• Lunar Starship teting ?

    From JF Mezei@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 13 20:20:24 2022
    What sort of testing and duration will be needed before NASA will trust
    to put people on a Starship and land it on moon and return to "gateway" ?

    I take it SpaceX will need to land a Starship succesfully and take off
    from Moon and prove it can dock ? How many times could it need to do
    this before there is trust in the platform?

    Obviously for Apollo, the LEM was manually driven to land, so they
    couldn't remotely test it so the first landing had to be tested. But
    prior to this, they had "iteratively" tested the Apollo platform with
    various tests around Earth and then one trip around the moon.

    Just curious how Starship would be tested for a mission that is quite
    different (though it does the same weekend camping trip capacity as Apollo).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to JF Mezei on Mon Mar 14 13:30:06 2022
    On 14-Mar-22 11:20 am, JF Mezei wrote:

    What sort of testing and duration will be needed before NASA will trust
    to put people on a Starship and land it on moon and return to "gateway" ?

    I take it SpaceX will need to land a Starship succesfully and take off
    from Moon and prove it can dock ? How many times could it need to do
    this before there is trust in the platform?

    Obviously for Apollo, the LEM was manually driven to land, so they
    couldn't remotely test it so the first landing had to be tested. But
    prior to this, they had "iteratively" tested the Apollo platform with
    various tests around Earth and then one trip around the moon.

    Just curious how Starship would be tested for a mission that is quite different (though it does the same weekend camping trip capacity as Apollo).

    As things are, the lunar Starship will only be used to transfer crew
    between the lunar orbit and the surface of the Moon, and vice-versa. It
    will not re-enter Earth's atmosphere, and will not have a heat shield
    that would allow it to.

    One might indeed wonder why Starship cannot do the entire job (other
    than compromising Congress's pork barrelling), but that's how the
    contracts stand.

    Sylvia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JF Mezei@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Wed Mar 16 02:12:02 2022
    On 2022-03-13 22:30, Sylvia Else wrote:

    As things are, the lunar Starship will only be used to transfer crew
    between the lunar orbit and the surface of the Moon, and vice-versa.


    Landing such a huge grain silo on the moon with undefined landing gear
    still needs to be tested. Ensuring that once landed on rough ground, it
    can take off, reach orbit and dock with that gateway thing is another
    big test.

    And if this is to be more tha a single weekend camping trip, what sort
    of testing will make NASA comfortable re-using the Starship for multiple
    moon landings and take offs?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dean Markley@21:1/5 to JF Mezei on Wed Mar 16 04:32:55 2022
    On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 2:12:05 AM UTC-4, JF Mezei wrote:
    On 2022-03-13 22:30, Sylvia Else wrote:

    As things are, the lunar Starship will only be used to transfer crew between the lunar orbit and the surface of the Moon, and vice-versa.
    Landing such a huge grain silo on the moon with undefined landing gear
    still needs to be tested. Ensuring that once landed on rough ground, it
    can take off, reach orbit and dock with that gateway thing is another
    big test.

    And if this is to be more tha a single weekend camping trip, what sort
    of testing will make NASA comfortable re-using the Starship for multiple
    moon landings and take offs?

    I am uncertain why you always need to use such sarcastic tones when asking rhetorical questions about SpaceX. Did you get turned down by them for employment?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)