My ability
My ability to identify the sexual orientation of a person by looking
at them or a picture of them seemed to be working last night,
though I was mildly drunk at the time. This time it is not based
on perineum click divination but on observation of the individual
or their picture. But once again the determinations fall within
my four orientation theory, in which I claim that there is a
fourth orientation compatible only with bisexual by nature (i.e.
someone who is attracted to both genders) of the opposite
gender. If the theory is correct then it should prove useful
to other matchmakers.
However the sensitivity doesn’t appear to be quite as strong
tonight, plus note that my matchmaking divinations were
quite off from summer 1997 to spring 1999 and from fall
2004 to early 2005.
Last night I divined that Joni Mitchell is 4th orientation female (significantly attracted to and orgasmic with only bisexual
by nature men, not purestraight men, gay men pretending
to be bi, or 4th orientation men).
I currently don’t have 4O.html on my web page but I do plan
to edit it a little and add it eventually, but I have some
academic work I need to take care of this week first.
But if my ability to detect someone’s sexual orientation by
looking at them or a picture of them is real, it should be
testable.
On Mar 10, 2019, David Dalton wrote
But if my ability to detect someone’s sexual orientation by
looking at them or a picture of them is real, it should be
testable.
I think I have been tested on alt.philosophy.taoism with two rare cases.
And last night someone on a Facebook group challenged me to
identify his sexuality and tonight I correctly identified him as
a two spirited purestraight male/bisexual female.
On Monday, 11 March 2019 06:34:34 UTC, David Dalton wrote:
On Mar 10, 2019, David Dalton wrote
But if my ability to detect someone’s sexual orientation by
looking at them or a picture of them is real, it should be
testable.
I think I have been tested on alt.philosophy.taoism with two rare cases.
And last night someone on a Facebook group challenged me to
identify his sexuality and tonight I correctly identified him as
a two spirited purestraight male/bisexual female.
Neither of which was a double-blind test, so not a standard of proof which most of us would accept.
On Mar 12, 2019, The Millennium Wombat wrote
On Monday, 11 March 2019 06:34:34 UTC, David Dalton wrote:
On Mar 10, 2019, David Dalton wrote
And last night someone on a Facebook group challenged me to
identify his sexuality and tonight I correctly identified him as
a two spirited purestraight male/bisexual female.
Neither of which was a double-blind test, so not a standard of proof which most of us would accept.
I won’t give his name since I don’t have his permission, but
I will quote from his Facebook private message reply to me
after I told him he was two-spited purestraight male/bisexual
female just from looking at his profile picture:
"Holy shit, I’ve nearly reaching androgeniety on the alchemical path. I’m alpha male and very attracted to females. But I’m also effeminate and am bi/pansexual”.
It's clear you have co-opted the term "sexual orientation" to mean something different to the rest of us. The standard definition is that it refers to the gender of people that the subject is attracted to. Gender can be classified as agender, male, female, intersex and nonbinary (though nonbinary covers all sorts of genders which vary between different cultures and times). Orientation can be classified as asexual, heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual (again, bisexual covers all sorts of orientations, notably including pansexual).
So there are already four orientations, but all of them refer to the gender of people one is attracted to. Your definition of "fourth orientation" refers to characteristics other than gender - so, according to the definition in common currency, what you are calling an orientation is not a sexual orientation at all, just like metrosexual, sapiosexual and the rest of these words which have sprung up in recent years. The other day I saw someone use the term "lumbersexual". Neologism is fun but it runs the risk of making important words meaningless.
J.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 294 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 244:39:29 |
| Calls: | 6,626 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,175 |
| Messages: | 5,320,400 |