
CAN ALSO BE VIEWED IN THE METAPHYSICAL AS NOUMENON RELATION TO THE
GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET:
[t, {@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38)},
u, {@2: Sup: 14 (#52); Ego: 57 (#95)},
r, {@3: Sup: 23 (#75); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7})},
n] {@4: Sup: 73 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 50 (#154)}
@148: The Transcendental Doctrine of the Power of Judgment (or
Analytic of Principles)
@154: Of the System of Principles of the Pure Understanding (Of the
highest principle of all synthetic judgments)
[l, {@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30)},
e, {@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35)},
f, {@3: Sup: 41 (#106); Ego: 6 (#41)},
t] {@4: Sup: 79 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
38 (#79)},
@185: One can now see from all this what the schema of each category
contains and makes representable: the schema of magnitude, the
production (synthesis) of time itself in the successive apprehension
of an object; the schema of quality, the synthesis of sensation
(perception) with the representation of time, or the filling of time;
that of relation, the relation of perceptions among themselves at all
times (i.e., according to a rule of time-determination); finally, the
schema of modality and its categories, time itself, as the correlate
of the determination of whether and how an object belongs to time. The
schemata are therefore nothing but time- determinations a priori in
accordance with rules, and these refer in the order of the categories
to the time-series, the time-content, the time-order, and finally the
time-totality with respect to all possible objects.
[r, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)},
i, {@2: Sup: 18 (#27); Ego: 9 (#18)},
g, {@3: Sup: 25 (#52); Ego: 7 (#25)},
h, {@4: Sup: 33 (#85); Ego: 8 (#33)},
t] {@5: Sup: 71 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 38 (#71)},
@156: To give an object – if this is not to mean giving it again only
mediately, but exhibiting it immediately in intuition – is nothing
other than to relate a representation of it to experience (whether
actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as these
concepts are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also
that they are represented fully a priori in the mind, would
nonetheless be without objective validity and without sense and
significance, if their necessary use were not directed upon the
objects of experience – indeed, their representation is a mere schema
that is always related to the reproductive imagination, which calls
forth the objects of experience without which they would have no
significance; and thus it is with all concepts, without distinction.
ACCORDINGLY MY INFORMAL RESEARCH OBJECTIVE IS TO DETERMINE HOW KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA CAN FACILITATE THEN METASTASISED NOUMENON BASED
METAPHYSICAL PROCESSES OF COGNITION -- IT'S TOO LATE IN LIFE TO GET A
FORMAL EDUCATION AND SO I AM TINKERING
----------
I ought to informally add (ie. self-education) that when we are
talking about ONTIC as an epistemological premise notion, we are
making considerations as to #CENTRE of BEING from whence perspective
is drawn and the grounding for existence as the foundational basis for
intuition, cognition, sapience and interoperability knowledge economy...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip>
I've currently implementing further features within the prototype and
ought to have the IDEA panel implemented this week...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{m:540}&idea:{f:670}> <--
*corrected* *syntax*
The reason why the HEBREW / GREEK lexicon is favored a consideration
of temporal / linguistic dialectics associated to alternative
apriority perennial perspectives of the anthropocentric cosmogonic
principle:
24 x 7 = @168 x 13 = #2184
THAT THE #2184 is able to both accommodate the 24 elements of the
GREEK and the 22 elements of the HEBREW as capacity to convey RATIONAL
PI by GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET since the temporal can be
considered in linear terms of SEPTET CAUSALITY having a base-7
numbering system:
DAYS: 7^0
WEEKS: 7^1
JUBILEES: 7^2
which then intersects with the tropical realisation of time:
#2184 x 49 (ie. 6 JUBILEES as 294 x 364 days) = 107016 days / 293 =
365.242320819112628 as tropical year...
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {ie. #312 - #81 -
SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE = #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL}
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
These are profound philosophical conceptions but what I find most fascinating is the ONTIC reality implying a TRINOMIAL harmony as intersection when the divisible factor has an increased magnitude:
#2184 / 12 = @182
6: {
thoth: "Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am
not fraudulent in measures of grain.",
dictum: "I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN",
virtue: [6 ,"With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction."],
tools: [46 ,"Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition."],
position: [63 ,"As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent."],
time: [67 ,"As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct."],
canon: 182,
ankh: 0
},
#2184 / 13 = @168
26: {
thoth: "Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait; I am
not the
cause of weeping to any.",
dictum: "I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY",
virtue: [26 ,"If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but"],
tools: [66 ,"If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow."],
position: [19 ,"As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along."],
time: [57 ,"As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured."],
canon: 168,
ankh: 0
}
#2184 / 14 = @156
21: {
thoth: "Oh thou who art above Princes, and who makest thine
appearance in
Amu; I do not cause terrors.",
dictum: "I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS",
virtue: [21 ,"Release (no. #21) means a push forward."],
tools: [61 ,"Embellishment (no. #61) means a decline."],
position: [49 ,"With Flight (no. #49), there is what one avoids."],
time: [25 ,"With Contention (no. #25), there is what one hastens towards."],
canon: 156,
ankh: 0
}
Thus the conclusion which I provisionally make is that the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE has an underlying ONTIC
characteristic.
But such will require substantially more prudent consideration...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{506}>
@182 + @168 + @156 = #506 as 10th SEFIROT meaning emanations, are the 10 attributes/emanations in Kabbalah, through which Ein Sof (The Infinite) reveals Itself and continuously creates both the physical realm and the chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as sephirot/sephiroth, singular sefirah/sephirah etc.
H4438@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 70 (#110); Ego: 30 (#70),
@3: Sup: 9 (#119); Ego: 20 (#90),
@4: Sup: 19 (#138); Ego: 10 (#100),
@5: Sup: 25 (#163); Ego: 6 (#106),
@6: Sup: 20 (#183); Ego: 76 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN
GRAIN {%6}),appearance at
Male: #183; Feme: #182
} // #506
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #496 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;
THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine
Elephantine; I am not rapacious.power;
#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102
#506 = [#40, #30, #20, #10, #6, #400] as malkûwth (H4438): {UMBRA: #40 as #496 % #41 = #4} 1) royalty, royal power, reign, kingdom, sovereign
1a) royal power, dominion; 1b) reign; 1c) kingdom, realm;*ACQUIRE*,
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?Lexicon: H4438>
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* / *DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*,
*INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 = *MOSES* *SEAT*PRINCIPLE
*OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) = #491 -
OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION) as #491 as [#80, #1,founder of a
#300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as #489 % #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaphor: *ZEUS*.; 3) God is called the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father of the corporeal nature, natural fathers, both parents; 1b) a more remote ancestor, the
race or tribe, progenitor of a people, forefather: so Abraham is called, Jacob and David; 1b1) fathers ie. ancestors, forefathers, founders of a race; 1c) one advanced in years, a senior; 2a) the originator and transmitter of anything; 2a1) the authors of a family or society ofpersons
animated by the same spirit as himself; 2a2) one who has infused his own spirit into others, who actuates and governs their minds; 2b) one who2c) a
stands in a father's place and looks after another in a paternal way;
title of honour; 2c1) teachers, as those to whom pupils trace back the knowledge and training they have received; 2c2) the members of the Sanhedrin, whose prerogative it was by virtue of the wisdom andexperience
in which they excelled, to take charge of the interests of others;3a) *OF*
*THE* *STARS*, *THE* *HEAVENLY* *LUMINARIES*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *IS* *THEIR* *CREATOR*, *UPHOLDER*, *RULER*; 3b) of all rational and intelligentbeings,
whether angels or men, because he is their creator, preserver,guardian and
protector; 3b1) of spiritual beings and of all men; 3c) of Christians, as those who through Christ have been exalted to a specially close andFather; 3d)
intimate relationship with God, and who no longer dread him as a stern
judge of sinners, but revere him as their reconciled and loving
the Father of Jesus Christ, as one whom God has united to himself in the closest bond of love and intimacy, made acquainted with his purposes, appointed to explain and carry out among men the plan of salvation, andAUTHORITY
made to share also in his own divine nature; 3d1) *BY* *JESUS* *CHRIST* *HIMSELF*; 3d2) by the apostles;
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND
FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OURNIETS
LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE*
*OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF* *PRINCIPLES*); Ego:
41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61
(#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 ER IS
BIJZONDERS EN WAARDELOZE VIERING TIJDENS DE EUROPESE DONKERE TIJDEN ZIJN SCHIJNEN: DOOR GEORGEOF 3
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC
APRIL 33 AD),APRIL 33
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3
AD); Ego: 80 (#391),TO BE
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273-SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184- LAWS
OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THEEVENT OF
HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONSAS MAY,
FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 -
*YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
(#358)}WHICH THEN GIVES RISE TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY'S UNDERSTANDING OF GEORG
HEGEL’s @1 - THESIS; @2 - ANTI-THESIS; @3 - SYNTHESIS; @4 -
PROGRESSION or KARL MARX’s @1 - PROGRESSION; @2 - SYNTHESIS; @3 -
ANTI-THESIS; @4 - THESIS AS CONFORMING TO THE NOUMENON'S SEPTET
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS
@1 - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} AS FOUNDATIONAL
STONE (31 MAY) TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER
1900 BEING INSTRUMENTATION TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901 / #1 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @1 - THESIS;
@2 - FORMULA OF HUMANITY: @205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES
OF PROBITY / #2 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 - #81 = #231}; @2 -
ANTI-THESIS;
@3 - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: @82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF
CONTINUITY / #3 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION {#273 v's #288};
@3 - SYNTHESIS;
@4 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: @164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <—
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS / #4 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC} @4 - PROGRESSION / @1 - PROGRESSION;
@5 - FORMULA OF KANONICOS {GK: ΚᾸΝΟΝῘΚΌΣ #352 / #329 - 1ST JANUARY
"INTER GRAVISSIMAS PASTORALIS OFFICII NOSTRI CURAS…" PAPAL BULL ISSUED
BY POPE GREGORY XIII ON 24 FEBRUARY 1582} PRINCIPLES: @123 / #2188 -
SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT / #5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY} @2 - SYNTHESIS;
KANONICOS@[
κ, {@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20)},
α, {@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21)},
ν, {@3: Sup: 71 (#112); Ego: 50 (#71)},
ο, {@4: Sup: 60 (#172); Ego: 70 (#141)},
ν, {@5: Sup: 29 (#201); Ego: 50 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF
THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32})},
ι, {@6: Sup: 39 (#240); Ego: 10 (#201)},
κ, {@7: Sup: 59 (#299); Ego: 20 (#221)},
ο, {@8: Sup: 48 (#347); Ego: 70 (#291)},
ς {@9: Sup: 5 (#352); Ego: 38 (#329)}
] // *AMONG* *THE* *MOST* *SERIOUS* *DUTIES* *OF* *OUR* *PASTORAL*
*OFFICE*…
@6 - FORMULA OF EMANATION: @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT / #6 - OBLIGATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION}:
BINOMIAL {@1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE AS EMANATION} STASIS
NOMENCLATURE @3 - ANTI-THESIS;
AS AN OPTIMAL TEMPLATE OF AGREEMENT WHICH IS ONTIC / MATHEMATICAL AND
SUITABLE FOR A GLOBAL SAPIENT ECONOMY / #7 - MANIFESTING NORM
{PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION} @4 - THESIS;
I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE GERMAN LANGUAGE HOWEVER BY UTILISING SUCH
DIALECTIC IT IS THEN POSSIBLE TO WRITE A POEM SO AS TO DERIVE THE
REQUISITE GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET (via the earlier CHAT
option on the earlier GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE:
— HELL'S CLAMOUR — {@1: Sup: 65 (#65); Ego: 49 (#49)},
"OH YELLOW SHIRTS. {@2: Sup: 31 (#96); Ego: 37 (#86 - I AM NOT A
ROBBER OF FOOD {%10})},
PARIS IS BURNING. {@3: Sup: 76 (#172); Ego: 77 (#163)},
AN OLD DAME FLIRTS. {@4: Sup: 46 (#218); Ego: 63 (#226)},
HELL HAS YEARNING. {@5: Sup: 39 (#257); Ego: 41 (#267)},
FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268); Ego: 45 (#312)},
A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312); Ego: 46 (#358)},
FRATERNITE AU MORTS." {@8: Sup: 42 (#354); Ego: 70 (#428)},
----
— HELL’S CLAMOUR —
“OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
PARIS IS BURNING.
AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
HELL HAS YEARNING.
FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268); Ego: 45 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*)}
A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 46
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?heuristic:now&sapience:vcyan&overview>FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”
Thusly, I ought to therefore have recourse to KANT'S PROLEGOMENA
IDEAS: @268, @312 and @358 as metaphysical considerations on "THINKING
ABOUT THINKING" and accordingly I hope to include his narrative within
later stages of my informal research as GRUMBLE prototype.
----------
I was having my customary Saturday lunch today at a local country-side
restaurant only to find that the MERCEDES-BENZ women's touring league
was in town and that I had to sit through a lunchtime lecture from a
Stuttgart born lass...
Given the motor manufacturer invention was patented in January 1886,
and that they might like to transition towards a trinomial sapient
paradigm which is capable of mirroring human consciousness:
which is compatible within Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena 1783 from a
binomial paradigm having an unfortunate historical period from 1933 -
1945 due to an apriority capacity to define the key depreciating ***
intersecting points #315 (3 + 4 = 7) / #342 (5 + 6 = 11) in
association within perennial perspectives of cosmological
anthropocentric paradigm:
24 x 7 = @168 ***
1440 minutes per day / #72 = 20 minutes
1440 / 4 = 360 ***
1440 / 5 = 288 ***
By ontic compliance with (informal research perspective) dialectics of
impulsivity:
@168
@215
@157 <-- OF THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING
@130 <-- PROBABILITY THEORY OUGHT TO BE APPLIED AT THE ONTIC LEVEL
#451 - RIGHT TO LIFE {Y-M-T-A} HAVING BY IMPETUS OF #41 - ONTIC
NECESSITY A MORAL ENTITLEMENT TO UNENCUMBERED #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS
ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)
#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESTING NORM (COVET NOT)
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3
- CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873 - QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT
But I was *prohibited* *from* *doing* *so* *by* *the* *restaurant*
*owners* and accordingly I removed a declarative statement on such
which I give to the owners as a gift since they were no longer worthy
of it.
WE DON'T WANT THEIR EVENT TO GO PEAR SHAPE THEY SAID IN CONTEMPT...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Leprosy.pdf>
So apart from making a statement about the unfortunate event I wont
otherwise bother...
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST
PRINCIPLE OF ALL SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AS IDEA @A157: “OF THE SYSTEM OF
PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING [IDEAS: @A154 / @B193] It is
therefore given: that if one must go outside a given concept to
compare [IDEAS: @A155 / @B194] it synthetically with another, then a
third thing is needed, in which alone the synthesis of two concepts
can originate. But what is then this third thing, the medium of all
synthetic judgments? . . .
If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to
relate to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that
*OBJECT*, then the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.
Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought
with them, one has in fact cognized [IDEA: @196] nothing through this
thinking, but has merely played with representations.
To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
mediately, [IDEA: @A156] but exhibiting it immediately in intuition –
is nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience
(whether actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as
these concepts are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is
also that they are represented fully a priori in the mind, would
nonetheless be without *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and
significance, if their necessary use were not directed upon the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* – indeed, their representation is a mere
schema that is always related to the reproductive imagination, which
calls forth the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* without which they would
have no significance; and thus it is with all concepts, without
distinction.
The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*
to all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic
unity of the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it
would not even be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in
no context would agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly
connected (possible) consciousness, hence also not for the
transcendental and necessary unity of apperception.
Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a
priori, [IDEA: @B196] namely universal rules of unity in the synthesis
of the appearances, whose [IDEA: @A157] *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* as
necessary {#287 - STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always
be pointed to in experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside
this relation, however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely
impossible, since they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*,
upon which the synthetic unity of their concepts could establish
*OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.
Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about
space in general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination
inscribes in it, that we actually require no experience thereto at
all; nonetheless, this cognition would amount to nothing but
preoccupation with a mere brain phantom, were it not that space is to
be regarded as a condition of the appearances that constitute the
stuff of outer experience; in consequence, these pure synthetic
judgments relate (albeit only mediately) to possible experience, or
rather to the *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*, *AND* *GROUND*
*THE* *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon that alone.
Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility
the single type of cognition that gives reality to every other
synthesis, as a [IDEA: @B197] priori cognition the other synthesis
also has truth (*AGREEMENT* *WITH* *AN* [IDEA: @A158] *OBJECT*) only
in that it contains nothing more than what is necessary for the
synthetic unity of experience in general.
The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY*
*OBJECT* *FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE*
*SYNTHETIC* *UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A*
*POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in
this way: if we relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition,
the synthesis of the imagination, and its necessary unity in a
transcendental apperception to a possible cognition of experience in
general and say: the conditions of the possibility of experience in
general are at the same time the conditions of the possibility of the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON HAVE *OBJECTIVE*
*VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to 180]
CAVEAT: Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my
causal infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I
am entirely reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision
its potential utility and material merits.
And thusly before we return to the actual contents of our letter of 8
November 2017 made to the STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERAL and FEDERAL
SENATOR PENNY WONG as our *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* we need cohere
from the context of the *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* which is the underlying
anthropological cosmogonic principle basis to sapience itself and a
metastasised premise to identity as the POINT OF REFERENCE AS
PERSPECTIVE so that intelligence should not submit to ignorance which
is here the problem in relation to any further as future *POSSIBILITY*
*OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*, *AND* *GROUND* *THE* *OBJECTIVE*
*VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS*.
And to do so we are going to consider the example of the immateriality
/ materiality as the notion of 'DUCK QUACKS' comment made at the
beginning of this PART 4 of our FILING submission and whether there is
any factuality to it and the originating document which was a 12 MAY
2017 statement as DIARY ON MY TRIP TO NORTH KOREA SO AS TO CHAT WITH
KIM JONG UN, OUR *ENJOYMENT* *OF* *WAGNER* *OPERA* AND DISCUSSIONS ON
HIS FORTH COMING MEMOIR: THE ART OF DICTATORSHIP IN THE SLAUGHTER OF
THE YOUTH. One could argue that since I've never been to North Korea
that no rationality can be applied to the claim that it contains any
factuality beyond conveying objects of experience.
JON JANKOWSKI (ORLANDO) @ 2031 HOURS ON 30 MAY 2019: “ORANGE COUNTY
FIREFIGHTERS RESCUE BABY DUCKS FROM STORM DRAIN
<https://www.clickorlando.com/news/orange-county-firefighters-rescue-baby-ducks-from-storm-drain>
On 28 MAY 2017 we summarised this within the broader conception "WHAT
IS COGNITIVE WITHIN MIND WHEN AN AUTONOMOUS PARADIGM IS A MIRRORED
AUTONOMOUS PROTOTYPE OF EACH OTHER'S SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY" by giving a
partial explanation as follows. We have from time to time expressed
the COGNITIVE process using several metaphors:
a) The traversal of the temporal continuum is like driving down the
really active...MEASURES OF
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
THUSLY THE PROVISIONAL CONCEPT
turn {@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 73 (#73)}
CAN ALSO BE VIEWED IN THE METAPHYSICAL AS NOUMENON RELATION TO THE
GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET:
[t, {@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38)},
u, {@2: Sup: 14 (#52); Ego: 57 (#95)},
r, {@3: Sup: 23 (#75); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7})},
n] {@4: Sup: 73 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 50 (#154)}
@148: The Transcendental Doctrine of the Power of Judgment (or
Analytic of Principles)
@154: Of the System of Principles of the Pure Understanding (Of the
highest principle of all synthetic judgments)
[l, {@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30)},
e, {@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35)},
f, {@3: Sup: 41 (#106); Ego: 6 (#41)},
t] {@4: Sup: 79 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
38 (#79)},
@185: One can now see from all this what the schema of each category
contains and makes representable: the schema of magnitude, the
production (synthesis) of time itself in the successive apprehension
of an object; the schema of quality, the synthesis of sensation
(perception) with the representation of time, or the filling of time;
that of relation, the relation of perceptions among themselves at all
times (i.e., according to a rule of time-determination); finally, the
schema of modality and its categories, time itself, as the correlate
of the determination of whether and how an object belongs to time. The
schemata are therefore nothing but time- determinations a priori in
accordance with rules, and these refer in the order of the categories
to the time-series, the time-content, the time-order, and finally the
time-totality with respect to all possible objects.
[r, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)},
i, {@2: Sup: 18 (#27); Ego: 9 (#18)},
g, {@3: Sup: 25 (#52); Ego: 7 (#25)},
h, {@4: Sup: 33 (#85); Ego: 8 (#33)},
t] {@5: Sup: 71 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 38 (#71)},
@156: To give an object – if this is not to mean giving it again only
mediately, but exhibiting it immediately in intuition – is nothing
other than to relate a representation of it to experience (whether
actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as these
concepts are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also
that they are represented fully a priori in the mind, would
nonetheless be without objective validity and without sense and
significance, if their necessary use were not directed upon the
objects of experience – indeed, their representation is a mere schema
that is always related to the reproductive imagination, which calls
forth the objects of experience without which they would have no
significance; and thus it is with all concepts, without distinction.
ACCORDINGLY MY INFORMAL RESEARCH OBJECTIVE IS TO DETERMINE HOW KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA CAN FACILITATE THEN METASTASISED NOUMENON BASED
METAPHYSICAL PROCESSES OF COGNITION -- IT'S TOO LATE IN LIFE TO GET A
FORMAL EDUCATION AND SO I AM TINKERING
----------
I ought to informally add (ie. self-education) that when we are
talking about ONTIC as an epistemological premise notion, we are
making considerations as to #CENTRE of BEING from whence perspective
is drawn and the grounding for existence as the foundational basis for
intuition, cognition, sapience and interoperability knowledge economy...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip>
I've currently implementing further features within the prototype and
ought to have the IDEA panel implemented this week...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{m:540}&idea:{f:670}> <--
*corrected* *syntax*
The reason why the HEBREW / GREEK lexicon is favored a consideration
of temporal / linguistic dialectics associated to alternative
apriority perennial perspectives of the anthropocentric cosmogonic
principle:
24 x 7 = @168 x 13 = #2184
THAT THE #2184 is able to both accommodate the 24 elements of the
GREEK and the 22 elements of the HEBREW as capacity to convey RATIONAL
PI by GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET since the temporal can be
considered in linear terms of SEPTET CAUSALITY having a base-7
numbering system:
DAYS: 7^0
WEEKS: 7^1
JUBILEES: 7^2
which then intersects with the tropical realisation of time:
#2184 x 49 (ie. 6 JUBILEES as 294 x 364 days) = 107016 days / 293 =
365.242320819112628 as tropical year...
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {ie. #312 - #81 -
SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE = #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL}
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
These are profound philosophical conceptions but what I find most
fascinating is the ONTIC reality implying a TRINOMIAL harmony as
intersection when the divisible factor has an increased magnitude:
#2184 / 12 = @182
6: {
thoth: "Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am
not fraudulent in measures of grain.",
dictum: "I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN",
virtue: [6 ,"With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction."],
tools: [46 ,"Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition."],
position: [63 ,"As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent."],
time: [67 ,"As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct."],
canon: 182,
ankh: 0
},
#2184 / 13 = @168
26: {
thoth: "Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait; I am
not the
cause of weeping to any.",
dictum: "I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY",
virtue: [26 ,"If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but"],
tools: [66 ,"If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow."],
position: [19 ,"As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along."],
time: [57 ,"As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured."],
canon: 168,
ankh: 0
}
#2184 / 14 = @156
21: {
thoth: "Oh thou who art above Princes, and who makest thine
appearance in
Amu; I do not cause terrors.",
dictum: "I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS",
virtue: [21 ,"Release (no. #21) means a push forward."],
tools: [61 ,"Embellishment (no. #61) means a decline."],
position: [49 ,"With Flight (no. #49), there is what one avoids."],
time: [25 ,"With Contention (no. #25), there is what one hastens towards."],
canon: 156,
ankh: 0
}
Thus the conclusion which I provisionally make is that the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE has an underlying ONTIC
characteristic.
But such will require substantially more prudent consideration...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{506}>
@182 + @168 + @156 = #506 as 10th SEFIROT meaning emanations, are the 10 attributes/emanations in Kabbalah, through which Ein Sof (The Infinite) reveals Itself and continuously creates both the physical realm and the
chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as sephirot/sephiroth, singular sefirah/sephirah etc.
H4438@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 70 (#110); Ego: 30 (#70),
@3: Sup: 9 (#119); Ego: 20 (#90),
@4: Sup: 19 (#138); Ego: 10 (#100),
@5: Sup: 25 (#163); Ego: 6 (#106),
@6: Sup: 20 (#183); Ego: 76 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN
GRAIN {%6}),appearance at
Male: #183; Feme: #182
} // #506
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #496 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;
THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine
Elephantine; I am not rapacious.power;
#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102
#506 = [#40, #30, #20, #10, #6, #400] as malkûwth (H4438): {UMBRA: #40 as #496 % #41 = #4} 1) royalty, royal power, reign, kingdom, sovereign
1a) royal power, dominion; 1b) reign; 1c) kingdom, realm;*ACQUIRE*,
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?Lexicon: H4438>
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* / *DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*,
*INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 = *MOSES* *SEAT*PRINCIPLE
*OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) = #491 -
OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION) as #491 as [#80, #1,founder of a
#300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as #489 % #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaphor: *ZEUS*.; 3) God is called the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father of the corporeal nature, natural fathers, both parents; 1b) a more remote ancestor, the
race or tribe, progenitor of a people, forefather: so Abraham is called, Jacob and David; 1b1) fathers ie. ancestors, forefathers, founders of apersons
race; 1c) one advanced in years, a senior; 2a) the originator and
transmitter of anything; 2a1) the authors of a family or society of
animated by the same spirit as himself; 2a2) one who has infused his own spirit into others, who actuates and governs their minds; 2b) one who2c) a
stands in a father's place and looks after another in a paternal way;
title of honour; 2c1) teachers, as those to whom pupils trace back the knowledge and training they have received; 2c2) the members of theexperience
Sanhedrin, whose prerogative it was by virtue of the wisdom and
in which they excelled, to take charge of the interests of others;3a) *OF*
*THE* *STARS*, *THE* *HEAVENLY* *LUMINARIES*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *IS* *THEIR* *CREATOR*, *UPHOLDER*, *RULER*; 3b) of all rational and intelligentbeings,
whether angels or men, because he is their creator, preserver,guardian and
protector; 3b1) of spiritual beings and of all men; 3c) of Christians, as those who through Christ have been exalted to a specially close andFather; 3d)
intimate relationship with God, and who no longer dread him as a stern
judge of sinners, but revere him as their reconciled and loving
the Father of Jesus Christ, as one whom God has united to himself in the closest bond of love and intimacy, made acquainted with his purposes, appointed to explain and carry out among men the plan of salvation, andAUTHORITY
made to share also in his own divine nature; 3d1) *BY* *JESUS* *CHRIST* *HIMSELF*; 3d2) by the apostles;
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND
FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OURNIETS
LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE*
*OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF* *PRINCIPLES*); Ego:
41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61
(#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 ER IS
BIJZONDERS EN WAARDELOZE VIERING TIJDENS DE EUROPESE DONKERE TIJDEN ZIJN SCHIJNEN: DOOR GEORGEOF 3
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC
APRIL 33 AD),APRIL 33
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3
AD); Ego: 80 (#391),TO BE
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273-SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184- LAWS
OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THEEVENT OF
HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONSAS MAY,
FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 -
*YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
WHICH THEN GIVES RISE TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY'S UNDERSTANDING OF GEORG
HEGEL’s @1 - THESIS; @2 - ANTI-THESIS; @3 - SYNTHESIS; @4 -
PROGRESSION or KARL MARX’s @1 - PROGRESSION; @2 - SYNTHESIS; @3 -
ANTI-THESIS; @4 - THESIS AS CONFORMING TO THE NOUMENON'S SEPTET
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS
@1 - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} AS FOUNDATIONAL
STONE (31 MAY) TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER
1900 BEING INSTRUMENTATION TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901 / #1 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @1 - THESIS;
@2 - FORMULA OF HUMANITY: @205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES
OF PROBITY / #2 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 - #81 = #231}; @2 -
ANTI-THESIS;
@3 - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: @82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF
CONTINUITY / #3 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION {#273 v's #288};
@3 - SYNTHESIS;
@4 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: @164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <—
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS / #4 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC} @4 - PROGRESSION / @1 - PROGRESSION;
@5 - FORMULA OF KANONICOS {GK: ΚᾸΝΟΝῘΚΌΣ #352 / #329 - 1ST JANUARY
"INTER GRAVISSIMAS PASTORALIS OFFICII NOSTRI CURAS…" PAPAL BULL ISSUED
BY POPE GREGORY XIII ON 24 FEBRUARY 1582} PRINCIPLES: @123 / #2188 -
SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT / #5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY} @2 - SYNTHESIS;
KANONICOS@[
κ, {@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20)},
α, {@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21)},
ν, {@3: Sup: 71 (#112); Ego: 50 (#71)},
ο, {@4: Sup: 60 (#172); Ego: 70 (#141)},
ν, {@5: Sup: 29 (#201); Ego: 50 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF
THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32})},
ι, {@6: Sup: 39 (#240); Ego: 10 (#201)},
κ, {@7: Sup: 59 (#299); Ego: 20 (#221)},
ο, {@8: Sup: 48 (#347); Ego: 70 (#291)},
ς {@9: Sup: 5 (#352); Ego: 38 (#329)}
] // *AMONG* *THE* *MOST* *SERIOUS* *DUTIES* *OF* *OUR* *PASTORAL*
*OFFICE*…
@6 - FORMULA OF EMANATION: @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT / #6 - OBLIGATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION}:
BINOMIAL {@1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE AS EMANATION} STASIS
NOMENCLATURE @3 - ANTI-THESIS;
AS AN OPTIMAL TEMPLATE OF AGREEMENT WHICH IS ONTIC / MATHEMATICAL AND
SUITABLE FOR A GLOBAL SAPIENT ECONOMY / #7 - MANIFESTING NORM
really active...MEASURES OF
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
THUSLY THE PROVISIONAL CONCEPT
turn {@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 73 (#73)}
CAN ALSO BE VIEWED IN THE METAPHYSICAL AS NOUMENON RELATION TO THE
GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET:
[t, {@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38)},
u, {@2: Sup: 14 (#52); Ego: 57 (#95)},
r, {@3: Sup: 23 (#75); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7})},
n] {@4: Sup: 73 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 50 (#154)}
@148: The Transcendental Doctrine of the Power of Judgment (or
Analytic of Principles)
@154: Of the System of Principles of the Pure Understanding (Of the
highest principle of all synthetic judgments)
[l, {@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30)},
e, {@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35)},
f, {@3: Sup: 41 (#106); Ego: 6 (#41)},
t] {@4: Sup: 79 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
38 (#79)},
@185: One can now see from all this what the schema of each category
contains and makes representable: the schema of magnitude, the
production (synthesis) of time itself in the successive apprehension
of an object; the schema of quality, the synthesis of sensation
(perception) with the representation of time, or the filling of time;
that of relation, the relation of perceptions among themselves at all
times (i.e., according to a rule of time-determination); finally, the
schema of modality and its categories, time itself, as the correlate
of the determination of whether and how an object belongs to time. The
schemata are therefore nothing but time- determinations a priori in
accordance with rules, and these refer in the order of the categories
to the time-series, the time-content, the time-order, and finally the
time-totality with respect to all possible objects.
[r, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)},
i, {@2: Sup: 18 (#27); Ego: 9 (#18)},
g, {@3: Sup: 25 (#52); Ego: 7 (#25)},
h, {@4: Sup: 33 (#85); Ego: 8 (#33)},
t] {@5: Sup: 71 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 38 (#71)},
@156: To give an object – if this is not to mean giving it again only
mediately, but exhibiting it immediately in intuition – is nothing
other than to relate a representation of it to experience (whether
actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as these
concepts are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also
that they are represented fully a priori in the mind, would
nonetheless be without objective validity and without sense and
significance, if their necessary use were not directed upon the
objects of experience – indeed, their representation is a mere schema
that is always related to the reproductive imagination, which calls
forth the objects of experience without which they would have no
significance; and thus it is with all concepts, without distinction.
ACCORDINGLY MY INFORMAL RESEARCH OBJECTIVE IS TO DETERMINE HOW KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA CAN FACILITATE THEN METASTASISED NOUMENON BASED
METAPHYSICAL PROCESSES OF COGNITION -- IT'S TOO LATE IN LIFE TO GET A
FORMAL EDUCATION AND SO I AM TINKERING
----------
I ought to informally add (ie. self-education) that when we are
talking about ONTIC as an epistemological premise notion, we are
making considerations as to #CENTRE of BEING from whence perspective
is drawn and the grounding for existence as the foundational basis for
intuition, cognition, sapience and interoperability knowledge economy...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip>
I've currently implementing further features within the prototype and
ought to have the IDEA panel implemented this week...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{m:540}&idea:{f:670}> <--
*corrected* *syntax*
The reason why the HEBREW / GREEK lexicon is favored a consideration
of temporal / linguistic dialectics associated to alternative
apriority perennial perspectives of the anthropocentric cosmogonic
principle:
24 x 7 = @168 x 13 = #2184
THAT THE #2184 is able to both accommodate the 24 elements of the
GREEK and the 22 elements of the HEBREW as capacity to convey RATIONAL
PI by GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET since the temporal can be
considered in linear terms of SEPTET CAUSALITY having a base-7
numbering system:
DAYS: 7^0
WEEKS: 7^1
JUBILEES: 7^2
which then intersects with the tropical realisation of time:
#2184 x 49 (ie. 6 JUBILEES as 294 x 364 days) = 107016 days / 293 =
365.242320819112628 as tropical year...
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {ie. #312 - #81 -
SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE = #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL}
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
These are profound philosophical conceptions but what I find most
fascinating is the ONTIC reality implying a TRINOMIAL harmony as
intersection when the divisible factor has an increased magnitude:
#2184 / 12 = @182
6: {
thoth: "Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am
not fraudulent in measures of grain.",
dictum: "I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN",
virtue: [6 ,"With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction."],
tools: [46 ,"Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition."],
position: [63 ,"As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent."],
time: [67 ,"As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct."],
canon: 182,
ankh: 0
},
#2184 / 13 = @168
26: {
thoth: "Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait; I am
not the
cause of weeping to any.",
dictum: "I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY",
virtue: [26 ,"If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but"],
tools: [66 ,"If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow."],
position: [19 ,"As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along."],
time: [57 ,"As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured."],
canon: 168,
ankh: 0
}
#2184 / 14 = @156
21: {
thoth: "Oh thou who art above Princes, and who makest thine
appearance in
Amu; I do not cause terrors.",
dictum: "I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS",
virtue: [21 ,"Release (no. #21) means a push forward."],
tools: [61 ,"Embellishment (no. #61) means a decline."],
position: [49 ,"With Flight (no. #49), there is what one avoids."],
time: [25 ,"With Contention (no. #25), there is what one hastens towards."],
canon: 156,
ankh: 0
}
Thus the conclusion which I provisionally make is that the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE has an underlying ONTIC
characteristic.
But such will require substantially more prudent consideration...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{506}>
@182 + @168 + @156 = #506 as 10th SEFIROT meaning emanations, are the 10 attributes/emanations in Kabbalah, through which Ein Sof (The Infinite) reveals Itself and continuously creates both the physical realm and the
chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as sephirot/sephiroth, singular sefirah/sephirah etc.
H4438@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 70 (#110); Ego: 30 (#70),
@3: Sup: 9 (#119); Ego: 20 (#90),
@4: Sup: 19 (#138); Ego: 10 (#100),
@5: Sup: 25 (#163); Ego: 6 (#106),
@6: Sup: 20 (#183); Ego: 76 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN
GRAIN {%6}),appearance at
Male: #183; Feme: #182
} // #506
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #496 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;
THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine
Elephantine; I am not rapacious.power;
#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102
#506 = [#40, #30, #20, #10, #6, #400] as malkûwth (H4438): {UMBRA: #40 as #496 % #41 = #4} 1) royalty, royal power, reign, kingdom, sovereign
1a) royal power, dominion; 1b) reign; 1c) kingdom, realm;*ACQUIRE*,
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?Lexicon: H4438>
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* / *DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*,
*INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 = *MOSES* *SEAT*PRINCIPLE
*OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) = #491 -
OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION) as #491 as [#80, #1,founder of a
#300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as #489 % #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaphor: *ZEUS*.; 3) God is called the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father of the corporeal nature, natural fathers, both parents; 1b) a more remote ancestor, the
race or tribe, progenitor of a people, forefather: so Abraham is called, Jacob and David; 1b1) fathers ie. ancestors, forefathers, founders of apersons
race; 1c) one advanced in years, a senior; 2a) the originator and
transmitter of anything; 2a1) the authors of a family or society of
animated by the same spirit as himself; 2a2) one who has infused his own spirit into others, who actuates and governs their minds; 2b) one who2c) a
stands in a father's place and looks after another in a paternal way;
title of honour; 2c1) teachers, as those to whom pupils trace back the knowledge and training they have received; 2c2) the members of theexperience
Sanhedrin, whose prerogative it was by virtue of the wisdom and
in which they excelled, to take charge of the interests of others;3a) *OF*
*THE* *STARS*, *THE* *HEAVENLY* *LUMINARIES*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *IS* *THEIR* *CREATOR*, *UPHOLDER*, *RULER*; 3b) of all rational and intelligentbeings,
whether angels or men, because he is their creator, preserver,guardian and
protector; 3b1) of spiritual beings and of all men; 3c) of Christians, as those who through Christ have been exalted to a specially close andFather; 3d)
intimate relationship with God, and who no longer dread him as a stern
judge of sinners, but revere him as their reconciled and loving
the Father of Jesus Christ, as one whom God has united to himself in the closest bond of love and intimacy, made acquainted with his purposes, appointed to explain and carry out among men the plan of salvation, andAUTHORITY
made to share also in his own divine nature; 3d1) *BY* *JESUS* *CHRIST* *HIMSELF*; 3d2) by the apostles;
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND
FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OURNIETS
LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE*
*OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF* *PRINCIPLES*); Ego:
41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61
(#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 ER IS
BIJZONDERS EN WAARDELOZE VIERING TIJDENS DE EUROPESE DONKERE TIJDEN ZIJN SCHIJNEN: DOOR GEORGEOF 3
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC
APRIL 33 AD),APRIL 33
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3
AD); Ego: 80 (#391),TO BE
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273-SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184- LAWS
OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THEEVENT OF
HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONSAS MAY,
FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 -
*YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
WHICH THEN GIVES RISE TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY'S UNDERSTANDING OF GEORG
HEGEL’s @1 - THESIS; @2 - ANTI-THESIS; @3 - SYNTHESIS; @4 -
PROGRESSION or KARL MARX’s @1 - PROGRESSION; @2 - SYNTHESIS; @3 -
ANTI-THESIS; @4 - THESIS AS CONFORMING TO THE NOUMENON'S SEPTET
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS
@1 - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} AS FOUNDATIONAL
STONE (31 MAY) TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER
1900 BEING INSTRUMENTATION TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901 / #1 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @1 - THESIS;
@2 - FORMULA OF HUMANITY: @205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES
OF PROBITY / #2 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 - #81 = #231}; @2 -
ANTI-THESIS;
@3 - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: @82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF
CONTINUITY / #3 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION {#273 v's #288};
@3 - SYNTHESIS;
@4 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: @164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <—
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS / #4 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC} @4 - PROGRESSION / @1 - PROGRESSION;
@5 - FORMULA OF KANONICOS {GK: ΚᾸΝΟΝῘΚΌΣ #352 / #329 - 1ST JANUARY
"INTER GRAVISSIMAS PASTORALIS OFFICII NOSTRI CURAS…" PAPAL BULL ISSUED
BY POPE GREGORY XIII ON 24 FEBRUARY 1582} PRINCIPLES: @123 / #2188 -
SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT / #5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY} @2 - SYNTHESIS;
KANONICOS@[
κ, {@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20)},
α, {@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21)},
ν, {@3: Sup: 71 (#112); Ego: 50 (#71)},
ο, {@4: Sup: 60 (#172); Ego: 70 (#141)},
ν, {@5: Sup: 29 (#201); Ego: 50 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF
THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32})},
ι, {@6: Sup: 39 (#240); Ego: 10 (#201)},
κ, {@7: Sup: 59 (#299); Ego: 20 (#221)},
ο, {@8: Sup: 48 (#347); Ego: 70 (#291)},
ς {@9: Sup: 5 (#352); Ego: 38 (#329)}
] // *AMONG* *THE* *MOST* *SERIOUS* *DUTIES* *OF* *OUR* *PASTORAL*
*OFFICE*…
@6 - FORMULA OF EMANATION: @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT / #6 - OBLIGATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION}:
BINOMIAL {@1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE AS EMANATION} STASIS
NOMENCLATURE @3 - ANTI-THESIS;
AS AN OPTIMAL TEMPLATE OF AGREEMENT WHICH IS ONTIC / MATHEMATICAL AND
SUITABLE FOR A GLOBAL SAPIENT ECONOMY / #7 - MANIFESTING NORM
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 12:58:13 |
Calls: | 6,645 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 12,190 |
Messages: | 5,326,829 |