In article <m0pyOKZ...@utacfd.uta.edu> sund...@utacfd.uta.edu (Ravi Sundaram) writes:
I was amused by the suggestion Devanagari (or any other)
script could be labelled "Perfect". The main argument
seems to be that it is phonetic script.
But all the Hindi newsreaders call a state kEraL.A non-Indian friend once asked me if 'Indian' didn't have the sound
(One irritated malayaaLee friend said "I am going
to call Haryana, HaryaN") So much for phonetics.
Others with more knowledge more valid points. But
'Z'. The reason shwe asked was that her professor (from NI) used to say 'jero' and not 'zero'. My reply was that his language had the 'Z' sound
but mine didn't. And god knows why I say zero and he 'jero' !!!
one minor point seem to have been missed by them.
There is an amibiguity in the letter "kha" which
looks just like two other letters side by side.
"khal thE hai?" can be pronounced as "raval thE hai?"
It is similer to the confusion regarding "au" inIn Telugu, draw the circle little bigger, you get 'ya' instead of 'ma' (example given since somoone claimed Telugu was superior to Devanagari !)
Tamil. "kauthami" and "keLathami" will look
identical.
English and French have many silent letters and
ambiguous prounciation, All the Indian languages
have much less ambiguity in pronounciation.
To claim a particular script Perfect shows the
bias of the proclaimer than anything else.
.--. o oJagadisan Shivakumar
.____ ___| .| .___ .___ .___ .____ . __
| | ( / || |_|__ | |_ |_|_ | | | | |
| | O L__| (__) | | _) (_./ ) | | |__|__|
/ / /
UTA
(The University of Texas at Arlington)
___________________________________________________________________________ regards,
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 51:16:05 |
Calls: | 6,649 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,330,303 |