As if the above IS NOT ENOUGH, exhaustive experiments done by France
since 2017 SHOWS (with error <10E-15) that THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE
BREAKS AT QUANTUM LEVEL.
As they wrote here:
https://www.oca.eu/en/news-lagrange/1363-first-results-from-microscope-satellite-confirm-albert-einstein-s-theory-of-relativity-with-unprecedented-precision
QUOTE:
«The satellite’s performance is far exceeding expectations. Data from
more than 1,900 additional orbits are already available and more are to
come, which should enable us to further improve the mission’s
performance and approach its target of acquiring measurements with a precision of 10-15. This first result is going to shake the world of
physics and will certainly lead to a revision of alternative theories to general relativity,» said the mission’s principal investigator Pierre Touboul.
Enjoy slowly, relativists. Please don't choke on your stupidity, as you
are allowed to fail for being just humans.
Den 15.09.2024 03:26, skrev rhertz:
As if the above IS NOT ENOUGH, exhaustive experiments done by France
since 2017 SHOWS (with error <10E-15) that THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE
BREAKS AT QUANTUM LEVEL.
As they wrote here:
https://www.oca.eu/en/news-lagrange/1363-first-results-from-
microscope-satellite-confirm-albert-einstein-s-theory-of-relativity-
with-unprecedented-precision
Didn't you notice the headline which is even in the link above?
"First results from Microscope satellite confirm Albert Einstein’s
theory of relativity with unprecedented precision.
Quote:
"Measurements of the equivalence principle had not been improved
upon for 10 years, but now the first results from CNES’s Microscope
satellite, equipped with accelerometers supplied by the French
aerospace research agency ONERA, are 10 times better. They show,
with an unprecedented precision of 2.E-14, that bodies in a vacuum
fall with the same acceleration. The equivalence principle has so
far proved unshakeable and this result simply reconfirms the theory
of general relativity postulated by Albert Einstein over a century
ago."
Since 1911, Einstein and relativistic heirs have been rotting physics
with the fairy tale about gravity affecting time shown in any kind of
clocks (mechanical, quartz based and atomic clocks).
In particular, and derived from 110 years old Schwarzchild's solution to
a VERY BASIC PROBLEM, it has been widely spread between relativistic
circles that ANY CLOCK raised to ANY HEIGHT above ground presents a time
or frequency difference (gravitational blue shift, from Schwarzschild
metric) of:
Δf/f = (GMe/c²) (1/R - 1/a) , where R is the Earth's radius and "a" is
the height of the clock above ground.
The above equation came from 1911 Einstein's paper, ratified later in
1915 through GR, that THE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL Φ = -GMe/R affects EM radiation by a factor Φ/c², increasing its energy (as the clock is
raised) to a value of Eo (1 + Φ/c²), where Eo is the energy at ground level.
In simpler terms, the gravitational potential gained by a raised object
is POTENTIAL ENERGY, which affects
measured time (allegedly) if the object is a clock.
Now, the AWFUL TRUTH that every single blind and deaf relativist CHOOSE
TO IGNORE:
1. EVERY SINGLE SATELLITE IN STABLE ORBIT (MANNED OR NOT) HAS
MICROGRAVITY WITHIN IT, WHICH AFFECTS EVERYTHING INSIDE THE SATELLITE,
EITHER LIVE FORMS OR ARTIFACTS.
2, FOR ANY PRACTICAL CASE, ARTIFACTS LIKE CLOCKS OPERATE AS IF g = ZERO,
DUE TO CENTRIPENTAL FORCES THAT ARE EQUAL TO GRAVITATIONAL FORCES (that
would make them to fall to Earth).
THIS IS PHYSICALLY EQUIVALENT TO THE CASE OF A MIRROR OF EARTH PLACED AT EQUAL DISTANCE FROM THE CENTER OF EARTH, BUT LOCATED ABOVE OF THE
SATELLITE (R vs. -R, referenced to the satellite).
THEREFORE, THE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL ACTING UPON ANY ONBOARD CLOCK IS
ZERO (MICROGRAVITY).
Obviously, you don't know the difference between gravitational force and gravitational potential. With a "mirror earth" above the satellite, the gravitational force would be zero, but the gravitational potential would
be a bit complicated, but still higher at that midpoint than at the
surface of the earth. Without it but with the satellite orbiting, the
net force would be zero but the gravitational potential still higher at
the satellite orbital level than at earth's surface.
You need a new hobby. The physics of relativity just isn't for you. I
don't know if you simply don't understand the physics or whether your
OCD just fucks up your physics abilities when relativity is involved.
I'm quite certain it's the latter.
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 12:31:29 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
It is the alternative theories which predict that
the equivalence principle could be violated at very weak levels
that have to be revised, not GR.
Because this experiment has shown that the equivalence principle
is NOT violated at very weak levels.
Two paragraphs that I wrote for Wikipedia which are nearly unchanged
from when I first wrote them a decade ago:
"Proposals that may lead to a quantum theory of gravity such as string
theory and loop quantum gravity predict violations of the weak
equivalence principle because they contain many light scalar fields
with long Compton wavelengths, which should generate fifth forces and variation of the fundamental constants. Heuristic arguments suggest
that the magnitude of these equivalence principle violations could be
in the 10−13 to 10−18 range.
"Currently envisioned tests of the weak equivalence principle are
approaching a degree of sensitivity such that non-discovery of a
violation would be just as profound a result as discovery of a
violation. Non-discovery of equivalence principle violation in this
range would suggest that gravity is so fundamentally different from
other forces as to require a major reevaluation of current attempts to
unify gravity with the other forces of nature. A positive detection,
on the other hand, would provide a major guidepost towards unification."
Two paragraphs that I wrote for Wikipedia which are nearly unchanged
from when I first wrote them a decade ago:
"Proposals that may lead to a quantum theory of gravity such as string
theory and loop quantum gravity predict violations of the weak
equivalence principle because they contain many light scalar fields
with long Compton wavelengths, which should generate fifth forces and variation of the fundamental constants. Heuristic arguments suggest
that the magnitude of these equivalence principle violations could be
in the 10−13 to 10−18 range.
"Currently envisioned tests of the weak equivalence principle are
approaching a degree of sensitivity such that non-discovery of a
violation would be just as profound a result as discovery of a
violation. Non-discovery of equivalence principle violation in this
range would suggest that gravity is so fundamentally different from
other forces as to require a major reevaluation of current attempts to
unify gravity with the other forces of nature. A positive detection,
on the other hand, would provide a major guidepost towards unification."
Extract from the OP:
Extract from the OP:
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 366 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 06:24:23 |
Calls: | 7,825 |
Calls today: | 8 |
Files: | 12,930 |
Messages: | 5,769,092 |
Posted today: | 1 |