1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • How physics has degenerated

    From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Tue Sep 5 02:53:53 2023
    On Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 11:02:58 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Particles are not quantised in the infinitely small. e
    It is done in a finite box, which is then generalised
    to an infinite box.
    To confuse you further: e
    monochromatic photons need an infinitely large space
    to be point particles in,

    As anyone can see - an idiot physicist is completely
    uninterested in providing usable, comprehendable info.
    He is concentrated on making an impression of
    a shaman-magician, a wielder of unapproachable
    powers, high above ordinary folk.
    But, well, mumble remains mumble.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to Maciej Wozniak on Tue Sep 5 11:55:11 2023
    On 9/5/2023 5:53 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 11:02:58 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Particles are not quantised in the infinitely small. e
    It is done in a finite box, which is then generalised
    to an infinite box.
    To confuse you further: e
    monochromatic photons need an infinitely large space
    to be point particles in,

    As anyone can see - an idiot physicist is completely
    uninterested in providing usable, comprehendable info.

    Just because your poor halfbrain is incapable of comprehending ordinary
    physics doesn't mean anything bad about the physicist who does
    comprehend it. It merely means that your poor halfbrain is defective,
    and you shouldn't be blaming others for your own defect.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to Volney on Tue Sep 5 09:00:39 2023
    On Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 17:55:16 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
    On 9/5/2023 5:53 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 11:02:58 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Particles are not quantised in the infinitely small. e
    It is done in a finite box, which is then generalised
    to an infinite box.
    To confuse you further: e
    monochromatic photons need an infinitely large space
    to be point particles in,

    As anyone can see - an idiot physicist is completely
    uninterested in providing usable, comprehendable info.
    Just because your poor halfbrain is incapable of comprehending ordinary physics doesn't mean anything bad about the physicist who does

    As said: your idiot gurus are pretending to have
    superhuman superpowers, but they're really just a
    bunch of clowns. And your Shit was not even consistent.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Laurence Clark Crossen@21:1/5 to Maciej Wozniak on Tue Sep 5 12:54:08 2023
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 2:53:56 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 11:02:58 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Particles are not quantised in the infinitely small. e
    It is done in a finite box, which is then generalised
    to an infinite box.
    To confuse you further: e
    monochromatic photons need an infinitely large space
    to be point particles in,

    As anyone can see - an idiot physicist is completely
    uninterested in providing usable, comprehendable info.
    He is concentrated on making an impression of
    a shaman-magician, a wielder of unapproachable
    powers, high above ordinary folk.
    But, well, mumble remains mumble.
    Soddy said of the discovery of radioactive decay: "...it was, and remained for long, unpopular with the then high priests of the subject..."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)