1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • Re: The concept of time

    From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Maciej Wozniak on Tue Apr 30 23:50:08 2024
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:

    While human concepts are not quite the same as
    computer "objective" classes, objects and variables
    - they're quite similiar. And no surprise - for
    computer applications we partially copied some
    solutions that evolved in human society network.

    Time has nothing in common with the nature. Nor
    with your precious experiments (apart of that
    you're applying it there).

    Sorry, poor halfbrains.

    which half, right or left? only one half is needed in science.



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 1 08:23:50 2024
    While human concepts are not quite the same as
    computer "objective" classes, objects and variables
    - they're quite similiar. And no surprise - for
    computer applications we partially copied some
    solutions that evolved in human society network.

    Time has nothing in common with the nature. Nor
    with your precious experiments (apart of that
    you're applying it there).

    Sorry, poor halfbrains.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gharnagel@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed May 1 11:47:34 2024
    The Starmaker wrote:

    Maciej Wozniak wrote:

    While human concepts are not quite the same as
    computer "objective" classes, objects and variables
    - they're quite similiar. And no surprise - for
    computer applications we partially copied some
    solutions that evolved in human society network.

    Time has nothing in common with the nature.

    Wozzie appeals to computers to capture time? So time
    didn't exist before computers? Wow, what insight!

    Nor with your precious experiments (apart of that
    you're applying it there).

    Deprecation with no brain behind it.

    Sorry, poor halfbrains.

    which half, right or left? only one half is needed in science.


    Apparently, not even half a brain is needed in computers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 1 18:12:40 2024
    W dniu 01.05.2024 o 13:47, gharnagel pisze:
    The Starmaker wrote:

    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    While human concepts are not quite the same as
    computer "objective" classes, objects and variables
    - they're quite similiar. And no surprise - for
    computer applications we partially copied some
    solutions that evolved in human society network.
    Time has nothing in common with the nature.

    Wozzie appeals to computers to capture time?


    No, Harrie lies. As expected from a relativistic
    idiot in general and from Harrie in particular.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 3 10:04:47 2024
    Am Mittwoch000001, 01.05.2024 um 08:23 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
    While human concepts are not quite the same as
    computer "objective" classes, objects and variables
    - they're quite similiar. And no surprise - for
    computer applications we partially copied some
    solutions that evolved in human society network.

    I had produced software for some time and know the concepts of oop.

    I actually use these ideas occasionally, because they make sense.

    E.g. I make a diffence between a text, a symbol, a name and an object.


    Example:

    E= m c²

    is a famous equation, but at the beginning only a short text.

    This text is interpreted as equation and became by this a symbol for
    some sort of relation in physics.

    The symbol 'E' is also a short text, but interpreted as 'energy'.


    The term 'energy' is a short text again and not energetic itself.


    Meant is a certain physical quantity, which occurs in a certain context
    and has the dimension 'energy' and a numerical value in e.g. Joules.

    That measure is an attribute and belongs to something, which is called 'object'.

    In phyiscis I prefer the term 'system' instead of 'object'.

    Systems are something of interest, which is under consideration.

    Systems consist of systems, which also contain systems.

    The borders of systems are arbitrary and infinetely thin.

    The borders are, what we observe.


    Now this system under consideration has something as an attribute, which
    we can call 'energy', which is measured in Joules and symbolized by 'E'
    in an equation.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)