Much talk about UFOs lately,
including this amazingly precise and highly detailed video that leaves 0
room for mis-interpretation :-)
https://youtu.be/9KAZE1wmV9k
So this brings this question:
when something falls out of the sky, such as fairings from a falcon9
launch, could their light weight and aerodynamic properties result in
their trajectory making them appear to be floating in the sky, or would
in all circumstances and from all angles be very obvious that they are
falling vertically or only slight diagonal trajectory due to wind? (at
least from altitudes reacheable by helicopters).
Apart form fairings, would there be other objects that would survive
re-entry AND be light enough to "parachute" down slowly?
For the Shuttle, from what I gather, the ET was jettisoed about 7581m/s
or 27,000kmh which is at or near orbital speed, but at altitude of
105km. It apparently made it from Kennedy to the Indian Ocean, so
roughly half an orbit. (which is quite different from Falcon9 whose bits
fall near KSC).
Since the ET made it to 105km altitude at near orbital speed without
burning up, how come it burns up on the way down? (or did it?). Once
empty, I would assume that atmospheric drag would slow it down such that
it would end up going through atmosphere at lower speed than when it was
being pushed by 3 SSMEs on the way up at same altitude.
Do we know that the ETs burned up, or could there be a big pile of
intact ETs sitting at bottom of the Indian Ocean?
And as a reslity check, if the above video was from infrared camera,
would the "black" object signifiy that it is cold? Or just that it is
colder than the background/sky ? is it normal that an object at low
altiutude would be colder than the infrared received from clouds at much
higher altitude?
If an object is moving through the air, shouldn't it have some heat on
its skin due to aerodynamic drag and thus appear brighter?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)