Den 10.09.2024 07:42, skrev rhertz:
WHY THE ASSERTION ABOUT RELATIVITY BEING A PSEUDOSCIENCE? THE FOLLOWING
APPLY:
1) As the distance between both reference frames is increasing
constantly, the communication of data between both frames is IMPOSSIBLE
to exist while exchanging information about time and position of both
frames, even using light as a carrier of data. Both origins will be
always out of sync, even when ghost observers, located at both origins,
are trying to communicate between them.
Hilarious, no? :-D
2) Therefore, the only way to PRETEND that remote data (x,t, x', t') is
KNOWN, is by using a couple of formulae (Lorentz, Poincaré), TO COMPUTE
at each frame time and position of the other frame.
This is THE FATAL CONCEPTUAL ERROR OF RELATIVITY.
Using Lorentz transforms introduces (ARTIFICIALLY: just mathematics), a
NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOR of space and time, which is a mere function of the
differential velocity v.
Due to this, remote sensing IS IMPOSSIBLE, because both frames are being
increasingly separated, and remote sensing is always out of sync.
Considering that the CORE of special relativity is that (Lorentz), time
and space ARE DIFFERENT at each frame, a valid exchange of information
(x,t, x', t') between observers at both frames IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE.
So, the ONLY CHANCE that an observer at any frame has, in order to know
time and space value AT THE OTHER FRAME is TO BELIEVE that mathematics
(not observations) give the desired answers.
Absolutely beautiful, Richard.
Your sense of humour has really evolved during your
absence from this forum!
YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE IN LORENTZ EQUATIONS AS THE HOLY GRAIL OF A NEW
PHYSICS.
To make things MUCH WORSE, you HAVE TO BELIEVE that in particle
accelerators, the full set of data is obtained with "real measurements".
But for this to happens, a disgraceful hypothesis has to be introduced:
THAT AT THE END POINT (COLLISIONS OR DECAYS), BOTH REFERENCE FRAMES
MERGES INTO ONE, WHERE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED.
Quite.
Accelerators work because the physicist BELIEVE IN LORENTZ
EQUATIONS and have designed the accelerators according to SR.
Or was your point that they don't work?
If the accelerators work it is a confirmation of SR.
WHY THE ASSERTION ABOUT RELATIVITY BEING A PSEUDOSCIENCE? THE FOLLOWING APPLY:
1) As the distance between both reference frames is increasing
constantly, the communication of data between both frames is IMPOSSIBLE
to exist while exchanging information about time and position of both
frames, even using light as a carrier of data. Both origins will be
always out of sync, even when ghost observers, located at both origins,
are trying to communicate between them.
2) Therefore, the only way to PRETEND that remote data (x,t, x', t') is KNOWN, is by using a couple of formulae (Lorentz, Poincaré), TO COMPUTE
at each frame time and position of the other frame.
This is THE FATAL CONCEPTUAL ERROR OF RELATIVITY.
Using Lorentz transforms introduces (ARTIFICIALLY: just mathematics), a NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOR of space and time, which is a mere function of the differential velocity v.
Due to this, remote sensing IS IMPOSSIBLE, because both frames are being increasingly separated, and remote sensing is always out of sync.
Considering that the CORE of special relativity is that (Lorentz), time
and space ARE DIFFERENT at each frame, a valid exchange of information
(x,t, x', t') between observers at both frames IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE.
So, the ONLY CHANCE that an observer at any frame has, in order to know
time and space value AT THE OTHER FRAME is TO BELIEVE that mathematics
(not observations) give the desired answers.
YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE IN LORENTZ EQUATIONS AS THE HOLY GRAIL OF A NEW
PHYSICS.
To make things MUCH WORSE, you HAVE TO BELIEVE that in particle
accelerators, the full set of data is obtained with "real measurements".
But for this to happens, a disgraceful hypothesis has to be introduced:
THAT AT THE END POINT (COLLISIONS OR DECAYS), BOTH REFERENCE FRAMES
MERGES INTO ONE, WHERE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED.
After all, physicists have the right to eat and to maintain a family
(while living in shame).
More additions to my OP about the pseudoscience that relativity is.
Remember MASS INCREASE due to inertial velocity v>0?
This one is also INDIGNANT and SHAMEFUL.
In the 1905 paper (§ 10. Dynamics of the Slowly Accelerated Electron), Einstein violated any concept of relativity when he MERGED BOTH
REFERENCE FRAMES INTO ONE, to obtain his incredible assertion that mass
of one electron increased with velocity v.
This DIABOLIC LIE was supported increasingly over the next 90 YEARS,
till mid 1990s, when the relativistic community started to ABANDON THIS
IDEA (90 years of idiocy and counting). Thanks to the relentless work of prestigious relativists (like the Russian Okun), MOST OF THE COMMUNITY switched to the concept of increase of kinetic energy, accepting that
MASS is INVARIABLE.
So, instead of thinking AND USING for 90 years the concept of mass
increase under inertial motion:
M = Mo/√(1 - v²/c²)
relativists switched (the majority of them, EVEN TODAY) to this
expression of KE increase:
KE = (1/√(1 - v²/c²) - 1) Mo, which doesn't include THE FAKE VALUE Mo of any mass at (relative) rest.
This was done, and still is done, WHILE THERE IS NOT A SINGLE IDEA ABOUT
WHAT MASS IS. Even less in 1905,
when Einstein plagiarized Poincaré by using TWO MASSES FOR AN ELECTRON: Longitudinal and transversal masses.
I don't know what moral stature and lack of intellectual integrity had
MANY GENERATIONS OF PHYSICISTS to support this STUPID IDEA FOR ALMOST A CENTURY.
DEGENERACY OF THOUGHT AND GENERALIZED INTELLECTUAL CORRUPTION OF THOSE
WHO WANTED TO KEEP BELONGING TO THE RELATIVISTIC HERD (ANYTHING FOR A
JOB, MONEY AND PRIVILEGES), BUT THESE CONFLICTS LED DIRECTLY TO THE
DEATH OF PHYSICS AS AN HONORABLE SCIENCE.
Today, physics (almost on the entire of branches using relativity) is rejected by the technological world, which is replacing it as a science
of value. Relativity has found shelter on two or three USELESS BRANCHES,
like particle physics, cosmology and astrophysics, which DON'T PROVIDE A SINGLE THING OF VALUE TO THE SOCIETY AND REAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
SINCE MID 1960s.
Shame on PSEUDOSCIENTISTS. They don't have a single ounce of moral and integrity.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 427 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 37:25:20 |
| Calls: | 9,029 |
| Files: | 13,384 |
| Messages: | 6,009,104 |