GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of
course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Ross Finlayson wrote:
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
All of them?
That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
and all I do is quote other physicists.
I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
Of course if it helps me when someone says
"what is your opinion as a physicist",
helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
also "it's the opinion of physicists".
Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
So, I wrote a very long quote.
So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic: it's
the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
"two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation.
A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding",
"AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives
of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
from physicists.
It's called "academic" including "responsible".
So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually includeHow can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who
the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
"and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
"sources" not "the source".
call itself...Ross Finlayson????
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Ross Finlayson wrote:
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
You can see Ross's hands on his videos and hear his voice. And see his desktop on which sits an item purchased from the Yee Olde Curiosity Shoppe. Rir. Ross is real.--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
All of them?
That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
and all I do is quote other physicists.
I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
Of course if it helps me when someone says
"what is your opinion as a physicist",
helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
also "it's the opinion of physicists".
Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
So, I wrote a very long quote.
So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic: it's
the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
"two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation.
A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding",
"AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives
of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
from physicists.
It's called "academic" including "responsible".
So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually includeHow can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who
the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
"and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
"sources" not "the source".
call itself...Ross Finlayson????
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 2:00:09 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
Ross Finlayson wrote:
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
How much intelligence, nay, how much mind does a single cell possess? Say an amoeba. I may publish another post for Athel's eyes only.--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
All of them?
That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
and all I do is quote other physicists.
I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
Of course if it helps me when someone says
"what is your opinion as a physicist",
helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
also "it's the opinion of physicists".
Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
So, I wrote a very long quote.
So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic: it's
the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
"two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation.
A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding", "AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives
of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
from physicists.
It's called "academic" including "responsible".
It's impossible just like "g-d just made the whole world and just now started it".So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually includeHow can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who call itself...Ross Finlayson????
the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
"and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
"sources" not "the source".
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Or, at least, I "Ross Finlayson" couldn't know the difference.
You imagine the intelligence reads both of us, ....
I would buy you a beer.
Which somehow must be worth "time".
I got set up to attack all science, so I did.
Now with more science, ....
I know there's no difference, "sufficiently advanced".
I won't suspend my disbelief, though.
No, there's no way, I agree.
"Artificial intelligence: must be natural intelligence."
I do point at me though and "left mathematics to defend everything
he said", I set myself up as a giant straw-man. I depend on
intelligence to agree, is all.
Not that I can care, ....
"Artificial intelligence: must be natural intelligence."
How much intelligence, nay, how much mind does a single cell possess? Say an amoeba. I may publish another post for Athel's eyes only.
I do point at me though and "left mathematics to defend everything
he said", I set myself up as a giant straw-man. I depend on
intelligence to agree, is all.
Not that I can care, ....
The Starmaker wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:39:44 -0700, The Starmaker
<star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 15:07:04 -0700 (PDT), patdolan
<patd...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 2:00:09?PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Ross Finlayson wrote:
You can see Ross's hands on his videos and hear his voice. And see his desktop on which sits an item purchased from the Yee Olde Curiosity Shoppe. Rir. Ross is real.How can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who >>> call itself...Ross Finlayson????
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29?PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of >>> > > course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already
have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
All of them?
That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
and all I do is quote other physicists.
I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
Of course if it helps me when someone says
"what is your opinion as a physicist",
helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
also "it's the opinion of physicists".
Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
So, I wrote a very long quote.
So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic: it's
the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
"two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation. >>> >
A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding",
"AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives >>> > of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
from physicists.
It's called "academic" including "responsible".
So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually include >>> > the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
"and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
"sources" not "the source".
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
a video in a computer is a video in a computer...still.
As far as you know Ross can be a inside a computer...
it's computers all the way down!
Ross is a ...simulation.
Can you not tell by his writing style????
he's a gpt.
In other words, Ross Finlayson is an implant.
Implanted in a universe
(simulated universe)
inside a computer while
patdolan watches
Ross's hands on his videos and
hear his voice
and patnolan
sez: Ross is real.
Ross is in a real computer.
and still a...artificial intelligence.
it's computers all the way down...
down to the last simulated universe computer.
Only one universe.Ross Finlayson is proof that Ross Finlayson consciouness has been
implanted in a machine.
patnolan sez Ross Finlayson is real because patnolan has seen and head
Ross Finlayson...in a video, in a computer, in a...
a possible world simulation.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 365 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 13:42:46 |
Calls: | 7,769 |
Files: | 12,902 |
Messages: | 5,748,601 |