• how to test treatment difference when response variable have correlatio

    From Jinsong Zhao@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 29 14:24:13 2020
    Hi there,

    I have set an one factor experiment with 4 level. In the experiment, I
    analyzed 3 variables (V1, V2, and V3) among the 4 treatments. I am
    planing to use one-way ANOVA to test the difference of each variable
    among the 4 treatments, and do post hoc comparison by LSD.

    However, in my experiment the 3 variables have relations like:
    V1 + V2 + V3 = C
    here, C (a constant) may varied among 4 treatments.

    The factor we test may have effects on V1 or each of them. When V1 have changed, then other variables may be changed accordingly. Under this
    situation, I don't know if ANOVA is a suite method to do the test.

    Any suggestion or reference? Thanks a lot.

    Best,
    Jinsong

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce Weaver@21:1/5 to Jinsong Zhao on Wed Apr 29 06:42:29 2020
    On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 at 2:24:15 AM UTC-4, Jinsong Zhao wrote:
    Hi there,

    I have set an one factor experiment with 4 level. In the experiment, I analyzed 3 variables (V1, V2, and V3) among the 4 treatments. I am
    planing to use one-way ANOVA to test the difference of each variable
    among the 4 treatments, and do post hoc comparison by LSD.

    However, in my experiment the 3 variables have relations like:
    V1 + V2 + V3 = C
    here, C (a constant) may varied among 4 treatments.

    The factor we test may have effects on V1 or each of them. When V1 have changed, then other variables may be changed accordingly. Under this situation, I don't know if ANOVA is a suite method to do the test.

    Any suggestion or reference? Thanks a lot.

    Best,
    Jinsong


    A Google search on <anova ipsative measures> turns up lots of resources that look relevant. Some of the older ones discuss use of ANOVA models, as one would expect. Some of the more recent ones suggest alternative (quite possibly better) approaches.
    You could also search on <compositional data analysis>.

    One other thing: Fisher's LSD provides good control over the familywise alpha only when there are 3 groups. With 4 groups, you may wish to consider some other MC procedure. If you need resources concerning this point, take a look at the following:

    "Statistical Methods for Psychology" by (the late) David Howell
    "Serious Stats" by Thom Baguley
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17128424

    HTH.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich Ulrich@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 29 14:15:27 2020
    On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:24:13 +0800, Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net>
    wrote:

    Hi there,

    I have set an one factor experiment with 4 level. In the experiment, I >analyzed 3 variables (V1, V2, and V3) among the 4 treatments. I am
    planing to use one-way ANOVA to test the difference of each variable
    among the 4 treatments, and do post hoc comparison by LSD.

    However, in my experiment the 3 variables have relations like:
    V1 + V2 + V3 = C

    Those are called compositional data, or ipsative measures ...
    Bruce has given you some references on that.


    here, C (a constant) may varied among 4 treatments.

    ... but I don't know what THAT implies, when C can vary.
    Why does it vary? How does it vary? What have other people
    done with similar data?

    Are your scores for V1, etc., directly comparable as criteria?
    Or should you be considering ratios, products, or some other
    combinations?


    The factor we test may have effects on V1 or each of them. When V1 have >changed, then other variables may be changed accordingly. Under this >situation, I don't know if ANOVA is a suite method to do the test.

    If you want to test the V's one at a time, ANOVA is what you have.

    If you want to look at relationships, the testing might be an
    application of MANOVA, which is what those "ipsative" sources
    are apt to refer you to. Or you can draw up prior hypotheses
    based on what you know about the V's, compute new measures
    that combine a couple of the V's and test /those/ one at a time.

    But "C ... varied among 4 treatments" suggests to me that
    you need to be very careful and specific about what your
    hypotheses are. The varying-ipsative nature of scoring
    also suggests that you should pay attention to the scaling of
    the measures. That is, when you are near 100% or 0% of
    C, are the "intervals" stilll "equal" in terms of what you expect
    from the outcome measure?


    Any suggestion or reference? Thanks a lot.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    Rich Ulrich

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jinsong Zhao@21:1/5 to Bruce Weaver on Fri May 1 09:10:37 2020
    On 2020/4/29 21:42, Bruce Weaver wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 at 2:24:15 AM UTC-4, Jinsong Zhao wrote:
    Hi there,

    I have set an one factor experiment with 4 level. In the experiment, I
    analyzed 3 variables (V1, V2, and V3) among the 4 treatments. I am
    planing to use one-way ANOVA to test the difference of each variable
    among the 4 treatments, and do post hoc comparison by LSD.

    However, in my experiment the 3 variables have relations like:
    V1 + V2 + V3 = C
    here, C (a constant) may varied among 4 treatments.

    The factor we test may have effects on V1 or each of them. When V1 have
    changed, then other variables may be changed accordingly. Under this
    situation, I don't know if ANOVA is a suite method to do the test.

    Any suggestion or reference? Thanks a lot.

    Best,
    Jinsong


    A Google search on <anova ipsative measures> turns up lots of resources that look relevant. Some of the older ones discuss use of ANOVA models, as one would expect. Some of the more recent ones suggest alternative (quite possibly better) approaches.
    You could also search on <compositional data analysis>.

    One other thing: Fisher's LSD provides good control over the familywise alpha only when there are 3 groups. With 4 groups, you may wish to consider some other MC procedure. If you need resources concerning this point, take a look at the following:

    "Statistical Methods for Psychology" by (the late) David Howell
    "Serious Stats" by Thom Baguley
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17128424

    HTH.


    Thank you very much for the searching keywords and the comments on the selection of MC procedure.

    Best,
    Jinsong

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jinsong Zhao@21:1/5 to Rich Ulrich on Fri May 1 09:37:53 2020
    On 2020/4/30 2:15, Rich Ulrich wrote:
    On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:24:13 +0800, Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net>
    wrote:

    Hi there,

    I have set an one factor experiment with 4 level. In the experiment, I
    analyzed 3 variables (V1, V2, and V3) among the 4 treatments. I am
    planing to use one-way ANOVA to test the difference of each variable
    among the 4 treatments, and do post hoc comparison by LSD.

    However, in my experiment the 3 variables have relations like:
    V1 + V2 + V3 = C

    Those are called compositional data, or ipsative measures ...
    Bruce has given you some references on that.

    Thank you and Bruce for point me to the name of my data. I don't have
    the knowledge about that in my education about statistics.

    here, C (a constant) may varied among 4 treatments.

    ... but I don't know what THAT implies, when C can vary.
    Why does it vary? How does it vary? What have other people
    done with similar data?

    Are your scores for V1, etc., directly comparable as criteria?
    Or should you be considering ratios, products, or some other
    combinations?


    I should reconsider about my data. I am wrong with my previous
    statement. In fact, V's have many source. Now, I am only consider it
    from, e.g., soils. Thus, it may vary with different treat.


    The factor we test may have effects on V1 or each of them. When V1 have
    changed, then other variables may be changed accordingly. Under this
    situation, I don't know if ANOVA is a suite method to do the test.

    If you want to test the V's one at a time, ANOVA is what you have.

    Yes, I have read many papers in my research field that apply ANOVA to
    test the effects of treatment on V.


    If you want to look at relationships, the testing might be an
    application of MANOVA, which is what those "ipsative" sources
    are apt to refer you to. Or you can draw up prior hypotheses
    based on what you know about the V's, compute new measures
    that combine a couple of the V's and test /those/ one at a time.

    But "C ... varied among 4 treatments" suggests to me that
    you need to be very careful and specific about what your
    hypotheses are. The varying-ipsative nature of scoring
    also suggests that you should pay attention to the scaling of
    the measures. That is, when you are near 100% or 0% of
    C, are the "intervals" stilll "equal" in terms of what you expect
    from the outcome measure?

    I am going to read some materials about this topic at first. Thank you
    very much for the suggestions on the question.



    Any suggestion or reference? Thanks a lot.

    Hope this helps.

    That helps a lot.

    Best,
    Jinsong

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)