Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.
Case closed. I don't want to hear none of your lip!
Do I make myself clear?
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:18:28 +1000, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id <l9bnqmFqncgU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:It is well known that personal testimony is the poorest kind
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:59:25 +1000, Maximusany court would disagree with you
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9b1k0FniudU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:Personal testimony is never evidence
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:38:00 -0700, The StarmakerI disagree. billions of believers and personal testimony is evidence.
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<662F2428.72E6@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:Not really. Theists postulate the existence of something
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.Religious beliefs and Atheism beliefs are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
Atheist are confident that there is no God, as Religions are confident that there is a God.
They are are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
without any supporting evidence for that existence.
of evidence.
The value of eyewitnesses:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahg6qcgoay4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bnnmWYI0lM
How about Hindu?since there is no wayI was referring to Xtianity and Islam primarily
to support it.
As far as the "belief of billions" is
concerned there are hundreds of different beliefs in there
and they can't all be correct.
There are hundreds of others. In fact
there are many, many different Christian beliefs.
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Maximus wrote:
D wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Maximus wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:38:00 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<662F2428.72E6@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.Religious beliefs and Atheism beliefs are both on the same level of >>>>>> ...beliefs.
Atheist are confident that there is no God, as Religions are confident >>>>>> that there is a God.
They are are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
Not really. Theists postulate the existence of something
without any supporting evidence for that existence.
I disagree. billions of believers and personal testimony is evidence.
That is not scientific proof.
I never said it was
That is kind of what proof means. I don't see any other way proof could
have any meaning.
In order to count as proof, they need to devise a test that proves god. No >>> such test has ever been devised that satisfies the rigorous standards of >>> science.
If personal testimony would be enough, then you end up with a pantheon of >>> gods, pink unicorns, ufos etc. I am sure you can see how foolish this
position is.
with any evidence, we must determine credibility. there are currently 2.4
billion christians and almost 2 billion muslims in the world today. believers
in pink unicorns, or other gods, don't even come close.
No, I don't consider "voting" proof. If that were the case, then clearly
the earth was proven to be flat once, and the sun was proven to circle the >earth. I could go on, but you realize of course how absurd equating
followers with proof is.
If you have a scientific proof, let's hear it, and I'm sure that this group >>> would be converted.
Now... here's the kicker. Any god that would be possible to prove with
science, would not be a god, but a component of this world.
So by the very nature of us, the world we live in and our senses, a god
that is per definition, outside this world, is impossible to prove.
That hasn't stopped people from trying, but that is why you will never
convince anyone here. I'm sure you know that and that this is just light >>> entertainment, but I'll mention it anyway.
Atheists
say without supporting evidence there is no reason to accept
the existence of anything. Including any god.
Using the logic of theists the existence of anything at all
can be supported, including werewolves, trolls, elves,
vampires, dragons, shape changers, and people with super
hero abilities.
Absence of proof that something exists does not suggest that
it does exist.
On 4/29/2024 10:46 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <v0nrka$1m0et$3@dont-email.me>, Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com says...
On 4/28/2024 11:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.
Religious beliefs and Atheism beliefs are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
Atheist are confident that there is no God, as Religions are confident that there is a God.
They are are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
No atheist thinks this way. Have your read Professor Richard Dawkins'
The God Delusion?
Dawn
If all you read is negative by atheists then your mind can not grasp the possibility.
I'm delighted to read anything by anyone, religious or not, and for that matter, on any topic espousing any position. Of course, there is only
so much time in any given day.
Dawn
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.
Religious beliefs and Atheism beliefs are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
Atheist are confident that there is no God, as Religions are confident that there is a God.
They are are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
Richard Dawkins writes a book "The God Delusion", and he's not even sure if God exist or not.
That has to be the REAL definion of an atheist, a person who is not even sure if God exist or not.
On 4/30/2024 8:09 PM, % wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 4/30/2024 9:49 AM, % wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:What's the alternative? Fantasy??
On 4/29/2024 10:46 AM, Skeeter wrote:you can read it all after you go flat dead into the ground with nothing >>>
In article <v0nrka$1m0et$3@dont-email.me>, Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com >>>>>> says...
On 4/28/2024 11:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.
Religious beliefs and Atheism beliefs are both on the same level >>>>>>>> of ...beliefs.
Atheist are confident that there is no God, as Religions are
confident that there is a God.
They are are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
No atheist thinks this way. Have your read Professor Richard
Dawkins'
The God Delusion?
Dawn
If all you read is negative by atheists then your mind can not
grasp the
possibility.
I'm delighted to read anything by anyone, religious or not, and for
that matter, on any topic espousing any position. Of course, there >>>>> is only so much time in any given day.
Dawn
Dawn
the alternative is just like yours , who knows what will happen after
Yeah, "Who knows?!" Is faith causal? I don't believe that it is,
which, in my opinion, makes faith pointless.
Dawn
The Starmaker wrote:
An atheist is a ...very religious nonbeliever.
Sort of a Charles Darwin, right? I forgot, was Charles Darwin a very religious Christian or Catholic person????
On Thu, 2 May 2024, Maximus wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2024 01:01:01 +1000, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9cfdfFu7b8U1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:True, but usually evidence has some validity factor.
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 22:57:53 +1000, Maximusno. evidence is not proof. evidence is just something that supports a
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9c86kFt574U1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:Or not. There is no actual evidence that would convince
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:43:47 +1000, Maximusno, but your point is there's no evidence. I say it's evidence the >>>>>> beliefs could be valid.
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9c3rjFsglgU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:I agree - it is evidence. It just isn't very useful
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:18:28 +1000, Maximusmaybe, but still evidence. and it's relative to numbers. if
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9bnqmFqncgU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:It is well known that personal testimony is the poorest kind >>>>>>>>> of evidence.
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:59:25 +1000, Maximusany court would disagree with you
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>> <l9b1k0FniudU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:Personal testimony is never evidence
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:38:00 -0700, The StarmakerI disagree. billions of believers and personal testimony is >>>>>>>>>>>> evidence.
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>> <662F2428.72E6@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:Not really. Theists postulate the existence of something >>>>>>>>>>>>> without any supporting evidence for that existence.
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.Religious beliefs and Atheism beliefs are both on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> same level of ...beliefs.
Atheist are confident that there is no God, as Religions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are confident that there is a God.
They are are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
twenty pp
say they saw me run down a pedestrian in my car, that carries more >>>>>>>> weight than if just one person says it.
evidence.
Any one will do. They all show what you see may not beThe value of eyewitnesses:I'm not going to watch all those, sorry. (see comment below)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahg6qcgoay4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bnnmWYI0lM
reality.
So what? That doesn't mean any of them are valid.about 1.2 billion. but Christians and Islamists make up overHow about Hindu?since there is no wayI was referring to Xtianity and Islam primarily
to support it.
As far as the "belief of billions" is
concerned there are hundreds of different beliefs in there >>>>>>>>>>> and they can't all be correct.
50% of all
religious faiths.
someone either way.
Proof - evidence - either way it is the same thing. Nono, faith is belief without proofOr not. There is exactly the same support either way.There are hundreds of others. In factyes. I'm just saying it's not as you say that there's no
there are many, many different Christian beliefs.
evidence. for
example believers spend a lot of money in support of their
faith. just
near where I am there's a 7th day Adventist complex worth many >>>>>>>> millions
of dollars. also many intelligent ppl have religious beliefs.
in fact
theists vastly outnumber us. you can't just dismiss such things >>>>>>>> as being
no evidence that there may be some validity to their beliefs.
but at theMost religions have common factors - rewards for believers
end of the day, I look at what the beliefs actually are. when
one does
that, it's not so difficult to dismiss them as nonsense. eg.
xtians
believe they will live in mansions, and walk on streets paved
with gold
in some god adoring afterlife, and muslims believe they will
get 70
virgins if they die as martyrs.
and painful punishment for non-believers.
Basically there is no actual supporting evidence either way
for anything involving religion. That is why faith was
invented. Faith is belief without evidence - for those who
believe in such.
facts.
conclusion.
Just what is evidence is usually left to the judgment of the
parties involved, which makes unsupported evidence useless.
Meaningful evidence is unambiguous, unrelated, verifiable
and credible.
unsupported evidence is not useless. all evidence is evaluated on
it's credibility. if there's a murder and I say I saw it happen, but
no one else did, that still needs to be investigated.
Absolutely correct but there is no unambiguous, unrelated,A fact is a statement that can be verified. It can be provenyes they do. Muhammad is an historical person, as is Jesus
to be true or false through objective evidence. No religion
has this.
verifiable and credible evidence that they were any
different from any John Doe off any street.
the impact they had on the world suggests otherwise
Simply
accepting (or proving) someone with that name existed at a
certain time and place proves nothing.
There is no independent and unrelated supporting evidence.
Your acceptance of them as evidence does nothing to actuallythe gospels are evidence for the events they contain. the gospels for example are a basisOr for any other religion. None of them have anything
for Xtian faith
beyond faith. Your gospels are accepted as being true
without any supporting evidence.
validate them
nevertheless they are still evidence for what they contain. your
claim is there's no evidence for religious belief, not that there's
no proof. just as sporting organizations, clubs, and participants are
evidence for their sport, ie. that the sport exists, Churches and
Mosques and the believers (billions of them) are evidence for their
God. ie. that the God exists, or there wouldn't be any Churches or
Mosques. to me this seem obvious.
No, that is incorrect. Churches and churchgoers are evidence that
churches and organized religions exist. They are not evidence of
everything that religion proclaims to be true, is true.
Such validation requires unambiguous,
unrelated, verifiable and credible evidence,
it's irrelevantNothing beyond some physical locations and independently
whether those events are true or not. they are still evidence. but
some
things in the gospels are known to be factual. Bart Ehrman is a (very) >>>> good authority on this.
verified historical figures. None of the mystical or
supernatural claims are independently supported.
yes
On 4/05/2024 7:03 pm, Attila wrote:
On Sat, 4 May 2024 12:25:30 +1000, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9lkksFb5ebU3@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2024 22:37:39 +1000, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9k44kF468qU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:She is the only person directly involved. The final
On Thu, 2 May 2024 10:36:18 +1000, Maximusso only the mother has a say in what happens?
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9g5g4FglehU2@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:He is not involved at this point.
On Wed, 1 May 2024 20:43:25 +0100, cldyes there is, the father.
<clowd@nimbus.net.inv> in alt.atheism with message-id
<SOqcnQWwu_GqBq_7nZ2dnZeNn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:There is no third person before live birth.
On Wed, 1 May 2024 01:01:01 +1000, Maximusand the third person
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9cfdfFu7b8U1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Did the last sane person leaving California remember to
turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten
Apple?
Abortion should be like any other medical procedure
and be the decision of the patient and the doctor.
-----------------
decision belongs to her. She is the only one directly
affected by that decision.
the father is directly involved. her decision will determine if he will
eventually have a biological child or not, assuming no miscarriage
No, the events will progress even if the father is not aware
of the situation. The only person who is always involved in
deciding what the eventual result will be is the woman
involved. In fact, the father does not even need to be
alive.
Her decision and her decision alone will determine he
outcome.
"Atheists never agree and are always squabbling over dumb things."
You've just been given a Maximus-like Mindset Moron Mindless Motto!
Michael Christ
--
On Sat, 4 May 2024 12:25:30 +1000, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id <l9lkksFb5ebU3@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:No,
On Fri, 3 May 2024 22:37:39 +1000, Maximusthe father is directly involved. her decision will determine if he will
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9k44kF468qU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:She is the only person directly involved. The final
On Thu, 2 May 2024 10:36:18 +1000, Maximusso only the mother has a say in what happens?
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9g5g4FglehU2@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:He is not involved at this point.
On Wed, 1 May 2024 20:43:25 +0100, cldyes there is, the father.
<clowd@nimbus.net.inv> in alt.atheism with message-id
<SOqcnQWwu_GqBq_7nZ2dnZeNn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:There is no third person before live birth.
On Wed, 1 May 2024 01:01:01 +1000, Maximusand the third person
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9cfdfFu7b8U1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Did the last sane person leaving California remember to
turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten
Apple?
Abortion should be like any other medical procedure
and be the decision of the patient and the doctor.
-----------------
decision belongs to her. She is the only one directly
affected by that decision.
eventually have a biological child or not, assuming no miscarriage
the events will progress even if the father is not aware
of the situation. The only person who is always involved in
deciding what the eventual result will be is the woman
involved. In fact, the father does not even need to be
alive.
Her decision and her decision alone will determine he
outcome.
Attila < wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2024 21:50:39 +0100, cld
<clowd@nimbus.net.inv> in alt.atheism with message-id
<1LednWR_pcz1Ya77nZ2dnZeNn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2024 20:43:25 +0100, cld
<clowd@nimbus.net.inv> in alt.atheism with message-id
<SOqcnQWwu_GqBq_7nZ2dnZeNn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2024 01:01:01 +1000, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9cfdfFu7b8U1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Did the last sane person leaving California remember to
turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten
Apple?
Abortion should be like any other medical procedure
and be the decision of the patient and the doctor.
-----------------
and the third person
There is no third person before live birth.
Conception comes before birth, ask anyone.
Irrelevant. In some cultures in the past babies were not
named until they were one year old due to the high infant
mortality rate.
If a fetus is a person can it be counted in a census? Is it
a tax deduction? Is it a citizen? Of where? Does it need
a passport?
a citizen? the fetus 'occupies' a place on earth
Albert Einstein said he was a citizen of the earth...
but i don't know how to verify earth to you.
i might find for you 'a blue dot' somewhere in space..
but i don't see the letters e-a-r-t-h on it, so
i'll have to keep trying to see if i can verify if
an earth exist.
wat about if i'm standing on the moon and i see
a BIG blue dot, would that help?
On 6/05/2024 8:18 am, Attila wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2024 11:14:04 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<6637CC6C.20E0@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Attila < wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2024 21:50:39 +0100, cld
<clowd@nimbus.net.inv> in alt.atheism with message-id
<1LednWR_pcz1Ya77nZ2dnZeNn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2024 20:43:25 +0100, cld
<clowd@nimbus.net.inv> in alt.atheism with message-id
<SOqcnQWwu_GqBq_7nZ2dnZeNn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2024 01:01:01 +1000, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<l9cfdfFu7b8U1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Did the last sane person leaving California remember to
turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten
Apple?
Abortion should be like any other medical procedure
and be the decision of the patient and the doctor.
-----------------
and the third person
There is no third person before live birth.
Conception comes before birth, ask anyone.
Irrelevant. In some cultures in the past babies were not
named until they were one year old due to the high infant
mortality rate.
If a fetus is a person can it be counted in a census? Is it
a tax deduction? Is it a citizen? Of where? Does it need
a passport?
a citizen? the fetus 'occupies' a place on earth
A citizen is a recognized legal member of a particular
country.
And a fetus is a citizen, a recognized member of the human race
according to God.
Michael Christ
Albert Einstein said he was a citizen of the earth...
So what? Did he decide the qualifications?
but i don't know how to verify earth to you.
i might find for you 'a blue dot' somewhere in space..
but i don't see the letters e-a-r-t-h on it, so
i'll have to keep trying to see if i can verify if
an earth exist.
wat about if i'm standing on the moon and i see
a BIG blue dot, would that help?
The Earth has no one formal political structure to grant
citizenship to anyone.
One could just as properly claim to be a citizen of the
galaxy - for what it's worth.
On Fri, 10 May 2024 11:08:49 +1000, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id <la5ad5FmaaaU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Thu, 9 May 2024 23:50:31 +1000, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id
<la42laFgid5U1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
Attila wrote:It sounds like our opinions basically agree.
On Wed, 08 May 2024 21:12:05 -0700, The Starmakerhttps://auslink.info/video/tyson_death.mp4
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<663C4D15.32A5@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Attila < wrote:Since I never said that. no.
On Tue, 07 May 2024 23:52:13 -0700, The StarmakerAre we back to the earth doesn't exist in your mind again???
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<663B211D.EF4@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Attila < wrote:"Possible creation" I do not concede such creation
On Mon, 06 May 2024 22:02:30 -0700, The Starmakeryou wrote:
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<6639B5E6.4553@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Okay, back to my reverse engineering...They exist as proven by any number of verifiable and
you agree there was some verification for an
earth and the heavens (you call it the universe)
repeatable experiments. Since they provide the structure
for our lives it would be a bit difficult to exist without
them.
And no, I am not getting into a dialog about whether or not
we exist.
'In the beginning, GodYou keep repeating a meaningless quote from an unverified
created the heavens and
the earth.'
source as if is relevant. Why is that?
Since it is unverified it is useless.
Next in reverse engineering isNot necessarily. And especially I have no idea how such
"created"
'...created the heavens and
the earth.'
Do you agree the universe/heavens and the earth
was...
'created'???
possible creation took place. Those are things that are not >>>>>>>>> yet known.
"creation took place"
occurred.
I said there is no supporting evidence that the Earth was
created or that any god exists.
I will modify my Earth response since there is supported
evidence that it was created at some point from matter that
was not included in the sun. There is no reason to think
any "creator" was involved at any point.
I know exactly where your mind is at...Actually when I die I expect the same level of awareness
You walk into a movie theater 1 minute before the movie ends...
you walk in, sit down and everyone else gets up and leaves..
you stare at the blank screen.
dats it.
you stare at ...nothiness.
you died.
that I had before I was born.
definitely, but more than opinion. I believe we cease to exist with
death. I don't believe in a soul or any afterlife.
I agree but I have no direct evidence either way.
On Wed, 15 May 2024 06:38:09 GMT, "Ted"
<ted.street@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <lLY0O.100365$Y79f.79618@fx16.iad> wrote:
Attila wrote:I see in your ignorance you don't know what a homophone is.
On Tue, 14 May 2024 16:30:31 GMT, "Ted"
<ted.street@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<HkM0O.14091$yT%1.12724@fx33.iad> wrote:
Attila wrote:you >> >> > > > > bother to look down.
On Sun, 12 May 2024 17:17:23 GMT, "Ted"
<ted.street@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<DQ60O.88922$TyYf.22662@fx15.iad> wrote:
Michael Christ wrote:
On 12/05/2024 2:49 pm, Attila wrote:
On Sat, 11 May 2024 21:07:15 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<66404073.5835@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Attila < wrote:
On Sat, 11 May 2024 11:10:59 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<663FB4B3.48A3@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Maximus wrote:
I believe we cease to exist with"believe"????
death. I don't believe in a soul or any afterlife.
Of course people have souls, or a spiritual essence, or
whatchamacallit it.
When you die...your soul leaves your body.
Very similar to an out-of-the-body experience.
Your soul leaves your body and you can see your body if
has >> a >> > > soul.Where is your evidence to support that? Unambiguous,
Now animals don't have souls, or insects, or fishes, or
gorillas, etc, ...just people do.
unrelated, verifiable and credible evidence?
I have yet to see any evidence that any soul exists.
I performed some experiments on gorillas, and none of them
exist. >> > His pointing out that animals don't wear shoes is just ashoes!Exactly how did you determine this? Please be precise andOf course, they have no sole, you idiot, gorillas don't where
detailed.
Exactly.
All atheists are idiots.
Michael Christ
Oh sheesh. Attilla is still trying to insist that soles don't
pathetic >> > grasping at straws. But it's all he has left. Because
he pig >> > headedly refuses to admit that humans have soles.
I am just paying the silly homophone game I did not start.Does that include humans who have no feet?
Now you're getting into philosophy. I suppose it's possible.
I'm not interested in faggot games, sorry. But I crossposted this
response to alt.homosexual. Maybe someone there will play with you.
Why am I not surprised?
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:38:00 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.
Religious beliefs and Atheism beliefs are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
Nope. Atheism is a lack of belief in the existence of a god.
Atheist are confident that there is no God, ...
That's a strawman. Not believing in the existence of a god is not the
same as a belief in the non-existence of a god.
... as Religions are confident that there is a God.
"Religions" are not confident that there is a god. The followers are. Anyway...
They are are both on the same level of ...beliefs.
Without claiming knowledge, I would say that I believe there are no
gods. But the difference between my belief and the theist's belief is
that I can be proven wrong, whereas the theist can't. And that is the fundamental difference between the two kinds of belief.
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.
Case closed. I don't want to hear none of your lip!
Do I make myself clear?
On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:44:34 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <66575B72.7656@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Maximus wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Maximus wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:57:02 -0700, The Starmakerwho is claiming atheism is a science?
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.So, since Atheism is a belief, and it's not a science...
Most books on atheism are written by scientists and the 'scientific community', not christians.
if so that doesn't mean atheism is a science
People who write books mostly write about ..what they know.
Since most atheism books are writteb by the 'scientific community', it
is they who claiming
atheism is a science (even if they don't believe it themslves).
I already explained this, Atheism books is not about atheism...it's
about How To Murder God.
I was not aware there is a law against killing a god. Any
god..
The Starmaker wrote:
Attila < wrote:i think , " thou shall not kill " says it all
On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:44:34 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<66575B72.7656@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Maximus wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Maximus wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:57:02 -0700, The Starmakerwho is claiming atheism is a science?
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.So, since Atheism is a belief, and it's not a science...
Most books on atheism are written by scientists and the 'scientific community', not christians.
if so that doesn't mean atheism is a science
People who write books mostly write about ..what they know.
Since most atheism books are writteb by the 'scientific community', it >>>> is they who claiming
atheism is a science (even if they don't believe it themslves).
I already explained this, Atheism books is not about atheism...it's
about How To Murder God.
I was not aware there is a law against killing a god. Any
god..
There are laws that are called Laws of Nature, that are not written in
books...
and God does not allow anyone to get away with...Murder...especially
His.
God will get you for dat.
Attila < wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:44:34 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<66575B72.7656@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Maximus wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Maximus wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:57:02 -0700, The Starmakerwho is claiming atheism is a science?
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.So, since Atheism is a belief, and it's not a science...
Most books on atheism are written by scientists and the 'scientific community', not christians.
if so that doesn't mean atheism is a science
People who write books mostly write about ..what they know.
Since most atheism books are writteb by the 'scientific community', it
is they who claiming
atheism is a science (even if they don't believe it themslves).
I already explained this, Atheism books is not about atheism...it's
about How To Murder God.
I was not aware there is a law against killing a god. Any
god..
There are laws that are called Laws of Nature, that are not written in >books...
and God does not allow anyone to get away with...Murder...especially
His.
God will get you for dat.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the
existence of any god.
On Fri, 31 May 2024 12:11:35 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <665A20E7.F58@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
[ … ]
The ham sandwich is what some others accept as sufficient
evidence. Thus proving nuts are everywhere.
Chock full o'Nuts is that heavenly coffee!...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 457 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 131:19:38 |
Calls: | 9,337 |
Calls today: | 8 |
Files: | 13,534 |
Messages: | 6,082,282 |
Posted today: | 1 |