• And the mumble of your idiot guru - still inconsistent

    From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 25 21:31:15 2024
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
    As seen, the definition of second loved so
    much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
    wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
    lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
    1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.


    Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
    solar system is measuring the length
    of solar day. What is the result predicted
    by the Einsteinian physics?
    One prediction is - 99766. From the
    postulates. The second prediction is -
    86400. From definition.
    And similiarly with the prediction of
    a measurement of a meridian.


    Thank you for your attention, poor
    relativistic fanatics, have a nice day

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Python@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 26 01:58:31 2024
    Le 25/05/2024 à 21:31, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
    As seen, the definition of second loved so
    much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
    wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
    lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
    1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.


    Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
    solar system is measuring the length
    of solar day. What is the result predicted
    by the Einsteinian physics?
    One prediction is - 99766. From the
    postulates. The second prediction is -
    86400. From definition.
    And similiarly with the prediction of
    a measurement of a meridian.

    Answers to this idiotic argument have been provided
    for years, stupid Wozniak. "Similiarly" you are an incurable
    insufferable kook shitting in your pants in an asylum in
    Poland. So what? You couldn't even convince one of your
    fellow cranks.

    And then you'll die and nobody will care.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 26 06:08:32 2024
    W dniu 26.05.2024 o 01:58, Python pisze:
    Le 25/05/2024 à 21:31, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
    As seen, the definition of second loved so
    much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
    wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
    lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
    1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.


    Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
    solar system is measuring the length
    of solar day. What is the result predicted
    by the Einsteinian physics?
    One prediction is - 99766. From the
    postulates. The second prediction is -
    86400. From definition.
    And similiarly with the prediction of
    a measurement of a meridian.

    Answers to this idiotic argument have been provided
    for years

    That's right, your barking and slandering have
    been indeed provided for years. That's what The
    Shit trains its doggies for, after all.

    , stupid Wozniak. "Similiarly" you are an incurable
    insufferable kook shitting in your pants in an asylum in
    Poland. So what? You couldn't even convince one of your
    fellow cranks.

    but it won't change anything, poor stinker.
    The mumble of your beloved guru was not even
    consistent and that has been proven.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Hachel@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 26 14:19:26 2024
    Le 26/05/2024 à 01:58, Python a écrit :

    And then you'll die and nobody will care.

    C'est notre lot à tous.

    A noter ce que disent les grands textes d'antan.

    "Les hommes n'ont jamais adorés que des grands manipulateurs, de grands copistes, et de grands faussaires".

    Aujourd'hui, beaucoup semblent dire que non ; et que les textes se
    trompent.

    Je persiste à penser que oui.

    Tu en pense quoi, toi, mon petit sucre en miel?

    R.H.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)