1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.SPACE.POLICY

  • So you think it is a thermal effect ...

    From Doctor Who@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 12 19:40:28 2023
    We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dean Markley@21:1/5 to Doctor Who on Thu Jan 12 11:20:43 2023
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 1:40:30 PM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:
    We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.

    A branch of physics that deals with the effects arising from the interactions of electric currents with magnets, with other currents, or with themselves.

    Huh, that was easy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Doctor Who@21:1/5 to damarkley@gmail.com on Thu Jan 12 20:30:42 2023
    On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:20:43 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
    <damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 1:40:30 PM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:
    We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.

    A branch of physics that deals with the effects arising from the interactions of electric currents with magnets, with other currents, or with themselves.

    Huh, that was easy.

    now prove that you know electrodynamics of open circuits.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snidely@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 13 03:16:53 2023
    Doctor Who scribbled something on Thursday the 1/12/2023:
    We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.

    An electric or magnetic field generates a force on a charged particle.
    But charged particles still have mass, and their acceleration is still constrained by that mass. Which has been well studied at highly
    relativistic speeds (and the magnets at CERN are very big and use a lot
    power to move a smattering of particles). Each upgrade since the
    original cyclotron has required more power for smaller increases in
    speed.

    Is there something else in electrodynamics that you think allows
    acceleration where F=ma doesn't apply, in either its Newtonian or
    relativistic form?

    /dps


    --
    You could try being nicer and politer
    instead, and see how that works out.
    -- Katy Jennison

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Doctor Who@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 13 14:37:25 2023
    On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 03:16:53 -0800, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Doctor Who scribbled something on Thursday the 1/12/2023:
    We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.

    An electric or magnetic field generates a force on a charged particle.
    But charged particles still have mass, and their acceleration is still >constrained by that mass. Which has been well studied at highly
    relativistic speeds (and the magnets at CERN are very big and use a lot
    power to move a smattering of particles). Each upgrade since the
    original cyclotron has required more power for smaller increases in
    speed.

    Is there something else in electrodynamics that you think allows
    acceleration where F=ma doesn't apply, in either its Newtonian or >relativistic form?

    /dps


    washing donkey's head is a waste of time with soap and water.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Doctor Who@21:1/5 to damarkley@gmail.com on Sun Jan 15 14:37:32 2023
    On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:20:43 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
    <damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 1:40:30 PM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:
    We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.

    A branch of physics that deals with the effects arising from the interactions of electric currents with magnets, with other currents, or with themselves.

    Huh, that was easy.

    yes it easy to copy from wikipedia !

    whata troll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)