• USAF Starting Bids For 6-th Gen Fighter Plane - But Are These Obsolete

    From 26B.X958@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 20 17:53:16 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.military, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    https://www.zerohedge.com/military/usaf-sends-classified-solicitation-sixth-gen-fighters-military-industrial-complex

    The US Air Force revealed days ago a classified solicitation
    to the military-industrial complex for a new stealth six-
    generation crewed tactical jet that will replace the Lockheed
    Martin F-22 Raptor. The effort is part of the service's Next
    Generation Air Dominance modernization initiative (NGAD) that
    will award a contract in 2024 to either Lockheed Martin Corp.,
    Boeing Co., or Northrop Grumman Corp. to produce the new fighter
    jet that will be combat-ready sometime in the 2030s.

    "This solicitation release formally begins the source selection
    process, providing the industry with the requirements the Air
    Force expects for NGAD, as the replacement of the F-22," USAF
    wrote in a statement as it gave defense contractors the
    classified request.

    . . .

    Ummm ... ok ... but are crewed aircraft yesterday's
    solution to yesterday's threats ???

    We spent a lot of money in the 1920s/30s on big
    battleships. By 1941 they were of little use -
    the aircraft carrier became THE Weapon.

    Now even the conventional aircraft carrier may be
    passe' ....

    The Chinese have been working furiously on 'drone'
    tech with 'AI' brains. By all reports they're at
    least five years ahead of the West in that respect.
    Note that Xi has a few carriers - but despite his
    resources only a few. I think he's been advised to
    put money elsewhere - into real 'next-gen' weapons.

    AI fighters/bombers are not limited by soft squishy
    humans inside - they could do 25-G maneuvers and
    looks like the AIs can do it all more precisely.
    Human-guided, semi-autonomous, fully-autonomous,
    swarm logic capable. It's increasingly a conceit
    that "humans will always be better". Oh yea,
    sans humans, those aircraft would be a lot cheaper
    to make - so you can field a lot MORE of them.
    Variously attributed to Stalin and a few others is
    the phrase "Quantity has a quality all of its own".

    "Carriers" - I predict more, smaller, ships - eventually
    with NO humans on-board. They'll be AI robots too, handle
    most everything, will be smaller targets, quicker,
    and with few/no humans will again be a lot cheaper.
    For now some humans will be required - mostly as fix-it
    monkeys.

    The military and pols DO want to be able to blow up
    shit - but, in the West, agonize over body counts.
    Well, nobody will mourn for Drone-AIF552391 ... it's
    "politically safer".

    And "boots on the ground" ? Humans still, for now, but :
    https://www.bostondynamics.com/atlas

    If he only had a brain ... oh, wait ..........

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)