On 2/3/2024 3:10 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 2/2/2024 5:10 PM, Myatt Mozhar Batura wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 2/2/2024 7:54 AM, Mac Jing Kuang wrote:
Volney wrote:
On 2/1/2024 1:15 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
Nice! https://youtu.be/Xjy_HSUujaw
That's pretty wild! Although I did skip forward frequently. I'd guess >>>>> the hardest part in making that is actually finding a point where you >>>>> could iterate that much without being clearly inside or outside the
set.
i was prekindergarten doing crap like that in assembler on 8 bit
computers. But you don't undrestand what is going on, asking that
question.
How deep did you zoom? Keep in mind that it requires arbitrary
precision...
you can't zoom "deep" due register/computer limitation plus math
bifurcation, etc. Yet another one not undrestanding what he does in
physics. Using tables, as I suspect he does, then zooming makes no sense.
It's a fake zoom. Not real.
[...]
You have used arbitrary precision before, right?
You do know this is just the nymshifter trying to mess with you. It
probably doesn't even know what the Mandelbrot set is, at least didn't
before its first response to this thread.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)