I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or
not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or
not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I haven’t checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:whether or
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining
not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I haven’t checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of
"statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Sylvia wrote:
Do you even understand the meaning of
"statistically significant"?
I don't believe in statistics and neither should
anybody else. It's one of the ways they try to
fool us. The Bible never mentions statistics.
I don't believe in statistics and neither should
anybody else. It's one of the ways they try to
fool us. The Bible never mentions statistics.
Ted wrote:
Sylvia wrote:
Do you even understand the meaning of
"statistically significant"?
One wonders what the word, statistics, means
at times when its meaning changes in mid-
thinking of a thought-stream.
I don't believe in statistics and neither should
anybody else. It's one of the ways they try to
fool us. The Bible never mentions statistics.
No mention of David's 10,000?
No 40 years, 40 days? No generations from
Adam to when Jesus was a number of nights and
the daze before emerging from death?
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I haven’t checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9og9F6jb3U1@mid.individual.net>):
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or >>>> not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I haven’t checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Yes. And what if I was presented with 100 cases
who all knew their sexual orientations and
spiritual genders and I didn’t and I got all
100 correct? (Even ten should be significant,
and even several separate accurate IDs
of individuals should be significant.)
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group)
On 04-May-21 12:32 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9og9F6jb3U1@mid.individual.net>):
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or
not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I haven’t checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Yes. And what if I was presented with 100 cases
who all knew their sexual orientations and
spiritual genders and I didn’t and I got all
100 correct? (Even ten should be significant,
and even several separate accurate IDs
of individuals should be significant.)
100 would be significant.
But what makes you think you can do this?
Have you been able to do such
a test?
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so
please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
4. 92% of formerly partially compatible relationships
involving at least one assisted shaktipat recipient
have been made optimally compatible; the remaining
8% have been broken up since there is no longer
partial compatibility for assisted shaktipat recipients.
But anyway, at least my intuition in checking
known cases proves correct.
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so
please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormal
divination ability.
On 04-May-21 12:32 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9og9F6jb3U1@mid.individual.net>):
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I cant do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or >>>>> not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I havent checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Yes. And what if I was presented with 100 cases
who all knew their sexual orientations and
spiritual genders and I didnt and I got all
100 correct? (Even ten should be significant,
and even several separate accurate IDs
of individuals should be significant.)
100 would be significant.
But what makes you think you can do this? Have you been able to do such
a test?
On Mon, 03 May 2021 07:15:58 -0700, one <being@apolka.sign> wrote:
Ted wrote:
Sylvia wrote:
Do you even understand the meaning of
"statistically significant"?
One wonders what the word, statistics, means
at times when its meaning changes in mid-
thinking of a thought-stream.
I don't believe in statistics and neither should
anybody else. It's one of the ways they try to
fool us. The Bible never mentions statistics.
No mention of David's 10,000?
No 40 years, 40 days? No generations from
Adam to when Jesus was a number of nights and
the daze before emerging from death?
You seem lacking in spiritual insight.
Certainly God gave us numbers to count with
and it's something we should thank him for,
but he never intended for them to be put to
perverted use.
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<fvg19ghg2rs2mccekhp1or9f80o1sa2huu@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 4 May 2021 12:48:41 +1000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else<sylvia@email.invalid>:
On 04-May-21 12:32 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9og9F6jb3U1@mid.individual.net>):
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or
not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I haven’t checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Yes. And what if I was presented with 100 cases
who all knew their sexual orientations and
spiritual genders and I didn’t and I got all
100 correct? (Even ten should be significant,
and even several separate accurate IDs
of individuals should be significant.)
100 would be significant.
But what makes you think you can do this? Have you been able to do suchAnd let's not forget that his opinion regarding the
a test?
orientation of others, even if it agrees with their personal
beliefs, is at best not-very-good evidence of anything,
since objective evidence is lacking.
What would you take as objective evidence? Perhaps
measurements of arousal indicators such as genital
temperature and blood flow when someone is exposed
to pictures or people of different genders? (In my
case, since I am straight-type-2, which I sometimes
call fourth orientation, I would be aroused only by
pictures of bisexual women.)
On Tue, 4 May 2021 12:48:41 +1000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else<sylvia@email.invalid>:
On 04-May-21 12:32 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9og9F6jb3U1@mid.individual.net>):
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or
not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I haven’t checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Yes. And what if I was presented with 100 cases
who all knew their sexual orientations and
spiritual genders and I didn’t and I got all
100 correct? (Even ten should be significant,
and even several separate accurate IDs
of individuals should be significant.)
100 would be significant.
But what makes you think you can do this? Have you been able to do suchAnd let's not forget that his opinion regarding the
a test?
orientation of others, even if it agrees with their personal
beliefs, is at best not-very-good evidence of anything,
since objective evidence is lacking.
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so
please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormalYou are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
divination ability.
free to reject them. HAND.
On Tue, 4 May 2021 12:48:41 +1000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>:
On 04-May-21 12:32 pm, David Dalton wrote:And let's not forget that his opinion regarding the
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9og9F6jb3U1@mid.individual.net>):
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or >>>>>> not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I haven’t checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Yes. And what if I was presented with 100 cases
who all knew their sexual orientations and
spiritual genders and I didn’t and I got all
100 correct? (Even ten should be significant,
and even several separate accurate IDs
of individuals should be significant.)
100 would be significant.
But what makes you think you can do this? Have you been able to do such
a test?
orientation of others, even if it agrees with their personal
beliefs, is at best not-very-good evidence of anything,
since objective evidence is lacking.
On 04-May-21 1:49 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2021 12:48:41 +1000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else<sylvia@email.invalid>:
On 04-May-21 12:32 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9og9F6jb3U1@mid.individual.net>):
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or
not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I haven’t checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Yes. And what if I was presented with 100 cases
who all knew their sexual orientations and
spiritual genders and I didn’t and I got all
100 correct? (Even ten should be significant,
and even several separate accurate IDs
of individuals should be significant.)
100 would be significant.
But what makes you think you can do this? Have you been able to do suchAnd let's not forget that his opinion regarding the
a test?
orientation of others, even if it agrees with their personal
beliefs, is at best not-very-good evidence of anything,
since objective evidence is lacking.
If he could reliably anticipate what the others would say about their orientation, that would be something, though in testing, one would have
to be careful to exclude other, non-psychic, ways that he could do that.
Of course, I doubt he has the ability. He hasn't done a proper test on himself, so has no rational basis for his belief. He's probably just delusional, and we've certainly seen that here before.
Sylvia.
On Mon, 03 May 2021 07:15:58 -0700, one <being@apolka.sign> wrote:
Ted wrote:
Sylvia wrote:
Do you even understand the meaning of
"statistically significant"?
One wonders what the word, statistics, means
at times when its meaning changes in mid-
thinking of a thought-stream.
I don't believe in statistics and neither should
anybody else. It's one of the ways they try to
fool us. The Bible never mentions statistics.
No mention of David's 10,000?
No 40 years, 40 days? No generations from
Adam to when Jesus was a number of nights and
the daze before emerging from death?
You seem lacking in spiritual insight.
Certainly God gave us numbers to count with
and it's something we should thank him for,
but he never intended for them to be put to
perverted use.
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<fvg19ghg2rs2mccekhp1or9f80o1sa2huu@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 4 May 2021 12:48:41 +1000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else<sylvia@email.invalid>:
On 04-May-21 12:32 pm, David Dalton wrote:And let's not forget that his opinion regarding the
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9og9F6jb3U1@mid.individual.net>):
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of >> > > > > > > those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum >> > > > > > > click divination, and I cant do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or
not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I havent checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Yes. And what if I was presented with 100 cases
who all knew their sexual orientations and
spiritual genders and I didnt and I got all
100 correct? (Even ten should be significant,
and even several separate accurate IDs
of individuals should be significant.)
100 would be significant.
But what makes you think you can do this? Have you been able to do such
a test?
orientation of others, even if it agrees with their personal
beliefs, is at best not-very-good evidence of anything,
since objective evidence is lacking.
What would you take as objective evidence?
On Mon, 03 May 2021 12:48:22 -0400, Ted <tedsmasher@gmail.com>wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2021 07:15:58 -0700, one <being@apolka.sign> wrote:
Ted wrote:
Sylvia wrote:
Do you even understand the meaning of
"statistically significant"?
One wonders what the word, statistics, means
at times when its meaning changes in mid-
thinking of a thought-stream.
I don't believe in statistics and neither should
anybody else. It's one of the ways they try to
fool us. The Bible never mentions statistics.
No mention of David's 10,000?
No 40 years, 40 days? No generations from
Adam to when Jesus was a number of nights and
the daze before emerging from death?
You seem lacking in spiritual insight.
Certainly God gave us numbers to count with
and it's something we should thank him for,
but he never intended for them to be put to
perverted use.
Does a five sigma mean anything to you?
What are the odds that the children of Abraham
would number half of Earth's population?
On 04-May-21 1:49 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2021 12:48:41 +1000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>:
On 04-May-21 12:32 pm, David Dalton wrote:And let's not forget that his opinion regarding the
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9og9F6jb3U1@mid.individual.net>):
On 03-May-21 5:07 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 3, 2021, Sylvia Else wrote
(in article <if9bt8F47vlU1@mid.individual.net>):
On 02-May-21 5:24 pm, David Dalton wrote:
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of >>>>>>>> those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum >>>>>>>> click divination, and I cant do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
or from memory
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
There does not appear to be any objective way of determining whether or >>>>>>> not you are correct, which makes testing you problematic.
Sylvia.
Huh? The individuals who I would try my ability on
would know if they are straight, gay/lesbian, or
bisexual, and if they are cis, trans, or multi-spirit
(many of whom identify as non-binary). But I
also subdivide straight into straight-type-1, who
are optimally compatible with straight-type-1
of the opposite gender, and straight-type-2,
who are compatible only with bisexual of the
opposite gender. Also I define bisexual as
attracted to both genders, not necessarily
having sex with both genders.
For example I have intuited that Christian Slater
is transgender lesbian, and you could test
that by asking him if he is.
I havent checked all groups for followups and
possible test cases yet but plan to tomorrow
(Monday) night. Instead of a range of test
cases you could just test me with yourself.
Do you even understand the meaning of "statistically significant"?
Sylvia.
Yes. And what if I was presented with 100 cases
who all knew their sexual orientations and
spiritual genders and I didnt and I got all
100 correct? (Even ten should be significant,
and even several separate accurate IDs
of individuals should be significant.)
100 would be significant.
But what makes you think you can do this? Have you been able to do such
a test?
orientation of others, even if it agrees with their personal
beliefs, is at best not-very-good evidence of anything,
since objective evidence is lacking.
If he could reliably anticipate what the others would say about their >orientation, that would be something, though in testing, one would have
to be careful to exclude other, non-psychic, ways that he could do that.
Of course, I doubt he has the ability. He hasn't done a proper test on >himself, so has no rational basis for his belief. He's probably just >delusional, and we've certainly seen that here before.
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<vrg19ghr8l761rjhrsceat33pfc6nfo83g@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteYou are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so
please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormal
divination ability.
free to reject them. HAND.
I’ve been on sci.skeptic for over 25 years and divination,
including dowsing, has always been relevant
on here, and my matchmaking ability is a form
of divination.
How do you define paranormal ability?
one wondered:
Does a five sigma mean anything to you?
Yes, it's an example of the Marxist influence
in our math curricula.
What are the odds that the children of Abraham
would number half of Earth's population?
God promised him as many as the stars in
the sky. If you'd like, I can share a video
explaining the background of that promise.
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
On 4/05/21 4:39 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<vrg19ghr8l761rjhrsceat33pfc6nfo83g@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so
please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormalYou are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
divination ability.
free to reject them. HAND.
I’ve been on sci.skeptic for over 25 years and divination,
including dowsing, has always been relevant
on here, and my matchmaking ability is a form
of divination.
How do you define paranormal ability?Ever heard the term BULLSHIT ?????
On May 4, 2021, George Black wrote
(in article<yIKdnYdeydnlOgz9nZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com>):
On 4/05/21 4:39 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteEver heard the term BULLSHIT ?????
(in article<vrg19ghr8l761rjhrsceat33pfc6nfo83g@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteYou are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so
please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormal
divination ability.
free to reject them. HAND.
Ive been on sci.skeptic for over 25 years and divination,
including dowsing, has always been relevant
on here, and my matchmaking ability is a form
of divination.
How do you define paranormal ability?
Ha, good one.
If I do have the ability to identify the sexual harmonic(s)
of an individual and to find an optimally (sexually
and personality-wise) compatible match for him
or her or them, it is a siddhi (paranormal ability).
On Thu, 06 May 2021 19:31:17 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 4, 2021, George Black wrote
(in article<yIKdnYdeydnlOgz9nZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com>):
On 4/05/21 4:39 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<vrg19ghr8l761rjhrsceat33pfc6nfo83g@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormalYou are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
divination ability.
free to reject them. HAND.
I’ve been on sci.skeptic for over 25 years and divination,
including dowsing, has always been relevant
on here, and my matchmaking ability is a form
of divination.
How do you define paranormal ability?Ever heard the term BULLSHIT ?????
Ha, good one.
If I do have the ability to identify the sexual harmonic(s)So you say, but you have described no way to prove it;
of an individual and to find an optimally (sexually
and personality-wise) compatible match for him
or her or them, it is a siddhi (paranormal ability).
assuming you require personal contact with the individuals
involved, *and* that there's some way other than their
testimony to show that they are indeed "matched", how do you
demonstrate to an objective observer that your "talent" is
any more than a really good ability to read personalities
and convince the subjects that you are correct?
Claimed paranormal abilities involve such things as
telepathy, telekinesis, teleportation, etc., all of which
can be tested objectively*. Your claimed ability, OTOH,
cannot, at least as far as I can see.
*No such test has ever shown the claimed ability to actually
exist, BTW.
On May 6, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<kjr89gpvpaoe57j3c1rqurgjmdhe03jm0g@4ax.com>):
On Thu, 06 May 2021 19:31:17 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 4, 2021, George Black wroteSo you say, but you have described no way to prove it;
(in article<yIKdnYdeydnlOgz9nZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com>):
On 4/05/21 4:39 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteEver heard the term BULLSHIT ?????
(in article<vrg19ghr8l761rjhrsceat33pfc6nfo83g@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteYou are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so
please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormal
divination ability.
free to reject them. HAND.
Ive been on sci.skeptic for over 25 years and divination,
including dowsing, has always been relevant
on here, and my matchmaking ability is a form
of divination.
How do you define paranormal ability?
Ha, good one.
If I do have the ability to identify the sexual harmonic(s)
of an individual and to find an optimally (sexually
and personality-wise) compatible match for him
or her or them, it is a siddhi (paranormal ability).
assuming you require personal contact with the individuals
involved, *and* that there's some way other than their
testimony to show that they are indeed "matched", how do you
demonstrate to an objective observer that your "talent" is
any more than a really good ability to read personalities
and convince the subjects that you are correct?
Claimed paranormal abilities involve such things as
telepathy, telekinesis, teleportation, etc., all of which
can be tested objectively*. Your claimed ability, OTOH,
cannot, at least as far as I can see.
*No such test has ever shown the claimed ability to actually
exist, BTW.
Well, if someone presented me with five pictures
of gay men and five pictures of straight men and
I identified all of their orientations correctly,
that would be some evidence.
On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:33:51 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 6, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<kjr89gpvpaoe57j3c1rqurgjmdhe03jm0g@4ax.com>):
On Thu, 06 May 2021 19:31:17 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 4, 2021, George Black wrote
(in article<yIKdnYdeydnlOgz9nZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com>):
On 4/05/21 4:39 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<vrg19ghr8l761rjhrsceat33pfc6nfo83g@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormal divination ability.You are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
free to reject them. HAND.
I’ve been on sci.skeptic for over 25 years and divination, including dowsing, has always been relevant
on here, and my matchmaking ability is a form
of divination.
How do you define paranormal ability?Ever heard the term BULLSHIT ?????
Ha, good one.
If I do have the ability to identify the sexual harmonic(s)So you say, but you have described no way to prove it;
of an individual and to find an optimally (sexually
and personality-wise) compatible match for him
or her or them, it is a siddhi (paranormal ability).
assuming you require personal contact with the individuals
involved, *and* that there's some way other than their
testimony to show that they are indeed "matched", how do you
demonstrate to an objective observer that your "talent" is
any more than a really good ability to read personalities
and convince the subjects that you are correct?
Claimed paranormal abilities involve such things as
telepathy, telekinesis, teleportation, etc., all of which
can be tested objectively*. Your claimed ability, OTOH,
cannot, at least as far as I can see.
*No such test has ever shown the claimed ability to actually
exist, BTW.
Well, if someone presented me with five picturesBut of what? Once again, how do you demonstrate to an
of gay men and five pictures of straight men and
I identified all of their orientations correctly,
that would be some evidence.
objective observer that your "talent" is any more than a
really good ability to read personalities and pick up on
subtle clues?
I had an accurate matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, and it has returned recently,
with differences being that I can distinguish between
species (there has been a split of ghomosapiens into
55 species in ghuman species group) and that this
time it is more difficult to identify the sexual harmonic(s) of
those who already have an optimally compatible match.
Also unlike past fake matchmaking periods I had beginning
in 1997, it is done by third eye intuition rather than perineum
click divination, and I can’t do it just from a name but
in person, or from a picture, video, or audio recording.
So anyway I challenge you to test me, I guess with
a number of pictures available on the Internet or
emailed to me, to see if I can identify the sexual
harmonic(s) of a range of individuals, both
cis one-spirit, transgender one-spirit, and
multi-spirit. I outline my eight sexual harmonics
theory fairly late on the Recent Changes/Working Notes
subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage.
On May 7, 2021, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<hsl99gte24kjb82ctql4jbnd23idicod01@4ax.com>):
On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:33:51 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 6, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteBut of what? Once again, how do you demonstrate to an
(in article<kjr89gpvpaoe57j3c1rqurgjmdhe03jm0g@4ax.com>):
On Thu, 06 May 2021 19:31:17 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 4, 2021, George Black wroteSo you say, but you have described no way to prove it;
(in article<yIKdnYdeydnlOgz9nZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com>):
On 4/05/21 4:39 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteEver heard the term BULLSHIT ?????
(in article<vrg19ghr8l761rjhrsceat33pfc6nfo83g@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteYou are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so >> > > > > > > > > please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormal
divination ability.
free to reject them. HAND.
Ive been on sci.skeptic for over 25 years and divination,
including dowsing, has always been relevant
on here, and my matchmaking ability is a form
of divination.
How do you define paranormal ability?
Ha, good one.
If I do have the ability to identify the sexual harmonic(s)
of an individual and to find an optimally (sexually
and personality-wise) compatible match for him
or her or them, it is a siddhi (paranormal ability).
assuming you require personal contact with the individuals
involved, *and* that there's some way other than their
testimony to show that they are indeed "matched", how do you
demonstrate to an objective observer that your "talent" is
any more than a really good ability to read personalities
and convince the subjects that you are correct?
Claimed paranormal abilities involve such things as
telepathy, telekinesis, teleportation, etc., all of which
can be tested objectively*. Your claimed ability, OTOH,
cannot, at least as far as I can see.
*No such test has ever shown the claimed ability to actually
exist, BTW.
Well, if someone presented me with five pictures
of gay men and five pictures of straight men and
I identified all of their orientations correctly,
that would be some evidence.
objective observer that your "talent" is any more than a
really good ability to read personalities and pick up on
subtle clues?
From pictures, particularly if they were non-stereotypical
and randomly ordered? I doubt that anyone with no
special ability could do that. And my ability does not
really draw on a picture but a sort of glint that I
sense around the picture.
The assisted shaktipat had not occurred but is now
in progress and thus within an hour or two there
should be over a million globally who will also
have the matchmaking ability, possibly including you,
Bob, and definitely if you had read at least 8000
words of my writing as of early April 7.
Well, if someone presented me with five pictures
of gay men and five pictures of straight men and
I identified all of their orientations correctly,
that would be some evidence.
On Thu, 06 May 2021 19:31:17 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 4, 2021, George Black wroteSo you say, but you have described no way to prove it;
(in article<yIKdnYdeydnlOgz9nZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com>):
On 4/05/21 4:39 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteEver heard the term BULLSHIT ?????
(in article<vrg19ghr8l761rjhrsceat33pfc6nfo83g@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteYou are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so
please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormal
divination ability.
free to reject them. HAND.
I’ve been on sci.skeptic for over 25 years and divination,
including dowsing, has always been relevant
on here, and my matchmaking ability is a form
of divination.
How do you define paranormal ability?
Ha, good one.
If I do have the ability to identify the sexual harmonic(s)
of an individual and to find an optimally (sexually
and personality-wise) compatible match for him
or her or them, it is a siddhi (paranormal ability).
assuming you require personal contact with the individuals
involved, *and* that there's some way other than their
testimony to show that they are indeed "matched", how do you
demonstrate to an objective observer that your "talent" is
any more than a really good ability to read personalities
and convince the subjects that you are correct?
Claimed paranormal abilities involve such things as
telepathy, telekinesis, teleportation, etc., all of which
can be tested objectively*. Your claimed ability, OTOH,
cannot, at least as far as I can see.
*No such test has ever shown the claimed ability to actually
exist, BTW.
On 7/05/21 12:03 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Well, if someone presented me with five picturesLook up James Randi...
of gay men and five pictures of straight men and
I identified all of their orientations correctly,
that would be some evidence.
And there are many such able to disprove your claims
On 7/05/21 12:03 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Well, if someone presented me with five picturesLook up James Randi...
of gay men and five pictures of straight men and
I identified all of their orientations correctly,
that would be some evidence.
And there are many such able to disprove your claims
On 7/05/21 10:39 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2021 19:31:17 -0230, the following appearedRemember Earl Gordon Curley?
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 4, 2021, George Black wroteSo you say, but you have described no way to prove it;
(in article<yIKdnYdeydnlOgz9nZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com>):
On 4/05/21 4:39 pm, David Dalton wrote:
On May 4, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteEver heard the term BULLSHIT ?????
(in article<vrg19ghr8l761rjhrsceat33pfc6nfo83g@4ax.com>):
On Tue, 04 May 2021 00:57:46 -0230, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by David Dalton<dalton@nfld.com>:
On May 3, 2021, Bob Casanova wroteYou are, of course, welcome to your opinions, just as I am
(in article<vb809gd0hbhqcq6ds859aeqio7ol74v5jn@4ax.com>):
Anyway, this is off-topic in sci.skeptic (which is about
claims of paranormal abilities), as is the entire thread, so
please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
I think my matchmaking ability counts as a paranormal
divination ability.
free to reject them. HAND.
Ive been on sci.skeptic for over 25 years and divination,
including dowsing, has always been relevant
on here, and my matchmaking ability is a form
of divination.
How do you define paranormal ability?
Ha, good one.
If I do have the ability to identify the sexual harmonic(s)
of an individual and to find an optimally (sexually
and personality-wise) compatible match for him
or her or them, it is a siddhi (paranormal ability).
assuming you require personal contact with the individuals
involved, *and* that there's some way other than their
testimony to show that they are indeed "matched", how do you
demonstrate to an objective observer that your "talent" is
any more than a really good ability to read personalities
and convince the subjects that you are correct?
Claimed paranormal abilities involve such things as
telepathy, telekinesis, teleportation, etc., all of which
can be tested objectively*. Your claimed ability, OTOH,
cannot, at least as far as I can see.
*No such test has ever shown the claimed ability to actually
exist, BTW.
I think this one is pretty much out there
George Black <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 7/05/21 12:03 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Well, if someone presented me with five picturesLook up James Randi...
of gay men and five pictures of straight men and
I identified all of their orientations correctly,
that would be some evidence.
And there are many such able to disprove your claims
Any evidence for that? LOL.
A few years back I was contracted to write a program that could
tell whether 2 people were "compatible". It was meant to be a phone ap.
Turned out is was "easily" doable using machine learning.
I tinkered up a "facelib" using open source s/w that could
take 1000s of facial measurements from color photos, fee that into
a neural network and decide whether they would ever date.
Trained on a large sample (10+) of hollychook head shots knowing
who had dated who over the years and who had married who and for how
long and how far back.
At least on the validation part of the tuning -- where you
feed your program photos it had not be tuned on to write the s/w --
it was getting 60-70% "this person will like that person well enough to
go on >=3 dates" and NOT x.
So not any great surprise that people seeking compatible people might
look for certain regularity or irregularity of features in the face
of potential dates and anyone else might know wnough to be able to
guess the answers way better than randomly.
So the threat is not unambiguously about any ESP but certainly
can be an intuitive-level skill that some people pick up better than others.
On Sat, 8 May 2021 02:40:35 +0000 (UTC), the following...
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by R Kym Horsell
<kym@kymhorsell.com>:
George Black <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:...which was exactly the point I made to the OP earlier.
On 7/05/21 12:03 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Well, if someone presented me with five picturesLook up James Randi...
of gay men and five pictures of straight men and
I identified all of their orientations correctly,
that would be some evidence.
And there are many such able to disprove your claims
Any evidence for that? LOL.
A few years back I was contracted to write a program that could
tell whether 2 people were "compatible". It was meant to be a phone ap.
Turned out is was "easily" doable using machine learning.
I tinkered up a "facelib" using open source s/w that could
take 1000s of facial measurements from color photos, fee that into
a neural network and decide whether they would ever date.
Trained on a large sample (10+) of hollychook head shots knowing
who had dated who over the years and who had married who and for how
long and how far back.
At least on the validation part of the tuning -- where you
feed your program photos it had not be tuned on to write the s/w --
it was getting 60-70% "this person will like that person well enough to
go on >=3 dates" and NOT x.
So not any great surprise that people seeking compatible people might
look for certain regularity or irregularity of features in the face
of potential dates and anyone else might know wnough to be able to
guess the answers way better than randomly.
So the threat is not unambiguously about any ESP but certainly
can be an intuitive-level skill that some people pick up better than others. >>
From that post:
"...how do you demonstrate to an objective observer that
your 'talent' is any more than a really good ability to read
personalities and pick up on subtle clues?"
He ignored that as a possibility; it had to be
"paranormal".
Ted wrote:
one wondered:
Does a five sigma mean anything to you?
Yes, it's an example of the Marxist influence
in our math curricula.
Interesting, what words mean to people.
What are the odds that the children of Abraham
would number half of Earth's population?
God promised him as many as the stars in
the sky. If you'd like, I can share a video
explaining the background of that promise.
Okay.
Sounds like a plan made before the world was made
without whom nothing was made that was made.
In the mean-while, on average, one wonders
how long does it take God to keep a promise.
At times, prehaps 400 years.
At times, an it may be only 3 nights.
One time a saying was said how heaven and earth
will pass away before some words would.
- statistically speaking, rhetorically,
hyperbolically ...
On Wed, 05 May 2021 04:39:21 -0700, one <being@apolka.sign> wrote:
Ted wrote:
one wondered:
Does a five sigma mean anything to you?
Yes, it's an example of the Marxist influence
in our math curricula.
Interesting, what words mean to people.
What are the odds that the children of Abraham
would number half of Earth's population?
God promised him as many as the stars in
the sky. If you'd like, I can share a video
explaining the background of that promise.
Okay.
Sounds like a plan made before the world was made
without whom nothing was made that was made.
In the mean-while, on average, one wonders
how long does it take God to keep a promise.
At times, prehaps 400 years.
At times, an it may be only 3 nights.
One time a saying was said how heaven and earth
will pass away before some words would.
- statistically speaking, rhetorically,
hyperbolically ...
Jesus said that. You believe in Jesus, don't you?
Ted wrote:
one wrote:
Ted wrote:
one wondered:
Does a five sigma mean anything to you?
Yes, it's an example of the Marxist influence
in our math curricula.
Interesting, what words mean to people.
What are the odds that the children of Abraham
would number half of Earth's population?
God promised him as many as the stars in
the sky. If you'd like, I can share a video
explaining the background of that promise.
Okay.
Sounds like a plan made before the world was made
without whom nothing was made that was made.
In the mean-while, on average, one wonders
how long does it take God to keep a promise.
At times, prehaps 400 years.
At times, an it may be only 3 nights.
One time a saying was said how heaven and earth
will pass away before some words would.
- statistically speaking, rhetorically,
hyperbolically ...
Jesus said that. You believe in Jesus, don't you?
I'm not sure what you mean
when you say, in Jesus,
or what: to believe in Jesus, means.
I can believe words can be found in Matthew 24:35.
The previous verse says: Verily I say unto you,
This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
The same words are found in Luke, Chapter 21, verses 32-33.
What does, quote, this generation, unquote mean?
Was Jesus speaking to his own disciples as being, that generation?
What does it mean to say, heaven and earth will pass away?
Can the saying have to do with a transcending of sorts?
Was Jesus talking about the destruction of the Temple?
- opinions vary ... Thanks!
On Sat, 29 May 2021 20:49:51 -0400, Ted <sam.street@gmail.com>wrote:
On Wed, 05 May 2021 04:39:21 -0700, one <being@apolka.sign> wrote:
Ted wrote:
one wondered:
Does a five sigma mean anything to you?
Yes, it's an example of the Marxist influence
in our math curricula.
Interesting, what words mean to people.
What are the odds that the children of Abraham
would number half of Earth's population?
God promised him as many as the stars in
the sky. If you'd like, I can share a video
explaining the background of that promise.
Okay.
Sounds like a plan made before the world was made
without whom nothing was made that was made.
In the mean-while, on average, one wonders
how long does it take God to keep a promise.
At times, prehaps 400 years.
At times, an it may be only 3 nights.
One time a saying was said how heaven and earth
will pass away before some words would.
- statistically speaking, rhetorically,
hyperbolically ...
Jesus said that. You believe in Jesus, don't you?
I'm not sure what you mean
when you say, in Jesus,
or what: to believe in Jesus, means.
I can believe words can be found in Matthew 24:35.
The previous verse says: Verily I say unto you,
This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
The same words are found in Luke, Chapter 21, verses 32-33.
What does, quote, this generation, unquote mean?
Was Jesus speaking to his own disciples as being, that generation?
What does it mean to say, heaven and earth will pass away?
Can the saying have to do with a
transcending of sorts?
Was Jesus talking about the destruction of
the Temple?
- opinions vary ... Thanks!
Bart Ehrman wrote a couple of books on the
historical Jesus. I recommend those, if
you're interested.
Yes, he believed God's Kingdom would soon
be established. There were many of that
opinion in Palestine at the time. Ehrman
calls them apocalypticists.
Ted wrote:
Bart Ehrman wrote a couple of books on the
historical Jesus. I recommend those, if
you're interested.
Seems likely to me a man existed who was
deified by his followers which defied
the culture in which he lived at the time.
Yes, he believed God's Kingdom would soon
be established. There were many of that
opinion in Palestine at the time. Ehrman
calls them apocalypticists.
So-called, super-natural events, paranormal,
unable to be replicated by science, may occur.
It's possible David, who started this thread, might
have experienced various mystical types of
them.
- paradigms vary ...
one wrote:
So-called, super-natural events, paranormal,
unable to be replicated by science, may occur.
It's possible David, who started this thread, might
have experienced various mystical types of them.
- paradigms vary ...
True. About twenty years ago, I was taken up
into the Third Heaven and shown visions of
the future. As sort of a side effect of that, I
guess, is why I too now sometimes have
supernormal experiences and abilities.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 285 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 67:29:46 |
Calls: | 6,488 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,096 |
Messages: | 5,275,152 |