On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 8:48:16 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
Dig it, relativistic assholes, and enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff0aofh6urU
My response seems to have disappeared and I don't feel like reposting it
all, so here is a condensed version.
The author of that video makes the standard mistake: he assumes that
clock sync is an essential part of special relativity.
It isn't.
Clock synchronisation is only used for the convenience of derivation.
It is NOT any fundamental defining aspect of it.
You can find the details in MTW. Basically, the only tools needed are
a bunch of identical rulers and a bunch of identical clocks (no synchronisation is assumed). Then a certain formula is tested
experimentally using the above tools, and if it's confirmed, then
space and time are Minkowskian.
In general, I'd STRONGLY recommend to stop assuming everyone is
an idiot.
--
Jan
On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 8:15:50 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote: \
On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 8:48:16 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
[Ridiculous besmirchment deleted]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff0aofh6urU
The author of that video makes the standard mistake: he assumes that
clock sync is an essential part of special relativity.
It isn't.
Clock synchronisation is only used for the convenience of derivation.
It is NOT any fundamental defining aspect of it.
You can find the details in MTW. Basically, the only tools needed are
a bunch of identical rulers and a bunch of identical clocks (no synchronisation is assumed). Then a certain formula is tested experimentally using the above tools, and if it's confirmed, then
space and time are Minkowskian.
In general, I'd STRONGLY recommend to stop assuming everyone is
an idiot.
--
Jan
Imbecile, the main FALLACY in SR is the assertion that OWLS = AB/(tB-tA),
As it is IMPOSSIBLE, the fallacious statement that TWLS = 2AB/(t´A -tA) = OWLS
is completely FALSE and UNPROVEN.
TE READING of B clock, which IS IMPOSSIBLE.
So, SR is rotten since the start of the theory claiming that OWLS = TWLS, without
any fucking proof (not once in 120 years).
With TWLS, you don't need any clock synchronization since the same clock is used twice.
And this fallacy MEANS CHEATING, A MASS DECEPTION
for little minds like yours, prompt to adhere to collectivist thinking (AKA communism).
You are a zombie parrot, with no brain. You just BOUGHT an unsubstantiated idea
On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 2:35:30 PM UTC-8, JanPB wrote:
The equation you quote refers to a particular property of a particular coordinate
system. This is not a defining property of special relativity, whose actual defining property is its geometry (which is Lorentzian).
This defining property is a reification fallacy. Space has no geometry.
It is imposed on it,
imbecile.
Gary wrote:
Larry wrote:
This defining property is a reification fallacy. Space has no geometry. It is imposed on it,
Just as are all laws of physics. We let go of a rock, it falls to the ground. We
ascribe a force pulls it down, or a geometry, or a fairy. The fact is, Larry, no
one really knows what "space" is. As Tom Roberts says, all we have is models.
imbecile.
Now, Larry, you KNOW that Jan is NOT an "imbecile." Calling him that is lying. Is
THAT how you want to be known -- as a liar? Have a little more respect for yourself.
Models are not reification fallacy. A model is an abstraction, not a reification
fallacy.
Models involving the reification fallacy are illogical and invalid models.
Tom and you are conflating the fallacy with abstractions without the fallacy.
You two are confusing math with physics;
many excellent scientists have commented on this unfortunate tendency in physics over
the past 100 years.
These mistakes are utterly stupid.
Accepting relativity involves making these mistakes.
It takes an imbecile to do that (less than 70 IQ). Even a child knows the difference,
and this gets laughs at a clown show..
The Left in the U.S. has long been extremely Marxist. To understand Marxism, Napoleon is instructive. He said, “Men are more easily governed through their
vices than through their virtues.” That is what Marxism is. It characterizes
those in power as oppressors, to exploit the vice of desiring power over others. Then it exploits, envy, greed... Relativity functions as an ideology.
On Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 16:02:03 UTC+1, gharnagel wrote:
Larry wrote:
.... Relativity functions as an ideology.
You were going okay there, Larry, until that last brain-fart. You didn't tell
the truth, but another Larry did:
“Relativity and quantum mechanics were not invented because someone thought it would be a good idea for the universe to obey these rules; rather, these revolutionary ideas were forced upon us by nature.”
Relativistic idiots are telling the truth very seldom,
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:02:03 AM UTC-8, gharnagel wrote:
“Relativity and quantum mechanics were not invented because someone thought it would be a good idea for the universe to obey these rules; rather, these revolutionary ideas were forced upon us by nature.”
-- Lawrence M. Krauss
And THAT'S the truth!
Have you read Krauss' book about nothing/something
and a mathematical universe hypothesis?
Relativistic idiots are telling the truth very seldom,
Now THAT'S the TRUTH. "Relativistic idiots" are those who deny relativity, like Wozniak the Shit.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 366 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 12:04:31 |
Calls: | 7,754 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 12,894 |
Messages: | 5,744,101 |