Software development is about creating informational schemaJonathan Bain is a software developer who tried to create a special relativity software and found it was impossible due to its self-contradictory nature. http://flight-light-and-spin.com/simulator/relativity.htm
extending the abilities of hardware they're upoaded to.
Science, on the other hand, is about - creating informational schema extending the abilities of hardware they're upoaded to.
And that's why rules like Occam's razor apply directly to
both.
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 10:21:14 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
Software development is about creating informational schema
extending the abilities of hardware they're upoaded to.
Science, on the other hand, is about - creating informational schema extending the abilities of hardware they're upoaded to.
And that's why rules like Occam's razor apply directly toJonathan Bain is a software developer who tried to create a special relativity software and found it was impossible due to its self-contradictory nature. http://flight-light-and-spin.com/simulator/relativity.htm
both.
Jonathan Bain is a software developer who tried to create a special relativity software and found it was impossible due to its
self-contradictory nature.
On 9/4/23 10:25 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
Jonathan Bain is a software developer who tried to create a special relativity software and found it was impossible due to its self-contradictory nature.Then he is an idiot. There are MANY computer libraries and programs that implement the equations and relationships of Special Relativity.
Note there are no "self-contradictions" in the math underlying SR -- it
On 9/4/23 10:25 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:The math of relativity is purely self-contradictory. In my opinion, you have demonstrated you don't understand it. If you understood it, you would know it is pure ignorant nonsense. Here is an example of when a third frame of reference is added: https://
Jonathan Bain is a software developer who tried to create a special relativity software and found it was impossible due to its self-contradictory nature.Then he is an idiot. There are MANY computer libraries and programs that implement the equations and relationships of Special Relativity. Only a
very poor software developer would attempt to re-implement them.
Note there are no "self-contradictions" in the math underlying SR -- it
has been proven to be as self-consistent as is Euclidean geometry, and
also as is real analysis. Your misunderstandings and fantasies don't
change this. You, personally, have demonstrated many times around here
that you simply do not understand SR; the problems you mention are due
to your personal misunderstandings, not in SR itself.
Tom Roberts
On Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 05:25:17 UTC+2, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:Thanks for the clarification.
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 10:21:14 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
Software development is about creating informational schema
extending the abilities of hardware they're upoaded to.
Science, on the other hand, is about - creating informational schema extending the abilities of hardware they're upoaded to.
Oh, when I said that software is extending the hardware abilities -And that's why rules like Occam's razor apply directly toJonathan Bain is a software developer who tried to create a special relativity software and found it was impossible due to its self-contradictory nature. http://flight-light-and-spin.com/simulator/relativity.htm
both.
I only meant "usually". When the development starts from
shouting that common sense is just a collection of prejudices
it's rather not going to happen.
On 9/4/23 10:25 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:Bain's article with that problem is here: http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com/simulator/Sum-Theory.pdf He has published: CPT Invariance and the Spin-Statistics Connection Oxford U.P.
Jonathan Bain is a software developer who tried to create a special relativity software and found it was impossible due to its self-contradictory nature.Then he is an idiot. There are MANY computer libraries and programs that implement the equations and relationships of Special Relativity. Only a
very poor software developer would attempt to re-implement them.
Note there are no "self-contradictions" in the math underlying SR -- it
has been proven to be as self-consistent as is Euclidean geometry, and
also as is real analysis. Your misunderstandings and fantasies don't
change this. You, personally, have demonstrated many times around here
that you simply do not understand SR; the problems you mention are due
to your personal misunderstandings, not in SR itself.
Tom Roberts
The math of relativity is purely self-contradictory.
In my opinion, you have demonstrated you don't understand it.
On 9/5/23 2:50 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
The math of relativity is purely self-contradictory.That is just plain not true. The math underlying SR has been proven to
be as self-consistent as is Euclidean geometry, and as is real analysis.
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 10:19:25 AM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 9/4/23 10:25 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
Jonathan Bain is a software developer who tried to create a special relativity software and found it was impossible due to its self-contradictory nature.Then he is an idiot. There are MANY computer libraries and programs that implement the equations and relationships of Special Relativity. Only a very poor software developer would attempt to re-implement them.
Note there are no "self-contradictions" in the math underlying SR -- it has been proven to be as self-consistent as is Euclidean geometry, and also as is real analysis. Your misunderstandings and fantasies don't change this. You, personally, have demonstrated many times around here that you simply do not understand SR; the problems you mention are due
to your personal misunderstandings, not in SR itself.
Tom RobertsThe math of relativity is purely self-contradictory.
In my opinion, you have demonstrated you don't understand it.
The math of relativity is purely self-contradictory.No. As Tom said, its consistency is equivalent to that of Euclidean
geometry (meaning, either both are consistent or both are inconsistent).
In my opinion, you have demonstrated you don't understand it.It's not a matter of opinion, it's a theorem.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 365 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 25:32:33 |
Calls: | 7,789 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,917 |
Messages: | 5,750,812 |