They are unable to fight against Doctor Hachel.
This should serve as a testimony to them.
No way.
Blinded by their madness, they behave like the captain of the Titanic.... "Captain, things are going badly, the hull didn't hold together, the
ship is going to fall apart before it even has time to see America,
there are leaks."
What does the captain do: “Speed up the ship, we must reach New York as quickly as possible”.
“Captain, the ship is going to fall apart!!!”
Always, always, always, the same phenomenon occurs again.
What matters in men (and women) is the size of their balls.
The rest is just trivial considerations.
Their balls are so beautiful...
Den 06.04.2024 17:06, skrev Richard Hachel:
Paul, having fun
Le 07/04/2024 à 13:10, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Den 06.04.2024 17:06, skrev Richard Hachel:
Paul, having fun
I don't think relativistic wanderings are so funny.
R.H.
Den 06.04.2024 17:06, skrev Richard Hachel:
They are unable to fight against Doctor Hachel.
This should serve as a testimony to them.
No way.
Blinded by their madness, they behave like the captain of the Titanic....
"Captain, things are going badly, the hull didn't hold together, the
ship is going to fall apart before it even has time to see America,
there are leaks."
What does the captain do: “Speed up the ship, we must reach New York
as quickly as possible”.
“Captain, the ship is going to fall apart!!!”
A very good analogy, indeed.
Paul is saying:
"Captain Hachel, your theory is full of holes and is sinking."
What does captain Hachel do?
Blinded by his madness he whines:
Always, always, always, the same phenomenon occurs again.
And what always, always, always, occurs again is that
Paul proves that Captain Richard Hachel's theory is full of
holes and has been sunk for 40 years.
And what always, always, always, occurs again is that
Paul proves that Captain Richard Hachel's theory is faløsified.
Den 07.04.2024 13:16, skrev Richard Hachel:
Richard Hachel's "theory" predicts that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider is 6927⋅c.
Le 07/04/2024 à 14:30, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Den 07.04.2024 13:16, skrev Richard Hachel:
Richard Hachel's "theory" predicts that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider is 6927⋅c.
This is not a prediction, it is a fact.
The speed of the protons is indeed 6927c, which is, obviously, enormous speeds.
There is also a way to calculate the momentum and kinetic energy of these protons.
p=m.Vr
Ec=mc².[sqrt(1+Vr²/c²) -1)
What you don't seem to understand is that the measured speeds are not the real
speeds but only the speeds observable in the laboratory reference frame.
This other speed (Vo) is an illusion and is so false that if we use it to describe things in accelerated frames of reference
we will find inconsistent and relative speeds with the position of the observer
in this same frame of reference.
Python also understood this very well, when he said that the speeds observable
at Hachel ARE inconsistent because they vary depending on the
position of who measures it in the frame of reference which indeed seems absurd.
But that’s exactly what I’m trying so hard to explain to you (and to others).
This is absurd because it is FALSE. This speed is NOT consistent.
If you take the real speed, all the nonsense disappears.
The instantaneous real velocity remains constant for all observers in all reference frames, including accelerated ones.
Not instantaneous observable velocities (Voi).
Note that the Voi which must be measured correctly must be measured at the same
place where the particle passes, and not from a distant location in the accelerated frames of reference.
And that the correct equation is Voi/c=[1+c²/2ax]^(-1/2) and not what the relativists say.
R.H.
Le 08/04/2024 à 01:39, Richard Hachel a écrit :
Le 07/04/2024 à 14:30, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Richard Hachel's "theory" predicts that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider is 6927⋅c.
This is not a prediction, it is a fact.
Paul B. Andersen objects that it is necessary to precisely regulate electromagnetic fields, etc.
And therefore depending on Vo=0.999999990c rather than Vr=6927c.
I'm not saying the opposite.
The times to be taken into account in the laboratory reference frames to adjust the fields crossed are those of the laboratory and not that of
the proton.
Le 07/04/2024 à 14:30, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Richard Hachel's "theory" predicts that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider is 6927⋅c.
This is not a prediction, it is a fact.
The speed of the protons is indeed 6927c, which is, obviously, enormous speeds.
There is also a way to calculate the momentum and kinetic energy of
these protons.
p=m.Vr
Ec=mc².[sqrt(1+Vr²/c²) -1)
What you don't seem to understand is that the measured speeds are not
the real speeds but only the speeds observable in the laboratory
reference frame.
This other speed (Vo) is an illusion and is so false that if we use it
to describe things in accelerated frames of reference
we will find inconsistent and relative speeds with the position of the observer in this same frame of reference.
Python also understood this very well, when he said that the speeds observable at Hachel ARE inconsistent because they vary depending on the position of who measures it in the frame of reference which indeed seems absurd.
But that’s exactly what I’m trying so hard to explain to you (and to others).
This is absurd because it is FALSE. This speed is NOT consistent.
If you take the real speed, all the nonsense disappears.
The instantaneous real velocity remains constant for all observers in
all reference frames, including accelerated ones.
Not instantaneous observable velocities (Voi).
Note that the Voi which must be measured correctly must be measured at
the same place where the particle passes, and not from a distant
location in the accelerated frames of reference.
And that the correct equation is Voi/c=[1+c²/2ax]^(-1/2) and not what
the relativists say.
R.H.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 360 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 133:03:21 |
| Calls: | 7,686 |
| Files: | 12,828 |
| Messages: | 5,711,426 |