• Re: A question for Maciej Wozniak

    From MaciejWozniak@21:1/5 to JanPB on Wed Feb 14 15:13:02 2024
    JanPB wrote:

    On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 10:34:08 PM UTC+1, Python wrote:
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Sunday, 16 January 2022 at 21:22:09 UTC+1, Python wrote:
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    ...
    Being a mumbling moron is no tactic.
    If it "is no tactic", why are acting like one? Maybe because
    you ARE one, Maciej.

    In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden
    by your moronic religion TAI keep measuring t'=t, just
    like all serious clocks always did.
    You've just done it again.

    I concluded a few years ago that Maciej is mentally ill, and

    See, poor trash, I've proven that the mumble of your
    beloved guru was not even consistent, and you can do
    nothing about it apart of throwing on me some shit from
    a safe distance. But you will do what you can for your
    idiot guru and your insane religion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to JanPB on Wed Feb 14 13:53:48 2024
    On 2/14/2024 8:19 AM, JanPB wrote:
    On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 10:34:08 PM UTC+1, Python wrote:
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Sunday, 16 January 2022 at 21:22:09 UTC+1, Python wrote:
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    ...
    Being a mumbling moron is no tactic.
    If it "is no tactic", why are acting like one? Maybe because
    you ARE one, Maciej.

    In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden
    by your moronic religion TAI keep measuring t'=t, just
    like all serious clocks always did.
    You've just done it again.

    I concluded a few years ago that Maciej is mentally ill, and
    since I have no way of helping him otherwise, I just cut him off my feed. There was (and is?) an obvious OCD component to his posts as well as infantile
    magic word thinking, all mixed together with the very obvious impairment
    to basic rules of logical inference.

    My diagnosis: mild schizophrenia. I had a neighbour like this once, his fantasy
    world was different (diplomacy instead of science) but same pattern otherwise.
    Very intelligent, taught himself two languages fluently, but a total mish-mash as
    far as the grasp of reality went.

    Probably. Definitely the 'magic word' syndrome, repeating things over
    and over. I don't know how to place his reverse interpretations of
    everything, especially the laughable claim the GPS 'proves' Newtonian
    time when in fact the GPS wouldn't even work correctly without GR
    compensation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MaciejWozniak@21:1/5 to Volney on Thu Feb 15 06:05:40 2024
    Volney wrote:

    On 2/14/2024 8:19 AM, JanPB wrote:
    On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 10:34:08 PM UTC+1, Python wrote:
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Sunday, 16 January 2022 at 21:22:09 UTC+1, Python wrote:
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    ...
    Being a mumbling moron is no tactic.
    If it "is no tactic", why are acting like one? Maybe because
    you ARE one, Maciej.

    In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden
    by your moronic religion TAI keep measuring t'=t, just
    like all serious clocks always did.
    You've just done it again.

    I concluded a few years ago that Maciej is mentally ill, and
    since I have no way of helping him otherwise, I just cut him off my feed.
    There was (and is?) an obvious OCD component to his posts as well as infantile
    magic word thinking, all mixed together with the very obvious impairment
    to basic rules of logical inference.

    My diagnosis: mild schizophrenia. I had a neighbour like this once, his fantasy
    world was different (diplomacy instead of science) but same pattern otherwise.
    Very intelligent, taught himself two languages fluently, but a total mish-mash as
    far as the grasp of reality went.

    Probably. Definitely the 'magic word' syndrome, repeating things over

    And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy
    is some "Newton mode"? You're such an agnorant idiot,
    stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your
    moronic religion.


    and over. I don't know how to place his reverse interpretations of everything, especially the laughable claim the GPS 'proves' Newtonian
    time when in fact the GPS wouldn't even work correctly without GR compensation.


    You do.You're such an agnorant idiot, stupid Mike,
    even considering the standards of your moronic religion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MaciejWozniak@21:1/5 to JanPB on Thu Feb 15 06:10:38 2024
    JanPB wrote:

    Python wrote:

    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Sunday, 16 January 2022 at 22:34:08 UTC+1, Python wrote:
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Sunday, 16 January 2022 at 21:22:09 UTC+1, Python wrote:
    Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    ...
    Being a mumbling moron is no tactic.
    If it "is no tactic", why are acting like one? Maybe because
    you ARE one, Maciej.

    In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden
    by your moronic religion TAI keep measuring t'=t, just
    like all serious clocks always did.
    You've just done it again.

    And I will do it many, many times more

    No doubt about that. Fortunately soon you'll die and all
    the nonsense you've been posting will only be of some
    interest for historians looking for information on fools
    and cranks.

    His case is a psychiatric one. That's why one cannot discuss
    anything with him, it's all just a form of hysteria and magic
    thinking.

    See, poor trash, I've proven that the mumble of your
    beloved guru was not even consistent, and you can do
    nothing about it apart of throwing on me some shit from
    a safe distance. But you will do what you can for your
    idiot guru and your insane religion.

    In other words - you can't discuss me, because I'm one
    of the best logicians the humanity ever had and you're
    just a brainwashed, narcistic religious maniac.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MaciejWozniak@21:1/5 to JanPB on Thu Feb 15 14:41:11 2024
    JanPB wrote:

    Richard Hertz wrote:

    On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 5:30:43 PM UTC-3, Dirk Van de moortel wrote: >>> Op 16-jan.-2022 om 20:25 schreef Richard Hertz:
    On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 3:40:25 PM UTC-3, Ross A. Finlayson wrote: >>> >> On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 8:42:51 AM UTC-8, Python wrote:
    [snip ross rant]
    Instead is for putting space-time together with a potential theory,
    helping to illustrate freedom in boost, kinetics will keep us together.. >>> >
    Bla, bla, bla, bla, bla, ........

    I've followed some of your posts for a while but I never WANTED to meddle with you, Ross.
    Paradoxically, it takes a big idiot to recognize a small one.

    Dirk Vdm

    TALKING ABOUT IDIOCIES, HERE ARE SOME DERIVED FROM YOUR GAY PAGAN GOD, CORRUPTER OF WORLDS:

    “Again, just as the electric field, for its part, depends upon the charges and is
    instrumental in producing mechanical interaction between the charges, so we must
    assume here that the metrical field (or, in mathematical language, the tensor with
    components g_ik ) is related to the material filling the world.” (Weyl 1952).

    “...we have, in following the ideas set out just above, to discover the invariant law of
    gravitation, according to which matter determines the components Γα_βl of the
    gravitational field, and which replaces the Newtonian law of attraction in Einstein’s
    Theory.” (Weyl 1952).

    “Thus the equations of the gravitational field also contain the equations for the matter
    (material particles and electromagnetic fields) which produces this field.” (Landau &
    Lifshitz 1951).

    “Clearly, the mass density, or equivalently, energy density ρ(x, t) must play the role as a
    source. However, it is the 00 component of a tensor T_uv(x), the mass-energy-momentum
    distribution of matter. So, this tensor must act as the source of the gravitational field.”
    (Hooft 2009).

    “In general relativity, the stress-energy or energy-momentum tensor T_ab acts as the
    source of the gravitational field. It is related to the Einstein tensor and hence to the
    curvature of space time via the Einstein equation.” (McMahon 2006).

    According to Newton’s laws the ‘natural’ trajectory of a particle which is not being acted
    upon by any external force is a straight line. In general theory of relativity, since gravity
    manifests itself as spacetime curvature, these ‘natural’ straight line trajectories generalize
    to curved paths known as geodesics. These are defined physically as the trajectories
    followed by freely falling particles, i.e., particles which are not being acted upon by any
    non-gravitational external force. Geodesics [1] are defined mathematically as spacetime
    curves that parallel transport their own tangent vectors.

    A question that often arises in gravitational theory is what happens to the geometry
    of space when there is a jump discontinuity in the energy-momentum
    tensor along a surface. For example, what is the connection between the
    curvature properties for the interior Schwarzschild solution and the exterior
    Schwarzschild solution? Here, along the boundary of some surface, the energy >> density experiences a jump discontinuity. Another case is for example
    a shock wave propagating outwards from an exploding star. For such shock
    waves the density can be infinite.
    To investigate these problems, W. Israel [Isr66] developed a mathematical
    framework which is called Israel’s formalism.

    **** MEANINGFUL SHIT, ISN'T IT? HOW COME NOT TO CONVERT TO THIS CULT?

    Yes, it's exactly as meaningful as any other theory in physics.

    No. It's even less meaningful than the rest of
    physics. You're worshipping some inconsistent
    mumble of an insane crazie. You've got a proof
    of the inconsistency, and your mad ravings are
    not changing anything, poor trash.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)