1) End B passes by origin x = 0. Clock tB = clock t = 0.
2) End A passes by the origin x = 0. Clock tA = clock t = 0, BUT clock tB is running L/v seconds ahead of tA = t = 0.
This problem has no solution, unless A COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM sets clock A = L/v, which is EXACTLY the time t. So NO RESET!
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 4:23:29 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
1) End B passes by origin x = 0. Clock tB = clock t = 0.
2) End A passes by the origin x = 0. Clock tA = clock t = 0, BUT clock tB is running L/v seconds ahead of tA = t = 0.
This problem has no solution, unless A COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM sets clock A = L/v, which is EXACTLY the time t. So NO RESET!
Dumbestfuck,
The problem has had a solution, since 1905 but you are too dumb to learn it. Instead, you keep showcasing your utter imbecility. Keep it up, dumbestfuck.
Den 29.09.2023 20:21, skrev Laurence Clark Crossen:
He said the moving frame of reference can have only one clock.
What was he hiding?
If more than one clock is used in the moving frame, they go out of
synchronization with each other due to the LT.
That is, the clocks within one IRF go out of sync with each other.
Nonsense.
https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdf
Le 30/09/2023 à 09:56, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Den 29.09.2023 20:21, skrev Laurence Clark Crossen:
He said the moving frame of reference can have only one clock.
What was he hiding?
If more than one clock is used in the moving frame, they go out of
synchronization with each other due to the LT.
That is, the clocks within one IRF go out of sync with each other.
Nonsense.
https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdfThe primum movens of the theory of relativity is the notion of the relativity of simultaneity.
What is particularly astonishing is that all of humanity seems to have missed this obvious fact.
Physicists have understood very well one of the visible consequences experimentally of this phenomenon
On Saturday, 30 September 2023 at 13:54:09 UTC+2, Richard Hachel wrote:I think this issue calls into question Einstein's intelligence more than it does the LT's.
Le 30/09/2023 à 09:56, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Den 29.09.2023 20:21, skrev Laurence Clark Crossen:
He said the moving frame of reference can have only one clock.
What was he hiding?
If more than one clock is used in the moving frame, they go out of
synchronization with each other due to the LT.
That is, the clocks within one IRF go out of sync with each other.
Nonsense.
https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdfThe primum movens of the theory of relativity is the notion of the relativity of simultaneity.
What is particularly astonishing is that all of humanity seems to have missed this obvious fact.
Physicists have understood very well one of the visible consequences experimentally of this phenomenonPhysicist has gedanken/fabricated, and the mumble of
your idiot guru wasn't even consistent.
3) GR prediction: 0.43 arcsec/year OR 0.103564055 arcsec/orbit.
Dumbestfuck
0.43 arcsec/year is the DIFFERENCE between the Newtonan prediction and the measured value. You have put your foot in your mouth once again.
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 8:49:50 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
<snip>
Dumbestfuck
0.43 arcsec/year is the DIFFERENCE between the Newtonan prediction and the measured value. You have put your foot in your mouth once again.Dyslexic imbecile,
that was exactly my point since the OP. NASA
3) GR prediction: 0.43 arcsec/year
JPL Horizons online database delivers results based on Kepler-Newton, not GR-PPN.
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 7:31:51 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
JPL Horizons online database delivers results based on Kepler-Newton, not GR-PPN.You are lying. Again. Keep it up, dumbestfuck.
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:37:30 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 7:31:51 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:<snip>
I repeat my previous post.JPL Horizons online database delivers results based on Kepler-Newton, not GR-PPN.You are lying. Again. Keep it up, dumbestfuck.
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/2WGF6G3hB2c/m/6Rab-uEGBAAJ
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 339 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 02:57:03 |
Calls: | 7,467 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,691 |
Messages: | 5,628,079 |