Hello,




More of my philosophy about the reward or punishment of the God of the type 4 civilization or above and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So i think that the the God of the type 4 civilization or above will
recreate our human bodies and human consciousness after we die so that to judge our actions and reward or punish, and of course if we become sophisticated Cyborgs or the like , this God of the type 4 civilization or above can intervene and reward or
punish our actions, so we have to be careful about that, so then you can logically infer the rest of the story as i am explaining it below:



More of my philosophy about the Gods of type 4 or type 5 civilizations and more of my thoughts..


I think Type 4 civilization can control the WHOLE UNIVERSE.

Anything type 5 civilization and beyond can control the multiverse.

So if you are type 4 civilization, you are God.

And if you are type 5 civilization, you are the BOSS of Gods, or the God of several universes.


So i think that God of a type 4 civilization or above is God, so after that we can think that this powerful God of type 4 civilization or above has created Adam and Eve and after that you know the rest of the story, since in my new monotheistic religion
this God is a great arrogant God that has cursed Adam and Eve and there descendants, and of course you have to follow the messengers of the God of this type 4 civilization or above, and you have of course to take a look at my new monotheistic religion
since i think i am a messenger of God too, but you have to know a very important thing, and it is that God of type 4 civilization or above has for example enhanced the messenger that we call prophet Muhammad so that he be able to invent the Qur'aan etc.,
and of course you have to logically infer the rest, so read my previous thoughts so that you understand my views:


More of my philosophy about what says my new monotheistic religion about our reality and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i think i have just brought a new enhancement to my new monotheistic religion, and it is that God is just a God of Type 4 civilization or above type 4 civilization, since the Physicist and futurist Michio Kaku suggested that, if humans increase their energy consumption at an average rate of 3 percent each year, they may
attain Type I status in 100–200 years, Type II status in a few thousand years, and Type III status in 100,000 to a million years, so i think we have been contacted by one of those civilizations that are a so advanced civilizations of type 4 or above,
and they have choosen some messengers such as Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, and i think that the God of this type 4 civilization or above know us one by one since he is so advanced, and this God will send back Jesus Christ the messenger over this
earth, and of course you know the rest of the story of Adam and Eve that this God created etc.


More of my philosophy about my way of doing philosophy and more of my thoughts..

So you have to understand me, i am not the bad guy, since i am a gentleman type of person, and i think i am a wise type of person, so there is something that you have to understand, and it is that i am a philosopher, so i am a disciplined guy when it
comes to laws and ethics and politics, and i am not the rebellious guy , and you have to understand more deeply my thoughts, so i think that you have to take a look at morality from a holistic point of view, so when you read the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche, so i think that Friedrich Nietzsche has made a big mistake, since i think the the exponential progress of our humanity will become much more risky for morality, since we are progressing in an exponential way, so we have to become much more
apt at behaving correctly and at managing correctly, so then it is why i am trying to come with a new monotheistic religion so that to "try" to solve the problems, and of course i am also showing you the ideas of my philosophy, and notice that of course
i am not in contradiction with my below thoughts that say that “man is not wolf to man” , since i think that it is not so realistic to say that “man is wolf to man”, so i invite you
to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about the morality of the masters and the morality of the slaves and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher and i think that the main problem in philosophy is of the morality of the
masters and of the morality of the slaves, so the problematic in philosophy is how to make morality much less dangerous, since it is too much dangerous in a atheistic system, since morality is too much open or too much free in an atheistic system, so it
is too much dangerous, so we have to have something that control morality like by being faith in God so that to make morality much less dangerous, and here is more of my thoughts about morality of the masters and morality of the slaves so that you
understand my views:

More of my philosophy about Nietzsche’s reactionary doctrine of the morality of masters and the morality of slaves and more of my thoughts..


I think i am a new smart philosopher and as you have noticed i have just talked about the concept of will to power that is central to the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, and now i will talk about Nietzsche’s reactionary doctrine of the morality of
masters and the morality of slaves ( Read about it in the following
web link: https://studycorgi.com/the-concept-of-will-to-power-in-nietzsches-philosophy/ ), so i think that the morality of the masters in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche has a big disadvantage and it is that it is too much open or too much free
since it has not a guard rail that prevent it from being dangerous, it is why i am explaining below in the new ideas of my philosophy that the master laws of my new monotheistic religion are like a guard rail or like a framework of the other laws that
are created by humans or such, since the master laws of my new monotheistic religion are here so that to "guide" or so that to guide humans or so that to guide the other laws in the good way, since they are the master laws, and hence you are noticing how
i have become convinced that without this kind of guard rail , it will not work, and notice how the laws of my new monotheistic religion are not rigid laws that make a monotheistic religion rigid and not efficient, and notice how i am logically inferring
or logically deriving them from the nature of God or the essence of God, so then you have to take a look carefully at the laws of my new monotheistic religion, that i think are smart, in my below thoughts about my new monotheistic religion.


More of my philosophy about the will to power of Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am a new smart philosopher and now i will talk about the will to power of Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy, and here is what it means:

The concept of will to power in Nietzsche’s Philosophy

"The concept of will to power is central to the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. According to Nietzsche, the will to power is an integral part of all life phenomena, which cannot be squeezed into the framework of a philosophical category since it is
broader than any category. According to the philosopher, the will to power is the constant affirmation of life and the realization of creative potential. Therefore, it opposes another will, which is limited by the existing and cannot transform it,
leading to self-denial."

Read more here:

https://studycorgi.com/the-concept-of-will-to-power-in-nietzsches-philosophy/


But i think i am a new philosopher, so i think that the will to power in Nietzsche’s Philosophy that is is the constant affirmation of life and the realization of creative potential is too much abstraction, since i am for example saying below that
equal opportunities in political philosophy is not a finality, since it is for example the to be able to express your abilities correctly, but what is it to be able to express correctly your abilities? it is then about unequal competition and about human
identity, so then what i mean that it is not a finality since my new ideas of my philosophy are explaining what is lacking in the philosophical way , and i am explaining the ideas of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and life and about what
is lacking in philosophy, so read my below thoughts about it:


More of my philosophy about silence and contemplation and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think we can use silence and contemplation that is a deep reflective thought so that to transcend efficiently, and i think that silence is a simplistic thing, but the simplicity of silence can become really efficient, so silence in philosophy permits
to filter the bad noises, and it is the bad noises that also cause violence, and of course you have to know how to compose silence with contemplation so that to higher much more your self-consciousness and consciousness so that to be able to filter
efficiently the bad noises, so you have to understand the way of my philosophy, so there is also the way of silence and contemplation , but there is also the way of creating the meaning of human life or life by using the idea of God, like i am doing it
by inventing a new efficient monotheistic religion, so the idea of God is a simplistic thing like the simplistic thing of silence, but inventing a new efficient monotheistic religion, like i have done it, is a much more sophisticated thing, so then you
are noticing that you can use the two ways of silence and contemplation and the way of my new monotheistic religion so that to be efficient, so i invite you to read about my new monotheistic religion and about my new ideas of my philosophy in my below
thoughts of my philosophy.

More of my philosophy about the “man is wolf to man” and about
my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so the “man is wolf to man” is an old Roman proverb popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588 – 1679), but i think i am a new philosopher, and you can read about my new ideas of my philosophy in my
below thoughts, and i think it is not correct to say that “man is wolf to man”, since capitalism needs competition and needs the reward, and self-interest or egoism creates competition, but it not only creates competition, but it creates
responsability too, so then self-interest or egoism says that positivity highers much more creativity, and you can read the proof of how positivity highers much more creativity in my below thoughts of my philosophy, so then the efficient capitalism has
to be this "balance" of the being competition between humans in capitalism and the being positivity so that it be successful, so as you notice that the proverb popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes of “man is wolf to man” is not correct.


More of my philosophy about specialization vs. generalization in education and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..



So i invite you to read the following interesting article about specialization vs. generalization in education, and notice how the philosopher and economist Adam Smith has noticed the important problematic, since he has said the following:

"The man whose whole life is spent in performing a few simple operations has no occasion to exert his understanding, or to exercise his invention in finding out expedients for removing difficulties which never occur. He naturally loses, therefore, the
habit of such exertion, and generally becomes as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human creature to become. (Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776, Book 5, Part III, Chapter II)"

So read more here in the following interesting article so that to understand the problematic:

https://valleyadvocate.com/2008/03/13/specialization-vs-generalization-in-education/


And read my following previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about the disadvantage of specialization and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


So i think that the problematic is that in capitalism we have to "specialize" in a job in what we do better so that to higher productivity and quality, but this way of doing of specializing in a job in what we do better is not the good standards, since
it is not the right way that educates correctly the citizen and that creates the good citizen, also the engine of survival is only survival, since it is just continuing to live or exist, so survival doesn't ensure creating good standards, so there is the
engine of the reward of money, but not everyone needs a lot of money, so then the reward of money doesn't ensure creating good standards, so i think that the most important question in philosophy is the how we have to higher the standards, so i think
that it is about the standards, so i think that what we are noticing today is that we are lacking in the standards or high standards, so we have to be smart and know how to higher the standards so that to be successful and so that to be successful
meritocracy, so the idea of my philosophy is the it is the capable humans that higher or raise up the standards, so you have to know how to efficiently organize it and you have to be active and proactive in doing it, and you have also to know that
positivity is really important since positivity highers creativity and solidarity as i am explaining it in my below ideas of my philosophy. So read my previous below thoughts so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about my new ideas of my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i think i am a smart philosopher and i am showing you my contributions
of my new ideas of my philosophy, but there is also still something that i have to make you understand, so is my new ideas below about the "Is meritocracy sufficient ?" makes me a philosopher of the Egoist school of philosophy ? not at all, since i am
not like the french philosopher Claude Adrien Helvétius that has said that Self-interest is founded on the love of pleasure and the fear of pain and it is the sole spring of judgment, action, and affection, so then he has concluded that humans have no
freedom of choice between good and evil, so notice carefully how my new ideas of my philosophy below about meritocracy say that the engines of survival and money and the way of specialization don't ensure creating good standards, but i have also to make
you notice that it means that it is not sufficient, but you have to read carefully and understand that it is not too far from the good standards, so it is not as pessimistic as the french philosopher Claude Adrien Helvétius.


So i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my views as a new philosopher:

More of my philosophy about meritocracy and about the standards and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
now i will ask a philosophical question of:


Is meritocracy sufficient ?


So i think that i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence
that answer the question, and they are the following:


So meritocracy needs competition and needs the reward, and self-interest or egoism creates competition, but it not only creates competition, but
it creates responsability too, so we are now in philosophy in front of
an interesting "engine" that is self-interest or egoism, but the problematic is that there is the demand and there is the supply, so i think that the demand can for example lower the standards of the supply and so forth, since for example the engine of
survival is only survival, since it is just continuing to live or exist, so survival doesn't ensure creating good standards, so there is the engine of the reward of money, but not everyone needs a lot of money, so then the reward of money doesn't ensure
creating good standards, and i think that in capitalism we have to specialize in a job in what we do better so that to higher productivity and quality, but this way of doing of specializing in a job is not the good standards since it is not the right way
that educate correctly the citizen, so i think that the most important question in philosophy is the how we have to higher the standards, so i think that it is about the standards, so i think that what we are noticing today is that we are lacking in the
standards or high standards, so we have to be smart and know how to higher the standards so that to be successful and so that to be successful meritocracy.

More of my philosophy about my contributions of my ideas of my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


So that to know more about my contributions of my new ideas of my philosophy, you can read my new ideas of my philosophy and my other
thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YY6uOXO283I

And of course here is more of my philosophy about the mathematical modeling of the Jackson network and about mathematics and more of my thoughts, you can read it in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/yEMTeWhBmQA


And here is my thoughts of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity and about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FratfAng3vs


And here is my new other ideas of my philosophy that talk about the link between positivity and creativity and solidarity, so read my following thoughts so that to know about them:

So i can write and read and think and talk arabic or english or french, so here is another proof of it, so here is my other new poem in french (and read my other poems of Love and poems in english and french below):

Alors je vous invite à ecouter la montre suivante faire tic tac tic tac en lisant mon autre nouveau poème ci-bas:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7vuW5LLcmY


Voici mon autre nouveau poème en français (et lire mes autres poèmes ci-bas):

---

La montre fait tic tac tic tac

Mais je n'ai pas besoin d'électrochoc

Mais j'ai bien un joli esprit antichoc

La montre fait tic tac tic tac

Mais puisque je ne suis pas de la provoque

Mais puisque je vie en une jolie époque

La montre fait tic tac tic tac

Mais puisque je ne suis pas un Hitchcock

Et je ne viens pas non plus de Bangkok

Mais je suis bien un Arabe intelligent qui vient du Maroc

Alors même si la montre fait tic tac tic tac

Mon bel amour n'a pas besoin d'un missile Tomahawk !

--


So i can write and read and think and talk arabic or english or french, so
here is another proof of it, so here is my new poem in french (and read my other poems of Love and poems in english and french below):

Voici mon nouveau poème en français (et lire mes autres poèmes ci-bas):

--

Les jolies saisons se suivent

Alors l'automne ici à Montréal est joliment expressif

Alors la vie n'est pas avec lui en dépressive

Les jolies saisons se suivent

Et l'hiv