1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • For didactic purposes

    From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Mon Sep 11 04:12:54 2023
    On Monday, 11 September 2023 at 11:47:51 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    It is make believe physics, for didactic purposes,
    good only for those who feel a philosophical need
    to believe that relativity can be derived from experiments. [2]

    For didactic purposes relativistic physics is plainly lying.
    Thanks, clown.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to Maciej Wozniak on Mon Sep 11 06:24:00 2023
    On Monday, 11 September 2023 at 13:12:57 UTC+2, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Monday, 11 September 2023 at 11:47:51 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    It is make believe physics, for didactic purposes,
    good only for those who feel a philosophical need
    to believe that relativity can be derived from experiments. [2]

    For didactic purposes relativistic physics is plainly lying.
    Thanks, clown.

    Some weaker minds may not understand,that
    everyone must believe The Shit just because
    everyone must believe The Shit. But, as
    everyone must believe The Shit - lying to such
    weaker minds is nothing wrong... Is it?

    Thanks, clown.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Laurence Clark Crossen@21:1/5 to Maciej Wozniak on Mon Sep 11 11:11:44 2023
    On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 4:12:57 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Monday, 11 September 2023 at 11:47:51 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    It is make believe physics, for didactic purposes,
    good only for those who feel a philosophical need
    to believe that relativity can be derived from experiments. [2]

    For didactic purposes relativistic physics is plainly lying.
    Thanks, clown.
    It definitely cannot be inductively derived from experiments because it is not empirical.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)