You eat dry forage.
and lallo
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.
and lalloI like donkeys. They're cute.
Sylvia.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are you trolling so hard?
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyAnswer my question.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are you trolling so hard?I am the Doctor.
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyAnswer my question.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:I am the Doctor.
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are you trolling so hard?
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyAnswer my question.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:I am the Doctor.
You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are >>>> you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:43:49 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyAnswer my question.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:I am the Doctor.
You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand.... >>>>>>You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are >>>>>> you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
It takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of
something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN
who spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around.
Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively
for 150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the
charged particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are
different sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
so you can tell us why for 150 years no one made such experiments on
open circuits?
instead, and see how that works out.-- Katy Jennison
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyAnswer my question.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:I am the Doctor.
You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand.... >>>>>You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are >>>>> you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
It takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of
something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN
who spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around. >Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively
for 150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the
charged particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are
different sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
On Monday, Doctor Who exclaimed wildly:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:43:49 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markleyyou don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:Answer my question.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:I am the Doctor.
You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand.... >>>>>>>You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why >>>>>>> are you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
It takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of
something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN who >>> spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around.
Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively for >>> 150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the charged
particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are different
sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
so you can tell us why for 150 years no one made such experiments on
open circuits?
Do you have the capacitance to understand?
Just this Monday, Snidely puzzled about:
On Monday, Doctor Who exclaimed wildly:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:43:49 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markleyyou don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:Answer my question.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:I am the Doctor.
You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand.... >>>>>>>>You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why >>>>>>>> are you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
It takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of
something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN who >>>> spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around.
Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively for >>>> 150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the charged
particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are different
sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
so you can tell us why for 150 years no one made such experiments on
open circuits?
Do you have the capacitance to understand?
Maybe you should radio in your answer.
/dps
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:31:39 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
Just this Monday, Snidely puzzled about:
On Monday, Doctor Who exclaimed wildly:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:43:49 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markleyyou don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:Answer my question.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:I am the Doctor.
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand.... >>>>>>>>>
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why >>>>>>>>> are you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
It takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of
something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN who >>>>> spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around.
Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively for >>>>> 150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the charged >>>>> particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are different >>>>> sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
so you can tell us why for 150 years no one made such experiments on
open circuits?
Do you have the capacitance to understand?
Maybe you should radio in your answer.
/dps
I think I'll stop writing here, there is no fertile ground.
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyAnswer my question.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:I am the Doctor.
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyAnswer my question.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:I am the Doctor.
You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand.... >>>>>You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are >>>>> you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
No because if you were serious, you certainly wouldn't be arguing in a Google Group.
On Tuesday or thereabouts, Dean Markley declared ...
On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyAnswer my question.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:I am the Doctor.
You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand.... >>>>>You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are
you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
No because if you were serious, you certainly wouldn't be arguing in a GoogleWell, technically, it's not a Google Group, it's a usenet newsgroup,
Group.
and it exists on servers outside of Google, and is just mirrored by
Google.
On the other hand, there's no one here representing either investors
nor people whose validation of the equipment would carry any weight in
the real world.
/dps
--
There's nothing inherently wrong with Big Data. What matters, as it
does for Arnold Lund in California or Richard Rothman in Baltimore, are
the questions -- old and new, good and bad -- this newest tool lets us
ask. (R. Lerhman, CSMonitor.com)
On Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 1:07:30 PM UTC-5, Snidely wrote:
On Tuesday or thereabouts, Dean Markley declared ...
On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:Well, technically, it's not a Google Group, it's a usenet newsgroup,
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markleyyou don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:Answer my question.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:I am the Doctor.
You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand.... >>>>>>>You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are
you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
No because if you were serious, you certainly wouldn't be arguing in a Google
Group.
and it exists on servers outside of Google, and is just mirrored by
Google.
On the other hand, there's no one here representing either investors
nor people whose validation of the equipment would carry any weight in
the real world.
/dps
--
There's nothing inherently wrong with Big Data. What matters, as it
does for Arnold Lund in California or Richard Rothman in Baltimore, are
the questions -- old and new, good and bad -- this newest tool lets us
ask. (R. Lerhman, CSMonitor.com)
Yes, thank you for the correction. But you amplified my point which I also appreciate. Why is this guy trying so hard in here? It's really not the place to try if you are serious.
On 22-Feb-23 11:21 pm, Dean Markley wrote:
On Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 1:07:30 PM UTC-5, Snidely wrote:
On Tuesday or thereabouts, Dean Markley declared ...
On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: >>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyWell, technically, it's not a Google Group, it's a usenet newsgroup,
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markleyyou don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:Answer my question.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:I am the Doctor.
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why are
you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.
No because if you were serious, you certainly wouldn't be arguing in a Google
Group.
and it exists on servers outside of Google, and is just mirrored by
Google.
On the other hand, there's no one here representing either investors
nor people whose validation of the equipment would carry any weight in
the real world.
/dps
--
There's nothing inherently wrong with Big Data. What matters, as it
does for Arnold Lund in California or Richard Rothman in Baltimore, are >> the questions -- old and new, good and bad -- this newest tool lets us
ask. (R. Lerhman, CSMonitor.com)
Yes, thank you for the correction. But you amplified my point which I also appreciate. Why is this guy trying so hard in here? It's really not the place to try if you are serious.The guy did get some traction (as distinct from thrust) at one point,
with NASA investigating (why they would spend money on that in the
absence of clear evidence that it works, I do not know).
Perhaps completely unmoderated groups are now the only slightly relevant places he can post to about it.
Sylvia.
On 21-Feb-23 5:50 am, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:31:39 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
Just this Monday, Snidely puzzled about:
On Monday, Doctor Who exclaimed wildly:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:43:49 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyIt takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of >>>>>> something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN who >>>>>> spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around.
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markleyyou don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:Answer my question.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:I am the Doctor.
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why >>>>>>>>>> are you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more. >>>>>>
Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively for
150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the charged >>>>>> particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are different >>>>>> sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
so you can tell us why for 150 years no one made such experiments on >>>>> open circuits?
Do you have the capacitance to understand?
Maybe you should radio in your answer.
/dps
I think I'll stop writing here, there is no fertile ground.
Yes, you shouldn't write here. But I'll bet that you're incapable of >stopping.
Sylvia.
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:21:12 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 21-Feb-23 5:50 am, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:31:39 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
Just this Monday, Snidely puzzled about:
On Monday, Doctor Who exclaimed wildly:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:43:49 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyIt takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of >>>>>>> something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN who
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markleyyou don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are >>>>>>>> donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more. >>>>>>>
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:Answer my question.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:I am the Doctor.
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why
are you trolling so hard?
spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around.
Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively for
150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the charged >>>>>>> particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are different >>>>>>> sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
so you can tell us why for 150 years no one made such experiments on >>>>>> open circuits?
Do you have the capacitance to understand?
Maybe you should radio in your answer.
/dps
I think I'll stop writing here, there is no fertile ground.
Yes, you shouldn't write here. But I'll bet that you're incapable of
stopping.
Sylvia.
Yours is cyber bullying.
On 24-Feb-23 9:35 pm, Doctor Who wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:21:12 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 21-Feb-23 5:50 am, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:31:39 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:
Just this Monday, Snidely puzzled about:
On Monday, Doctor Who exclaimed wildly:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:43:49 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyIt takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of >>>>>>>> something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN who
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markleyyou don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are >>>>>>>>> donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more. >>>>>>>>
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:Answer my question.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:I am the Doctor.
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why
are you trolling so hard?
spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around.
Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively for
150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the charged >>>>>>>> particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are different >>>>>>>> sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
so you can tell us why for 150 years no one made such experiments on >>>>>>> open circuits?
Do you have the capacitance to understand?
Maybe you should radio in your answer.
/dps
I think I'll stop writing here, there is no fertile ground.
Yes, you shouldn't write here. But I'll bet that you're incapable of
stopping.
Sylvia.
Yours is cyber bullying.
That doesn't even make sense.
Sylvia.
On Friday, February 24, 2023 at 8:05:05?AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 21:42:46 +1100, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 24-Feb-23 9:35 pm, Doctor Who wrote:It doesn't make sense for donkeys.
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:21:12 +1100, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 21-Feb-23 5:50 am, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:31:39 -0800, Snidely <snide...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Just this Monday, Snidely puzzled about:
On Monday, Doctor Who exclaimed wildly:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:43:49 -0800, Snidely <snide...@gmail.com>
wrote:
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyIt takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of >> >>>>>>>> something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN who
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyAnswer my question.
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:I am the Doctor.
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why
are you trolling so hard?
donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more. >> >>>>>>>>
spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around.
Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively for
150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the charged
particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are different
sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
so you can tell us why for 150 years no one made such experiments on >> >>>>>>> open circuits?
Do you have the capacitance to understand?
Maybe you should radio in your answer.
/dps
I think I'll stop writing here, there is no fertile ground.
Yes, you shouldn't write here. But I'll bet that you're incapable of
stopping.
Sylvia.
Yours is cyber bullying.
That doesn't even make sense.
Sylvia.
So now, you admit YOU are a donkey? LOL.
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 21:42:46 +1100, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 24-Feb-23 9:35 pm, Doctor Who wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:21:12 +1100, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 21-Feb-23 5:50 am, Doctor Who wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:31:39 -0800, Snidely <snide...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Just this Monday, Snidely puzzled about:
On Monday, Doctor Who exclaimed wildly:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:43:49 -0800, Snidely <snide...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
After serious thinking Doctor Who wrote :
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean MarkleyIt takes a great deal of evidence to convince us of the reality of >>>>>>>> something no one else has ever seen, not even the physicists at CERN who
<dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are >>>>>>>>> donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more. >>>>>>>>
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley >>>>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:Answer my question.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:I am the Doctor.
On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....
You eat dry forage.I like donkeys. They're cute.
and lallo
Sylvia.
So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why
are you trolling so hard?
spend a great deal of time moving charged particles around. >>>>>>>> Electrostatics and electrodynamics have been studied very intensively for
150 years, and the Lorenz force clearly takes the mass of the charged
particle into account. Electron rings and proton rings are different
sizes for a reason.
Your evidence is
a) experiments unduplicated elsewhere
b) no effort to eliminate alternate explanations
c) patent applications
/dps
so you can tell us why for 150 years no one made such experiments on >>>>>>> open circuits?
Do you have the capacitance to understand?
Maybe you should radio in your answer.
/dps
I think I'll stop writing here, there is no fertile ground.
Yes, you shouldn't write here. But I'll bet that you're incapable of
stopping.
Sylvia.
Yours is cyber bullying.
That doesn't even make sense.
Sylvia.It doesn't make sense for donkeys.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 117:58:13 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,334,287 |