https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And [similarly] with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
Le 07/08/2024 à 12:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
If the observer brings his own co-moving copy of the Solar System he
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
Le 07/08/2024 à 12:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
If the observer brings his own co-moving copy of the Solar System he
will notice that the rotation time of his own copy of Earth won't match
the rotation time of the original Earth.
And [similarly] with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
Same. He will notice that the length of a meridian won't change on his
own copy of Earth while it will be shorter on the original Earth.
Case closed: SR is consistent.
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:29, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies of Solar
System (sic) is not changing anything.
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:29, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies of Solar
System (sic) is not changing anything.
It is.
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:51, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:29, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies of Solar
System (sic) is not changing anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Python <python@invalid.org> wrote:
Le 07/08/2024 à 12:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
If the observer brings his own co-moving copy of the Solar System he
will notice that the rotation time of his own copy of Earth won't match
the rotation time of the original Earth.
And [similarly] with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
Same. He will notice that the length of a meridian won't change on his
own copy of Earth while it will be shorter on the original Earth.
Case closed: SR is consistent.
And GR too. If he is just sitting still wrt to the solar system,
but far out beyond Pluto, he will notice that his clocks run at TCB, (barycentric coordinate time)
which differs from TAI by about half a second per year,
Jan
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:59, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:51, Python pisze:Yawn.
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:29, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies of Solar
System (sic) is not changing anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 15:04, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:59, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:51, Python pisze:Yawn.
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:29, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies of Solar
System (sic) is not changing anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Your yawning changes nothing, samely as
your moronic gedanken copies of Earth.
The Shit of your idiot guru remains
not even consistent.
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
[profanity]
Le 07/08/2024 à 15:06, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 15:04, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:59, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:51, Python pisze:Yawn.
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:29, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies of Solar
System (sic) is not changing anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Your yawning changes nothing, samely as
your moronic gedanken copies of Earth.
The Shit of your idiot guru remains
not even consistent.
Yawn. Yawn.
The case is closed.
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 15:09, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 15:06, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 15:04, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:59, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:51, Python pisze:Yawn.
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:29, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 14:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies of Solar
System (sic) is not changing anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Your yawning changes nothing, samely as
your moronic gedanken copies of Earth.
The Shit of your idiot guru remains
not even consistent.
Yawn. Yawn.
The case is closed.
Yes it is, I've proven the mumble
of your idiot guru to be not even
consistent. A fanatic piece of shit
screaming "NOOOOO!!" and trying to
fake the definitions it was using
is changing nothing.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 379 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 70:00:56 |
| Calls: | 8,084 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 13,069 |
| Messages: | 5,849,722 |