1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • Revisiting Entrained Ether

    From Alan B@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 22 06:57:09 2023
    https://epjc.epj.org/articles/epjc/abs/2001/14/epjc0759/epjc0759.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dono.@21:1/5 to Alan B on Fri Sep 22 10:01:08 2023
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 6:57:11 AM UTC-7, Alan B wrote:
    https://epjc.epj.org/articles/epjc/abs/2001/14/epjc0759/epjc0759.html


    Meh: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammar_experiment

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary Harnagel@21:1/5 to Alan B on Fri Sep 22 09:21:41 2023
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:57:11 AM UTC-6, Alan B wrote:

    https://epjc.epj.org/articles/epjc/abs/2001/14/epjc0759/epjc0759.html

    "Based on this local-ether model of wave propagation, a wide variety of earthbound, interplanetary, and interstellar propagation phenomena are
    accounted for."

    But starlight aberration refutes it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan B@21:1/5 to Gary Harnagel on Fri Sep 22 10:15:06 2023
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 12:21:44 PM UTC-4, Gary Harnagel wrote:
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:57:11 AM UTC-6, Alan B wrote:

    https://epjc.epj.org/articles/epjc/abs/2001/14/epjc0759/epjc0759.html

    "Based on this local-ether model of wave propagation, a wide variety of earthbound, interplanetary, and interstellar propagation phenomena are
    accounted for."

    But starlight aberration refutes it.

    https://groups.google.com/g/npachat/c/eg8-bTVkLd8/m/plMkM9SnpmoJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan B@21:1/5 to Gary Harnagel on Fri Sep 22 10:21:29 2023
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 12:21:44 PM UTC-4, Gary Harnagel wrote:
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:57:11 AM UTC-6, Alan B wrote:

    https://epjc.epj.org/articles/epjc/abs/2001/14/epjc0759/epjc0759.html

    "Based on this local-ether model of wave propagation, a wide variety of earthbound, interplanetary, and interstellar propagation phenomena are
    accounted for."

    But starlight aberration refutes it.

    The current correct link to the stephenkinsella.com page is now at https://www.stephankinsella.com/wp-content/uploads/texts/beckmann_einstein-dissident-physics-material.pdf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Roberts@21:1/5 to Gary Harnagel on Fri Sep 22 13:06:43 2023
    On 9/22/23 11:21 AM, Gary Harnagel wrote:
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:57:11 AM UTC-6, Alan B wrote:
    https://epjc.epj.org/articles/epjc/abs/2001/14/epjc0759/epjc0759.html

    "Based on this local-ether model of wave propagation, a wide variety of earthbound, interplanetary, and interstellar propagation phenomena are
    accounted for."

    But starlight aberration refutes it.

    As do all quantum optics experiments.

    Tom Roberts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lou@21:1/5 to Gary Harnagel on Sat Sep 23 07:07:32 2023
    On Friday, 22 September 2023 at 17:21:44 UTC+1, Gary Harnagel wrote:
    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:57:11 AM UTC-6, Alan B wrote:

    https://epjc.epj.org/articles/epjc/abs/2001/14/epjc0759/epjc0759.html

    "Based on this local-ether model of wave propagation, a wide variety of earthbound, interplanetary, and interstellar propagation phenomena are
    accounted for."

    But starlight aberration refutes it.

    Fortunately MMX proved that classical emission models of emr
    do not need an aether. In which case one calculates aberration in
    the observer frame for a classical model where light is already
    arriving to the telescope at an angle.
    Notice that SR also uses this method to explain aberration.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary Harnagel@21:1/5 to Lou on Sat Sep 23 20:09:34 2023
    On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 8:07:35 AM UTC-6, Lou wrote:

    On Friday, 22 September 2023 at 17:21:44 UTC+1, Gary Harnagel wrote:

    On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:57:11 AM UTC-6, Alan B wrote:

    https://epjc.epj.org/articles/epjc/abs/2001/14/epjc0759/epjc0759.html

    "Based on this local-ether model of wave propagation, a wide variety of
    earthbound, interplanetary, and interstellar propagation phenomena are accounted for."

    But starlight aberration refutes it.

    Fortunately MMX proved that classical emission models of emr
    do not need an aether. In which case one calculates aberration in
    the observer frame for a classical model where light is already
    arriving to the telescope at an angle.
    Notice that SR also uses this method to explain aberration.

    Notice that LLR experiments refute emission theory, as does de Sitter's
    double star light (X-rays for experimental confirmation).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)