1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • "Primitive stage"

    From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Mon Sep 4 04:30:46 2023
    On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 10:05:59 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    When we do measurements, we get results.
    Yes, but only in a very trivial sense.
    Experiments need interpretation,
    and that interpretation is inevitably theory-laden.
    (in all but the most primitive stages of science)

    Listen to your idiot guru, cause this time he is
    - exceptionally - right.
    Your faith in experiments and measurements
    exposing us some "laws of nature" - is just
    a "primitive stage". Yes, it is. On the higher
    levels of initiation this mumble is no more.

    The Shit is - simply - THE BEST WAY. Because
    so. And whoever disagree or oppose - must be
    a Polish drunkard janitor full of bottles of vodka,
    nazi capo crackpot, etc, etc, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Laurence Clark Crossen@21:1/5 to Maciej Wozniak on Tue Sep 5 20:22:50 2023
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 4:30:49 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 10:05:59 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    When we do measurements, we get results.
    Yes, but only in a very trivial sense.
    Experiments need interpretation,
    and that interpretation is inevitably theory-laden.
    (in all but the most primitive stages of science)

    Listen to your idiot guru, cause this time he is
    - exceptionally - right.
    Your faith in experiments and measurements
    exposing us some "laws of nature" - is just
    a "primitive stage". Yes, it is. On the higher
    levels of initiation this mumble is no more.

    The Shit is - simply - THE BEST WAY. Because
    so. And whoever disagree or oppose - must be
    a Polish drunkard janitor full of bottles of vodka,
    nazi capo crackpot, etc, etc, etc.
    To the relativists, the inductive empirical science is primitive! Look who's talking!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to Laurence Clark Crossen on Tue Sep 5 23:25:21 2023
    On Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 05:22:52 UTC+2, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 4:30:49 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
    On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 10:05:59 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    When we do measurements, we get results.
    Yes, but only in a very trivial sense.
    Experiments need interpretation,
    and that interpretation is inevitably theory-laden.
    (in all but the most primitive stages of science)

    Listen to your idiot guru, cause this time he is
    - exceptionally - right.
    Your faith in experiments and measurements
    exposing us some "laws of nature" - is just
    a "primitive stage". Yes, it is. On the higher
    levels of initiation this mumble is no more.

    The Shit is - simply - THE BEST WAY. Because
    so. And whoever disagree or oppose - must be
    a Polish drunkard janitor full of bottles of vodka,
    nazi capo crackpot, etc, etc, etc.
    To the relativists, the inductive empirical science is primitive!

    But only a very small number of them is smart
    enough to notice, and none of them is smart enough
    to realize what it means.
    Anyway, yes, it is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)