Hello,





More of my philosophy of does GPT-5 will attain AGI and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..




I invite you to read the following article about the coming GPT-5:


GPT-5 might make ChatGPT indistinguishable from a human


Read more here:

https://bgr.com/tech/gpt-5-might-make-chatgpt-indistinguishable-from-a-human/


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so GPT-4 is indeed multimodal that supports text and images, but the coming GPT-5 will be multimodal too and it
will support text and images and videos, but i think there is still a problem, and it is that even if GPT-5 will be multimodal and it will support text and images and videos, it will still not understand as the humans are understanding for example the
meaning of the past, the present and the future and it will not understand the meaning of being near or far etc. etc. so then GPT-5 will still lack the what is explaining my new model below of what is human consciousness that permits to understand the
meaning and the context, so it is why i think that GPT-5 will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, so i invite you to read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:



More of my philosophy about political philosophy and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..



I will now talk more political philosophy, so you have to understand my way of thinking, since as you are noticing, i am not considering USA as an enemy, since you have to understand my point of views, so let me talk for example about do we have to be a
fully multipolar world or not? so i think that the way to answer this question is first by being positivity and saying that we have to be positive since as i am saying in my below thoughts that in about 20 years from now, even Arab countries will have a
much higher GDP per capita and will have an average IQ of around 95 or 97, and of course that capitalism is not a zero-sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a
relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, and as we say in french: « Chassez le naturel, il revient au galop », and it means in english: "When natural is driven off, it returns at a gallop", and i think the world is not a fully
multipolar world since USA has a strong diversified economy and it is a powerful and advanced country and it is a Democracy, and it is by logical analogy like the "natural" in the above saying , so then wanting to be a fully multipolar world needs from
other countries such as Russia and China the good requirements such as the ones of USA above and it needs good professionalism, so it is why i am for example saying in my new proverb below the following:

"Not wanting the US dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency is like swimming against the tide, and it is like choosing communism as a system that is like swimming against the tide."


So notice that there is a logical analogy to be made between my new proverb above and the following saying: "When natural is driven off, it returns at a gallop" as i am explaining it above, since i also think that USA will solve its deficit problem
efficiently, and i think that's not the problem, since i also think that USA is borrowing mostly at a low interest rates, since i think in a long-term the interest rates at wich it is borrowing are low since USA is also a well diversified and powerful
economy that is really resilient, so it is why i think that the USA government can handle a "much" heavier debt load since also USA is a well diversified and powerful economy that is really resilient, so it is why i think that USA debt is not problematic,
also I think that USA will still be a super power in the future, since the USA debt is not problematic as i am explaining it, and i also say that we can not compare USA to China, since China has many defects like the "productivity" of China is not good
both qualitatively and quantitatively, and China has a debt problem, so China is constrained by this factor of its debt problem, so China can not attain the level of productivity both quantitatively and qualitatively of that of USA in the near to medium
future. But the productivity of USA is good both qualitatively and quantitatively, and China has other problems such as the quality of education of its workforce is much less than that of USA, it is why China is also lacking much in productivity both
qualitatively and quantitatively. And you can look at the following video so that to understand more:

Why won't China Surpass the United States? - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqowS-hlZ3M



More of my philosophy about the how to measure the IQ of GPT-4 and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


But i think that we can not say that GPT-4 has a 114 IQ as is saying the below article, since even if it scores 114 IQ, that doesn't mean that it has 114 IQ, so i think the we have not to say as the below article that GPT4 has an IQ of 114, but we have
to say that GPT-4 "scores" 114 IQ, so read my previous following thoughts so that you understand my views about it:


More of my philosophy of how GPT-4 scores 114 in IQ and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I invite you to read the following article that says that GPT-4 has a 114 IQ:


Bing AI and GPT4 Has an IQ of 114 and is Smarter Than the Average Human

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/03/bing-ai-and-gpt4-has-an-iq-of-114-and-is-smart-than-average-human.html



But i think that we can not say that GPT-4 has a 114 IQ, since even if it scores 114 IQ, it can still score low in IQ since we can not guarantee that the huge data on wich GPT-4 has been trained is of high quality, and since, as i am explaining it below,
that ChatGPT can not yet understand correctly the context, so it is why i say that the IQ of GPT-4 is not low , but it scores a variable IQ, since it can score low or it can score high.


More of my philosophy about what is the IQ of GPT-4 and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that since we can not guarantee that the huge data on wich GPT-4 has been trained is of high quality,
and since, as i am explaining it below, that ChatGPT can not yet understand correctly the context, so i think that the IQ of ChatGPT is not low, but it scores a variable IQ, and it can score high or it can score low, so then as i am saying below that i
think that ChatGPT or such artificial intelligence can not replace a lot of jobs of software programming, so we can also say that it is not just the demand of the rule of supply and demand that fixes the price, but it is also the since ChatGPT or such
artificial intelligence have still this problematic of the not so good data on wich they have been trained, so that means that there will be still a kind of distribution of quality of the software from the high to low, so then the high quality of
software can also fix the price since it has a few competition from others.


More of my philosophy about the understanding of the context and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, and of course i have to be precise, so the below video of Yann LeCun the Meta Chief AI Scientist is showing the two
most important problems of ChatGPT, so i have just given you the first problem that is that most of human knowledge is not language related, but the second most important problem is then that ChatGPT and such artificial intelligence is not able to
understand correctly the context , and i think i have just explained my new model below of what is consciousness that explains the problematic and that explains how artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, and the
other problem of ChatGPT is that you can not simply use the code from ChatGPT into your software product that you want to sell, since the code from ChatGPT can be the code of someone else and it can be not free software, so you have to pay for it, so how
do you know that the code from ChatGPT is or is not free software ? so as you notice that it creates problems, so you have to be careful, and the other problem with ChatGPT and such artificial intelligence is that it goes straight into the wall of
knowledge as i am explaining it below, and of course i am also speaking below about the other problem of ChatGPT that is the high cost of computational power of ChatGPT and i am explaining how to solve it, so i invite you to read my following previous
thoughts:


More of my philosophy about the the other weaknesses of GPT-4 and
about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..





The memory of Large Language Models like GPT is limited, GPT-3.5 and the earlier version of ChatGPT set the limit at 4,096 “tokens,” which is equivalent to around 8,000 words or about four or five pages of a book. So, it would essentially lose sight
of something after it traveled so far “back” in its attention function. And for GPT-4 it is around 64,000 words (or 50 pages), that’s enough for a full-length play or a significant short story. This implies it will be able to retain the equivalent
of 50 pages of text, vastly enhancing its capacity for dialogue and text generation. You can go back as far as twenty pages in the discussion log and as far as thirty-five pages in the event log.


But there is another important problem with GPT-4 and such artificial intelligence, and here it is:

Here is what is saying Yann LeCun, Meta Chief AI Scientist about ChatGPT in the following video:


"How much of human knowledge is present and described in text ?
and my answer to this is: A tiny portion, and most of human knowledge is not language related."


I invite you to look at it here and Yann LeCun is explaining why ChatGPT has other problems:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULbpPHjiSBg


More of my philosophy about the weaknesses of ChatGPT and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so as you are noticing i am with my fluid intelligence inventing a new model that explains human consciousness and
i am predicting with it that we are not going to attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, so you can read about it in my below thoughts, and of course you are then noticing that the problematic with artificial intelligence is the also that it can
not has the human sensations and feelings from the human senses, since notice how i am saying below that the human sensations and feelings give a true meaning that is real and it comes from the part of the human brain that processes the sensations, but
artificial intelligence is not able to do it, and of course i am proving it in my below thoughts that talk about the theorem that is known as the transitive property of implication, since i am explaining how artificial intelligence can not understand the
meaning from the low level constructs of the transitive property of implication so that to generalize, so i invite you so that to read about my new model that explains what is consciousness in my below thoughts, other than that, i have just looked at the
following video of an Arab north African women called Asma Mhalla that talks about the power of the data in AI, so i invite you to look at it and it is in french:

Asma Mhalla - IA et nouveaux pouvoirs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5OYjWLaA3Q


So i think in the above video she is making a mistake, since artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is trained in an unsupervised way, so then it has a problem or weakness since the huge data is not guaranteed to be of high quality, and it is the big
weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT, and notice how i am saying about it the following:

So i am still analysing quickly GPT-4, so i think that ChatGPT has another problem, and it is that smartness of ChatGPT and such artificial intelligence is dependent on the quality of data on wich it has been trained, and from what i know is that the
quality of data on wich ChatGPT has been trained is not so good, so i think that we can still be not sure of the quality of data of software programming on wich ChatGPT has been trained , so it is why we can not be sure of the level of smartness of
ChatGPT, so i think it is why i say that ChatGPT or such artificial intelligence can not replace a lot of jobs of software programming, so we can also say that it is not just the demand of the rule of supply and demand that fixes the price, but it is
also the since ChatGPT or such artificial intelligence have still this problematic of the not so good data on wich they have been trained, so that means that there will be still a kind of distribution of quality of the software from the high to low, so
then the high quality of software can also fix the price since it has a few competition from others.


And read my previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about the other problem with GPT-4 and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think there is another problem, since i have just said the following:


"I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that artificial intelligence like ChatGPT is a monopolistic practice, since ChatGPT is learning the
patterns from the creativity of humans such as software developers and the like, but the problematic is that those creative humans have not given the rights to artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT to monopolize creativity in such a way, since i think
that for example those creative people such as software developers and the like have to do business with there creativity and be able to make money, so i think that the philosophy of OpenAI and the like are not following the right philosophy, since i
think that the right way to do is to just use artificial intelligence in not a such monopolistic way that causes problems in such way, but to wait until humanity has advanced enough so that to permit artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT be used by the
people of the world."


So i think that the other problem with ChatGPT, it is that you can
not simply use the code from ChatGPT into your software product that
you want to sell, since the code from ChatGPT can be the code of
someone else and it can be not free software, so you have to pay for it,
so how do you know that the code from ChatGPT is or is not free software ? so as you notice that it creates problems, so you have to be careful.


So i think even if GPT-4 will increase much more productivity and improve software and overall code quality, i think you still need to debug the code and you still have to be technical in helping GPT-4 to spot the problems , since ChatGPT Bot ‘makes a
lot of mistakes’, and i think it is also why you can not reduce the price of the software product or software service so much, so i think that GPT-4 or such artificial intelligence will not replace software engineers jobs and will not replace a lot of
jobs in software programming, and i invite you to look at the following interesting and smart video so that to know more:


ChatGPT Bot ‘makes a lot of mistakes’ and provides inaccurate info

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r97HMlS_LM8


More of my philosophy about my just other new model of what is consciousness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, and here is my complete just new other model that explains human consciousness:


So my just new other model is adding to my previous new model the following:

1- So there must be a motor in the brain that guides, and this motor can
not be called a full consciousness as i am explaining it in my
previous thoughts below.

2- The motor is exposed to the sensations and feelings of the 3d reality
of the world that like reify with sensations and feelings and that
gives a true meaning of what is reality that artificial intelligence
can not do, so it makes an idea like "alive", and it is why we are
feeling like we are alive.

3- This process of like reifying shows that the brain also process with meanings, so consciousness is like a movie composed with meanings
that are composed from the sensations and feeling from the senses,
and that is played in the brain.


4- I also say that there is another sense that makes us feel and
understand that the oneself is thinking, and this also permit to
create the self-consciousness or self-awareness.


And i think my just new other complete model explains human consciousness, and this new model of mine also proves that artificial
intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI.


So read my following previous thoughts so that to understand
the other parts of my new model that explains consciousness:


More of my philosophy of does artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT-4 will replace a lot of jobs and about productivity and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i can predict the future about artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT-4, so i think that ChatGPT-4 will
not replace a lot of jobs, since read my following thoughts so that to understand it:

So i think that ChatGPT and such artificial intelligence will not replace a lot of jobs, since i think that ChatGPT Bot ‘makes a lot of mistakes’ and provides inaccurate info, so you have to understand the output of ChatGPT so that to find those
mistakes, so it is detrimental to the quality of the output of ChatGPT and of such artificial intelligence, so i invite you to look at the following interesting and smart video that smartly explains this problematic with ChatGPT and of such artificial
intelligence, so here it is and look at it carefully so that you understand:


ChatGPT Bot ‘makes a lot of mistakes’ and provides inaccurate info

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r97HMlS_LM8



So it is why i think that artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT will
not replace a lot of jobs, but it will higher or increase much more productivity as i am explaining it below, but increasing much more productivity doesn't mean that you have to use much less workers, other than that , read in the following web link my
thoughts about productivity and capitalism etc. so that to understand my views:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU


And look at my following below previous thoughts at how i am predicting that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, but i think that it will become "powerful".


More of my philosophy about economic diversification in Arab countries
and more of my philosophy about productivity and about artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts...


I think that Arab Gulf nations have made “significant improvement” in the diversification of their economies, so i think that Arab countries
are understanding that they have to diversify there economies and they are taking it seriously, so i think that we have to be optimistic about Arab countries and the Arab world, so i invite you to read the following article that is showing how Arab
countries are taking economic diversification seriously:

UAE and Saudi Arabia drive GCC's 'significant improvement' in economic diversification

https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/economy/2023/02/14/uae-and-saudi-arabia-drive-gccs-significant-improvement-in-economic-diversification/

I think with artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT there will be a
huge gain in productivity, so i think that artificial intelligence could double annual growth rates in around year 2030 or year 2035, and you can read about it in the following:


"Compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about growth today. There
has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of
production capital investment and labor to propel economic growth."

And it it says the following:

"Accenture research on the impact of AI in 12 developed economies
reveals that AI could double annual economic growth rates in 2035 by
changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man
and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business is projected to
increase labor productivity by up to 40 percent and enable people to
make more efficient use of their time."

Read more here so that to notice it:

https://www.accenture.com/ca-en/insight-artificial-intelligence-future-growth-canada


Other than that, since artificial intelligence could double annual growth rates in around year 2030 or year 2035, so i think that Arab countries of north Africa will attain a GDP per capita of around 22000 dollars in about 20 years from now, so i think
that in about 20 years from now, there will be much less immigration from Arab countries to western countries since there GDP per capita will be much higher, so they will have much less corruption. And since USA has progressed in IQ from year 1965 by
around 5 points IQ in each decade, so i think that Arab countries will attain an average IQ of around 97 in 20 years from now, so i think that we have to be optimistic about Arab countries and the Arab world.


More of my philosophy about my new model of what is consciousness and
what is self-consciousness and about artificial intelligence and about
my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
you have to understand my new model of what is consciousness and self-consciousness, so what i mean is that consciousness without this important process of like reification with the sensations and feelings from the human senses can not be called
consciousness, since the human meaning is composed from this important process that i am explaining, so without this human meaning i say that artificial intelligence can not attain artificial general intelligence, so then you are understanding that my
new model is not trying to make you understand all the process of human consciousness, but it is explaining an important process of human consciousness that permits to predict that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence.


So read my previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about the human senses and human consciousness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i am talking in my previous thoughts below about my new model that explains what is human consciousness and what is self-consciousness or
self-awareness, but there is something that i have to explain so that you understand my new model, and it is that there is not only the five basic human senses that are: vision, hearing, touch, smell and taste, but in my new model there is one more other
sense that is the one that gives the sensation and feeling of the oneself that is thinking that exists inside the brain and that permits to create self-conscisousness or self-awareness, so then my new model that explains consciousness is complete, so
then you are noticing that my new model for example says that when you touch a water that is fluid and cold, the sensations of the fluid and cold that are created by the brain part that receives the signals from the human sense , permits to like reify
the ideas of the water with the meaning from the sensations and feelings, so it is the same for all the human senses, so i think that this process of like reifying with the meaning from the senses, permits to create the meaning that doesn't exist in
artificial intelligence, and it also permits to create self-awareness or self-consciousness from also the sense that gives the sensations and feelings of the oneself thinking, so i think that from my new model you are also understanding more how to
compose consciousness and self-consciousness or self-awareness.


And read my previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about what is consciousness and about the most important weakness of artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i think that the most important weakness of artificial intelligence is not the high cost of computational power, since i am showing how to solve it in my below thoughts, and it is not the wall of knowledge as i am writing about it in my below thoughts,
but the most important weakness of artificial intelligence is the one that i have talked about , and it is how to ensure the quality of the exactness of the output without using the mechanisms of human consciousness, so i think i have explained what is
human consciousness in a holistic way, read about it in my below and above thoughts:


More of my philosophy about the process of reification and more about human consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


Reification is when you think of or treat something abstract as a physical thing. Reification is a complex idea for when you treat something immaterial — like happiness, fear, or evil — as a material thing, so i think that human conscicousness is by
logical analogy like the process of Reification, i mean that a concept in our brain is not just a class or object like in object oriented programming, since i mean that a class in object oriented programming is not just a class but it is also reification
by our brain, since we are also reifying the class with or by using the true meaning from our human consciousness, so it is like composability since we are composing with consciousness of time and space and reality from the low level to the high level,
so it is the same for what i am explaining below, since so that to compose the theorem that is known as the transitive property of implication, we have to understand the meaning of the low level constructs such as: If a then b and if b then c then a then
c, so then it is like a reification that we do, since when for example we say: a then b, we are like reifying from the low level constructs of consciousness of time and space and matter to the upper levels.


More of my philosophy about self-awareness or self-consciousness and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i have just explained more what is consciousness, and now i will explain what is self-awareness or self-consciousness:

So i think that self-awareness or self-consciousness of a human is also
like a reification + the smartness, since i think that consciousness of yourself is obtained by knowing about the true meaning of yourself by also using like a reification with sensations and feelings and consciousness of time and space and matter and
reality with wich you compose the consciousness, so then after smartness obtains like a true meaning by using consciousness of who you are by looking at yourself, so self-awareness or self-consciousness is developed. And it is my explanation of what is
consciousness.


More of my philosophy about my model of what is consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think i am really smart, but you have to understand my model that explains what is consciousness and self-consciousness, so my model is not trying to explain all the low levels of consciousness, but what it explains is that human consciousness gives
like the true meaning by composing with our sensations of what is reality and with feelings and with consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so now you are then understanding that my model explains that it is like a dynamic reification,
i mean that when you have an "idea", so an idea can be just a word, but if you add like the true meaning to this word by using your sensations and feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter, so it become like an idea that is "
alive" with consciousness, so then if you have a sentence or many sentences or a text, so this kind of reification can become like a "movie" of meanings of consciousness that is played in your brain and that gives a consciousness of the text or sentence,
so it is why my model says that the human brain compose with those meanings of sensations and feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so then my model of what is consciousness permits to make you understand how
artificial intelligence is limited as i am explaining it above and below, and it permits to do predictions like i am doing it below, so i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about the essence of smartness and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the following video of a french arab Algerian called Idriss Aberkane, so Idriss Aberkane has obtained three doctorate degrees in management science from Paris Saclay, in comparative literature from University of Strasbourg, and in
diplomacy from Centre d'Études Diplomatiques et Stratégiques, you can read about him in
wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idriss_Aberkane


And here is his video about IQ, so i invite you to look at it:

Pourquoi le QI est une ESCROQUERIE ? | Idriss Aberkane


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpA1dSHdqRQ


So i am not in accordance with Idriss Aberkane in the above video,
and i am finding him not so smart as me, since he is saying that the IQ is not important, but i think that the IQ is also important, but notice how i am defining smartness in my below proverb, and here is my proverb and read it carefully:

"Smartness is not just smartness of the IQ and smartness of the culture, but it is also the being precision in thinking that is not precision of smartness of the IQ and of the culture, and it is also the smartness of the being intellectually lively and
well attentive and it is also emotional smartness."


So I think i am a new smart philosopher, so I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i will talk more about the essence of smartness, so i will ask a
philosophical question of:


What is smartness ?


So i think that you have to discover a pattern or patterns with your fluid intelligence that answers the question more precisely, and the patterns are the following:


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)