1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • And the clocks are adjustable

    From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 21 09:33:13 2024
    It's their key feature. Should be obvious
    even for an idiot physicist - calibration
    of the measurement devices is absolutely
    necessary in his precious experiments.

    Still, your wannabe predictions has - simply -
    neglected this key feature of clocks. Admitting
    it - admitting that clocks are simply indicating
    what we want them to - would ruin your absurd
    delusions of Cosmic Music you're allegedly
    receiving.

    And when your "predictions" failed miserably
    - the clocks are NOT indicating what you've
    announced they have to - all you can do is
    casting tons of shit at the ones telling you
    that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 21 18:14:07 2024
    It hasn't occurred to the relativists to calibrate them. Time itself
    must dilate!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 22 14:03:15 2024
    W dniu 22.06.2024 o 13:17, Mikko pisze:
    On 2024-06-21 18:14:07 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:

    It hasn't occurred to the relativists to calibrate them. Time itself
    must dilate!

    Some clocks are adjustable, some are not.


    Those from the reality are - those from your
    absurd gedankenwelt are not.

    In particular, a cesium clock
    needn't as

    As a brainwashed idiot dreams of a perfect world
    where he is obeyed. As for the reality - anyone
    can check GPS - oh yes, they do need adjusting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mikko@21:1/5 to LaurenceClarkCrossen on Sat Jun 22 14:17:16 2024
    On 2024-06-21 18:14:07 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:

    It hasn't occurred to the relativists to calibrate them. Time itself
    must dilate!

    Some clocks are adjustable, some are not. In particular, a cesium clock
    needn't as it directly implements the definition of second.

    --
    Mikko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Maciej Wozniak on Sat Jun 22 10:15:39 2024
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:

    It's their key feature. Should be obvious
    even for an idiot physicist - calibration
    of the measurement devices is absolutely
    necessary in his precious experiments.

    Still, your wannabe predictions has - simply -
    neglected this key feature of clocks. Admitting
    it - admitting that clocks are simply indicating
    what we want them to - would ruin your absurd
    delusions of Cosmic Music you're allegedly
    receiving.

    And when your "predictions" failed miserably
    - the clocks are NOT indicating what you've
    announced they have to - all you can do is
    casting tons of shit at the ones telling you
    that.


    What time do you have? i think my watch needs adjusting ...again.


    Sometimes i lose a whole day if i forget to change my Success Desk
    Calender!



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)