Le 10/09/2024 à 22:30, Python a écrit :
Le 10/09/2024 à 22:15, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 21:34, Python pisze:
Le 10/09/2024 à 19:24, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 18:55, gharnagel pisze:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:59:41 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 16:32, gharnagel pisze:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 5:24:14 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
As expected from a relativistic piece of
shit - you're projecting your own lies,
backtracking and disinformation on me;
and your lack of responsibility as
well.
Mimicry is an infantile response, but that's
all Wozniak can do.
I can also present a proof that the mumble
of your idiot guru was not even consistent.
Wozzie-liar's baseless ass-insertion has been
refuted by logical argument and measurement.
Neither you, nor your fellow trash presented
any. Just ravings, insults and slanders, typical
for relativistic scum.
"The satellite clocks were designed to run slow
(dt') in orbit so they would appear to run
normally as measured from the ground (dt).
And their indications - t and t' - are equal.
Wozzie-liar keeps insisting this is so without
even a single measurement as proof.
Harrie-liar keeps insisting they're not, but
asked about numbers he only responds with a
stream of ravings,
You are right! Let me correct his answers then:
I'll gladly let you, and remind the question too,
poor stinker. When t (the clock indication in a
ground GPS base) is 2024-09-12 17:00:00.0000000, t'
(the clock indication in a GPS satellite) will be...?
Choose any base, any satellite and consider the
simultaneity of the base.
What is your answer, poor stinker? Let me guess:
some usual slanders about my bottles of vodka,
as expected from a relativistic piece of shit.
As "Doctor Hachel" do, do you believe that "3 = 4 for some observers" ?
Dr. Hachel never said that.
That's what Python and Newtonian physicists say.
So, they say for example that if I see Stella leaving for the stars at
Vo=0.8c for a 30-year journey, well, I will be 30 years old when she comes back, and she will necessarily be 30 too.
Well, that's not how it works.
Depending on the observers, each will measure a different time,
and if one finds 3, the other will find 4.
That's what I'm saying.
On the other hand, YOU make me say that I claim that Srella's proper time, which is 18 years, will become a different proper time depending on how I
watch her evolve. That's absurd. I never said that.
A proper time can only be unique.
What his own watch marks upon arrival can only be unique.
N.B. Merci de ne pas m'ennuyer avec des conneries pareilles.
R.H.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)