On Thursday 11 January 2024 at 23:23:07 UTC, Volney wrote:
On 1/11/2024 4:42 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
On Wednesday, January 10, 2024 at 4:28:05 PM UTC-8, Volney wrote:
On 1/10/2024 4:35 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
As Lou said, "> You forgot. The time doesn’t change. The atoms resonant frequency beats faster at higher altitudes." - That's why it is set to a lower frequency.
And, obviously, Lou is wrong. As are you.
Says Volney as he pretends Relativity predicted anywhere near
the exact amount of 446 ms/day before 442ms/day was observed in
1977 by the first GPS sat.
Still no sign of any citations backing up your fantasy.
pendulum clock is used in space?
So, you stand by your position that clocks in orbit are not affected by gravity? And, Newton mode is when you pretend Newtonian can't explain the different rate of the clocks in space because that is time dilation and not instrumental error as when a
Clocks in orbit are affected by relativity's Schwarzschild metric,
GM/rc². Gravity is also an effect of general relativity. So the answer
really is that clocks in orbit aren't affected by gravity
Yes. According to Relativity, clock rates and time dilation has nothing to do with gravity and GM/r. You could be floating inbetween 2 galaxies
and still measure clock gains of 446ms/day.
since both the
clock rate and gravity itself are effects of GR.
What’s this sloppy bad formula writing?.... GM/rc². !!
It should be the full version of the metric
Please next time type it out properly and in full please :D
'On Saturday 13 January 2024 at 07:06:36 UTC, Volney wrote:
On 1/12/2024 4:04 PM, Lou wrote:
On Thursday 11 January 2024 at 23:23:07 UTC, Volney wrote:I already told you. The design spec for the NTS-2 satellite.
On 1/11/2024 4:42 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
On Wednesday, January 10, 2024 at 4:28:05 PM UTC-8, Volney wrote: >>>>>> On 1/10/2024 4:35 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
As Lou said, "> You forgot. The time doesn’t change. The atoms resonant frequency beats faster at higher altitudes." - That's why it is set to a lower frequency.
And, obviously, Lou is wrong. As are you.
Says Volney as he pretends Relativity predicted anywhere near
the exact amount of 446 ms/day before 442ms/day was observed in
1977 by the first GPS sat.
Still no sign of any citations backing up your fantasy.
A circular argument you use. The NTS-2 docs are written
post 1977, post test. How could they be considered as evidence of a prediction
made prior to the test in 1977?
Let me guess...relativistic time travel?
Happy googling. (I'm not doing your work for you)
Said the guy whose evidence for a prediction made prior
to the 1977 GPS test...was written AFTER the 1977 test.
How does one google a doc that didn’t exist prior to test date?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 30:19:10 |
Calls: | 6,707 |
Files: | 12,239 |
Messages: | 5,353,022 |