Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System β the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base β is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been >bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System β the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base β is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
rocket !
On 2023-09-11 3:23 a.m., Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
rocket !
You do understand that SpaceX is a very profitable company.
Alain Fournier
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System β the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base β is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been >bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
rocket !
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
rocket !
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System β the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base β is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been >bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
rocket !
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been >> >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
rocket !
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&
We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean MarkleyOffice.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System β the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base β is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability
ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
rocket !
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_
We don't need any help.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean MarkleyOffice.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> >> >> wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System β the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base β is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability
hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
rocket !
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&
We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:Office.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> >> >> >> wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability
hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
rocket !
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&
It is fun to see you troll-back :-)We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
How's that financial backing coming along?
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean MarkleyOffice.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System β the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base β is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability
9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion >> >> >> rocket !
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is >> >> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=
As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your bandwagon.It is fun to see you troll-back :-)We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
How's that financial backing coming along?Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?
You will suffer less...
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:Office.
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability
9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion >> >> >> >> rocket !
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is >> >> >> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=
As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your bandwagon.Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?It is fun to see you troll-back :-)We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
How's that financial backing coming along?
You will suffer less...
What are you waiting for?
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean MarkleyAccountability Office.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System β the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base β is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government
9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
rocket !
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=
You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On theAs soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your bandwagon.Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here? >> >> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
How's that financial backing coming along?
You will suffer less...
What are you waiting for?
other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
Kill yourself now!
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:Office.
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability
9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
rocket !
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=
You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On theAs soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your bandwagon.Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here? >> >> >> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
How's that financial backing coming along?
You will suffer less...
What are you waiting for?
other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
Kill yourself now!
So, when does your first orbital flight happen?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else
<syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion >>>>>>>>>>> rocket !
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System the >>>>>>>>>>>>> massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program >>>>>>>>>>>>> to establish a moon base is "inaccessible," according to a >>>>>>>>>>>>> report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
Unaffordable.
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is >>>>>>>>>>>> expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have >>>>>>>>>>>> been bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into >>>>>>>>>> space. So here:
https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%
You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On theAs soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your >>>> bandwagon. What are you waiting for?Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here? >>>>>>> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
How's that financial backing coming along?
You will suffer less...
other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
Kill yourself now!
So, when does your first orbital flight happen?
again fuck off again !
Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else
<syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
Unaffordable.
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to establish a moon base is "inaccessible," according to a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is >>>>>>>>>>>>> expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have >>>>>>>>>>>>> been bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
rocket !
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into
space. So here:
https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%
You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On theAs soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on yourHey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here? >>>>>>>> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
How's that financial backing coming along?
You will suffer less...
bandwagon. What are you waiting for?
other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
Kill yourself now!
So, when does your first orbital flight happen?
again fuck off again !
If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
group, where there's none of the resources you need.
/dps
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:40:26 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
wrote:
Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else
<syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian >>>>>>>>>>>>> propulsion rocket !
Unaffordable.
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System Β >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program to establish a moon base Β is "inaccessible," >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention >>>>>>>>>>>> into space. So here:
https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%
You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On theAs soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on >>>>>> your bandwagon. What are you waiting for?Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?It is fun to see you troll-back :-)We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on >>>>>>>>>> here?
How's that financial backing coming along?
You will suffer less...
other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
Kill yourself now!
So, when does your first orbital flight happen?
again fuck off again !
If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
group, where there's none of the resources you need.
/dps
I do what I want, thank you!
Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:[snip]
again fuck off again !
If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
group, where there's none of the resources you need.
On 2023-09-19 3:40 p.m., Snidely wrote:
Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:[snip]
again fuck off again !
If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
group, where there's none of the resources you need.
I wouldn't say that there's none of the resources that they need here.
If they could convince us all that they really do have a "magic drive",
I think that there are engineers here and I know there are some people
who at least visit occasionally that could organize some interesting >financing. But no one here will go help people who can't show that their >device works and have for most common answer variations of "fuck off"
and proooooooot.
Alain Fournier
Just this Tuesday, Doctor Who puzzled about:20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:40:26 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley >>>>>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else
<syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian >>>>>>>>>>>>>> propulsion rocket !
Unaffordable.
Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program to establish a moon base ? is "inaccessible," >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors
have been bleeding the tax payer dry.
It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
Sylvia.
I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention >>>>>>>>>>>>> into space. So here:
https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%
You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On the >>>>>> other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on >>>>>>> your bandwagon. What are you waiting for?Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?It is fun to see you troll-back :-)We don't need any help.
If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on >>>>>>>>>>> here?
How's that financial backing coming along?
You will suffer less...
Kill yourself now!
So, when does your first orbital flight happen?
again fuck off again !
If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
group, where there's none of the resources you need.
/dps
I do what I want, thank you!
Which is to come here and masturbate and act childish, eh?
/dps
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:18:45 -0400, Alain Fournier
<alai...@videotron.ca> wrote:
On 2023-09-19 3:40 p.m., Snidely wrote:
Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:[snip]
again fuck off again !
If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
group, where there's none of the resources you need.
I wouldn't say that there's none of the resources that they need here.
If they could convince us all that they really do have a "magic drive",
I think that there are engineers here and I know there are some people
who at least visit occasionally that could organize some interesting >financing. But no one here will go help people who can't show that their >device works and have for most common answer variations of "fuck off"
and proooooooot.
Alain FournierProoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 5:56:31?PM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:18:45 -0400, Alain Fournier
<alai...@videotron.ca> wrote:
On 2023-09-19 3:40 p.m., Snidely wrote:Prooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot
Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:[snip]
again fuck off again !
If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
group, where there's none of the resources you need.
I wouldn't say that there's none of the resources that they need here.
If they could convince us all that they really do have a "magic drive",
I think that there are engineers here and I know there are some people
who at least visit occasionally that could organize some interesting
financing. But no one here will go help people who can't show that their
device works and have for most common answer variations of "fuck off"
and proooooooot.
Alain Fournier
I wonder why the trolls never seem to understand that they are trolls?
You do understand that SpaceX is a very profitable company.
You do understand that SpaceX is a very profitable company.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 127:51:04 |
Calls: | 6,663 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,212 |
Messages: | 5,335,183 |