Le 11/09/2024 à 02:35, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :

More additions to my OP about the pseudoscience that relativity is.

Remember MASS INCREASE due to inertial velocity v>0?

This one is also INDIGNANT and SHAMEFUL.

It is very strange that 120 years later, we have remained at this
conceptual ugliness.
I think that humans, unconsciously or consciously, like a certain form of ugliness.
What is more ridiculous than many misunderstood realtivist concepts?
"If I roll this marble on the table, its mass increases".
Why this notion? What is the point? Have you ever heard Dr. Hachel say
such nonsense?
What does Hachel (blessed be He and praised his eternal grace) say?
He says that kinetic energy will increase.
He says that momentum will increase.
He says that mass, like charge, will remain unchanged.
That a hippopotamus does not become two hippopotamuses by changing the
frame of reference, neither for him nor for an external observer.

R.H.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Le 11/09/2024 à 02:35, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :

This DIABOLIC LIE was supported increasingly over the next 90 YEARS,
till mid 1990s, when the relativistic community started to ABANDON THIS
IDEA (90 years of idiocy and counting). Thanks to the relentless work of prestigious relativists (like the Russian Okun), MOST OF THE COMMUNITY switched to the concept of increase of kinetic energy, accepting that
MASS is INVARIABLE.

So, instead of thinking AND USING for 90 years the concept of mass
increase under inertial motion:

M = Mo/√(1 - v²/c²)

relativists switched (the majority of them, EVEN TODAY) to this
expression of KE increase:

KE = (1/√(1 - v²/c²) - 1) Mo, which doesn't include THE FAKE VALUE Mo of any mass at (relative) rest.

This was done, and still is done, WHILE THERE IS NOT A SINGLE IDEA ABOUT

That's exactly it.

The mass remains unchanged, and we absolutely do not need it to change to explain very simply the behavior of particles in space and time.

We therefore have a quantity of movement in direct relation to the speed,
and whatever the speed, the same simplistic equation:
p=m.Vr
We know that with the speed relativistic decoys appear,
and that the true speed (Vr) is no longer measured correctly, but only as
a simply OBSERVABLE, measurable speed, Vo, and that relativistic
corrections are needed.
We then set Vo=Vr/sqrt(1+Vr²/c²). and there is no longer any need to
bother with stupid ideas that physicists love to eat.
This equation leads directly, by permutation, to:
Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
and so we have:
p=m.[Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)]
Same for energy, and kinetic energy.
E=mc².sqrt(1+Vr²/c²)
E=mc²/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)

No point in seeing a relativity of masses when we have already seen a relativity, a decoy, on speeds. Time and space are enough to explain RR.
Exit masses and charges. No need to add hippotatamuses or car batteries.

R.H.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Le 11/09/2024 à 02:35, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :

Shame on PSEUDOSCIENTISTS. They don't have a single ounce of moral and integrity.

We shouldn't blame them, they are just a bit stupid.

I'm not saying that there aren't scientific criminals whose goal is to try
to kill potential Richard Hachels, if possible by mockery, contempt and insults, to keep their shitty ideology.

There are even kings of idiots (because you have to be king among idiots)
like John Baez trying to classify cranks.

Do you see a genius like Richard Hachel trying to wage war on cranks? But
I have other things to do than be the king of the monkeys.

Do you see Charles de Gaulle keeping a register of waitress who don't wipe their plates properly?

The devil doesn't give credit, if you are stupid enough to teach stupid physics, you are stupid enough to waste your time trying to humiliate and destroy those who contest it, even if they contest it poorly.

R.H.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: fr.sci.physique

Le 11/09/2024 à 12:01, tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) a
écrit :

========================================================================== Basically, what I am saying is that the concept of velocity-dependent
mass
has a long history independent of the theory of relativity. ==========================================================================

Pour moi, ça reste l'une des plus grandes stupidités de l'histoire
humaine.

Que s'est-il passé?

On a coupé les quatre pattes d'un chien, puis on a tapé sur sa gamelle
en criant : "Pluto! Pluto! Viens manger, mon chéri".

On s'est étonné que Pluto ne venait plus manger comme habituellement.

On a alors demandé à l'immense génie Albert Einstein son avis.

Il a ouvert un cahier, et a écrit:
"Un phénomène étrange est apparu dans l'étude des chiens : si l'on
coupe les pattes d'un chien,
il devient sourd".

Ne riez pas les amis, ce n'est pas drôle.

R.H.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)